Comparison of microbial communities in different sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification reactors
Sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification is a useful approach for the eutrophication control in lakes and rivers, yet the microorganisms in this process are still not clearly known. In order to reveal the bacterial composition in these denitrification reactors, high-throughput sequencing was perform...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2017-01, Vol.101 (1), p.447-453 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 453 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 447 |
| container_title | Applied microbiology and biotechnology |
| container_volume | 101 |
| creator | Zhou, Weili Li, Yang Liu, Xu He, Shengbing Huang, Jung Chen |
| description | Sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification is a useful approach for the eutrophication control in lakes and rivers, yet the microorganisms in this process are still not clearly known. In order to reveal the bacterial composition in these denitrification reactors, high-throughput sequencing was performed over the sludge samples. And the results indicated that when using thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide as electron donors, the microbial communities were clearly different. Besides the well-known
Thiobacillus
, many other genera of denitrifiers were identified.
Chlorobaculum
,
Dechloromonas
, and
Acinetobacter
were the most predominant genera in thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide systems, respectively, while
Janthinobacterium
accounted for the most in the heterotrophic reactor with ethanol as electron donor.
Thiobacillus
existed abundantly in every system, even in the heterotrophic one. PCA comparison revealed that the microbial communities in the denitrification systems may vary greatly according to the electron donor, the running condition, sampling position, and other factors. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00253-016-7912-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859500112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A475880578</galeid><sourcerecordid>A475880578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-19d6f506afc832a3e76b2548e499886cb0bd22cea7a29ff60274b0c7ea9898233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEUhYMoTs_oD3AjBW50UWOSynM5ND4GBgQf65BK3bQZqiptkgL730-KHh8tCpJFIPc7B87NQegZwZcEY_k6Y0x512IiWqkJbQ8P0IawjrZYEPYQbTCRvJVcqzN0nvMtxoQqIR6jMyolY5zzDeq3cdrbFHKcm-ibKbgU-2DHxsVpWuZQAuQmzM0QvIcEc2nyMvoltb3NMDR2KbGkuP8aXDNAxVPwwdkSql0C60pM-Ql65O2Y4en9fYG-vH3zefu-vfnw7np7ddM6gXVpiR6E51hY71RHbQdS9JQzBUxrpYTrcT9Q6sBKS7X3AlPJeuwkWK20ol13gV4effcpflsgFzOF7GAc7QxxyYYornndAaH_gXacdYphVtEXf6C3cUlzDbIaVkhgoX5ROzuCCbOvW7FuNTVXTHKlMJcrdfkXqp4B6uLjDD7U9xPBqxNBZQp8Lzu75GyuP308ZcmRrT-YcwJv9ilMNh0MwWatiznWxdS6mLUu5lA1z-_DLf0Ew0_Fj35UgB6BXEfzDtJv6f_pegfr6clR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854386068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of microbial communities in different sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification reactors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Zhou, Weili ; Li, Yang ; Liu, Xu ; He, Shengbing ; Huang, Jung Chen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weili ; Li, Yang ; Liu, Xu ; He, Shengbing ; Huang, Jung Chen</creatorcontrib><description>Sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification is a useful approach for the eutrophication control in lakes and rivers, yet the microorganisms in this process are still not clearly known. In order to reveal the bacterial composition in these denitrification reactors, high-throughput sequencing was performed over the sludge samples. And the results indicated that when using thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide as electron donors, the microbial communities were clearly different. Besides the well-known
Thiobacillus
, many other genera of denitrifiers were identified.
Chlorobaculum
,
Dechloromonas
, and
Acinetobacter
were the most predominant genera in thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide systems, respectively, while
Janthinobacterium
accounted for the most in the heterotrophic reactor with ethanol as electron donor.
Thiobacillus
existed abundantly in every system, even in the heterotrophic one. PCA comparison revealed that the microbial communities in the denitrification systems may vary greatly according to the electron donor, the running condition, sampling position, and other factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7912-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27744555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acinetobacter ; Analysis ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - metabolism ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bioreactors ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Biota ; Biotechnology ; Chemical properties ; Denitrification ; Drinking water ; Environmental Biotechnology ; Ethanol ; Eutrophication ; Flow velocity ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Janthinobacterium ; Life Sciences ; Microbial activity ; Microbial colonies ; Microbial Genetics and Genomics ; Microbiology ; Microorganisms ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Reactors ; Sludge ; Studies ; Sulfides ; Sulfur ; Sulfur - metabolism ; Sulfur Compounds - metabolism ; Surface water ; Thiobacillus ; Water Microbiology</subject><ispartof>Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2017-01, Vol.101 (1), p.447-453</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-19d6f506afc832a3e76b2548e499886cb0bd22cea7a29ff60274b0c7ea9898233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-19d6f506afc832a3e76b2548e499886cb0bd22cea7a29ff60274b0c7ea9898233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00253-016-7912-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00253-016-7912-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27744555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shengbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jung Chen</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of microbial communities in different sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification reactors</title><title>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</title><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><description>Sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification is a useful approach for the eutrophication control in lakes and rivers, yet the microorganisms in this process are still not clearly known. In order to reveal the bacterial composition in these denitrification reactors, high-throughput sequencing was performed over the sludge samples. And the results indicated that when using thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide as electron donors, the microbial communities were clearly different. Besides the well-known
Thiobacillus
, many other genera of denitrifiers were identified.
Chlorobaculum
,
Dechloromonas
, and
Acinetobacter
were the most predominant genera in thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide systems, respectively, while
Janthinobacterium
accounted for the most in the heterotrophic reactor with ethanol as electron donor.
Thiobacillus
existed abundantly in every system, even in the heterotrophic one. PCA comparison revealed that the microbial communities in the denitrification systems may vary greatly according to the electron donor, the running condition, sampling position, and other factors.</description><subject>Acinetobacter</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Environmental Biotechnology</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Janthinobacterium</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbial colonies</subject><subject>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulfur - metabolism</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds - metabolism</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Thiobacillus</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><issn>0175-7598</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEUhYMoTs_oD3AjBW50UWOSynM5ND4GBgQf65BK3bQZqiptkgL730-KHh8tCpJFIPc7B87NQegZwZcEY_k6Y0x512IiWqkJbQ8P0IawjrZYEPYQbTCRvJVcqzN0nvMtxoQqIR6jMyolY5zzDeq3cdrbFHKcm-ibKbgU-2DHxsVpWuZQAuQmzM0QvIcEc2nyMvoltb3NMDR2KbGkuP8aXDNAxVPwwdkSql0C60pM-Ql65O2Y4en9fYG-vH3zefu-vfnw7np7ddM6gXVpiR6E51hY71RHbQdS9JQzBUxrpYTrcT9Q6sBKS7X3AlPJeuwkWK20ol13gV4effcpflsgFzOF7GAc7QxxyYYornndAaH_gXacdYphVtEXf6C3cUlzDbIaVkhgoX5ROzuCCbOvW7FuNTVXTHKlMJcrdfkXqp4B6uLjDD7U9xPBqxNBZQp8Lzu75GyuP308ZcmRrT-YcwJv9ilMNh0MwWatiznWxdS6mLUu5lA1z-_DLf0Ew0_Fj35UgB6BXEfzDtJv6f_pegfr6clR</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Zhou, Weili</creator><creator>Li, Yang</creator><creator>Liu, Xu</creator><creator>He, Shengbing</creator><creator>Huang, Jung Chen</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Comparison of microbial communities in different sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification reactors</title><author>Zhou, Weili ; Li, Yang ; Liu, Xu ; He, Shengbing ; Huang, Jung Chen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-19d6f506afc832a3e76b2548e499886cb0bd22cea7a29ff60274b0c7ea9898233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acinetobacter</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Environmental Biotechnology</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Janthinobacterium</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbial colonies</topic><topic>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulfur - metabolism</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds - metabolism</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Thiobacillus</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shengbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jung Chen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Weili</au><au>Li, Yang</au><au>Liu, Xu</au><au>He, Shengbing</au><au>Huang, Jung Chen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of microbial communities in different sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification reactors</atitle><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</stitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>447-453</pages><issn>0175-7598</issn><eissn>1432-0614</eissn><abstract>Sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification is a useful approach for the eutrophication control in lakes and rivers, yet the microorganisms in this process are still not clearly known. In order to reveal the bacterial composition in these denitrification reactors, high-throughput sequencing was performed over the sludge samples. And the results indicated that when using thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide as electron donors, the microbial communities were clearly different. Besides the well-known
Thiobacillus
, many other genera of denitrifiers were identified.
Chlorobaculum
,
Dechloromonas
, and
Acinetobacter
were the most predominant genera in thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and sulfide systems, respectively, while
Janthinobacterium
accounted for the most in the heterotrophic reactor with ethanol as electron donor.
Thiobacillus
existed abundantly in every system, even in the heterotrophic one. PCA comparison revealed that the microbial communities in the denitrification systems may vary greatly according to the electron donor, the running condition, sampling position, and other factors.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27744555</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00253-016-7912-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0175-7598 |
| ispartof | Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2017-01, Vol.101 (1), p.447-453 |
| issn | 0175-7598 1432-0614 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859500112 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Acinetobacter Analysis Bacteria Bacteria - classification Bacteria - metabolism Biomedical and Life Sciences Bioreactors Bioreactors - microbiology Biota Biotechnology Chemical properties Denitrification Drinking water Environmental Biotechnology Ethanol Eutrophication Flow velocity High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Janthinobacterium Life Sciences Microbial activity Microbial colonies Microbial Genetics and Genomics Microbiology Microorganisms Nitrates Nitrogen Reactors Sludge Studies Sulfides Sulfur Sulfur - metabolism Sulfur Compounds - metabolism Surface water Thiobacillus Water Microbiology |
| title | Comparison of microbial communities in different sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification reactors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T01%3A31%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20microbial%20communities%20in%20different%20sulfur-based%20autotrophic%20denitrification%20reactors&rft.jtitle=Applied%20microbiology%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Zhou,%20Weili&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=447-453&rft.issn=0175-7598&rft.eissn=1432-0614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00253-016-7912-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA475880578%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854386068&rft_id=info:pmid/27744555&rft_galeid=A475880578&rfr_iscdi=true |