Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue

Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 2000-01, Vol.59 (1), p.57-67
1. Verfasser: Nelson, Brian S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Animal behaviour
container_volume 59
creator Nelson, Brian S.
description Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/anbe.1999.1278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859312533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347299912782</els_id><sourcerecordid>17917609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90Utr3DAUBWBRWprJJNssiwklZOOpnra0DHkWAt20a3EtXYGCx55K9kD-fWVmIKWQroTg0-HqHkIuGN0wSptvMHS4YcaYDeOt_kBWjBpVa675R7KilIpayJafkNOcX8q1UVR9JieMNpKKpl2Ru5t9hKHyuMPB4-CwGocqj_Pgq13CnOeEVY977CvIVYEw-ziN6bXyMU-weDfjGfkUoM94fjzX5NfD_c_bp_r5x-P325vn2kluppo3nVcdOKWRgYQyaCe8kUKI0DGnuGMBte8gsFZLB9BJVz4AQasgg3FcrMn1IXeXxt8z5sluY3bY9zDgOGfLtDKCcVUS1-Tq_7Q1rG2oKfDyH_gyzmko37CcS6Ua1ixoc0AujTknDHaX4hbSq2XULj3YpQe79GCXHsqDL8fUudui_4sfFl_A1yOA7KAPqewy5jdXQmi7MH1gWNa6j5hsdnGpyceEbrJ-jO-N8AeCPKK9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224556169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Nelson, Brian S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><description>Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10640367</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal communication ; Animal ethology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Pipilo erythrophthalmus ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Sound ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2000-01, Vol.59 (1), p.57-67</ispartof><rights>2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Jan 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1278077$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10640367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><title>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><description>Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables.</description><subject>Animal communication</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Pipilo erythrophthalmus</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90Utr3DAUBWBRWprJJNssiwklZOOpnra0DHkWAt20a3EtXYGCx55K9kD-fWVmIKWQroTg0-HqHkIuGN0wSptvMHS4YcaYDeOt_kBWjBpVa675R7KilIpayJafkNOcX8q1UVR9JieMNpKKpl2Ru5t9hKHyuMPB4-CwGocqj_Pgq13CnOeEVY977CvIVYEw-ziN6bXyMU-weDfjGfkUoM94fjzX5NfD_c_bp_r5x-P325vn2kluppo3nVcdOKWRgYQyaCe8kUKI0DGnuGMBte8gsFZLB9BJVz4AQasgg3FcrMn1IXeXxt8z5sluY3bY9zDgOGfLtDKCcVUS1-Tq_7Q1rG2oKfDyH_gyzmko37CcS6Ua1ixoc0AujTknDHaX4hbSq2XULj3YpQe79GCXHsqDL8fUudui_4sfFl_A1yOA7KAPqewy5jdXQmi7MH1gWNa6j5hsdnGpyceEbrJ-jO-N8AeCPKK9</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>Nelson, Brian S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</title><author>Nelson, Brian S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-26bd5bac58e1a4a095b3d94333fb1c52c1fe8dbaf1784caab4c003af85f4f9c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animal communication</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Pipilo erythrophthalmus</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Brian S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>57-67</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100±10cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (−6 or −12dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (−6, −12 or +6dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10640367</pmid><doi>10.1006/anbe.1999.1278</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3472
ispartof Animal behaviour, 2000-01, Vol.59 (1), p.57-67
issn 0003-3472
1095-8282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859312533
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal communication
Animal ethology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Ears & hearing
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Pipilo erythrophthalmus
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Sound
Vertebrata
title Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Avian%20dependence%20on%20sound%20pressure%20level%20as%20an%20auditory%20distance%20cue&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Nelson,%20Brian%20S.&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=57-67&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/anbe.1999.1278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17917609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224556169&rft_id=info:pmid/10640367&rft_els_id=S0003347299912782&rfr_iscdi=true