Treatment of the abdominal wall defects in an ambulatory surgical setting: our experience

Introduction: The creation of Outpatient Surgery (OPS) units has allowed to reduce the costs and the waiting lists in an efficient fashion. We describe our series of patients operated on for abdominal wall defects, a pathology suitable for ambulatory surgery. Patients and methods: Between May 1994 a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ambulatory surgery 2000-07, Vol.8 (3), p.158-158
Hauptverfasser: Flores, B., Carrasco, L., Aguayo, J.L., Moreno Egea, A., Cartagena, J., De Vicente, J.P., Liron, R., Candel, M.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue 3
container_start_page 158
container_title Ambulatory surgery
container_volume 8
creator Flores, B.
Carrasco, L.
Aguayo, J.L.
Moreno Egea, A.
Cartagena, J.
De Vicente, J.P.
Liron, R.
Candel, M.F.
description Introduction: The creation of Outpatient Surgery (OPS) units has allowed to reduce the costs and the waiting lists in an efficient fashion. We describe our series of patients operated on for abdominal wall defects, a pathology suitable for ambulatory surgery. Patients and methods: Between May 1994 and March 1998, 206 inguinal hernias, 23 femoral hernias, 47 umbilical-epigastric hernias and nine incisional hernias were operated on in an ambulatory surgical setting. The patients were selected following the selection criteria previously established (related to the patient, the environment and the surgical procedure). The average age was 45 years, and the distribution by sex, 210 men and 75 women. Spinal anesthesia was preferently performed. The surgical techniques employed were Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty and Shouldice and Bassini procedures for inguinal hernias; Lichtenstein’s plug technique for femoral hernias and simple closure or preperitoneal mesh for the middle line defects. Results: 44 patients needed readmitttance to hospital (failure of OPS), the most important causes being excessive pain, urinary retention and nausea/vomiting. There was no severe morbidity nor mortality. Conclusion: Surgery for abdominal wall defects constitutes a group of procedures suitable for efficient and low risk OPS programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0966-6532(00)00051-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859325800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966653200000512</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859325800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2109-e0649f6747a4dcd52f8cc10e0fd46a43369184fb5f553cf3a8a54102bca0191a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgHMAsTH4CaAcx6HgpE3WckFo4iVN4sA4cIrS1BlBfYykBfbv6VaEuCFZsmR_tuWPkBMG5wyYvHiCTMpIiphPAc4AQLCI75Hxb3lEDkN46xs84-KAjBikQqZJNiYvS4-6rbBuaWNp-4pU50VTuVqX9FOXJS3QomkDdTXVfVR5V-q28RsaOr9ypscCtq2rV5e06TzFrzV6h7XBI7JvdRnw-CdPyPPtzXJ-Hy0e7x7m14vIcAZZhCCTzMpZMtNJYQrBbWoMAwRbJFIncSwzliY2F1aI2NhYp1okDHhuNLCM6XhCpsPetW_eOwytqlwwWJa6xqYLiqUii7lIAXpUDKjxTQgerVp7V2m_UQzU1qTamVRbZQpA7Uwq3s-d_pzo8gqLP1ODxh64GgDsH_1w6FUwOwmF8709VTTunxPfftKFDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859325800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of the abdominal wall defects in an ambulatory surgical setting: our experience</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Flores, B. ; Carrasco, L. ; Aguayo, J.L. ; Moreno Egea, A. ; Cartagena, J. ; De Vicente, J.P. ; Liron, R. ; Candel, M.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flores, B. ; Carrasco, L. ; Aguayo, J.L. ; Moreno Egea, A. ; Cartagena, J. ; De Vicente, J.P. ; Liron, R. ; Candel, M.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The creation of Outpatient Surgery (OPS) units has allowed to reduce the costs and the waiting lists in an efficient fashion. We describe our series of patients operated on for abdominal wall defects, a pathology suitable for ambulatory surgery. Patients and methods: Between May 1994 and March 1998, 206 inguinal hernias, 23 femoral hernias, 47 umbilical-epigastric hernias and nine incisional hernias were operated on in an ambulatory surgical setting. The patients were selected following the selection criteria previously established (related to the patient, the environment and the surgical procedure). The average age was 45 years, and the distribution by sex, 210 men and 75 women. Spinal anesthesia was preferently performed. The surgical techniques employed were Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty and Shouldice and Bassini procedures for inguinal hernias; Lichtenstein’s plug technique for femoral hernias and simple closure or preperitoneal mesh for the middle line defects. Results: 44 patients needed readmitttance to hospital (failure of OPS), the most important causes being excessive pain, urinary retention and nausea/vomiting. There was no severe morbidity nor mortality. Conclusion: Surgery for abdominal wall defects constitutes a group of procedures suitable for efficient and low risk OPS programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6532</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6532(00)00051-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10856849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belgium: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Hernia ; Incisional hernia ; Outpatient surgery</subject><ispartof>Ambulatory surgery, 2000-07, Vol.8 (3), p.158-158</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2109-e0649f6747a4dcd52f8cc10e0fd46a43369184fb5f553cf3a8a54102bca0191a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10856849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flores, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguayo, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno Egea, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartagena, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vicente, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liron, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candel, M.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of the abdominal wall defects in an ambulatory surgical setting: our experience</title><title>Ambulatory surgery</title><addtitle>Ambul Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction: The creation of Outpatient Surgery (OPS) units has allowed to reduce the costs and the waiting lists in an efficient fashion. We describe our series of patients operated on for abdominal wall defects, a pathology suitable for ambulatory surgery. Patients and methods: Between May 1994 and March 1998, 206 inguinal hernias, 23 femoral hernias, 47 umbilical-epigastric hernias and nine incisional hernias were operated on in an ambulatory surgical setting. The patients were selected following the selection criteria previously established (related to the patient, the environment and the surgical procedure). The average age was 45 years, and the distribution by sex, 210 men and 75 women. Spinal anesthesia was preferently performed. The surgical techniques employed were Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty and Shouldice and Bassini procedures for inguinal hernias; Lichtenstein’s plug technique for femoral hernias and simple closure or preperitoneal mesh for the middle line defects. Results: 44 patients needed readmitttance to hospital (failure of OPS), the most important causes being excessive pain, urinary retention and nausea/vomiting. There was no severe morbidity nor mortality. Conclusion: Surgery for abdominal wall defects constitutes a group of procedures suitable for efficient and low risk OPS programs.</description><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Incisional hernia</subject><subject>Outpatient surgery</subject><issn>0966-6532</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgHMAsTH4CaAcx6HgpE3WckFo4iVN4sA4cIrS1BlBfYykBfbv6VaEuCFZsmR_tuWPkBMG5wyYvHiCTMpIiphPAc4AQLCI75Hxb3lEDkN46xs84-KAjBikQqZJNiYvS4-6rbBuaWNp-4pU50VTuVqX9FOXJS3QomkDdTXVfVR5V-q28RsaOr9ypscCtq2rV5e06TzFrzV6h7XBI7JvdRnw-CdPyPPtzXJ-Hy0e7x7m14vIcAZZhCCTzMpZMtNJYQrBbWoMAwRbJFIncSwzliY2F1aI2NhYp1okDHhuNLCM6XhCpsPetW_eOwytqlwwWJa6xqYLiqUii7lIAXpUDKjxTQgerVp7V2m_UQzU1qTamVRbZQpA7Uwq3s-d_pzo8gqLP1ODxh64GgDsH_1w6FUwOwmF8709VTTunxPfftKFDg</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Flores, B.</creator><creator>Carrasco, L.</creator><creator>Aguayo, J.L.</creator><creator>Moreno Egea, A.</creator><creator>Cartagena, J.</creator><creator>De Vicente, J.P.</creator><creator>Liron, R.</creator><creator>Candel, M.F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Treatment of the abdominal wall defects in an ambulatory surgical setting: our experience</title><author>Flores, B. ; Carrasco, L. ; Aguayo, J.L. ; Moreno Egea, A. ; Cartagena, J. ; De Vicente, J.P. ; Liron, R. ; Candel, M.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2109-e0649f6747a4dcd52f8cc10e0fd46a43369184fb5f553cf3a8a54102bca0191a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Incisional hernia</topic><topic>Outpatient surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flores, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguayo, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno Egea, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartagena, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vicente, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liron, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candel, M.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ambulatory surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flores, B.</au><au>Carrasco, L.</au><au>Aguayo, J.L.</au><au>Moreno Egea, A.</au><au>Cartagena, J.</au><au>De Vicente, J.P.</au><au>Liron, R.</au><au>Candel, M.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of the abdominal wall defects in an ambulatory surgical setting: our experience</atitle><jtitle>Ambulatory surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ambul Surg</addtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>158-158</pages><issn>0966-6532</issn><abstract>Introduction: The creation of Outpatient Surgery (OPS) units has allowed to reduce the costs and the waiting lists in an efficient fashion. We describe our series of patients operated on for abdominal wall defects, a pathology suitable for ambulatory surgery. Patients and methods: Between May 1994 and March 1998, 206 inguinal hernias, 23 femoral hernias, 47 umbilical-epigastric hernias and nine incisional hernias were operated on in an ambulatory surgical setting. The patients were selected following the selection criteria previously established (related to the patient, the environment and the surgical procedure). The average age was 45 years, and the distribution by sex, 210 men and 75 women. Spinal anesthesia was preferently performed. The surgical techniques employed were Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty and Shouldice and Bassini procedures for inguinal hernias; Lichtenstein’s plug technique for femoral hernias and simple closure or preperitoneal mesh for the middle line defects. Results: 44 patients needed readmitttance to hospital (failure of OPS), the most important causes being excessive pain, urinary retention and nausea/vomiting. There was no severe morbidity nor mortality. Conclusion: Surgery for abdominal wall defects constitutes a group of procedures suitable for efficient and low risk OPS programs.</abstract><cop>Belgium</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10856849</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0966-6532(00)00051-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6532
ispartof Ambulatory surgery, 2000-07, Vol.8 (3), p.158-158
issn 0966-6532
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859325800
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Hernia
Incisional hernia
Outpatient surgery
title Treatment of the abdominal wall defects in an ambulatory surgical setting: our experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20the%20abdominal%20wall%20defects%20in%20an%20ambulatory%20surgical%20setting:%20our%20experience&rft.jtitle=Ambulatory%20surgery&rft.au=Flores,%20B.&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=158-158&rft.issn=0966-6532&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0966-6532(00)00051-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859325800%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859325800&rft_id=info:pmid/10856849&rft_els_id=S0966653200000512&rfr_iscdi=true