Risk analysis of the insertion of biofloc technology in a marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production in a farm in Pernambuco, Brazil: A case study

Uncertainties related to the future behavior of projected cash flows cause doubts when choosing investments. Therefore, it is essential to provide information that assist the entrepreneur in decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the financial indicators and verify the risk of biofloc technol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture 2017-02, Vol.469, p.67-71
Hauptverfasser: Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares, Sabbag, Omar Jorge, Soares, Roberta, Peixoto, Silvio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue
container_start_page 67
container_title Aquaculture
container_volume 469
creator Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares
Sabbag, Omar Jorge
Soares, Roberta
Peixoto, Silvio
description Uncertainties related to the future behavior of projected cash flows cause doubts when choosing investments. Therefore, it is essential to provide information that assist the entrepreneur in decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the financial indicators and verify the risk of biofloc technology (BFT) and conventional system employed in a shrimp farm in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. We used the simulation by the Monte Carlo method as a probabilistic analysis of the net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). The input variables considered were retail price (US$/kg), feed price (US$/kg), labor value (US$), productivity (kg/ha/year), production cycle period (days) and feed conversion rate (FCR). The cash flows have been designed for 10years to the discount rates of 10, 13 and 16%. The BFT system showed greater sensitivity to changes in rates, reducing significantly the NPV when interest rates increased. Risk was only observed in the BFT system, with up to 15% of probability when subjected to the discount rate of 16%. Both shrimp production systems represent a significant investment alternative for the rural sector in northeastern Brazil, because even from the perspective of risk management, the IRR has 90% probability of ranging from 7.66% to 59.40% for the BFT, and from 67.96% to 201.03% for the conventional systems. Brazilian shrimp producers are looking for new technologies to improve their productive performance and to avoid problems related to diseases in conventional pond culture system. They are interested in the biofloc technology (BFT) system, but there are many doubts about financial issues related to this technology. However, few studies evaluate the economic aspects of the different culture systems used in this activity, hampering the decision-making by the producer. Our study verified the viability of the BFT system, as well as the conventional system employed in the northeast Brazilian shrimp farms, but both systems were impacted along the time by productive aspects and changes in the prices of the main inputs used in the production. •Risk analysis of BFT and conventional systems was applied in northeastern Brazil to help entrepreneurs in decision-making.•The Monte Carlo method was used to establish the financial risk and the maximum expected financial return.•The BFT showed high sensitivity to changes in costs and revenues, but both systems have probability of high financial returns.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.12.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859489766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0044848616311528</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859489766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f4068a59a4189edc2062b6d6111a1dc86f2683c6608e71ca02e27ad67eabd9eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRBILIX_YG4cSGp7E8fhVlYFKq0EqsrZmjgT1ktib_1Rafkf_b_1djlw5DSjmfee5s0j5D1nNWdcXu5ruM9g8pxywFqUUc1FzZh8QVZcdeuqlUK8JCvGmqZSjZKvyZsY96wgZMtX5PHWxt8UHMzHaCP1E007pNZFDMl6dxoM1k-zNzSh2Tk_-1_HsqdAFwjWIY27YJcD3drkD-gAc6QP4BwsaOkh-DGbZ6FnygRhOXU_MBTAkI3_SD8H-GPnT_SKGohFLuXx-Ja8mmCO-O5vvSA_v1zfbb5V2-9fbzZX28o0rE3V1DCpoO2h4arH0QgmxSBHyTkHPholJyHV2kjJFHbcABMoOhhlhzCMPQ7rC_LhrFsOvc8Yk15sNDjP4NDnqLlq-0b1nZQF2p-hJvgYA076UHxDOGrO9CkKvdf_RKFPUWgudHl04W7OXCxeHiwGHY1FZ3C0AU3So7f_ofIEupubjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859489766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk analysis of the insertion of biofloc technology in a marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production in a farm in Pernambuco, Brazil: A case study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares ; Sabbag, Omar Jorge ; Soares, Roberta ; Peixoto, Silvio</creator><creatorcontrib>Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares ; Sabbag, Omar Jorge ; Soares, Roberta ; Peixoto, Silvio</creatorcontrib><description>Uncertainties related to the future behavior of projected cash flows cause doubts when choosing investments. Therefore, it is essential to provide information that assist the entrepreneur in decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the financial indicators and verify the risk of biofloc technology (BFT) and conventional system employed in a shrimp farm in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. We used the simulation by the Monte Carlo method as a probabilistic analysis of the net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). The input variables considered were retail price (US$/kg), feed price (US$/kg), labor value (US$), productivity (kg/ha/year), production cycle period (days) and feed conversion rate (FCR). The cash flows have been designed for 10years to the discount rates of 10, 13 and 16%. The BFT system showed greater sensitivity to changes in rates, reducing significantly the NPV when interest rates increased. Risk was only observed in the BFT system, with up to 15% of probability when subjected to the discount rate of 16%. Both shrimp production systems represent a significant investment alternative for the rural sector in northeastern Brazil, because even from the perspective of risk management, the IRR has 90% probability of ranging from 7.66% to 59.40% for the BFT, and from 67.96% to 201.03% for the conventional systems. Brazilian shrimp producers are looking for new technologies to improve their productive performance and to avoid problems related to diseases in conventional pond culture system. They are interested in the biofloc technology (BFT) system, but there are many doubts about financial issues related to this technology. However, few studies evaluate the economic aspects of the different culture systems used in this activity, hampering the decision-making by the producer. Our study verified the viability of the BFT system, as well as the conventional system employed in the northeast Brazilian shrimp farms, but both systems were impacted along the time by productive aspects and changes in the prices of the main inputs used in the production. •Risk analysis of BFT and conventional systems was applied in northeastern Brazil to help entrepreneurs in decision-making.•The Monte Carlo method was used to establish the financial risk and the maximum expected financial return.•The BFT showed high sensitivity to changes in costs and revenues, but both systems have probability of high financial returns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-8486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.12.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biofloc ; Decapoda ; Investment analysis ; Litopenaeus vannamei ; Marine ; Monte Carlo method ; Penaeidae ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shrimp farming</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture, 2017-02, Vol.469, p.67-71</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f4068a59a4189edc2062b6d6111a1dc86f2683c6608e71ca02e27ad67eabd9eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f4068a59a4189edc2062b6d6111a1dc86f2683c6608e71ca02e27ad67eabd9eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2192-3854</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848616311528$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbag, Omar Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, Silvio</creatorcontrib><title>Risk analysis of the insertion of biofloc technology in a marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production in a farm in Pernambuco, Brazil: A case study</title><title>Aquaculture</title><description>Uncertainties related to the future behavior of projected cash flows cause doubts when choosing investments. Therefore, it is essential to provide information that assist the entrepreneur in decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the financial indicators and verify the risk of biofloc technology (BFT) and conventional system employed in a shrimp farm in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. We used the simulation by the Monte Carlo method as a probabilistic analysis of the net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). The input variables considered were retail price (US$/kg), feed price (US$/kg), labor value (US$), productivity (kg/ha/year), production cycle period (days) and feed conversion rate (FCR). The cash flows have been designed for 10years to the discount rates of 10, 13 and 16%. The BFT system showed greater sensitivity to changes in rates, reducing significantly the NPV when interest rates increased. Risk was only observed in the BFT system, with up to 15% of probability when subjected to the discount rate of 16%. Both shrimp production systems represent a significant investment alternative for the rural sector in northeastern Brazil, because even from the perspective of risk management, the IRR has 90% probability of ranging from 7.66% to 59.40% for the BFT, and from 67.96% to 201.03% for the conventional systems. Brazilian shrimp producers are looking for new technologies to improve their productive performance and to avoid problems related to diseases in conventional pond culture system. They are interested in the biofloc technology (BFT) system, but there are many doubts about financial issues related to this technology. However, few studies evaluate the economic aspects of the different culture systems used in this activity, hampering the decision-making by the producer. Our study verified the viability of the BFT system, as well as the conventional system employed in the northeast Brazilian shrimp farms, but both systems were impacted along the time by productive aspects and changes in the prices of the main inputs used in the production. •Risk analysis of BFT and conventional systems was applied in northeastern Brazil to help entrepreneurs in decision-making.•The Monte Carlo method was used to establish the financial risk and the maximum expected financial return.•The BFT showed high sensitivity to changes in costs and revenues, but both systems have probability of high financial returns.</description><subject>Biofloc</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Investment analysis</subject><subject>Litopenaeus vannamei</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Monte Carlo method</subject><subject>Penaeidae</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shrimp farming</subject><issn>0044-8486</issn><issn>1873-5622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRBILIX_YG4cSGp7E8fhVlYFKq0EqsrZmjgT1ktib_1Rafkf_b_1djlw5DSjmfee5s0j5D1nNWdcXu5ruM9g8pxywFqUUc1FzZh8QVZcdeuqlUK8JCvGmqZSjZKvyZsY96wgZMtX5PHWxt8UHMzHaCP1E007pNZFDMl6dxoM1k-zNzSh2Tk_-1_HsqdAFwjWIY27YJcD3drkD-gAc6QP4BwsaOkh-DGbZ6FnygRhOXU_MBTAkI3_SD8H-GPnT_SKGohFLuXx-Ja8mmCO-O5vvSA_v1zfbb5V2-9fbzZX28o0rE3V1DCpoO2h4arH0QgmxSBHyTkHPholJyHV2kjJFHbcABMoOhhlhzCMPQ7rC_LhrFsOvc8Yk15sNDjP4NDnqLlq-0b1nZQF2p-hJvgYA076UHxDOGrO9CkKvdf_RKFPUWgudHl04W7OXCxeHiwGHY1FZ3C0AU3So7f_ofIEupubjg</recordid><startdate>20170220</startdate><enddate>20170220</enddate><creator>Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares</creator><creator>Sabbag, Omar Jorge</creator><creator>Soares, Roberta</creator><creator>Peixoto, Silvio</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2192-3854</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170220</creationdate><title>Risk analysis of the insertion of biofloc technology in a marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production in a farm in Pernambuco, Brazil: A case study</title><author>Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares ; Sabbag, Omar Jorge ; Soares, Roberta ; Peixoto, Silvio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f4068a59a4189edc2062b6d6111a1dc86f2683c6608e71ca02e27ad67eabd9eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biofloc</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Investment analysis</topic><topic>Litopenaeus vannamei</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Monte Carlo method</topic><topic>Penaeidae</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shrimp farming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbag, Omar Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, Silvio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rego, Marcelo Augusto Soares</au><au>Sabbag, Omar Jorge</au><au>Soares, Roberta</au><au>Peixoto, Silvio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk analysis of the insertion of biofloc technology in a marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production in a farm in Pernambuco, Brazil: A case study</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle><date>2017-02-20</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>469</volume><spage>67</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>67-71</pages><issn>0044-8486</issn><eissn>1873-5622</eissn><abstract>Uncertainties related to the future behavior of projected cash flows cause doubts when choosing investments. Therefore, it is essential to provide information that assist the entrepreneur in decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the financial indicators and verify the risk of biofloc technology (BFT) and conventional system employed in a shrimp farm in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. We used the simulation by the Monte Carlo method as a probabilistic analysis of the net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). The input variables considered were retail price (US$/kg), feed price (US$/kg), labor value (US$), productivity (kg/ha/year), production cycle period (days) and feed conversion rate (FCR). The cash flows have been designed for 10years to the discount rates of 10, 13 and 16%. The BFT system showed greater sensitivity to changes in rates, reducing significantly the NPV when interest rates increased. Risk was only observed in the BFT system, with up to 15% of probability when subjected to the discount rate of 16%. Both shrimp production systems represent a significant investment alternative for the rural sector in northeastern Brazil, because even from the perspective of risk management, the IRR has 90% probability of ranging from 7.66% to 59.40% for the BFT, and from 67.96% to 201.03% for the conventional systems. Brazilian shrimp producers are looking for new technologies to improve their productive performance and to avoid problems related to diseases in conventional pond culture system. They are interested in the biofloc technology (BFT) system, but there are many doubts about financial issues related to this technology. However, few studies evaluate the economic aspects of the different culture systems used in this activity, hampering the decision-making by the producer. Our study verified the viability of the BFT system, as well as the conventional system employed in the northeast Brazilian shrimp farms, but both systems were impacted along the time by productive aspects and changes in the prices of the main inputs used in the production. •Risk analysis of BFT and conventional systems was applied in northeastern Brazil to help entrepreneurs in decision-making.•The Monte Carlo method was used to establish the financial risk and the maximum expected financial return.•The BFT showed high sensitivity to changes in costs and revenues, but both systems have probability of high financial returns.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.12.006</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2192-3854</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-8486
ispartof Aquaculture, 2017-02, Vol.469, p.67-71
issn 0044-8486
1873-5622
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859489766
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biofloc
Decapoda
Investment analysis
Litopenaeus vannamei
Marine
Monte Carlo method
Penaeidae
Sensitivity analysis
Shrimp farming
title Risk analysis of the insertion of biofloc technology in a marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production in a farm in Pernambuco, Brazil: A case study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A20%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20analysis%20of%20the%20insertion%20of%20biofloc%20technology%20in%20a%20marine%20shrimp%20Litopenaeus%20vannamei%20production%20in%20a%20farm%20in%20Pernambuco,%20Brazil:%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture&rft.au=Rego,%20Marcelo%20Augusto%20Soares&rft.date=2017-02-20&rft.volume=469&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=67-71&rft.issn=0044-8486&rft.eissn=1873-5622&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859489766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859489766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0044848616311528&rfr_iscdi=true