Kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches

In this study, we analyzed the kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches by elite baseball pitchers, and tested a null hypothesis that “no type of pitch has the same kinematic characteristics as another.”  A high-speed video camera was used to record the initial trajectory of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences) Health and Sport Sciences), 2016, Vol.61(2), pp.589-605
Hauptverfasser: Nagami, Tomoyuki, Kimura, Yasuhiro, Kanosue, Kazuyuki, Yanai, Toshimasa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 605
container_issue 2
container_start_page 589
container_title Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
container_volume 61
creator Nagami, Tomoyuki
Kimura, Yasuhiro
Kanosue, Kazuyuki
Yanai, Toshimasa
description In this study, we analyzed the kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches by elite baseball pitchers, and tested a null hypothesis that “no type of pitch has the same kinematic characteristics as another.”  A high-speed video camera was used to record the initial trajectory of the pitched ball thrown by 84 skilled baseball pitchers. Each pitcher was asked to throw all the different types of pitch he would use in competition and practice, and to self-declare the type of pitch used for each throw. The kinematic characteristics of each pitched ball were analyzed as ball speed, the direction of the spin axis, and the spin rate. A custom-made device was used to analyze the direction of the spin axis and the spin rate, and the ball speed was measured with a radar gun. One-way ANOVA with the Games-Howell post hoc test was used to test the hypothesis.  The total of 364 pitches were categorized into 11 self-declared pitch types. Four of 10 pitch types thrown by more than one pitcher - the four-seam fastball, slider, curveball and cutter - had unique kinematic characteristic distinct from all of the other pitch types. No significant differences were found in any of the kinematic parameters between 1) changeup and sinker, 2) forkball and split-fingered fastball, and 3) two-seam fastball and shoot ball. Therefore, the hypothesis was retained for these 3 pairs of pitch types: although they were kinematically similar, the pitchers categorized them as different types.  When the breaking ball was compared with the four-seam fastball, they were classifiable into 3 types: 1) pitches with a slower ball speed and lower spin rate with a different direction of spin axis (changeup, sinker, forkball and split-fingered fastball), 2) pitches with a slower ball speed, different direction of the spin axis and a spin rate comparable to the four-seam fastball (slider, curveball and cutter), and 3) pitches with a comparable ball speed, similar spin axis direction, and lower spin rate (two-seam fastball and shoot ball). These data revealed that the kinematic characteristics of some pitch types are quite different from those described in baseball coaching handbooks.
doi_str_mv 10.5432/jjpehss.16021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859486282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859486282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2141-2763777a900c58060dc1fb12497a9346d02fd2aa6b1645927ae139aa2da374433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAMgCMEEhPsyL1HLh1xkibpBQlNvMQkLnCO3DRlmbq1xB3S_j3dQ7vYsv3Zsj7G7oDPCiXFw2rVhyXRDDQXcMEmYC3kxoC9ZBOurMq1AX7NpkSxGuvScK5hwh4_4iascYg-80tM6IeQIo0lZV2T_WGK3ZayYdeHQ6NCChW2bdbHwS8D3bKrBlsK01O-Yd8vz1_zt3zx-fo-f1rkXoCCXBgtjTFYcu4LyzWvPTQVCFWOPal0zUVTC0RdgVZFKQwGkCWiqFEapaS8YffHu33qfreBBreO5EPb4iaMDzqwRamsFlaMaH5EfeqIUmhcn-Ia084Bd3tV7qTKHVSN_PzIr2jAn3CmMY0W2nCmNTixD4et83QvzYWN_AfgHHUp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859486282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Nagami, Tomoyuki ; Kimura, Yasuhiro ; Kanosue, Kazuyuki ; Yanai, Toshimasa</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagami, Tomoyuki ; Kimura, Yasuhiro ; Kanosue, Kazuyuki ; Yanai, Toshimasa</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we analyzed the kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches by elite baseball pitchers, and tested a null hypothesis that “no type of pitch has the same kinematic characteristics as another.”  A high-speed video camera was used to record the initial trajectory of the pitched ball thrown by 84 skilled baseball pitchers. Each pitcher was asked to throw all the different types of pitch he would use in competition and practice, and to self-declare the type of pitch used for each throw. The kinematic characteristics of each pitched ball were analyzed as ball speed, the direction of the spin axis, and the spin rate. A custom-made device was used to analyze the direction of the spin axis and the spin rate, and the ball speed was measured with a radar gun. One-way ANOVA with the Games-Howell post hoc test was used to test the hypothesis.  The total of 364 pitches were categorized into 11 self-declared pitch types. Four of 10 pitch types thrown by more than one pitcher - the four-seam fastball, slider, curveball and cutter - had unique kinematic characteristic distinct from all of the other pitch types. No significant differences were found in any of the kinematic parameters between 1) changeup and sinker, 2) forkball and split-fingered fastball, and 3) two-seam fastball and shoot ball. Therefore, the hypothesis was retained for these 3 pairs of pitch types: although they were kinematically similar, the pitchers categorized them as different types.  When the breaking ball was compared with the four-seam fastball, they were classifiable into 3 types: 1) pitches with a slower ball speed and lower spin rate with a different direction of spin axis (changeup, sinker, forkball and split-fingered fastball), 2) pitches with a slower ball speed, different direction of the spin axis and a spin rate comparable to the four-seam fastball (slider, curveball and cutter), and 3) pitches with a comparable ball speed, similar spin axis direction, and lower spin rate (two-seam fastball and shoot ball). These data revealed that the kinematic characteristics of some pitch types are quite different from those described in baseball coaching handbooks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0484-6710</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-7718</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5432/jjpehss.16021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences</publisher><subject>angular velocity ; breaking balls ; direction of spin axis ; spin rate</subject><ispartof>Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), 2016, Vol.61(2), pp.589-605</ispartof><rights>2016 Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2141-2763777a900c58060dc1fb12497a9346d02fd2aa6b1645927ae139aa2da374433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2141-2763777a900c58060dc1fb12497a9346d02fd2aa6b1645927ae139aa2da374433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagami, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanosue, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanai, Toshimasa</creatorcontrib><title>Kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches</title><title>Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)</title><addtitle>Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences</addtitle><description>In this study, we analyzed the kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches by elite baseball pitchers, and tested a null hypothesis that “no type of pitch has the same kinematic characteristics as another.”  A high-speed video camera was used to record the initial trajectory of the pitched ball thrown by 84 skilled baseball pitchers. Each pitcher was asked to throw all the different types of pitch he would use in competition and practice, and to self-declare the type of pitch used for each throw. The kinematic characteristics of each pitched ball were analyzed as ball speed, the direction of the spin axis, and the spin rate. A custom-made device was used to analyze the direction of the spin axis and the spin rate, and the ball speed was measured with a radar gun. One-way ANOVA with the Games-Howell post hoc test was used to test the hypothesis.  The total of 364 pitches were categorized into 11 self-declared pitch types. Four of 10 pitch types thrown by more than one pitcher - the four-seam fastball, slider, curveball and cutter - had unique kinematic characteristic distinct from all of the other pitch types. No significant differences were found in any of the kinematic parameters between 1) changeup and sinker, 2) forkball and split-fingered fastball, and 3) two-seam fastball and shoot ball. Therefore, the hypothesis was retained for these 3 pairs of pitch types: although they were kinematically similar, the pitchers categorized them as different types.  When the breaking ball was compared with the four-seam fastball, they were classifiable into 3 types: 1) pitches with a slower ball speed and lower spin rate with a different direction of spin axis (changeup, sinker, forkball and split-fingered fastball), 2) pitches with a slower ball speed, different direction of the spin axis and a spin rate comparable to the four-seam fastball (slider, curveball and cutter), and 3) pitches with a comparable ball speed, similar spin axis direction, and lower spin rate (two-seam fastball and shoot ball). These data revealed that the kinematic characteristics of some pitch types are quite different from those described in baseball coaching handbooks.</description><subject>angular velocity</subject><subject>breaking balls</subject><subject>direction of spin axis</subject><subject>spin rate</subject><issn>0484-6710</issn><issn>1881-7718</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAMgCMEEhPsyL1HLh1xkibpBQlNvMQkLnCO3DRlmbq1xB3S_j3dQ7vYsv3Zsj7G7oDPCiXFw2rVhyXRDDQXcMEmYC3kxoC9ZBOurMq1AX7NpkSxGuvScK5hwh4_4iascYg-80tM6IeQIo0lZV2T_WGK3ZayYdeHQ6NCChW2bdbHwS8D3bKrBlsK01O-Yd8vz1_zt3zx-fo-f1rkXoCCXBgtjTFYcu4LyzWvPTQVCFWOPal0zUVTC0RdgVZFKQwGkCWiqFEapaS8YffHu33qfreBBreO5EPb4iaMDzqwRamsFlaMaH5EfeqIUmhcn-Ia084Bd3tV7qTKHVSN_PzIr2jAn3CmMY0W2nCmNTixD4et83QvzYWN_AfgHHUp</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Nagami, Tomoyuki</creator><creator>Kimura, Yasuhiro</creator><creator>Kanosue, Kazuyuki</creator><creator>Yanai, Toshimasa</creator><general>Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches</title><author>Nagami, Tomoyuki ; Kimura, Yasuhiro ; Kanosue, Kazuyuki ; Yanai, Toshimasa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2141-2763777a900c58060dc1fb12497a9346d02fd2aa6b1645927ae139aa2da374433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>angular velocity</topic><topic>breaking balls</topic><topic>direction of spin axis</topic><topic>spin rate</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagami, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanosue, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanai, Toshimasa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagami, Tomoyuki</au><au>Kimura, Yasuhiro</au><au>Kanosue, Kazuyuki</au><au>Yanai, Toshimasa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches</atitle><jtitle>Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)</jtitle><addtitle>Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>589</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>589-605</pages><issn>0484-6710</issn><eissn>1881-7718</eissn><abstract>In this study, we analyzed the kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches by elite baseball pitchers, and tested a null hypothesis that “no type of pitch has the same kinematic characteristics as another.”  A high-speed video camera was used to record the initial trajectory of the pitched ball thrown by 84 skilled baseball pitchers. Each pitcher was asked to throw all the different types of pitch he would use in competition and practice, and to self-declare the type of pitch used for each throw. The kinematic characteristics of each pitched ball were analyzed as ball speed, the direction of the spin axis, and the spin rate. A custom-made device was used to analyze the direction of the spin axis and the spin rate, and the ball speed was measured with a radar gun. One-way ANOVA with the Games-Howell post hoc test was used to test the hypothesis.  The total of 364 pitches were categorized into 11 self-declared pitch types. Four of 10 pitch types thrown by more than one pitcher - the four-seam fastball, slider, curveball and cutter - had unique kinematic characteristic distinct from all of the other pitch types. No significant differences were found in any of the kinematic parameters between 1) changeup and sinker, 2) forkball and split-fingered fastball, and 3) two-seam fastball and shoot ball. Therefore, the hypothesis was retained for these 3 pairs of pitch types: although they were kinematically similar, the pitchers categorized them as different types.  When the breaking ball was compared with the four-seam fastball, they were classifiable into 3 types: 1) pitches with a slower ball speed and lower spin rate with a different direction of spin axis (changeup, sinker, forkball and split-fingered fastball), 2) pitches with a slower ball speed, different direction of the spin axis and a spin rate comparable to the four-seam fastball (slider, curveball and cutter), and 3) pitches with a comparable ball speed, similar spin axis direction, and lower spin rate (two-seam fastball and shoot ball). These data revealed that the kinematic characteristics of some pitch types are quite different from those described in baseball coaching handbooks.</abstract><pub>Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences</pub><doi>10.5432/jjpehss.16021</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0484-6710
ispartof Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), 2016, Vol.61(2), pp.589-605
issn 0484-6710
1881-7718
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859486282
source J-STAGE Free; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects angular velocity
breaking balls
direction of spin axis
spin rate
title Kinematic characteristics of various types of baseball pitches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinematic%20characteristics%20of%20various%20types%20of%20baseball%20pitches&rft.jtitle=Taiikugaku%20kenkyu%20(Japan%20Journal%20of%20Physical%20Education,%20Health%20and%20Sport%20Sciences)&rft.au=Nagami,%20Tomoyuki&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=589&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=589-605&rft.issn=0484-6710&rft.eissn=1881-7718&rft_id=info:doi/10.5432/jjpehss.16021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859486282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859486282&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true