Measuring infections in Australia: simple yet frustrating
[...]New South Wales, Australia's most populous state (32% of the population) continues to not record the most common bacterial cause of diarrhoea (Campylobacter spp) and was the last state to start recording the most commonly notified sexually transmitted disease, chlamydia.1,2 Problems with d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.9-10 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | The Lancet infectious diseases |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Grayson, M Lindsay |
description | [...]New South Wales, Australia's most populous state (32% of the population) continues to not record the most common bacterial cause of diarrhoea (Campylobacter spp) and was the last state to start recording the most commonly notified sexually transmitted disease, chlamydia.1,2 Problems with definitions also persist between jurisdictions for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection, as well as the timing of acquisition, despite the potential public health implications of such differences.1 Furthermore, the fact that only South Australia, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory (about 19% of Australia's population, but 63% of its land mass)2,3 reliably recorded Indigenous status is annoying because it clearly affects the authors' ability to categorically link this important risk factor to disease rates and separate it from features such as remoteness or disadvantage. [...]detection rates might be higher in remote communities because of screening and more accurate detection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30392-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859489870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1473309916303929</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859489870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5ae6ff150aa0679c86be6a93449a16f0182c4b3d8f66a5a643b8db38a75342d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMo3h9BKbjRRTVpLk1cKMPgDRQX6jqk6alEO-2YtMK8vZnWC7jRVU4OX75wzo_QHsHHBBNx8kBYTlOKlTok4ohiqrJUraDN2GYpYzxfHeoR2UBbIbxgTHKC2TrayPJcKiLxJlJ3YELvXfOcuKYC27m2CbFMJn3ovKmdOU2Cm81rSBbQJZUf2l3kd9BaZeoAu5_nNnq6vHicXqe391c308ltalmmupQbEFVFODYGi1xZKQoQRlHGlCGiwkRmlhW0lJUQhhvBaCHLgkqTc8qyEtNtdDh657596yF0euaChbo2DbR90ERyxaSS-X9QyoVUgsqIHvxCX9reN3GQpTBTkmDKI8VHyvo2BA-Vnns3M36hCdbLGPQQg17uWMfbEINW8d3-p70vZlB-v_raewTORwDi5t4deB2sg8ZC6XwMQZet-_OLs18GW7vGWVO_wgLCzzQ6ZBqPkqWDiMGg6Ac3PKnt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852981035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring infections in Australia: simple yet frustrating</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Grayson, M Lindsay</creator><creatorcontrib>Grayson, M Lindsay</creatorcontrib><description>[...]New South Wales, Australia's most populous state (32% of the population) continues to not record the most common bacterial cause of diarrhoea (Campylobacter spp) and was the last state to start recording the most commonly notified sexually transmitted disease, chlamydia.1,2 Problems with definitions also persist between jurisdictions for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection, as well as the timing of acquisition, despite the potential public health implications of such differences.1 Furthermore, the fact that only South Australia, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory (about 19% of Australia's population, but 63% of its land mass)2,3 reliably recorded Indigenous status is annoying because it clearly affects the authors' ability to categorically link this important risk factor to disease rates and separate it from features such as remoteness or disadvantage. [...]detection rates might be higher in remote communities because of screening and more accurate detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30392-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27789180</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Disease transmission ; Hepatitis ; Humans ; Infection - epidemiology ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Methods ; Public health ; Risk factors ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.9-10</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 01, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5ae6ff150aa0679c86be6a93449a16f0182c4b3d8f66a5a643b8db38a75342d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1852981035?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grayson, M Lindsay</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring infections in Australia: simple yet frustrating</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>[...]New South Wales, Australia's most populous state (32% of the population) continues to not record the most common bacterial cause of diarrhoea (Campylobacter spp) and was the last state to start recording the most commonly notified sexually transmitted disease, chlamydia.1,2 Problems with definitions also persist between jurisdictions for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection, as well as the timing of acquisition, despite the potential public health implications of such differences.1 Furthermore, the fact that only South Australia, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory (about 19% of Australia's population, but 63% of its land mass)2,3 reliably recorded Indigenous status is annoying because it clearly affects the authors' ability to categorically link this important risk factor to disease rates and separate it from features such as remoteness or disadvantage. [...]detection rates might be higher in remote communities because of screening and more accurate detection.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMo3h9BKbjRRTVpLk1cKMPgDRQX6jqk6alEO-2YtMK8vZnWC7jRVU4OX75wzo_QHsHHBBNx8kBYTlOKlTok4ohiqrJUraDN2GYpYzxfHeoR2UBbIbxgTHKC2TrayPJcKiLxJlJ3YELvXfOcuKYC27m2CbFMJn3ovKmdOU2Cm81rSBbQJZUf2l3kd9BaZeoAu5_nNnq6vHicXqe391c308ltalmmupQbEFVFODYGi1xZKQoQRlHGlCGiwkRmlhW0lJUQhhvBaCHLgkqTc8qyEtNtdDh657596yF0euaChbo2DbR90ERyxaSS-X9QyoVUgsqIHvxCX9reN3GQpTBTkmDKI8VHyvo2BA-Vnns3M36hCdbLGPQQg17uWMfbEINW8d3-p70vZlB-v_raewTORwDi5t4deB2sg8ZC6XwMQZet-_OLs18GW7vGWVO_wgLCzzQ6ZBqPkqWDiMGg6Ac3PKnt</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Grayson, M Lindsay</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Measuring infections in Australia: simple yet frustrating</title><author>Grayson, M Lindsay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5ae6ff150aa0679c86be6a93449a16f0182c4b3d8f66a5a643b8db38a75342d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grayson, M Lindsay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grayson, M Lindsay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring infections in Australia: simple yet frustrating</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>9-10</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>[...]New South Wales, Australia's most populous state (32% of the population) continues to not record the most common bacterial cause of diarrhoea (Campylobacter spp) and was the last state to start recording the most commonly notified sexually transmitted disease, chlamydia.1,2 Problems with definitions also persist between jurisdictions for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection, as well as the timing of acquisition, despite the potential public health implications of such differences.1 Furthermore, the fact that only South Australia, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory (about 19% of Australia's population, but 63% of its land mass)2,3 reliably recorded Indigenous status is annoying because it clearly affects the authors' ability to categorically link this important risk factor to disease rates and separate it from features such as remoteness or disadvantage. [...]detection rates might be higher in remote communities because of screening and more accurate detection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27789180</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30392-9</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-3099 |
ispartof | The Lancet infectious diseases, 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.9-10 |
issn | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859489870 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Australia Disease transmission Hepatitis Humans Infection - epidemiology Infectious Disease Infectious diseases Methods Public health Risk factors Sexually transmitted diseases STD |
title | Measuring infections in Australia: simple yet frustrating |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20infections%20in%20Australia:%20simple%20yet%20frustrating&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Grayson,%20M%20Lindsay&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=9-10&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30392-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859489870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852981035&rft_id=info:pmid/27789180&rft_els_id=S1473309916303929&rfr_iscdi=true |