Scent marking in shelter dogs: Effects of body size

•Scent marking allows communication without direct interaction.•Most evidence indicates more frequent marking by more competitive individuals.•We scored scent-marking behavior of 281 shelter dogs that varied in body size.•Small dogs urinated at higher rates and directed more urinations than did larg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied animal behaviour science 2017-01, Vol.186, p.49-55
Hauptverfasser: McGuire, Betty, Bemis, Katherine E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 55
container_issue
container_start_page 49
container_title Applied animal behaviour science
container_volume 186
creator McGuire, Betty
Bemis, Katherine E.
description •Scent marking allows communication without direct interaction.•Most evidence indicates more frequent marking by more competitive individuals.•We scored scent-marking behavior of 281 shelter dogs that varied in body size.•Small dogs urinated at higher rates and directed more urinations than did large dogs.•We suggest small dogs prefer scent marking because direct interactions are risky. Placing scent marks in the environment allows individuals to transfer information without direct interactions. Given that body size often indicates competitive ability, small individuals may preferentially communicate via scent marking because direct social interactions are potentially costly. However, most evidence indicates a positive relationship between competitive ability and frequency of scent marking. Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) exhibit extreme morphological variation, which allowed us to examine whether scent-marking behavior varied with body size in shelter dogs. We observed 281 dogs on 20-min walks and recorded total urinations, urinations directed at targets in the environment, and defecations. Some dogs were walked once and others multiple times (total walks, 619). We found that size class influenced rate of urination (P=0.002): small dogs urinated at higher rates (0.36 urinations per min) than both medium (0.26) and large dogs (0.24). There was a tendency for size class to influence percent of directed urinations (P=0.057): small dogs directed more of their urinations at targets in the environment (72%) than did large dogs (60%). Consistent with previous reports, we found that males urinated at higher rates (0.41) than females (0.18; P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859485506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168159116303173</els_id><sourcerecordid>1932194731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-edb13a7cf4b4eb3cf00c704482005846febe507689814d5fbaa5cf6e62921e7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8gSGzYJntjOgxWoKg-pEgtgbSXOuDikcbFTpPL1uCps2LAajebembmHkHNgKTDIr7q0Xq_7erCrNIt9CpAyBgdkAmWRJRUT8pBM4qBMQFZwTE5C6BhjkgObEP6scRjpqvbvdlhSO9Dwhv2InrZuGa7p3BjUY6DO0Ma1WxrsF56SI1P3Ac9-6pS83s1fZg_J4un-cXa7SDQv-Jhg2wCvC21EI7Dh2jCmCyZEmcXjpcgNNihZkZdVCaKVpqlrqU2OeVZlgAXyKbnc711797HBMKqVDRr7mBXdJigoZSVKKVkepRd_pJ3b-CF-p6DiGVSi4BBV-V6lvQvBo1Frb2P0rQKmdixVp35Zqh1LBaAiy2i82Rsxxv206FXQFgeNrfURj2qd_W_FN12xfqk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932194731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scent marking in shelter dogs: Effects of body size</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McGuire, Betty ; Bemis, Katherine E.</creator><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Betty ; Bemis, Katherine E.</creatorcontrib><description>•Scent marking allows communication without direct interaction.•Most evidence indicates more frequent marking by more competitive individuals.•We scored scent-marking behavior of 281 shelter dogs that varied in body size.•Small dogs urinated at higher rates and directed more urinations than did large dogs.•We suggest small dogs prefer scent marking because direct interactions are risky. Placing scent marks in the environment allows individuals to transfer information without direct interactions. Given that body size often indicates competitive ability, small individuals may preferentially communicate via scent marking because direct social interactions are potentially costly. However, most evidence indicates a positive relationship between competitive ability and frequency of scent marking. Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) exhibit extreme morphological variation, which allowed us to examine whether scent-marking behavior varied with body size in shelter dogs. We observed 281 dogs on 20-min walks and recorded total urinations, urinations directed at targets in the environment, and defecations. Some dogs were walked once and others multiple times (total walks, 619). We found that size class influenced rate of urination (P=0.002): small dogs urinated at higher rates (0.36 urinations per min) than both medium (0.26) and large dogs (0.24). There was a tendency for size class to influence percent of directed urinations (P=0.057): small dogs directed more of their urinations at targets in the environment (72%) than did large dogs (60%). Consistent with previous reports, we found that males urinated at higher rates (0.41) than females (0.18; P&lt;0.0001), and directed more of their urinations (males, 87%; females, 45%; P&lt;0.0001). Body size and sex did not influence likelihood of defecation during a walk. Defecation is thought to play a less important role than urination in scent marking in dogs, so the absence of size and sex differences in likelihood of defecation was not surprising. Time spent at the shelter positively influenced rate of urination (P=0.0005), percent of directed urinations (P=0.005), and likelihood of defecation (P=0.006), which we interpret as resulting from the dogs becoming increasingly familiar and more comfortable with us. Our findings regarding body size and urinary behavior support the hypothesis that small dogs communicate more frequently via scent marking than larger dogs. Body size is known to influence visual and auditory communication in mammals, and our data show that body size also influences chemical communication. Finally, our results provide context for problematic marking behaviors in the home.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Auditory communication ; Body size ; Canis lupus ; Chemical communication ; Communication ; Defecation ; Dog ; Dogs ; Females ; Gender aspects ; Males ; Marking ; Marking behavior ; Morphology ; Scent marking ; Scent marking behavior ; Sensory integration ; Sex ; Sex differences ; Shelter ; Shelters ; Social factors ; Social interactions ; Studies ; Urination ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Applied animal behaviour science, 2017-01, Vol.186, p.49-55</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-edb13a7cf4b4eb3cf00c704482005846febe507689814d5fbaa5cf6e62921e7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-edb13a7cf4b4eb3cf00c704482005846febe507689814d5fbaa5cf6e62921e7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bemis, Katherine E.</creatorcontrib><title>Scent marking in shelter dogs: Effects of body size</title><title>Applied animal behaviour science</title><description>•Scent marking allows communication without direct interaction.•Most evidence indicates more frequent marking by more competitive individuals.•We scored scent-marking behavior of 281 shelter dogs that varied in body size.•Small dogs urinated at higher rates and directed more urinations than did large dogs.•We suggest small dogs prefer scent marking because direct interactions are risky. Placing scent marks in the environment allows individuals to transfer information without direct interactions. Given that body size often indicates competitive ability, small individuals may preferentially communicate via scent marking because direct social interactions are potentially costly. However, most evidence indicates a positive relationship between competitive ability and frequency of scent marking. Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) exhibit extreme morphological variation, which allowed us to examine whether scent-marking behavior varied with body size in shelter dogs. We observed 281 dogs on 20-min walks and recorded total urinations, urinations directed at targets in the environment, and defecations. Some dogs were walked once and others multiple times (total walks, 619). We found that size class influenced rate of urination (P=0.002): small dogs urinated at higher rates (0.36 urinations per min) than both medium (0.26) and large dogs (0.24). There was a tendency for size class to influence percent of directed urinations (P=0.057): small dogs directed more of their urinations at targets in the environment (72%) than did large dogs (60%). Consistent with previous reports, we found that males urinated at higher rates (0.41) than females (0.18; P&lt;0.0001), and directed more of their urinations (males, 87%; females, 45%; P&lt;0.0001). Body size and sex did not influence likelihood of defecation during a walk. Defecation is thought to play a less important role than urination in scent marking in dogs, so the absence of size and sex differences in likelihood of defecation was not surprising. Time spent at the shelter positively influenced rate of urination (P=0.0005), percent of directed urinations (P=0.005), and likelihood of defecation (P=0.006), which we interpret as resulting from the dogs becoming increasingly familiar and more comfortable with us. Our findings regarding body size and urinary behavior support the hypothesis that small dogs communicate more frequently via scent marking than larger dogs. Body size is known to influence visual and auditory communication in mammals, and our data show that body size also influences chemical communication. Finally, our results provide context for problematic marking behaviors in the home.</description><subject>Auditory communication</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Canis lupus</subject><subject>Chemical communication</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Defecation</subject><subject>Dog</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marking</subject><subject>Marking behavior</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Scent marking</subject><subject>Scent marking behavior</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Shelter</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Urination</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0168-1591</issn><issn>1872-9045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8gSGzYJntjOgxWoKg-pEgtgbSXOuDikcbFTpPL1uCps2LAajebembmHkHNgKTDIr7q0Xq_7erCrNIt9CpAyBgdkAmWRJRUT8pBM4qBMQFZwTE5C6BhjkgObEP6scRjpqvbvdlhSO9Dwhv2InrZuGa7p3BjUY6DO0Ma1WxrsF56SI1P3Ac9-6pS83s1fZg_J4un-cXa7SDQv-Jhg2wCvC21EI7Dh2jCmCyZEmcXjpcgNNihZkZdVCaKVpqlrqU2OeVZlgAXyKbnc711797HBMKqVDRr7mBXdJigoZSVKKVkepRd_pJ3b-CF-p6DiGVSi4BBV-V6lvQvBo1Frb2P0rQKmdixVp35Zqh1LBaAiy2i82Rsxxv206FXQFgeNrfURj2qd_W_FN12xfqk</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>McGuire, Betty</creator><creator>Bemis, Katherine E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Scent marking in shelter dogs: Effects of body size</title><author>McGuire, Betty ; Bemis, Katherine E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-edb13a7cf4b4eb3cf00c704482005846febe507689814d5fbaa5cf6e62921e7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Auditory communication</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Canis lupus</topic><topic>Chemical communication</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Defecation</topic><topic>Dog</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marking</topic><topic>Marking behavior</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Scent marking</topic><topic>Scent marking behavior</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Shelter</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Urination</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bemis, Katherine E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGuire, Betty</au><au>Bemis, Katherine E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scent marking in shelter dogs: Effects of body size</atitle><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>49</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>49-55</pages><issn>0168-1591</issn><eissn>1872-9045</eissn><abstract>•Scent marking allows communication without direct interaction.•Most evidence indicates more frequent marking by more competitive individuals.•We scored scent-marking behavior of 281 shelter dogs that varied in body size.•Small dogs urinated at higher rates and directed more urinations than did large dogs.•We suggest small dogs prefer scent marking because direct interactions are risky. Placing scent marks in the environment allows individuals to transfer information without direct interactions. Given that body size often indicates competitive ability, small individuals may preferentially communicate via scent marking because direct social interactions are potentially costly. However, most evidence indicates a positive relationship between competitive ability and frequency of scent marking. Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) exhibit extreme morphological variation, which allowed us to examine whether scent-marking behavior varied with body size in shelter dogs. We observed 281 dogs on 20-min walks and recorded total urinations, urinations directed at targets in the environment, and defecations. Some dogs were walked once and others multiple times (total walks, 619). We found that size class influenced rate of urination (P=0.002): small dogs urinated at higher rates (0.36 urinations per min) than both medium (0.26) and large dogs (0.24). There was a tendency for size class to influence percent of directed urinations (P=0.057): small dogs directed more of their urinations at targets in the environment (72%) than did large dogs (60%). Consistent with previous reports, we found that males urinated at higher rates (0.41) than females (0.18; P&lt;0.0001), and directed more of their urinations (males, 87%; females, 45%; P&lt;0.0001). Body size and sex did not influence likelihood of defecation during a walk. Defecation is thought to play a less important role than urination in scent marking in dogs, so the absence of size and sex differences in likelihood of defecation was not surprising. Time spent at the shelter positively influenced rate of urination (P=0.0005), percent of directed urinations (P=0.005), and likelihood of defecation (P=0.006), which we interpret as resulting from the dogs becoming increasingly familiar and more comfortable with us. Our findings regarding body size and urinary behavior support the hypothesis that small dogs communicate more frequently via scent marking than larger dogs. Body size is known to influence visual and auditory communication in mammals, and our data show that body size also influences chemical communication. Finally, our results provide context for problematic marking behaviors in the home.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1591
ispartof Applied animal behaviour science, 2017-01, Vol.186, p.49-55
issn 0168-1591
1872-9045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859485506
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Auditory communication
Body size
Canis lupus
Chemical communication
Communication
Defecation
Dog
Dogs
Females
Gender aspects
Males
Marking
Marking behavior
Morphology
Scent marking
Scent marking behavior
Sensory integration
Sex
Sex differences
Shelter
Shelters
Social factors
Social interactions
Studies
Urination
Urine
title Scent marking in shelter dogs: Effects of body size
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scent%20marking%20in%20shelter%20dogs:%20Effects%20of%20body%20size&rft.jtitle=Applied%20animal%20behaviour%20science&rft.au=McGuire,%20Betty&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=49-55&rft.issn=0168-1591&rft.eissn=1872-9045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1932194731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932194731&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168159116303173&rfr_iscdi=true