What Is the Clinical Impact of Macrolide Resistance?
Respiratory tract infections are treated empirically. Treatment is based on the likely pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility. The most common respiratory tract pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the United States, approximately 25% to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to erythromycin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current infectious disease reports 2004, Vol.6 (1), p.7-12 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Current infectious disease reports |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Lonks, John R. |
description | Respiratory tract infections are treated empirically. Treatment is based on the likely pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility. The most common respiratory tract pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the United States, approximately 25% to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to erythromycin and other macrolides. There are two mechanisms of resistance: ribosomal methylation that causes high-level resistance, and an efflux pump that causes low-level resistance. Macrolides are ineffective in animal models that use pneumococcal isolates with the methylase- or efflux-mediated resistance mechanisms. There are many case reports that describe clinical failure and isolation of a macrolide-resistant pneumococcus while a patient receives macrolide treatment. Two recent studies that included macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant pneumococci showed that breakthrough bacteremia in patients receiving macrolide treatment occurred only with macrolide-resistant isolates. Study of bacteremic disease ensures the pathogenic role of the pneumococcus; however, it underestimates the true clinical impact of macrolide resistance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11908-004-0018-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859445801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859445801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-1a0956325b9d8d0fd44a9a4a82005f3cfbcf3429c9b66628aa09c223569559e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBcJnrxEM_na5CRS_ChUBFE8hmw2S7fsR93sHvz3ZmlB8BAmDM-8zDwIXQK9BUqzuwhgqCaUivRAEzhCc5BcEA5CHU9_xgnXIpuhsxi3lLI0pU_RDETGU5_PkfjauAGvIh42AS_rqq28q_Gq2Tk_4K7Er873XV0VAb-HWMXBtT7cn6OT0tUxXBzqAn0-PX4sX8j67Xm1fFgTzwQMBBw1UnEmc1PogpaFEM444XRaQ5bcl7kvuWDGm1wpxbRLvGeMS2WkNEHzBbrZ5-767nsMcbBNFX2oa9eGbowWtDRCSE0hodf_0G039m3azjLKlOaaZwmCPZRuirEPpd31VeP6HwvUTkbt3qhNRu1k1E7BV4fgMW9C8TdxUMh_AUNUbZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202683837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Is the Clinical Impact of Macrolide Resistance?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lonks, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lonks, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>Respiratory tract infections are treated empirically. Treatment is based on the likely pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility. The most common respiratory tract pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the United States, approximately 25% to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to erythromycin and other macrolides. There are two mechanisms of resistance: ribosomal methylation that causes high-level resistance, and an efflux pump that causes low-level resistance. Macrolides are ineffective in animal models that use pneumococcal isolates with the methylase- or efflux-mediated resistance mechanisms. There are many case reports that describe clinical failure and isolation of a macrolide-resistant pneumococcus while a patient receives macrolide treatment. Two recent studies that included macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant pneumococci showed that breakthrough bacteremia in patients receiving macrolide treatment occurred only with macrolide-resistant isolates. Study of bacteremic disease ensures the pathogenic role of the pneumococcus; however, it underestimates the true clinical impact of macrolide resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-3847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-3146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11908-004-0018-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14733843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animal models ; Antibiotics ; Drug resistance ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Pathogens ; Pathology ; Respiratory diseases ; Respiratory tract</subject><ispartof>Current infectious disease reports, 2004, Vol.6 (1), p.7-12</ispartof><rights>Current Science Inc. 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-1a0956325b9d8d0fd44a9a4a82005f3cfbcf3429c9b66628aa09c223569559e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-1a0956325b9d8d0fd44a9a4a82005f3cfbcf3429c9b66628aa09c223569559e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14733843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lonks, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>What Is the Clinical Impact of Macrolide Resistance?</title><title>Current infectious disease reports</title><addtitle>Curr Infect Dis Rep</addtitle><description>Respiratory tract infections are treated empirically. Treatment is based on the likely pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility. The most common respiratory tract pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the United States, approximately 25% to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to erythromycin and other macrolides. There are two mechanisms of resistance: ribosomal methylation that causes high-level resistance, and an efflux pump that causes low-level resistance. Macrolides are ineffective in animal models that use pneumococcal isolates with the methylase- or efflux-mediated resistance mechanisms. There are many case reports that describe clinical failure and isolation of a macrolide-resistant pneumococcus while a patient receives macrolide treatment. Two recent studies that included macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant pneumococci showed that breakthrough bacteremia in patients receiving macrolide treatment occurred only with macrolide-resistant isolates. Study of bacteremic disease ensures the pathogenic role of the pneumococcus; however, it underestimates the true clinical impact of macrolide resistance.</description><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><issn>1523-3847</issn><issn>1534-3146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBcJnrxEM_na5CRS_ChUBFE8hmw2S7fsR93sHvz3ZmlB8BAmDM-8zDwIXQK9BUqzuwhgqCaUivRAEzhCc5BcEA5CHU9_xgnXIpuhsxi3lLI0pU_RDETGU5_PkfjauAGvIh42AS_rqq28q_Gq2Tk_4K7Er873XV0VAb-HWMXBtT7cn6OT0tUxXBzqAn0-PX4sX8j67Xm1fFgTzwQMBBw1UnEmc1PogpaFEM444XRaQ5bcl7kvuWDGm1wpxbRLvGeMS2WkNEHzBbrZ5-767nsMcbBNFX2oa9eGbowWtDRCSE0hodf_0G039m3azjLKlOaaZwmCPZRuirEPpd31VeP6HwvUTkbt3qhNRu1k1E7BV4fgMW9C8TdxUMh_AUNUbZY</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Lonks, John R.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>What Is the Clinical Impact of Macrolide Resistance?</title><author>Lonks, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-1a0956325b9d8d0fd44a9a4a82005f3cfbcf3429c9b66628aa09c223569559e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lonks, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current infectious disease reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lonks, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Is the Clinical Impact of Macrolide Resistance?</atitle><jtitle>Current infectious disease reports</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Infect Dis Rep</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>7-12</pages><issn>1523-3847</issn><eissn>1534-3146</eissn><abstract>Respiratory tract infections are treated empirically. Treatment is based on the likely pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility. The most common respiratory tract pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the United States, approximately 25% to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to erythromycin and other macrolides. There are two mechanisms of resistance: ribosomal methylation that causes high-level resistance, and an efflux pump that causes low-level resistance. Macrolides are ineffective in animal models that use pneumococcal isolates with the methylase- or efflux-mediated resistance mechanisms. There are many case reports that describe clinical failure and isolation of a macrolide-resistant pneumococcus while a patient receives macrolide treatment. Two recent studies that included macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant pneumococci showed that breakthrough bacteremia in patients receiving macrolide treatment occurred only with macrolide-resistant isolates. Study of bacteremic disease ensures the pathogenic role of the pneumococcus; however, it underestimates the true clinical impact of macrolide resistance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>14733843</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11908-004-0018-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-3847 |
ispartof | Current infectious disease reports, 2004, Vol.6 (1), p.7-12 |
issn | 1523-3847 1534-3146 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859445801 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal models Antibiotics Drug resistance Infections Infectious diseases Pathogens Pathology Respiratory diseases Respiratory tract |
title | What Is the Clinical Impact of Macrolide Resistance? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Is%20the%20Clinical%20Impact%20of%20Macrolide%20Resistance?&rft.jtitle=Current%20infectious%20disease%20reports&rft.au=Lonks,%20John%20R.&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=7-12&rft.issn=1523-3847&rft.eissn=1534-3146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11908-004-0018-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859445801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202683837&rft_id=info:pmid/14733843&rfr_iscdi=true |