Using a functional approach to test trending volatility in the price of Mexican and international agricultural products

In this article, we extend the traditional GARCH(1,1) model by including a functional trend term in the conditional volatility of a time series. We derive the main properties of the model and apply it to all agricultural commodities in the Mexican CPI basket, as well as to the international prices o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural economics 2017-01, Vol.48 (1), p.3-13
Hauptverfasser: Guerrero, Santiago, Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo, Juárez‐Torres, Miriam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Agricultural economics
container_volume 48
creator Guerrero, Santiago
Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo
Juárez‐Torres, Miriam
description In this article, we extend the traditional GARCH(1,1) model by including a functional trend term in the conditional volatility of a time series. We derive the main properties of the model and apply it to all agricultural commodities in the Mexican CPI basket, as well as to the international prices of maize, wheat, swine, poultry, and beef products for three different time periods that implied changes in price regulations and behavior: before the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA; 1987–1993), post‐NAFTA (1994–2005), and commodity supercycle (2006–2014). The proposed model seems to adequately fit the volatility process and, according to heteroscedasticity tests, also outperforms the ARCH(1) and GARCH(1,1) models, some of the most popular approaches used in the literature to analyze price volatility. Our results show that, consistent with anecdotal evidence, price volatility trends increased from the period 1987–1993 to 1994–2005. From 1994–2005 to 2006–2014, trends decreased but the persistence of volatility increased for most products, especially for international commodities. In addition, we identify some agricultural products such as avocado, beans, and chicken that, due to their increasing price volatility trends in the 2006–2014 period, may present a risk for food inflation in the short run.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/agec.12290
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859486830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859486830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-6a95ae87ff7f7e1db13865620dc2f95147fdfcba2fd8c0b68841bc1d4ea8597e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UFPwyAUB3BiNHFOL34CEi_GpBNaSuG4LHOazHhxZ0IpbCyMzkKd-_ayTS8e5EIIP_4vjwfALUYjnNajXGo1wnnO0RkY4LIiGWI0PwcDhCnPSlyiS3AVwhohTFBeDMBuEaxfQglN71W0rZcOyu22a6VawdjCqEOEsdO-ObDP1slonY17aD2MKw23nVUatga-6i-rpIfSN-ku6s7L37hlMr2LfZcOKbnpVQzX4MJIF_TNzz4Ei6fp--Q5m7_NXibjeaYKzlFGJS-lZpUxlak0bmpcMFrSHDUqN7zEpDKNUbXMTcMUqiljBNcKN0RLVvJKF0Nwf8pNhT_61IzY2KC0c9Lrtg8CJ0YYZQVK9O4PXbd9asMdFSVVRTlJ6uGkVNeG0Gkj0hdsZLcXGInDDMRhBuI4g4TxCe-s0_t_pBjPppPTm2__0Ytg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1856477694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using a functional approach to test trending volatility in the price of Mexican and international agricultural products</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Guerrero, Santiago ; Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo ; Juárez‐Torres, Miriam</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Santiago ; Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo ; Juárez‐Torres, Miriam</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we extend the traditional GARCH(1,1) model by including a functional trend term in the conditional volatility of a time series. We derive the main properties of the model and apply it to all agricultural commodities in the Mexican CPI basket, as well as to the international prices of maize, wheat, swine, poultry, and beef products for three different time periods that implied changes in price regulations and behavior: before the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA; 1987–1993), post‐NAFTA (1994–2005), and commodity supercycle (2006–2014). The proposed model seems to adequately fit the volatility process and, according to heteroscedasticity tests, also outperforms the ARCH(1) and GARCH(1,1) models, some of the most popular approaches used in the literature to analyze price volatility. Our results show that, consistent with anecdotal evidence, price volatility trends increased from the period 1987–1993 to 1994–2005. From 1994–2005 to 2006–2014, trends decreased but the persistence of volatility increased for most products, especially for international commodities. In addition, we identify some agricultural products such as avocado, beans, and chicken that, due to their increasing price volatility trends in the 2006–2014 period, may present a risk for food inflation in the short run.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-0862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/agec.12290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural commodities ; Agricultural Prices ; ARCH ; C22 ; Economic models ; GARCH ; North American Free Trade Agreement ; Persea americana ; Price Volatility ; Q11 ; Q17 ; Trade agreements ; Trends ; Triticum aestivum ; Volatility ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Agricultural economics, 2017-01, Vol.48 (1), p.3-13</ispartof><rights>2016 International Association of Agricultural Economists</rights><rights>2017 International Association of Agricultural Economists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-6a95ae87ff7f7e1db13865620dc2f95147fdfcba2fd8c0b68841bc1d4ea8597e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-6a95ae87ff7f7e1db13865620dc2f95147fdfcba2fd8c0b68841bc1d4ea8597e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fagec.12290$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fagec.12290$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juárez‐Torres, Miriam</creatorcontrib><title>Using a functional approach to test trending volatility in the price of Mexican and international agricultural products</title><title>Agricultural economics</title><description>In this article, we extend the traditional GARCH(1,1) model by including a functional trend term in the conditional volatility of a time series. We derive the main properties of the model and apply it to all agricultural commodities in the Mexican CPI basket, as well as to the international prices of maize, wheat, swine, poultry, and beef products for three different time periods that implied changes in price regulations and behavior: before the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA; 1987–1993), post‐NAFTA (1994–2005), and commodity supercycle (2006–2014). The proposed model seems to adequately fit the volatility process and, according to heteroscedasticity tests, also outperforms the ARCH(1) and GARCH(1,1) models, some of the most popular approaches used in the literature to analyze price volatility. Our results show that, consistent with anecdotal evidence, price volatility trends increased from the period 1987–1993 to 1994–2005. From 1994–2005 to 2006–2014, trends decreased but the persistence of volatility increased for most products, especially for international commodities. In addition, we identify some agricultural products such as avocado, beans, and chicken that, due to their increasing price volatility trends in the 2006–2014 period, may present a risk for food inflation in the short run.</description><subject>Agricultural commodities</subject><subject>Agricultural Prices</subject><subject>ARCH</subject><subject>C22</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>GARCH</subject><subject>North American Free Trade Agreement</subject><subject>Persea americana</subject><subject>Price Volatility</subject><subject>Q11</subject><subject>Q17</subject><subject>Trade agreements</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0169-5150</issn><issn>1574-0862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UFPwyAUB3BiNHFOL34CEi_GpBNaSuG4LHOazHhxZ0IpbCyMzkKd-_ayTS8e5EIIP_4vjwfALUYjnNajXGo1wnnO0RkY4LIiGWI0PwcDhCnPSlyiS3AVwhohTFBeDMBuEaxfQglN71W0rZcOyu22a6VawdjCqEOEsdO-ObDP1slonY17aD2MKw23nVUatga-6i-rpIfSN-ku6s7L37hlMr2LfZcOKbnpVQzX4MJIF_TNzz4Ei6fp--Q5m7_NXibjeaYKzlFGJS-lZpUxlak0bmpcMFrSHDUqN7zEpDKNUbXMTcMUqiljBNcKN0RLVvJKF0Nwf8pNhT_61IzY2KC0c9Lrtg8CJ0YYZQVK9O4PXbd9asMdFSVVRTlJ6uGkVNeG0Gkj0hdsZLcXGInDDMRhBuI4g4TxCe-s0_t_pBjPppPTm2__0Ytg</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Guerrero, Santiago</creator><creator>Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo</creator><creator>Juárez‐Torres, Miriam</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Using a functional approach to test trending volatility in the price of Mexican and international agricultural products</title><author>Guerrero, Santiago ; Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo ; Juárez‐Torres, Miriam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-6a95ae87ff7f7e1db13865620dc2f95147fdfcba2fd8c0b68841bc1d4ea8597e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural commodities</topic><topic>Agricultural Prices</topic><topic>ARCH</topic><topic>C22</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>GARCH</topic><topic>North American Free Trade Agreement</topic><topic>Persea americana</topic><topic>Price Volatility</topic><topic>Q11</topic><topic>Q17</topic><topic>Trade agreements</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juárez‐Torres, Miriam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerrero, Santiago</au><au>Hernández‐del‐Valle, Gerardo</au><au>Juárez‐Torres, Miriam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using a functional approach to test trending volatility in the price of Mexican and international agricultural products</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>3-13</pages><issn>0169-5150</issn><eissn>1574-0862</eissn><abstract>In this article, we extend the traditional GARCH(1,1) model by including a functional trend term in the conditional volatility of a time series. We derive the main properties of the model and apply it to all agricultural commodities in the Mexican CPI basket, as well as to the international prices of maize, wheat, swine, poultry, and beef products for three different time periods that implied changes in price regulations and behavior: before the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA; 1987–1993), post‐NAFTA (1994–2005), and commodity supercycle (2006–2014). The proposed model seems to adequately fit the volatility process and, according to heteroscedasticity tests, also outperforms the ARCH(1) and GARCH(1,1) models, some of the most popular approaches used in the literature to analyze price volatility. Our results show that, consistent with anecdotal evidence, price volatility trends increased from the period 1987–1993 to 1994–2005. From 1994–2005 to 2006–2014, trends decreased but the persistence of volatility increased for most products, especially for international commodities. In addition, we identify some agricultural products such as avocado, beans, and chicken that, due to their increasing price volatility trends in the 2006–2014 period, may present a risk for food inflation in the short run.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/agec.12290</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5150
ispartof Agricultural economics, 2017-01, Vol.48 (1), p.3-13
issn 0169-5150
1574-0862
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859486830
source Wiley Online Library
subjects Agricultural commodities
Agricultural Prices
ARCH
C22
Economic models
GARCH
North American Free Trade Agreement
Persea americana
Price Volatility
Q11
Q17
Trade agreements
Trends
Triticum aestivum
Volatility
Zea mays
title Using a functional approach to test trending volatility in the price of Mexican and international agricultural products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A52%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20a%20functional%20approach%20to%20test%20trending%20volatility%20in%20the%20price%20of%20Mexican%20and%20international%20agricultural%20products&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Guerrero,%20Santiago&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=3-13&rft.issn=0169-5150&rft.eissn=1574-0862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/agec.12290&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859486830%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1856477694&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true