Predators, Predator Removal, and Sage-Grouse: A Review

Populations of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) have been in a decline since the nineteenth century. We used our research, unpublished reports, and scientific literature to identify which predators kill sage-grouse and to assess whether lethal control of these predators b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2017-01, Vol.81 (1), p.7-15
Hauptverfasser: CONOVER, MICHAEL R., ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 7
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 81
creator CONOVER, MICHAEL R.
ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.
description Populations of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) have been in a decline since the nineteenth century. We used our research, unpublished reports, and scientific literature to identify which predators kill sage-grouse and to assess whether lethal control of these predators benefited the species. We also asked state wildlife biologists and scientists whether they had ever witnessed a predator kill sage-grouse. We identified 266 instances where the predator responsible for depredating nests or killing juvenile or adult sage-grouse could be ascertained. Most adult sage-grouse were killed by eagles (Accipitridae), owls (Strigiformes), coyotes (Canis latrans), or red foxes (Vuples vulpes). Based on nest cameras, most depredated eggs are taken by common ravens (Corvus corax), badgers (Taxidae taxus), or coyotes. There are too few studies to conclude that predator removal increases survival rates of juvenile or adult sage-grouse. No study has been conducted to determine whether badger removal increases nest success of sage-grouse, and the only study on coyote removal produced ambiguous results. Several studies reported that more sage-grouse nests are successful (i.e., >1 eggs hatched) in areas where common ravens were removed or in areas where raven densities were lower than in other areas. The data we reviewed did not indicate predators played a role in the decline during the past century, but increasing numbers of ravens since the 1970s may have contributed to the declining sage-grouse populations in recent decades. We conclude that removing common ravens can increase nest success, although not necessarily sage-grouse abundance. Without a better understanding of sage-grouse and their predators, wildlife biologists will be handicapped in their efforts to prevent sage-grouse populations from continuing to decline.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.21168
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859485776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26606953</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26606953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-785bdc37dd2b6faebba28b67c7c70793efee63a56b39707aaa5799d5cb6d64b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtLw0AQxhdRsFYv3oWAF5Gm7qP7OkrRqlQUH-ht2U0mpSFp6m5r6X_v1lgPHmQOM8z8vuHjQ-iY4D7BmF6Uq3rSp4QItYM6RDOZUkXkLurEI035gLzvo4MQSowZIUp0UO_RQ24XjQ-9ZDsmT1A3n7bqJXaWJ892AunIN8sAh2ivsFWAo5_eRa_XVy_Dm3T8MLodXo7TjGmqUqm4yzMm85w6UVhwzlLlhMxiYakZFACCWS4c03FhreVS65xnTuRi4AjrorP279w3H0sIC1NPQwZVZWcQfRiiuB4oLqWI6OkftGyWfhbdbSgqJNNcR-q8pTLfhOChMHM_ra1fG4LNJjizCc58Bxdh0sKraQXrf0hz93Y_2mpOWk0ZYoC_GioEFpoz9gVJcXhn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852673959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predators, Predator Removal, and Sage-Grouse: A Review</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>CONOVER, MICHAEL R. ; ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.</creator><creatorcontrib>CONOVER, MICHAEL R. ; ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.</creatorcontrib><description>Populations of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) have been in a decline since the nineteenth century. We used our research, unpublished reports, and scientific literature to identify which predators kill sage-grouse and to assess whether lethal control of these predators benefited the species. We also asked state wildlife biologists and scientists whether they had ever witnessed a predator kill sage-grouse. We identified 266 instances where the predator responsible for depredating nests or killing juvenile or adult sage-grouse could be ascertained. Most adult sage-grouse were killed by eagles (Accipitridae), owls (Strigiformes), coyotes (Canis latrans), or red foxes (Vuples vulpes). Based on nest cameras, most depredated eggs are taken by common ravens (Corvus corax), badgers (Taxidae taxus), or coyotes. There are too few studies to conclude that predator removal increases survival rates of juvenile or adult sage-grouse. No study has been conducted to determine whether badger removal increases nest success of sage-grouse, and the only study on coyote removal produced ambiguous results. Several studies reported that more sage-grouse nests are successful (i.e., &gt;1 eggs hatched) in areas where common ravens were removed or in areas where raven densities were lower than in other areas. The data we reviewed did not indicate predators played a role in the decline during the past century, but increasing numbers of ravens since the 1970s may have contributed to the declining sage-grouse populations in recent decades. We conclude that removing common ravens can increase nest success, although not necessarily sage-grouse abundance. Without a better understanding of sage-grouse and their predators, wildlife biologists will be handicapped in their efforts to prevent sage-grouse populations from continuing to decline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21168</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Accipitridae ; Biologists ; Canis latrans ; Centrocercus urophasianus ; Corvus corax ; coyotes ; eagles ; Eggs ; foxes ; great horned owl ; Invited Paper ; lethal control ; Nests ; North America ; Predation ; predator control ; Predators ; predator–prey interactions ; ravens ; sage‐grouse ; Strigiformes ; Survival ; Taxus ; Vulpes ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2017-01, Vol.81 (1), p.7-15</ispartof><rights>2016 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2016</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-785bdc37dd2b6faebba28b67c7c70793efee63a56b39707aaa5799d5cb6d64b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-785bdc37dd2b6faebba28b67c7c70793efee63a56b39707aaa5799d5cb6d64b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26606953$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26606953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CONOVER, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.</creatorcontrib><title>Predators, Predator Removal, and Sage-Grouse: A Review</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Populations of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) have been in a decline since the nineteenth century. We used our research, unpublished reports, and scientific literature to identify which predators kill sage-grouse and to assess whether lethal control of these predators benefited the species. We also asked state wildlife biologists and scientists whether they had ever witnessed a predator kill sage-grouse. We identified 266 instances where the predator responsible for depredating nests or killing juvenile or adult sage-grouse could be ascertained. Most adult sage-grouse were killed by eagles (Accipitridae), owls (Strigiformes), coyotes (Canis latrans), or red foxes (Vuples vulpes). Based on nest cameras, most depredated eggs are taken by common ravens (Corvus corax), badgers (Taxidae taxus), or coyotes. There are too few studies to conclude that predator removal increases survival rates of juvenile or adult sage-grouse. No study has been conducted to determine whether badger removal increases nest success of sage-grouse, and the only study on coyote removal produced ambiguous results. Several studies reported that more sage-grouse nests are successful (i.e., &gt;1 eggs hatched) in areas where common ravens were removed or in areas where raven densities were lower than in other areas. The data we reviewed did not indicate predators played a role in the decline during the past century, but increasing numbers of ravens since the 1970s may have contributed to the declining sage-grouse populations in recent decades. We conclude that removing common ravens can increase nest success, although not necessarily sage-grouse abundance. Without a better understanding of sage-grouse and their predators, wildlife biologists will be handicapped in their efforts to prevent sage-grouse populations from continuing to decline.</description><subject>Accipitridae</subject><subject>Biologists</subject><subject>Canis latrans</subject><subject>Centrocercus urophasianus</subject><subject>Corvus corax</subject><subject>coyotes</subject><subject>eagles</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>foxes</subject><subject>great horned owl</subject><subject>Invited Paper</subject><subject>lethal control</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>predator control</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>predator–prey interactions</subject><subject>ravens</subject><subject>sage‐grouse</subject><subject>Strigiformes</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Taxus</subject><subject>Vulpes</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtLw0AQxhdRsFYv3oWAF5Gm7qP7OkrRqlQUH-ht2U0mpSFp6m5r6X_v1lgPHmQOM8z8vuHjQ-iY4D7BmF6Uq3rSp4QItYM6RDOZUkXkLurEI035gLzvo4MQSowZIUp0UO_RQ24XjQ-9ZDsmT1A3n7bqJXaWJ892AunIN8sAh2ivsFWAo5_eRa_XVy_Dm3T8MLodXo7TjGmqUqm4yzMm85w6UVhwzlLlhMxiYakZFACCWS4c03FhreVS65xnTuRi4AjrorP279w3H0sIC1NPQwZVZWcQfRiiuB4oLqWI6OkftGyWfhbdbSgqJNNcR-q8pTLfhOChMHM_ra1fG4LNJjizCc58Bxdh0sKraQXrf0hz93Y_2mpOWk0ZYoC_GioEFpoz9gVJcXhn</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>CONOVER, MICHAEL R.</creator><creator>ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Predators, Predator Removal, and Sage-Grouse</title><author>CONOVER, MICHAEL R. ; ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-785bdc37dd2b6faebba28b67c7c70793efee63a56b39707aaa5799d5cb6d64b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accipitridae</topic><topic>Biologists</topic><topic>Canis latrans</topic><topic>Centrocercus urophasianus</topic><topic>Corvus corax</topic><topic>coyotes</topic><topic>eagles</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>foxes</topic><topic>great horned owl</topic><topic>Invited Paper</topic><topic>lethal control</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>predator control</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>predator–prey interactions</topic><topic>ravens</topic><topic>sage‐grouse</topic><topic>Strigiformes</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Taxus</topic><topic>Vulpes</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CONOVER, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CONOVER, MICHAEL R.</au><au>ROBERTS, ANTHONY J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predators, Predator Removal, and Sage-Grouse: A Review</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>7-15</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Populations of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) have been in a decline since the nineteenth century. We used our research, unpublished reports, and scientific literature to identify which predators kill sage-grouse and to assess whether lethal control of these predators benefited the species. We also asked state wildlife biologists and scientists whether they had ever witnessed a predator kill sage-grouse. We identified 266 instances where the predator responsible for depredating nests or killing juvenile or adult sage-grouse could be ascertained. Most adult sage-grouse were killed by eagles (Accipitridae), owls (Strigiformes), coyotes (Canis latrans), or red foxes (Vuples vulpes). Based on nest cameras, most depredated eggs are taken by common ravens (Corvus corax), badgers (Taxidae taxus), or coyotes. There are too few studies to conclude that predator removal increases survival rates of juvenile or adult sage-grouse. No study has been conducted to determine whether badger removal increases nest success of sage-grouse, and the only study on coyote removal produced ambiguous results. Several studies reported that more sage-grouse nests are successful (i.e., &gt;1 eggs hatched) in areas where common ravens were removed or in areas where raven densities were lower than in other areas. The data we reviewed did not indicate predators played a role in the decline during the past century, but increasing numbers of ravens since the 1970s may have contributed to the declining sage-grouse populations in recent decades. We conclude that removing common ravens can increase nest success, although not necessarily sage-grouse abundance. Without a better understanding of sage-grouse and their predators, wildlife biologists will be handicapped in their efforts to prevent sage-grouse populations from continuing to decline.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21168</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2017-01, Vol.81 (1), p.7-15
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859485776
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Accipitridae
Biologists
Canis latrans
Centrocercus urophasianus
Corvus corax
coyotes
eagles
Eggs
foxes
great horned owl
Invited Paper
lethal control
Nests
North America
Predation
predator control
Predators
predator–prey interactions
ravens
sage‐grouse
Strigiformes
Survival
Taxus
Vulpes
Wildfowl
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
title Predators, Predator Removal, and Sage-Grouse: A Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A14%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predators,%20Predator%20Removal,%20and%20Sage-Grouse:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=CONOVER,%20MICHAEL%20R.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=7-15&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21168&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26606953%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852673959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26606953&rfr_iscdi=true