Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue
Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal behaviour 2000-01, Vol.59 (1), p.57-67 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Animal behaviour |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Nelson, Brian S. |
description | Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/anbe.1999.1278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859312533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347299912782</els_id><sourcerecordid>17917609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90Utr3DAUBWBRWprJJNssiwklZOOpnra0DHkWAt20a3EtXYGCx55K9kD-fWVmIKWQroTg0-HqHkIuGN0wSptvMHS4YcaYDeOt_kBWjBpVa675R7KilIpayJafkNOcX8q1UVR9JieMNpKKpl2Ru5t9hKHyuMPB4-CwGocqj_Pgq13CnOeEVY977CvIVYEw-ziN6bXyMU-weDfjGfkUoM94fjzX5NfD_c_bp_r5x-P325vn2kluppo3nVcdOKWRgYQyaCe8kUKI0DGnuGMBte8gsFZLB9BJVz4AQasgg3FcrMn1IXeXxt8z5sluY3bY9zDgOGfLtDKCcVUS1-Tq_7Q1rG2oKfDyH_gyzmko37CcS6Ua1ixoc0AujTknDHaX4hbSq2XULj3YpQe79GCXHsqDL8fUudui_4sfFl_A1yOA7KAPqewy5jdXQmi7MH1gWNa6j5hsdnGpyceEbrJ-jO-N8AeCPKK9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224556169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Nelson, Brian S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><description>Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10640367</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal communication ; Animal ethology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Ears & hearing ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Pipilo erythrophthalmus ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Sound ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2000-01, Vol.59 (1), p.57-67</ispartof><rights>2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Jan 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1278077$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10640367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><title>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><description>Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables.</description><subject>Animal communication</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Pipilo erythrophthalmus</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90Utr3DAUBWBRWprJJNssiwklZOOpnra0DHkWAt20a3EtXYGCx55K9kD-fWVmIKWQroTg0-HqHkIuGN0wSptvMHS4YcaYDeOt_kBWjBpVa675R7KilIpayJafkNOcX8q1UVR9JieMNpKKpl2Ru5t9hKHyuMPB4-CwGocqj_Pgq13CnOeEVY977CvIVYEw-ziN6bXyMU-weDfjGfkUoM94fjzX5NfD_c_bp_r5x-P325vn2kluppo3nVcdOKWRgYQyaCe8kUKI0DGnuGMBte8gsFZLB9BJVz4AQasgg3FcrMn1IXeXxt8z5sluY3bY9zDgOGfLtDKCcVUS1-Tq_7Q1rG2oKfDyH_gyzmko37CcS6Ua1ixoc0AujTknDHaX4hbSq2XULj3YpQe79GCXHsqDL8fUudui_4sfFl_A1yOA7KAPqewy5jdXQmi7MH1gWNa6j5hsdnGpyceEbrJ-jO-N8AeCPKK9</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>Nelson, Brian S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</title><author>Nelson, Brian S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animal communication</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Pipilo erythrophthalmus</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Brian S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>57-67</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10640367</pmid><doi>10.1006/anbe.1999.1278</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3472 |
ispartof | Animal behaviour, 2000-01, Vol.59 (1), p.57-67 |
issn | 0003-3472 1095-8282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859312533 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal communication Animal ethology Aves Biological and medical sciences Birds Ears & hearing Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Pipilo erythrophthalmus Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Sound Vertebrata |
title | Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Avian%20dependence%20on%20sound%20pressure%20level%20as%20an%20auditory%20distance%20cue&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Nelson,%20Brian%20S.&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=57-67&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/anbe.1999.1278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17917609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224556169&rft_id=info:pmid/10640367&rft_els_id=S0003347299912782&rfr_iscdi=true |