Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis

Background The objective of the present analysis was to assess whether small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gastric GIST on a population-based level. Patients and methods Data on patients age...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2017, Vol.20 (1), p.49-60
Hauptverfasser: Guller, Ulrich, Tarantino, Ignazio, Cerny, Thomas, Ulrich, Alexis, Schmied, Bruno M., Warschkow, Rene
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
container_volume 20
creator Guller, Ulrich
Tarantino, Ignazio
Cerny, Thomas
Ulrich, Alexis
Schmied, Bruno M.
Warschkow, Rene
description Background The objective of the present analysis was to assess whether small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gastric GIST on a population-based level. Patients and methods Data on patients aged 18 years or older with histologically proven GIST was extracted from the SEER database from 1998 to 2011. OS and CSS for small bowel GIST were compared with OS and CSS for gastric GIST by application of adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses and propensity score analyses. Results GIST were located in the stomach ( n  = 3011, 59 %), duodenum ( n  = 313, 6 %), jejunum/ileum ( n  = 1288, 25 %), colon ( n  = 139, 3 %), rectum ( n  = 172, 3 %), and extraviscerally ( n  = 173, 3 %). OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the duodenum [OS, HR 0.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.19; CSS, HR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.76–1.29] and in the jejunum/ileum (OS, HR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.85–1.10; CSS, HR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.81–1.10) were similar to those of patients with gastric GIST in multivariate analyses. Conversely, OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the colon (OS, HR 1.40; 95 % CI 1.07–1.83; CSS, HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.41–2.54) and in an extravisceral location (OS, HR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.14–1.77; CSS, HR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.11–1.84) were significantly worse than those of patients with gastric GIST. Conclusions Contrary to common belief, OS and CSS of patients with small bowel GIST are not statistically different from those of patients with gastric GIST when adjustment is made for confounding variables on a population-based level. The prognosis of patients with nongastric GIST is worse because of a colonic and extravisceral GIST location. These findings have implications regarding adjuvant treatment of GIST patients. Hence, the dogma that small bowel GIST patients have worse prognosis than gastric GIST patients and therefore should receive adjuvant treatment to a greater extent must be revisited.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10120-015-0571-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859487967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4293152851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-1e285047b7fddec61970c093d151ebfcb1d6018175110940f5f47589a137a0cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1q3DAURkVpaNKkD9BNEXSTjVNdW7Ks7kKYpoFAIT9rIcvyVEG2XF17wjxA37uaTlJKoZCVBDrfdyUdQt4DOwPG5CcEBiUrGIiCCQlF9YocAa_qoqqYeP28LxUckreIDyyDCuo35LCsa654xY_Izxu38ehnP66poV1cD-YzRT_4YBLFJW38xgQaezqZ2btxRvro5-8UBxMCbeOjC9SMHV0bnJO39PLq9u6MntMpTkvIiTgWrUHX0SnFyY150JaijcnR29XqJkdN2KLHE3LQm4Du3dN6TO6_rO4uvhbX3y6vLs6vC8tlORfgykYwLlvZd52zNSjJLFNVBwJc29sWuppBA1IAMMVZL3ouRaMMVNIw21fH5HTfm6_zY3E468GjdSGY0cUFNTRC8UaqWr4A3X1irZo6ox__QR_ikvLTfheKUvKmgUzBnrIpIibX6yn5waStBqZ3OvVep86W9E6nrnLmw1Pz0g6u-5N49peBcg9gPhrXLv01-r-tvwA1ZKnP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1855274881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Guller, Ulrich ; Tarantino, Ignazio ; Cerny, Thomas ; Ulrich, Alexis ; Schmied, Bruno M. ; Warschkow, Rene</creator><creatorcontrib>Guller, Ulrich ; Tarantino, Ignazio ; Cerny, Thomas ; Ulrich, Alexis ; Schmied, Bruno M. ; Warschkow, Rene</creatorcontrib><description>Background The objective of the present analysis was to assess whether small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gastric GIST on a population-based level. Patients and methods Data on patients aged 18 years or older with histologically proven GIST was extracted from the SEER database from 1998 to 2011. OS and CSS for small bowel GIST were compared with OS and CSS for gastric GIST by application of adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses and propensity score analyses. Results GIST were located in the stomach ( n  = 3011, 59 %), duodenum ( n  = 313, 6 %), jejunum/ileum ( n  = 1288, 25 %), colon ( n  = 139, 3 %), rectum ( n  = 172, 3 %), and extraviscerally ( n  = 173, 3 %). OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the duodenum [OS, HR 0.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.19; CSS, HR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.76–1.29] and in the jejunum/ileum (OS, HR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.85–1.10; CSS, HR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.81–1.10) were similar to those of patients with gastric GIST in multivariate analyses. Conversely, OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the colon (OS, HR 1.40; 95 % CI 1.07–1.83; CSS, HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.41–2.54) and in an extravisceral location (OS, HR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.14–1.77; CSS, HR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.11–1.84) were significantly worse than those of patients with gastric GIST. Conclusions Contrary to common belief, OS and CSS of patients with small bowel GIST are not statistically different from those of patients with gastric GIST when adjustment is made for confounding variables on a population-based level. The prognosis of patients with nongastric GIST is worse because of a colonic and extravisceral GIST location. These findings have implications regarding adjuvant treatment of GIST patients. Hence, the dogma that small bowel GIST patients have worse prognosis than gastric GIST patients and therefore should receive adjuvant treatment to a greater extent must be revisited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10120-015-0571-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26649434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer Research ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastric cancer ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - epidemiology ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - mortality ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery ; Humans ; Intestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Intestinal Neoplasms - mortality ; Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology ; Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery ; Intestine, Small - pathology ; Intestine, Small - surgery ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Prognosis ; Propensity Score ; SEER Program ; Stomach Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Stomach Neoplasms - mortality ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival Rate ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2017, Vol.20 (1), p.49-60</ispartof><rights>The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2015</rights><rights>Gastric Cancer is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-1e285047b7fddec61970c093d151ebfcb1d6018175110940f5f47589a137a0cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-1e285047b7fddec61970c093d151ebfcb1d6018175110940f5f47589a137a0cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10120-015-0571-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10120-015-0571-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26649434$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarantino, Ignazio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerny, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmied, Bruno M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warschkow, Rene</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis</title><title>Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association</title><addtitle>Gastric Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Gastric Cancer</addtitle><description>Background The objective of the present analysis was to assess whether small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gastric GIST on a population-based level. Patients and methods Data on patients aged 18 years or older with histologically proven GIST was extracted from the SEER database from 1998 to 2011. OS and CSS for small bowel GIST were compared with OS and CSS for gastric GIST by application of adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses and propensity score analyses. Results GIST were located in the stomach ( n  = 3011, 59 %), duodenum ( n  = 313, 6 %), jejunum/ileum ( n  = 1288, 25 %), colon ( n  = 139, 3 %), rectum ( n  = 172, 3 %), and extraviscerally ( n  = 173, 3 %). OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the duodenum [OS, HR 0.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.19; CSS, HR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.76–1.29] and in the jejunum/ileum (OS, HR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.85–1.10; CSS, HR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.81–1.10) were similar to those of patients with gastric GIST in multivariate analyses. Conversely, OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the colon (OS, HR 1.40; 95 % CI 1.07–1.83; CSS, HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.41–2.54) and in an extravisceral location (OS, HR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.14–1.77; CSS, HR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.11–1.84) were significantly worse than those of patients with gastric GIST. Conclusions Contrary to common belief, OS and CSS of patients with small bowel GIST are not statistically different from those of patients with gastric GIST when adjustment is made for confounding variables on a population-based level. The prognosis of patients with nongastric GIST is worse because of a colonic and extravisceral GIST location. These findings have implications regarding adjuvant treatment of GIST patients. Hence, the dogma that small bowel GIST patients have worse prognosis than gastric GIST patients and therefore should receive adjuvant treatment to a greater extent must be revisited.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - mortality</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intestinal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - pathology</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1436-3291</issn><issn>1436-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1q3DAURkVpaNKkD9BNEXSTjVNdW7Ks7kKYpoFAIT9rIcvyVEG2XF17wjxA37uaTlJKoZCVBDrfdyUdQt4DOwPG5CcEBiUrGIiCCQlF9YocAa_qoqqYeP28LxUckreIDyyDCuo35LCsa654xY_Izxu38ehnP66poV1cD-YzRT_4YBLFJW38xgQaezqZ2btxRvro5-8UBxMCbeOjC9SMHV0bnJO39PLq9u6MntMpTkvIiTgWrUHX0SnFyY150JaijcnR29XqJkdN2KLHE3LQm4Du3dN6TO6_rO4uvhbX3y6vLs6vC8tlORfgykYwLlvZd52zNSjJLFNVBwJc29sWuppBA1IAMMVZL3ouRaMMVNIw21fH5HTfm6_zY3E468GjdSGY0cUFNTRC8UaqWr4A3X1irZo6ox__QR_ikvLTfheKUvKmgUzBnrIpIibX6yn5waStBqZ3OvVep86W9E6nrnLmw1Pz0g6u-5N49peBcg9gPhrXLv01-r-tvwA1ZKnP</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Guller, Ulrich</creator><creator>Tarantino, Ignazio</creator><creator>Cerny, Thomas</creator><creator>Ulrich, Alexis</creator><creator>Schmied, Bruno M.</creator><creator>Warschkow, Rene</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis</title><author>Guller, Ulrich ; Tarantino, Ignazio ; Cerny, Thomas ; Ulrich, Alexis ; Schmied, Bruno M. ; Warschkow, Rene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-1e285047b7fddec61970c093d151ebfcb1d6018175110940f5f47589a137a0cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - mortality</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intestinal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - pathology</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guller, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarantino, Ignazio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerny, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmied, Bruno M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warschkow, Rene</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guller, Ulrich</au><au>Tarantino, Ignazio</au><au>Cerny, Thomas</au><au>Ulrich, Alexis</au><au>Schmied, Bruno M.</au><au>Warschkow, Rene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis</atitle><jtitle>Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association</jtitle><stitle>Gastric Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Gastric Cancer</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>49-60</pages><issn>1436-3291</issn><eissn>1436-3305</eissn><abstract>Background The objective of the present analysis was to assess whether small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gastric GIST on a population-based level. Patients and methods Data on patients aged 18 years or older with histologically proven GIST was extracted from the SEER database from 1998 to 2011. OS and CSS for small bowel GIST were compared with OS and CSS for gastric GIST by application of adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses and propensity score analyses. Results GIST were located in the stomach ( n  = 3011, 59 %), duodenum ( n  = 313, 6 %), jejunum/ileum ( n  = 1288, 25 %), colon ( n  = 139, 3 %), rectum ( n  = 172, 3 %), and extraviscerally ( n  = 173, 3 %). OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the duodenum [OS, HR 0.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.19; CSS, HR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.76–1.29] and in the jejunum/ileum (OS, HR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.85–1.10; CSS, HR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.81–1.10) were similar to those of patients with gastric GIST in multivariate analyses. Conversely, OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the colon (OS, HR 1.40; 95 % CI 1.07–1.83; CSS, HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.41–2.54) and in an extravisceral location (OS, HR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.14–1.77; CSS, HR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.11–1.84) were significantly worse than those of patients with gastric GIST. Conclusions Contrary to common belief, OS and CSS of patients with small bowel GIST are not statistically different from those of patients with gastric GIST when adjustment is made for confounding variables on a population-based level. The prognosis of patients with nongastric GIST is worse because of a colonic and extravisceral GIST location. These findings have implications regarding adjuvant treatment of GIST patients. Hence, the dogma that small bowel GIST patients have worse prognosis than gastric GIST patients and therefore should receive adjuvant treatment to a greater extent must be revisited.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>26649434</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10120-015-0571-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-3291
ispartof Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2017, Vol.20 (1), p.49-60
issn 1436-3291
1436-3305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859487967
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology
Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer Research
Cohort Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastric cancer
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - epidemiology
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - mortality
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - pathology
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - surgery
Humans
Intestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Intestinal Neoplasms - mortality
Intestinal Neoplasms - pathology
Intestinal Neoplasms - surgery
Intestine, Small - pathology
Intestine, Small - surgery
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Staging
Oncology
Original Article
Prognosis
Propensity Score
SEER Program
Stomach Neoplasms - epidemiology
Stomach Neoplasms - mortality
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Surgical Oncology
Survival Rate
United States - epidemiology
Young Adult
title Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A25%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20a%20dogma:%20similar%20survival%20of%20patients%20with%20small%20bowel%20and%20gastric%20GIST.%20A%20population-based%20propensity%20score%20SEER%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Gastric%20cancer%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20International%20Gastric%20Cancer%20Association%20and%20the%20Japanese%20Gastric%20Cancer%20Association&rft.au=Guller,%20Ulrich&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=49-60&rft.issn=1436-3291&rft.eissn=1436-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10120-015-0571-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4293152851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1855274881&rft_id=info:pmid/26649434&rfr_iscdi=true