Copper as an antibacterial material in different facilities
The present study was performed in real life settings in different facilities (hospital, kindergarten, retirement home, office building) with copper and copper alloy touch surface products (floor drain lids, toilet flush buttons, door handles, light switches, closet touch surfaces, corridor hand rai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Letters in applied microbiology 2017-01, Vol.64 (1), p.19-26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Letters in applied microbiology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Inkinen, J. Mäkinen, R. Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M. Nordström, K. Ahonen, M. |
description | The present study was performed in real life settings in different facilities (hospital, kindergarten, retirement home, office building) with copper and copper alloy touch surface products (floor drain lids, toilet flush buttons, door handles, light switches, closet touch surfaces, corridor hand rails, front door handles and toilet support rails) in parallel to reference products. Pure copper surfaces supported lower total bacterial counts (16 ± 45 vs 105 ± 430 CFU cm−2, n = 214, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/lam.12680 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859498983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1926807570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4800-c094d80766b091cab57db37dd84d844f6c9413b5ed8854d23010dd3db18c65493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1LwzAABuAgipvTg39ACl70UJe0-cTTGH7BxIuCt5AmKWT0y6RF9u_N7PQgKIZAQnh4Q_ICcIrgFYpjXqn6CmWUwz0wRZhlKaPkdR9MYUZpyjOCJ-AohDWEkKNMHIJJxhiK52IKrpdt11mfqJCoJs7eFUr31jtVJbXabVyTGFeW1tumT0qlXeV6Z8MxOChVFezJbp2Bl9ub5-V9unq6e1guVqnGHMJUQ4ENh4zSAgqkVUGYKXJmDI_HGJdUC4zygljDOcEmyyGCxuSmQFxTgkU-Axdjbufbt8GGXtYuaFtVqrHtECTiRGDBBc__QXOSc0YyFOn5D7puB9_Eh0gktp_JCIN_Ko4FwtFur70clfZtCN6WsvOuVn4jEZTbimSsSH5WFO3ZLnEoamu-5VcnEcxH8O4qu_k9Sa4Wj2PkBzKhlwE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1849141923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Copper as an antibacterial material in different facilities</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Inkinen, J. ; Mäkinen, R. ; Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M. ; Nordström, K. ; Ahonen, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Inkinen, J. ; Mäkinen, R. ; Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M. ; Nordström, K. ; Ahonen, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study was performed in real life settings in different facilities (hospital, kindergarten, retirement home, office building) with copper and copper alloy touch surface products (floor drain lids, toilet flush buttons, door handles, light switches, closet touch surfaces, corridor hand rails, front door handles and toilet support rails) in parallel to reference products. Pure copper surfaces supported lower total bacterial counts (16 ± 45 vs 105 ± 430 CFU cm−2, n = 214, P < 0·001) and a lower occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus (2·6 vs 14%, n = 157, P < 0·01) and Gram‐negatives (21 vs 34%, n = 214, P < 0·05) respectively than did reference surfaces, whereas the occurrence of enterococci (15%, n = 214, P > 0·05) was similar. The studied products could be assigned to three categories according to their bacterial loads as follows (P < 0·001): floor drain lids (300 ± 730 CFU cm−2, n = 32), small area touch surfaces (8·0 ± 7·1 to 62 ± 160 CFU cm−2, n = 90) and large area touch surfaces (1·1 ± 1·1 to 1·7 ± 2·4 CFU cm−2, n = 92). In conclusion, copper touch surface products can function as antibacterial materials to reduce the bacterial load, especially on frequently touched small surfaces.
Significance and Impact of the Study
The efficiency of copper as an antimicrobial material has been noted in laboratory studies and in the hospital environment. The present study further shows that copper exerted an antibacterial effect in different facilities, i.e. in a hospital, a kindergarten, an office building and in a retirement home for the elderly. The study suggests that copper has potential use as an antibacterial material and therefore might serve as a means to lower the incidence of transmission of infectious agents from inanimate surfaces in different facilities, with everyday functions.
Significance and Impact of the Study: The efficiency of copper as an antimicrobial material has been noted in laboratory studies and in the hospital environment. The present study further shows that copper exerted an antibacterial effect in different facilities, i.e. in a hospital, a kindergarten, an office building and in a retirement home for the elderly. The study suggests that copper has potential use as an antibacterial material and therefore might serve as a means to lower the incidence of transmission of infectious agents from inanimate surfaces in different facilities, with everyday functions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-8254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-765X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/lam.12680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27718259</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LAMIE7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; antibacterial copper ; Antibacterial materials ; Bacteria ; Categories ; Copper ; Copper - pharmacology ; Copper base alloys ; Coverings ; Disinfectants - pharmacology ; Enterococcus - drug effects ; environmental microbiology ; Geriatrics ; Humans ; hygiene ; Incidence ; infection control ; Loads (forces) ; Older people ; Rails ; Retirement ; Retirement homes ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control ; Staphylococcal Infections - transmission ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Surface Properties ; Switches ; Touch ; touch surfaces</subject><ispartof>Letters in applied microbiology, 2017-01, Vol.64 (1), p.19-26</ispartof><rights>2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><rights>2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4800-c094d80766b091cab57db37dd84d844f6c9413b5ed8854d23010dd3db18c65493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4800-c094d80766b091cab57db37dd84d844f6c9413b5ed8854d23010dd3db18c65493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Flam.12680$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Flam.12680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27718259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inkinen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäkinen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordström, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahonen, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Copper as an antibacterial material in different facilities</title><title>Letters in applied microbiology</title><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>The present study was performed in real life settings in different facilities (hospital, kindergarten, retirement home, office building) with copper and copper alloy touch surface products (floor drain lids, toilet flush buttons, door handles, light switches, closet touch surfaces, corridor hand rails, front door handles and toilet support rails) in parallel to reference products. Pure copper surfaces supported lower total bacterial counts (16 ± 45 vs 105 ± 430 CFU cm−2, n = 214, P < 0·001) and a lower occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus (2·6 vs 14%, n = 157, P < 0·01) and Gram‐negatives (21 vs 34%, n = 214, P < 0·05) respectively than did reference surfaces, whereas the occurrence of enterococci (15%, n = 214, P > 0·05) was similar. The studied products could be assigned to three categories according to their bacterial loads as follows (P < 0·001): floor drain lids (300 ± 730 CFU cm−2, n = 32), small area touch surfaces (8·0 ± 7·1 to 62 ± 160 CFU cm−2, n = 90) and large area touch surfaces (1·1 ± 1·1 to 1·7 ± 2·4 CFU cm−2, n = 92). In conclusion, copper touch surface products can function as antibacterial materials to reduce the bacterial load, especially on frequently touched small surfaces.
Significance and Impact of the Study
The efficiency of copper as an antimicrobial material has been noted in laboratory studies and in the hospital environment. The present study further shows that copper exerted an antibacterial effect in different facilities, i.e. in a hospital, a kindergarten, an office building and in a retirement home for the elderly. The study suggests that copper has potential use as an antibacterial material and therefore might serve as a means to lower the incidence of transmission of infectious agents from inanimate surfaces in different facilities, with everyday functions.
Significance and Impact of the Study: The efficiency of copper as an antimicrobial material has been noted in laboratory studies and in the hospital environment. The present study further shows that copper exerted an antibacterial effect in different facilities, i.e. in a hospital, a kindergarten, an office building and in a retirement home for the elderly. The study suggests that copper has potential use as an antibacterial material and therefore might serve as a means to lower the incidence of transmission of infectious agents from inanimate surfaces in different facilities, with everyday functions.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>antibacterial copper</subject><subject>Antibacterial materials</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper - pharmacology</subject><subject>Copper base alloys</subject><subject>Coverings</subject><subject>Disinfectants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Enterococcus - drug effects</subject><subject>environmental microbiology</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hygiene</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>infection control</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Rails</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Retirement homes</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Switches</subject><subject>Touch</subject><subject>touch surfaces</subject><issn>0266-8254</issn><issn>1472-765X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1LwzAABuAgipvTg39ACl70UJe0-cTTGH7BxIuCt5AmKWT0y6RF9u_N7PQgKIZAQnh4Q_ICcIrgFYpjXqn6CmWUwz0wRZhlKaPkdR9MYUZpyjOCJ-AohDWEkKNMHIJJxhiK52IKrpdt11mfqJCoJs7eFUr31jtVJbXabVyTGFeW1tumT0qlXeV6Z8MxOChVFezJbp2Bl9ub5-V9unq6e1guVqnGHMJUQ4ENh4zSAgqkVUGYKXJmDI_HGJdUC4zygljDOcEmyyGCxuSmQFxTgkU-Axdjbufbt8GGXtYuaFtVqrHtECTiRGDBBc__QXOSc0YyFOn5D7puB9_Eh0gktp_JCIN_Ko4FwtFur70clfZtCN6WsvOuVn4jEZTbimSsSH5WFO3ZLnEoamu-5VcnEcxH8O4qu_k9Sa4Wj2PkBzKhlwE</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Inkinen, J.</creator><creator>Mäkinen, R.</creator><creator>Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M.</creator><creator>Nordström, K.</creator><creator>Ahonen, M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Copper as an antibacterial material in different facilities</title><author>Inkinen, J. ; Mäkinen, R. ; Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M. ; Nordström, K. ; Ahonen, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4800-c094d80766b091cab57db37dd84d844f6c9413b5ed8854d23010dd3db18c65493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>antibacterial copper</topic><topic>Antibacterial materials</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper - pharmacology</topic><topic>Copper base alloys</topic><topic>Coverings</topic><topic>Disinfectants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Enterococcus - drug effects</topic><topic>environmental microbiology</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hygiene</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>infection control</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Rails</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Retirement homes</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Switches</topic><topic>Touch</topic><topic>touch surfaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inkinen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäkinen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordström, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahonen, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inkinen, J.</au><au>Mäkinen, R.</au><au>Keinänen‐Toivola, M.M.</au><au>Nordström, K.</au><au>Ahonen, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Copper as an antibacterial material in different facilities</atitle><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>19-26</pages><issn>0266-8254</issn><eissn>1472-765X</eissn><coden>LAMIE7</coden><abstract>The present study was performed in real life settings in different facilities (hospital, kindergarten, retirement home, office building) with copper and copper alloy touch surface products (floor drain lids, toilet flush buttons, door handles, light switches, closet touch surfaces, corridor hand rails, front door handles and toilet support rails) in parallel to reference products. Pure copper surfaces supported lower total bacterial counts (16 ± 45 vs 105 ± 430 CFU cm−2, n = 214, P < 0·001) and a lower occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus (2·6 vs 14%, n = 157, P < 0·01) and Gram‐negatives (21 vs 34%, n = 214, P < 0·05) respectively than did reference surfaces, whereas the occurrence of enterococci (15%, n = 214, P > 0·05) was similar. The studied products could be assigned to three categories according to their bacterial loads as follows (P < 0·001): floor drain lids (300 ± 730 CFU cm−2, n = 32), small area touch surfaces (8·0 ± 7·1 to 62 ± 160 CFU cm−2, n = 90) and large area touch surfaces (1·1 ± 1·1 to 1·7 ± 2·4 CFU cm−2, n = 92). In conclusion, copper touch surface products can function as antibacterial materials to reduce the bacterial load, especially on frequently touched small surfaces.
Significance and Impact of the Study
The efficiency of copper as an antimicrobial material has been noted in laboratory studies and in the hospital environment. The present study further shows that copper exerted an antibacterial effect in different facilities, i.e. in a hospital, a kindergarten, an office building and in a retirement home for the elderly. The study suggests that copper has potential use as an antibacterial material and therefore might serve as a means to lower the incidence of transmission of infectious agents from inanimate surfaces in different facilities, with everyday functions.
Significance and Impact of the Study: The efficiency of copper as an antimicrobial material has been noted in laboratory studies and in the hospital environment. The present study further shows that copper exerted an antibacterial effect in different facilities, i.e. in a hospital, a kindergarten, an office building and in a retirement home for the elderly. The study suggests that copper has potential use as an antibacterial material and therefore might serve as a means to lower the incidence of transmission of infectious agents from inanimate surfaces in different facilities, with everyday functions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>27718259</pmid><doi>10.1111/lam.12680</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-8254 |
ispartof | Letters in applied microbiology, 2017-01, Vol.64 (1), p.19-26 |
issn | 0266-8254 1472-765X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859498983 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology antibacterial copper Antibacterial materials Bacteria Categories Copper Copper - pharmacology Copper base alloys Coverings Disinfectants - pharmacology Enterococcus - drug effects environmental microbiology Geriatrics Humans hygiene Incidence infection control Loads (forces) Older people Rails Retirement Retirement homes Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control Staphylococcal Infections - transmission Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects Surface Properties Switches Touch touch surfaces |
title | Copper as an antibacterial material in different facilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T02%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Copper%20as%20an%20antibacterial%20material%20in%20different%20facilities&rft.jtitle=Letters%20in%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Inkinen,%20J.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=19-26&rft.issn=0266-8254&rft.eissn=1472-765X&rft.coden=LAMIE7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/lam.12680&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1926807570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1849141923&rft_id=info:pmid/27718259&rfr_iscdi=true |