Impacts of willow and miscanthus bioenergy buffers on biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum
In this article, the belowground and aboveground biomass production in bioenergy buffers and biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum was assessed. In a sandy loam soil with shallow groundwater, bioenergy buffers of miscanthus and willow (5 and 10 m wide) were planted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology. Bioenergy 2017-01, Vol.9 (1), p.246-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Global change biology. Bioenergy |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Ferrarini, Andrea Fornasier, Flavio Serra, Paolo Ferrari, Federico Trevisan, Marco Amaducci, Stefano |
description | In this article, the belowground and aboveground biomass production in bioenergy buffers and biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum was assessed. In a sandy loam soil with shallow groundwater, bioenergy buffers of miscanthus and willow (5 and 10 m wide) were planted along a ditch of an agricultural field (AF) located in the Po valley (Italy). Mineral N forms and dissolved organic C (DOC) were monitored monthly over an 18‐month period in groundwater before and after the bioenergy buffers. Soil samples were measured for inorganic N, DOC, microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), and potential nitrate reductase activity (NRA). The results indicated that bioenergy buffers are able to efficiently remove from groundwater the incoming NO3‐N (62% – 5 m and 80% – 10 m). NO3‐N removal rate was higher when nitrate input from AF increased due to N fertilization. Willow performed better than miscanthus in terms of biomass production (17 Mg DM ha−1 yr−1), fine root biomass (5.3 Mg ha−1) and N removal via harvesting (73 kg N ha−1). The negative nonlinear relationship found between NO3‐N and DOC along the soil–groundwater continuum from AF to bioenergy buffers indicates that DOC:NO3‐N ratio is an important controlling factor for promoting denitrification in bioenergy buffers. Bioenergy buffers promoted soil microbial functioning as they stimulated plant–microbial linkages by increasing the easily available C sources for microorganisms (as DOC). First, willow and miscanthus promoted high rates of biological removal of nitrate (NRA) along the soil profile. Second, rhizosphere processes activated the soil microbial community leading to significant increases in MBC and microbial N immobilization. Herbaceous and woody bioenergy crops have been confirmed as providing good environmental performances when cultivated as bioenergy buffers by mitigating the disservices of agricultural activities such as groundwater N pollution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcbb.12340 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859475115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290123977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-7487cb129814756d48915f240b57da5ffa5636c8bb7300e520aaa4152625f3c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFOwzAMhisEEmNw4QkicUFIHUnbNO2RTTAmTXCBc5SmTtepTUbSMu0E78Ab8iSkDC4c8MWW9dn67T8IzgmeEB_XlSyKCYniBB8EI8IoCwnD7PC3TvP4ODhxbo1xSlOSj4K3RbsRsnPIKLStm8ZskdAlamsnhe5WvUNFbUCDrXao6JUC61E9NCswcgVtLUWDHpCF1rz6amONBOfAIdEYXaFuBciZuvl8_6is6XW5FR1YJI3uat337WlwpETj4Ownj4Pnu9un2X24fJwvZjfLUCYxwyFLMiYLEuUZSRhNyyTLCVVRggvKSkGVEjSNU5kVBYsxBhphIURCaJRGVMUyi8fB5X6vF_jSg-v4cCI0jdBgesdJRnO_mRDq0Ys_6Nr0Vnt1PIpy7L-bM-apqz0lrXHOguIbW7fC7jjBfPCCD17wby88TPawfzHs_iH5fDad7me-AF0Kjdo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290123977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of willow and miscanthus bioenergy buffers on biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ferrarini, Andrea ; Fornasier, Flavio ; Serra, Paolo ; Ferrari, Federico ; Trevisan, Marco ; Amaducci, Stefano</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrarini, Andrea ; Fornasier, Flavio ; Serra, Paolo ; Ferrari, Federico ; Trevisan, Marco ; Amaducci, Stefano</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, the belowground and aboveground biomass production in bioenergy buffers and biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum was assessed. In a sandy loam soil with shallow groundwater, bioenergy buffers of miscanthus and willow (5 and 10 m wide) were planted along a ditch of an agricultural field (AF) located in the Po valley (Italy). Mineral N forms and dissolved organic C (DOC) were monitored monthly over an 18‐month period in groundwater before and after the bioenergy buffers. Soil samples were measured for inorganic N, DOC, microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), and potential nitrate reductase activity (NRA). The results indicated that bioenergy buffers are able to efficiently remove from groundwater the incoming NO3‐N (62% – 5 m and 80% – 10 m). NO3‐N removal rate was higher when nitrate input from AF increased due to N fertilization. Willow performed better than miscanthus in terms of biomass production (17 Mg DM ha−1 yr−1), fine root biomass (5.3 Mg ha−1) and N removal via harvesting (73 kg N ha−1). The negative nonlinear relationship found between NO3‐N and DOC along the soil–groundwater continuum from AF to bioenergy buffers indicates that DOC:NO3‐N ratio is an important controlling factor for promoting denitrification in bioenergy buffers. Bioenergy buffers promoted soil microbial functioning as they stimulated plant–microbial linkages by increasing the easily available C sources for microorganisms (as DOC). First, willow and miscanthus promoted high rates of biological removal of nitrate (NRA) along the soil profile. Second, rhizosphere processes activated the soil microbial community leading to significant increases in MBC and microbial N immobilization. Herbaceous and woody bioenergy crops have been confirmed as providing good environmental performances when cultivated as bioenergy buffers by mitigating the disservices of agricultural activities such as groundwater N pollution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-1693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-1707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; bioenergy buffers ; Biogeochemistry ; Biomass ; biomass production ; Buffers ; Crops ; Denitrification ; dissolved organic C ; Dissolved organic carbon ; ecological stoichiometry ; Ecosystems ; Environmental performance ; Experiments ; Fertilization ; fine root biomass ; Food ; Groundwater ; Groundwater pollution ; groundwater quality ; Harvesting ; Immobilization ; Loam ; Loam soils ; Microorganisms ; Miscanthus ; Nitrate reductase ; Nitrate removal ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen removal ; Reductases ; Renewable energy ; Rhizosphere ; Sandy loam ; Sandy soils ; soil microbial biomass ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil profiles ; Soil properties ; Soils ; Water quality ; Willow</subject><ispartof>Global change biology. Bioenergy, 2017-01, Vol.9 (1), p.246-261</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-7487cb129814756d48915f240b57da5ffa5636c8bb7300e520aaa4152625f3c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-7487cb129814756d48915f240b57da5ffa5636c8bb7300e520aaa4152625f3c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcbb.12340$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcbb.12340$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrarini, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornasier, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaducci, Stefano</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of willow and miscanthus bioenergy buffers on biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum</title><title>Global change biology. Bioenergy</title><description>In this article, the belowground and aboveground biomass production in bioenergy buffers and biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum was assessed. In a sandy loam soil with shallow groundwater, bioenergy buffers of miscanthus and willow (5 and 10 m wide) were planted along a ditch of an agricultural field (AF) located in the Po valley (Italy). Mineral N forms and dissolved organic C (DOC) were monitored monthly over an 18‐month period in groundwater before and after the bioenergy buffers. Soil samples were measured for inorganic N, DOC, microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), and potential nitrate reductase activity (NRA). The results indicated that bioenergy buffers are able to efficiently remove from groundwater the incoming NO3‐N (62% – 5 m and 80% – 10 m). NO3‐N removal rate was higher when nitrate input from AF increased due to N fertilization. Willow performed better than miscanthus in terms of biomass production (17 Mg DM ha−1 yr−1), fine root biomass (5.3 Mg ha−1) and N removal via harvesting (73 kg N ha−1). The negative nonlinear relationship found between NO3‐N and DOC along the soil–groundwater continuum from AF to bioenergy buffers indicates that DOC:NO3‐N ratio is an important controlling factor for promoting denitrification in bioenergy buffers. Bioenergy buffers promoted soil microbial functioning as they stimulated plant–microbial linkages by increasing the easily available C sources for microorganisms (as DOC). First, willow and miscanthus promoted high rates of biological removal of nitrate (NRA) along the soil profile. Second, rhizosphere processes activated the soil microbial community leading to significant increases in MBC and microbial N immobilization. Herbaceous and woody bioenergy crops have been confirmed as providing good environmental performances when cultivated as bioenergy buffers by mitigating the disservices of agricultural activities such as groundwater N pollution.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>bioenergy buffers</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>biomass production</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>dissolved organic C</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>ecological stoichiometry</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>fine root biomass</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>groundwater quality</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Loam</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Miscanthus</subject><subject>Nitrate reductase</subject><subject>Nitrate removal</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Reductases</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>Sandy loam</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>soil microbial biomass</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Willow</subject><issn>1757-1693</issn><issn>1757-1707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFOwzAMhisEEmNw4QkicUFIHUnbNO2RTTAmTXCBc5SmTtepTUbSMu0E78Ab8iSkDC4c8MWW9dn67T8IzgmeEB_XlSyKCYniBB8EI8IoCwnD7PC3TvP4ODhxbo1xSlOSj4K3RbsRsnPIKLStm8ZskdAlamsnhe5WvUNFbUCDrXao6JUC61E9NCswcgVtLUWDHpCF1rz6amONBOfAIdEYXaFuBciZuvl8_6is6XW5FR1YJI3uat337WlwpETj4Ownj4Pnu9un2X24fJwvZjfLUCYxwyFLMiYLEuUZSRhNyyTLCVVRggvKSkGVEjSNU5kVBYsxBhphIURCaJRGVMUyi8fB5X6vF_jSg-v4cCI0jdBgesdJRnO_mRDq0Ys_6Nr0Vnt1PIpy7L-bM-apqz0lrXHOguIbW7fC7jjBfPCCD17wby88TPawfzHs_iH5fDad7me-AF0Kjdo</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Ferrarini, Andrea</creator><creator>Fornasier, Flavio</creator><creator>Serra, Paolo</creator><creator>Ferrari, Federico</creator><creator>Trevisan, Marco</creator><creator>Amaducci, Stefano</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Impacts of willow and miscanthus bioenergy buffers on biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum</title><author>Ferrarini, Andrea ; Fornasier, Flavio ; Serra, Paolo ; Ferrari, Federico ; Trevisan, Marco ; Amaducci, Stefano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-7487cb129814756d48915f240b57da5ffa5636c8bb7300e520aaa4152625f3c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>bioenergy buffers</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>biomass production</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>dissolved organic C</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>ecological stoichiometry</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>fine root biomass</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>groundwater quality</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Loam</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Miscanthus</topic><topic>Nitrate reductase</topic><topic>Nitrate removal</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Reductases</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>Sandy loam</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>soil microbial biomass</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Willow</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrarini, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornasier, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaducci, Stefano</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global change biology. Bioenergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrarini, Andrea</au><au>Fornasier, Flavio</au><au>Serra, Paolo</au><au>Ferrari, Federico</au><au>Trevisan, Marco</au><au>Amaducci, Stefano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of willow and miscanthus bioenergy buffers on biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology. Bioenergy</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>246-261</pages><issn>1757-1693</issn><eissn>1757-1707</eissn><abstract>In this article, the belowground and aboveground biomass production in bioenergy buffers and biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum was assessed. In a sandy loam soil with shallow groundwater, bioenergy buffers of miscanthus and willow (5 and 10 m wide) were planted along a ditch of an agricultural field (AF) located in the Po valley (Italy). Mineral N forms and dissolved organic C (DOC) were monitored monthly over an 18‐month period in groundwater before and after the bioenergy buffers. Soil samples were measured for inorganic N, DOC, microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), and potential nitrate reductase activity (NRA). The results indicated that bioenergy buffers are able to efficiently remove from groundwater the incoming NO3‐N (62% – 5 m and 80% – 10 m). NO3‐N removal rate was higher when nitrate input from AF increased due to N fertilization. Willow performed better than miscanthus in terms of biomass production (17 Mg DM ha−1 yr−1), fine root biomass (5.3 Mg ha−1) and N removal via harvesting (73 kg N ha−1). The negative nonlinear relationship found between NO3‐N and DOC along the soil–groundwater continuum from AF to bioenergy buffers indicates that DOC:NO3‐N ratio is an important controlling factor for promoting denitrification in bioenergy buffers. Bioenergy buffers promoted soil microbial functioning as they stimulated plant–microbial linkages by increasing the easily available C sources for microorganisms (as DOC). First, willow and miscanthus promoted high rates of biological removal of nitrate (NRA) along the soil profile. Second, rhizosphere processes activated the soil microbial community leading to significant increases in MBC and microbial N immobilization. Herbaceous and woody bioenergy crops have been confirmed as providing good environmental performances when cultivated as bioenergy buffers by mitigating the disservices of agricultural activities such as groundwater N pollution.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/gcbb.12340</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-1693 |
ispartof | Global change biology. Bioenergy, 2017-01, Vol.9 (1), p.246-261 |
issn | 1757-1693 1757-1707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859475115 |
source | Wiley Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural land bioenergy buffers Biogeochemistry Biomass biomass production Buffers Crops Denitrification dissolved organic C Dissolved organic carbon ecological stoichiometry Ecosystems Environmental performance Experiments Fertilization fine root biomass Food Groundwater Groundwater pollution groundwater quality Harvesting Immobilization Loam Loam soils Microorganisms Miscanthus Nitrate reductase Nitrate removal Nitrates Nitrogen removal Reductases Renewable energy Rhizosphere Sandy loam Sandy soils soil microbial biomass Soil microorganisms Soil profiles Soil properties Soils Water quality Willow |
title | Impacts of willow and miscanthus bioenergy buffers on biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20willow%20and%20miscanthus%20bioenergy%20buffers%20on%20biogeochemical%20N%20removal%20processes%20along%20the%20soil%E2%80%93groundwater%20continuum&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology.%20Bioenergy&rft.au=Ferrarini,%20Andrea&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=246-261&rft.issn=1757-1693&rft.eissn=1757-1707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcbb.12340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290123977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290123977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |