Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results

Homogeneously reprocessed combined GPS/GLONASS 1- and 3-day solutions from 1994 to 2013, generated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) in the frame of the second reprocessing campaign REPRO-2 of the International GNSS Service, as well as GPS- and GLONASS-only 1- and 3-day solution...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geodesy 2016-04, Vol.90 (4), p.365-378
Hauptverfasser: Lutz, Simon, Meindl, Michael, Steigenberger, Peter, Beutler, Gerhard, Sośnica, Krzysztof, Schaer, Stefan, Dach, Rolf, Arnold, Daniel, Thaller, Daniela, Jäggi, Adrian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 378
container_issue 4
container_start_page 365
container_title Journal of geodesy
container_volume 90
creator Lutz, Simon
Meindl, Michael
Steigenberger, Peter
Beutler, Gerhard
Sośnica, Krzysztof
Schaer, Stefan
Dach, Rolf
Arnold, Daniel
Thaller, Daniela
Jäggi, Adrian
description Homogeneously reprocessed combined GPS/GLONASS 1- and 3-day solutions from 1994 to 2013, generated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) in the frame of the second reprocessing campaign REPRO-2 of the International GNSS Service, as well as GPS- and GLONASS-only 1- and 3-day solutions for the years 2009 to 2011 are analyzed to assess the impact of the arc length on the estimated Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP, namely polar motion and length of day), on the geocenter, and on the orbits. The conventional CODE 3-day solutions assume continuity of orbits, polar motion components, and of other parameters at the day boundaries. An experimental 3-day solution, which assumes continuity of the orbits, but independence from day to day for all other parameters, as well as a non-overlapping 3-day solution, is included into our analysis. The time series of EOPs, geocenter coordinates, and orbit misclosures, are analyzed. The long-arc solutions were found to be superior to the 1-day solutions: the RMS values of EOP and geocenter series are typically reduced between 10 and 40 %, except for the polar motion rates, where RMS reductions by factors of 2–3 with respect to the 1-day solutions are achieved for the overlapping and the non-overlapping 3-day solutions. In the low-frequency part of the spectrum, the reduction is even more important. The better performance of the orbits of 3-day solutions with respect to 1-day solutions is also confirmed by the validation with satellite laser ranging.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00190-015-0878-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859481364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859481364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-1dcef10ce5774541d71add0e5bd79c747f27069798c25c659d4ed0831eb70c003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQRy0EEqXwAdgssbAY7hI7F4-ogrZSBUNhtlzH6R-lSbGTod-elDAgJKZb3vvp9Bi7RXhAAHqMAKhBACoBOeUCz9gIZZoITLU8ZyPQUgsilJfsKsZdT5PKsxHD-f5gXcubkrcbz21wvPL1ut3wpubT1-WS29pWx7iNPPjYVW28ZhelraK_-blj9vHy_D6ZicXbdD55WgiX6qQVWDhfIjiviKSSWBDaogCvVgVpR5LKhCDTpHOXKJcpXUhfQJ6iXxE4gHTM7ofdQ2g-Ox9bs99G56vK1r7posFcaZljmskevfuD7pou9H-fqEwlktQ3hQPlQhNj8KU5hO3ehqNBMKeIZoho-ojmFNFg7ySDE3u2Xvvwa_lf6Qvml3GW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865247564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lutz, Simon ; Meindl, Michael ; Steigenberger, Peter ; Beutler, Gerhard ; Sośnica, Krzysztof ; Schaer, Stefan ; Dach, Rolf ; Arnold, Daniel ; Thaller, Daniela ; Jäggi, Adrian</creator><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Simon ; Meindl, Michael ; Steigenberger, Peter ; Beutler, Gerhard ; Sośnica, Krzysztof ; Schaer, Stefan ; Dach, Rolf ; Arnold, Daniel ; Thaller, Daniela ; Jäggi, Adrian</creatorcontrib><description>Homogeneously reprocessed combined GPS/GLONASS 1- and 3-day solutions from 1994 to 2013, generated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) in the frame of the second reprocessing campaign REPRO-2 of the International GNSS Service, as well as GPS- and GLONASS-only 1- and 3-day solutions for the years 2009 to 2011 are analyzed to assess the impact of the arc length on the estimated Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP, namely polar motion and length of day), on the geocenter, and on the orbits. The conventional CODE 3-day solutions assume continuity of orbits, polar motion components, and of other parameters at the day boundaries. An experimental 3-day solution, which assumes continuity of the orbits, but independence from day to day for all other parameters, as well as a non-overlapping 3-day solution, is included into our analysis. The time series of EOPs, geocenter coordinates, and orbit misclosures, are analyzed. The long-arc solutions were found to be superior to the 1-day solutions: the RMS values of EOP and geocenter series are typically reduced between 10 and 40 %, except for the polar motion rates, where RMS reductions by factors of 2–3 with respect to the 1-day solutions are achieved for the overlapping and the non-overlapping 3-day solutions. In the low-frequency part of the spectrum, the reduction is even more important. The better performance of the orbits of 3-day solutions with respect to 1-day solutions is also confirmed by the validation with satellite laser ranging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00190-015-0878-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geodetics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>Journal of geodesy, 2016-04, Vol.90 (4), p.365-378</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>Journal of Geodesy is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-1dcef10ce5774541d71add0e5bd79c747f27069798c25c659d4ed0831eb70c003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-1dcef10ce5774541d71add0e5bd79c747f27069798c25c659d4ed0831eb70c003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00190-015-0878-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00190-015-0878-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meindl, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steigenberger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sośnica, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dach, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaller, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäggi, Adrian</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results</title><title>Journal of geodesy</title><addtitle>J Geod</addtitle><description>Homogeneously reprocessed combined GPS/GLONASS 1- and 3-day solutions from 1994 to 2013, generated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) in the frame of the second reprocessing campaign REPRO-2 of the International GNSS Service, as well as GPS- and GLONASS-only 1- and 3-day solutions for the years 2009 to 2011 are analyzed to assess the impact of the arc length on the estimated Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP, namely polar motion and length of day), on the geocenter, and on the orbits. The conventional CODE 3-day solutions assume continuity of orbits, polar motion components, and of other parameters at the day boundaries. An experimental 3-day solution, which assumes continuity of the orbits, but independence from day to day for all other parameters, as well as a non-overlapping 3-day solution, is included into our analysis. The time series of EOPs, geocenter coordinates, and orbit misclosures, are analyzed. The long-arc solutions were found to be superior to the 1-day solutions: the RMS values of EOP and geocenter series are typically reduced between 10 and 40 %, except for the polar motion rates, where RMS reductions by factors of 2–3 with respect to the 1-day solutions are achieved for the overlapping and the non-overlapping 3-day solutions. In the low-frequency part of the spectrum, the reduction is even more important. The better performance of the orbits of 3-day solutions with respect to 1-day solutions is also confirmed by the validation with satellite laser ranging.</description><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geodetics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>0949-7714</issn><issn>1432-1394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQRy0EEqXwAdgssbAY7hI7F4-ogrZSBUNhtlzH6R-lSbGTod-elDAgJKZb3vvp9Bi7RXhAAHqMAKhBACoBOeUCz9gIZZoITLU8ZyPQUgsilJfsKsZdT5PKsxHD-f5gXcubkrcbz21wvPL1ut3wpubT1-WS29pWx7iNPPjYVW28ZhelraK_-blj9vHy_D6ZicXbdD55WgiX6qQVWDhfIjiviKSSWBDaogCvVgVpR5LKhCDTpHOXKJcpXUhfQJ6iXxE4gHTM7ofdQ2g-Ox9bs99G56vK1r7posFcaZljmskevfuD7pou9H-fqEwlktQ3hQPlQhNj8KU5hO3ehqNBMKeIZoho-ojmFNFg7ySDE3u2Xvvwa_lf6Qvml3GW</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Lutz, Simon</creator><creator>Meindl, Michael</creator><creator>Steigenberger, Peter</creator><creator>Beutler, Gerhard</creator><creator>Sośnica, Krzysztof</creator><creator>Schaer, Stefan</creator><creator>Dach, Rolf</creator><creator>Arnold, Daniel</creator><creator>Thaller, Daniela</creator><creator>Jäggi, Adrian</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results</title><author>Lutz, Simon ; Meindl, Michael ; Steigenberger, Peter ; Beutler, Gerhard ; Sośnica, Krzysztof ; Schaer, Stefan ; Dach, Rolf ; Arnold, Daniel ; Thaller, Daniela ; Jäggi, Adrian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-1dcef10ce5774541d71add0e5bd79c747f27069798c25c659d4ed0831eb70c003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geodetics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meindl, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steigenberger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sośnica, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dach, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaller, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäggi, Adrian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lutz, Simon</au><au>Meindl, Michael</au><au>Steigenberger, Peter</au><au>Beutler, Gerhard</au><au>Sośnica, Krzysztof</au><au>Schaer, Stefan</au><au>Dach, Rolf</au><au>Arnold, Daniel</au><au>Thaller, Daniela</au><au>Jäggi, Adrian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle><stitle>J Geod</stitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>365-378</pages><issn>0949-7714</issn><eissn>1432-1394</eissn><abstract>Homogeneously reprocessed combined GPS/GLONASS 1- and 3-day solutions from 1994 to 2013, generated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) in the frame of the second reprocessing campaign REPRO-2 of the International GNSS Service, as well as GPS- and GLONASS-only 1- and 3-day solutions for the years 2009 to 2011 are analyzed to assess the impact of the arc length on the estimated Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP, namely polar motion and length of day), on the geocenter, and on the orbits. The conventional CODE 3-day solutions assume continuity of orbits, polar motion components, and of other parameters at the day boundaries. An experimental 3-day solution, which assumes continuity of the orbits, but independence from day to day for all other parameters, as well as a non-overlapping 3-day solution, is included into our analysis. The time series of EOPs, geocenter coordinates, and orbit misclosures, are analyzed. The long-arc solutions were found to be superior to the 1-day solutions: the RMS values of EOP and geocenter series are typically reduced between 10 and 40 %, except for the polar motion rates, where RMS reductions by factors of 2–3 with respect to the 1-day solutions are achieved for the overlapping and the non-overlapping 3-day solutions. In the low-frequency part of the spectrum, the reduction is even more important. The better performance of the orbits of 3-day solutions with respect to 1-day solutions is also confirmed by the validation with satellite laser ranging.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00190-015-0878-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-7714
ispartof Journal of geodesy, 2016-04, Vol.90 (4), p.365-378
issn 0949-7714
1432-1394
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859481364
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geodetics
Geophysics/Geodesy
Global positioning systems
GPS
Original Article
title Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A42%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20arc%20length%20on%20GNSS%20analysis%20results&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geodesy&rft.au=Lutz,%20Simon&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=365-378&rft.issn=0949-7714&rft.eissn=1432-1394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00190-015-0878-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859481364%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865247564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true