Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees

In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 1998-04, Vol.55 (4), p.819-825
Hauptverfasser: SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL, STAUFFER, HANS-PETER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 825
container_issue 4
container_start_page 819
container_title Animal behaviour
container_volume 55
creator SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL
STAUFFER, HANS-PETER
description In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/anbe.1997.0661
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859158002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347297906618</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859158002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd1beeda6f32fecb3a1be2005497112b4ccdc2024c48e558e747f9d1af63a8643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAQgEVo2G7SXHsrmBJCcvBmNJZk-VhCXhBIDs1ZyPKIKnjtVFo35N9HZpc9FNrTMMw3r4-xrxxWHEBd2qGlFW-aegVK8QO25NDIUqPGT2wJAFVZiRo_s6OUXnKqJMgFWzSqQlHDkl082WhT2FAq7NAVvh_fKBbu1xgcFaMv2mnd9tQSpS_s0Ns-0ckuHrPnm-ufV3flw-Pt_dWPh9IJ1JvSdTzTnVW-Qk-urWzOEUCKpuYcW-Fc5xBQOKFJSk21qH3TcetVZbUS1TE73859jePvidLGrENy1Pd2oHFKhmvZcKkBMKNn_0drVCBAZvD7X-DLOMUhv2EQRb4ClM7Qagu5OKYUyZvXGNY2vhsOZnZtZtdmdm1m17nh227q1K6p2-M7ubl-uqvb5Gzvox1cSHsMkaOGea_eYpSt_gkUTXKBBkddiOQ2phvDvy74AHsAl7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224558068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL ; STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL ; STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creatorcontrib><description>In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9632470</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal ethology ; Apidae ; Bees ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bombus ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hymenoptera ; Parasites ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 1998-04, Vol.55 (4), p.819-825</ispartof><rights>1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Apr 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd1beeda6f32fecb3a1be2005497112b4ccdc2024c48e558e747f9d1af63a8643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2212808$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9632470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creatorcontrib><title>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><description>In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Apidae</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAQgEVo2G7SXHsrmBJCcvBmNJZk-VhCXhBIDs1ZyPKIKnjtVFo35N9HZpc9FNrTMMw3r4-xrxxWHEBd2qGlFW-aegVK8QO25NDIUqPGT2wJAFVZiRo_s6OUXnKqJMgFWzSqQlHDkl082WhT2FAq7NAVvh_fKBbu1xgcFaMv2mnd9tQSpS_s0Ns-0ckuHrPnm-ufV3flw-Pt_dWPh9IJ1JvSdTzTnVW-Qk-urWzOEUCKpuYcW-Fc5xBQOKFJSk21qH3TcetVZbUS1TE73859jePvidLGrENy1Pd2oHFKhmvZcKkBMKNn_0drVCBAZvD7X-DLOMUhv2EQRb4ClM7Qagu5OKYUyZvXGNY2vhsOZnZtZtdmdm1m17nh227q1K6p2-M7ubl-uqvb5Gzvox1cSHsMkaOGea_eYpSt_gkUTXKBBkddiOQ2phvDvy74AHsAl7c</recordid><startdate>19980401</startdate><enddate>19980401</enddate><creator>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</creator><creator>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980401</creationdate><title>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</title><author>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL ; STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd1beeda6f32fecb3a1be2005497112b4ccdc2024c48e558e747f9d1af63a8643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Apidae</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</au><au>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><date>1998-04-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>819</spage><epage>825</epage><pages>819-825</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9632470</pmid><doi>10.1006/anbe.1997.0661</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3472
ispartof Animal behaviour, 1998-04, Vol.55 (4), p.819-825
issn 0003-3472
1095-8282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859158002
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal behavior
Animal ethology
Apidae
Bees
Biological and medical sciences
Bombus
Flowers & plants
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hymenoptera
Parasites
Protozoa. Invertebrata
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
title Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parasites%20and%20flower%20choice%20of%20bumblebees&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=SCHMID-HEMPEL,%20PAUL&rft.date=1998-04-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=819&rft.epage=825&rft.pages=819-825&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/anbe.1997.0661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859158002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224558068&rft_id=info:pmid/9632470&rft_els_id=S0003347297906618&rfr_iscdi=true