A longitudinal study of screening for endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy in diabetic females
Diabetics are at high risk of developing endometrial cancer; the relative risk of endometrial cancer in diabetics is fourfold in comparison to non-diabetic controls. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the effectiveness of screening asymptomatic diabetic females in terms of the pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecological cancer 1995-09, Vol.5 (5), p.390-395 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 395 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 390 |
container_title | International journal of gynecological cancer |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | VUENTO, M. H. MAATELA, J. I. TYRKKÖ, J. E. LAIPPALA, P. J. GRÖNROOS, M. SALMI, T. A. |
description | Diabetics are at high risk of developing endometrial cancer; the relative risk of endometrial cancer in diabetics is fourfold in comparison to non-diabetic controls. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the effectiveness of screening asymptomatic diabetic females in terms of the premalignant and malignant endometrial findings, and to try to determine the optimal screening interval. In 1980–1981, a group of 462 diabetic females was identified and registered. One half of them (237) was invited to be screened. Endometrial samples were taken by using Vabra aspiration. The results of this first randomized screening in 1980–1981 have been published elsewhere. At that time 124 females participated. The remaining 225 females acted as an unscreened control group. Eight years later (1988–1989), both groups were invited to be screened. The Pistolet aspiration method was used. At this stage, group 1 (screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 78 females, and group 2 (not screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 148 females. In 85% (193/226) of the females, the uterine cavity was reached with the Pistolet instrument; 96% of the females found the pain acceptable. In the group screened twice (group 1), no pathologic lesions of the endometrium were found in the second screening. In the group screened for the first time (group 2), one female had endometrial adenocarcinoma (0.8%), one had complex hyperplasia without atypia (0.8%) and four had endometrial polyps (3.3%). In 165 cases of 193, both a cytologic and a histologic specimen were available. In 130 cases (79%) the cytology was of class I, including the one endometrial adenocarcinoma. In three cases (2%) it was of class II and in one case (1%) of class III. Endometrial biopsy by Pistolet aspiration was a method highly acceptable by the patients for examining the endometrium. However, cytologic examination was not able to show the existing endometrial adenocarcinoma. One endometrial sampling of asymptomatic diabetic females during early menopause could detect the bulk of the occult, slowly progressing lesions of the endometrium. Such screeening might be most efficient in terms of cost-benefit ratio. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05050390.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859356532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1048891X24144404</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859356532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b6573-3365d97ca971822e71bf8f319d17ba1125e7db078a80cda596d24d34e8344d443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUU1v1TAQjBCIlsJfQJZ64ZLgz9gWp6qUUlSJC0jcLCfetH4k8cNOaPPvcZRXEJyoLMu79sysd6coTgmuCOb1211FBBUl4UxVRGtRYZEX07i6f1Ic_357mmPMVak0-XZUvEhphzHWFOvnxREhQipB8HHRnKE-jDd-mp0fbY9SDhYUOpTaCDD68QZ1ISIYXRhgij5DWju2EFGz_HXb-LBPC_Ijct42MPkWdTDYHtLL4lln-wSvDudJ8fXDxZfzj-X158ur87PrsqmFZCVjtXBatlZLoigFSZpOdYxoR2RjCaECpGuwVFbh1lmha0e5YxwU49xxzk6KN5vuPoYfM6TJDD610Pd2hDAnQ5TQTNSC0Qw9_Qe6C3PM_SdDhaBSM8plRr3bUG0MKUXozD76wcbFEGxWK8zOrOM267jNaoV5sMLcZ_brQ425GcD94R5mnwF8A9yFfoKYvvfzHURzC7afbg1e3RJSlqsu1jkr8yYs094faL6H5TFfMlefLh-yLHOxyUC25KfPhVPrITvrfIR2Mi74_2yz3nSaYfeo-fwCriPN8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552793247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A longitudinal study of screening for endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy in diabetic females</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>VUENTO, M. H. ; MAATELA, J. I. ; TYRKKÖ, J. E. ; LAIPPALA, P. J. ; GRÖNROOS, M. ; SALMI, T. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>VUENTO, M. H. ; MAATELA, J. I. ; TYRKKÖ, J. E. ; LAIPPALA, P. J. ; GRÖNROOS, M. ; SALMI, T. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Diabetics are at high risk of developing endometrial cancer; the relative risk of endometrial cancer in diabetics is fourfold in comparison to non-diabetic controls. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the effectiveness of screening asymptomatic diabetic females in terms of the premalignant and malignant endometrial findings, and to try to determine the optimal screening interval. In 1980–1981, a group of 462 diabetic females was identified and registered. One half of them (237) was invited to be screened. Endometrial samples were taken by using Vabra aspiration. The results of this first randomized screening in 1980–1981 have been published elsewhere. At that time 124 females participated. The remaining 225 females acted as an unscreened control group. Eight years later (1988–1989), both groups were invited to be screened. The Pistolet aspiration method was used. At this stage, group 1 (screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 78 females, and group 2 (not screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 148 females. In 85% (193/226) of the females, the uterine cavity was reached with the Pistolet instrument; 96% of the females found the pain acceptable. In the group screened twice (group 1), no pathologic lesions of the endometrium were found in the second screening. In the group screened for the first time (group 2), one female had endometrial adenocarcinoma (0.8%), one had complex hyperplasia without atypia (0.8%) and four had endometrial polyps (3.3%). In 165 cases of 193, both a cytologic and a histologic specimen were available. In 130 cases (79%) the cytology was of class I, including the one endometrial adenocarcinoma. In three cases (2%) it was of class II and in one case (1%) of class III. Endometrial biopsy by Pistolet aspiration was a method highly acceptable by the patients for examining the endometrium. However, cytologic examination was not able to show the existing endometrial adenocarcinoma. One endometrial sampling of asymptomatic diabetic females during early menopause could detect the bulk of the occult, slowly progressing lesions of the endometrium. Such screeening might be most efficient in terms of cost-benefit ratio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-891X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05050390.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11578510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Suite 500, 5th Floor, 238 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Asymptomatic ; Biopsy ; cancer registry ; Diabetes ; endometrial biopsy ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrium ; Longitudinal studies ; Pistolet aspiration ; screening</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecological cancer, 1995-09, Vol.5 (5), p.390-395</ispartof><rights>International Gynecologic Cancer Society</rights><rights>1995 IGCS and ESGO.</rights><rights>1995 Blackwell Science Ltd.</rights><rights>International Gynecologic Cancer Society1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b6573-3365d97ca971822e71bf8f319d17ba1125e7db078a80cda596d24d34e8344d443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b6573-3365d97ca971822e71bf8f319d17ba1125e7db078a80cda596d24d34e8344d443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1525-1438.1995.05050390.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1525-1438.1995.05050390.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11578510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VUENTO, M. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAATELA, J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TYRKKÖ, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAIPPALA, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRÖNROOS, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALMI, T. A.</creatorcontrib><title>A longitudinal study of screening for endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy in diabetic females</title><title>International journal of gynecological cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><description>Diabetics are at high risk of developing endometrial cancer; the relative risk of endometrial cancer in diabetics is fourfold in comparison to non-diabetic controls. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the effectiveness of screening asymptomatic diabetic females in terms of the premalignant and malignant endometrial findings, and to try to determine the optimal screening interval. In 1980–1981, a group of 462 diabetic females was identified and registered. One half of them (237) was invited to be screened. Endometrial samples were taken by using Vabra aspiration. The results of this first randomized screening in 1980–1981 have been published elsewhere. At that time 124 females participated. The remaining 225 females acted as an unscreened control group. Eight years later (1988–1989), both groups were invited to be screened. The Pistolet aspiration method was used. At this stage, group 1 (screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 78 females, and group 2 (not screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 148 females. In 85% (193/226) of the females, the uterine cavity was reached with the Pistolet instrument; 96% of the females found the pain acceptable. In the group screened twice (group 1), no pathologic lesions of the endometrium were found in the second screening. In the group screened for the first time (group 2), one female had endometrial adenocarcinoma (0.8%), one had complex hyperplasia without atypia (0.8%) and four had endometrial polyps (3.3%). In 165 cases of 193, both a cytologic and a histologic specimen were available. In 130 cases (79%) the cytology was of class I, including the one endometrial adenocarcinoma. In three cases (2%) it was of class II and in one case (1%) of class III. Endometrial biopsy by Pistolet aspiration was a method highly acceptable by the patients for examining the endometrium. However, cytologic examination was not able to show the existing endometrial adenocarcinoma. One endometrial sampling of asymptomatic diabetic females during early menopause could detect the bulk of the occult, slowly progressing lesions of the endometrium. Such screeening might be most efficient in terms of cost-benefit ratio.</description><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>cancer registry</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>endometrial biopsy</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Pistolet aspiration</subject><subject>screening</subject><issn>1048-891X</issn><issn>1525-1438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUU1v1TAQjBCIlsJfQJZ64ZLgz9gWp6qUUlSJC0jcLCfetH4k8cNOaPPvcZRXEJyoLMu79sysd6coTgmuCOb1211FBBUl4UxVRGtRYZEX07i6f1Ic_357mmPMVak0-XZUvEhphzHWFOvnxREhQipB8HHRnKE-jDd-mp0fbY9SDhYUOpTaCDD68QZ1ISIYXRhgij5DWju2EFGz_HXb-LBPC_Ijct42MPkWdTDYHtLL4lln-wSvDudJ8fXDxZfzj-X158ur87PrsqmFZCVjtXBatlZLoigFSZpOdYxoR2RjCaECpGuwVFbh1lmha0e5YxwU49xxzk6KN5vuPoYfM6TJDD610Pd2hDAnQ5TQTNSC0Qw9_Qe6C3PM_SdDhaBSM8plRr3bUG0MKUXozD76wcbFEGxWK8zOrOM267jNaoV5sMLcZ_brQ425GcD94R5mnwF8A9yFfoKYvvfzHURzC7afbg1e3RJSlqsu1jkr8yYs094faL6H5TFfMlefLh-yLHOxyUC25KfPhVPrITvrfIR2Mi74_2yz3nSaYfeo-fwCriPN8Q</recordid><startdate>199509</startdate><enddate>199509</enddate><creator>VUENTO, M. H.</creator><creator>MAATELA, J. I.</creator><creator>TYRKKÖ, J. E.</creator><creator>LAIPPALA, P. J.</creator><creator>GRÖNROOS, M.</creator><creator>SALMI, T. A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199509</creationdate><title>A longitudinal study of screening for endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy in diabetic females</title><author>VUENTO, M. H. ; MAATELA, J. I. ; TYRKKÖ, J. E. ; LAIPPALA, P. J. ; GRÖNROOS, M. ; SALMI, T. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b6573-3365d97ca971822e71bf8f319d17ba1125e7db078a80cda596d24d34e8344d443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>cancer registry</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>endometrial biopsy</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Pistolet aspiration</topic><topic>screening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VUENTO, M. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAATELA, J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TYRKKÖ, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAIPPALA, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRÖNROOS, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALMI, T. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VUENTO, M. H.</au><au>MAATELA, J. I.</au><au>TYRKKÖ, J. E.</au><au>LAIPPALA, P. J.</au><au>GRÖNROOS, M.</au><au>SALMI, T. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A longitudinal study of screening for endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy in diabetic females</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><date>1995-09</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>390</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>390-395</pages><issn>1048-891X</issn><eissn>1525-1438</eissn><abstract>Diabetics are at high risk of developing endometrial cancer; the relative risk of endometrial cancer in diabetics is fourfold in comparison to non-diabetic controls. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the effectiveness of screening asymptomatic diabetic females in terms of the premalignant and malignant endometrial findings, and to try to determine the optimal screening interval. In 1980–1981, a group of 462 diabetic females was identified and registered. One half of them (237) was invited to be screened. Endometrial samples were taken by using Vabra aspiration. The results of this first randomized screening in 1980–1981 have been published elsewhere. At that time 124 females participated. The remaining 225 females acted as an unscreened control group. Eight years later (1988–1989), both groups were invited to be screened. The Pistolet aspiration method was used. At this stage, group 1 (screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 78 females, and group 2 (not screened in 1980–1981) consisted of 148 females. In 85% (193/226) of the females, the uterine cavity was reached with the Pistolet instrument; 96% of the females found the pain acceptable. In the group screened twice (group 1), no pathologic lesions of the endometrium were found in the second screening. In the group screened for the first time (group 2), one female had endometrial adenocarcinoma (0.8%), one had complex hyperplasia without atypia (0.8%) and four had endometrial polyps (3.3%). In 165 cases of 193, both a cytologic and a histologic specimen were available. In 130 cases (79%) the cytology was of class I, including the one endometrial adenocarcinoma. In three cases (2%) it was of class II and in one case (1%) of class III. Endometrial biopsy by Pistolet aspiration was a method highly acceptable by the patients for examining the endometrium. However, cytologic examination was not able to show the existing endometrial adenocarcinoma. One endometrial sampling of asymptomatic diabetic females during early menopause could detect the bulk of the occult, slowly progressing lesions of the endometrium. Such screeening might be most efficient in terms of cost-benefit ratio.</abstract><cop>Suite 500, 5th Floor, 238 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11578510</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05050390.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1048-891X |
ispartof | International journal of gynecological cancer, 1995-09, Vol.5 (5), p.390-395 |
issn | 1048-891X 1525-1438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859356532 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Asymptomatic Biopsy cancer registry Diabetes endometrial biopsy Endometrial cancer Endometrium Longitudinal studies Pistolet aspiration screening |
title | A longitudinal study of screening for endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy in diabetic females |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A03%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20longitudinal%20study%20of%20screening%20for%20endometrial%20cancer%20by%20endometrial%20biopsy%20in%20diabetic%20females&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecological%20cancer&rft.au=VUENTO,%20M.%20H.&rft.date=1995-09&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=390&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=390-395&rft.issn=1048-891X&rft.eissn=1525-1438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05050390.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859356532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552793247&rft_id=info:pmid/11578510&rft_els_id=S1048891X24144404&rfr_iscdi=true |