Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees
In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal behaviour 1998-04, Vol.55 (4), p.819-825 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 825 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 819 |
container_title | Animal behaviour |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL STAUFFER, HANS-PETER |
description | In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/anbe.1997.0661 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859158002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347297906618</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859158002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd1beeda6f32fecb3a1be2005497112b4ccdc2024c48e558e747f9d1af63a8643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAQgEVo2G7SXHsrmBJCcvBmNJZk-VhCXhBIDs1ZyPKIKnjtVFo35N9HZpc9FNrTMMw3r4-xrxxWHEBd2qGlFW-aegVK8QO25NDIUqPGT2wJAFVZiRo_s6OUXnKqJMgFWzSqQlHDkl082WhT2FAq7NAVvh_fKBbu1xgcFaMv2mnd9tQSpS_s0Ns-0ckuHrPnm-ufV3flw-Pt_dWPh9IJ1JvSdTzTnVW-Qk-urWzOEUCKpuYcW-Fc5xBQOKFJSk21qH3TcetVZbUS1TE73859jePvidLGrENy1Pd2oHFKhmvZcKkBMKNn_0drVCBAZvD7X-DLOMUhv2EQRb4ClM7Qagu5OKYUyZvXGNY2vhsOZnZtZtdmdm1m17nh227q1K6p2-M7ubl-uqvb5Gzvox1cSHsMkaOGea_eYpSt_gkUTXKBBkddiOQ2phvDvy74AHsAl7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224558068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL ; STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL ; STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creatorcontrib><description>In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9632470</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal ethology ; Apidae ; Bees ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bombus ; Flowers & plants ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hymenoptera ; Parasites ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 1998-04, Vol.55 (4), p.819-825</ispartof><rights>1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Apr 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd1beeda6f32fecb3a1be2005497112b4ccdc2024c48e558e747f9d1af63a8643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2212808$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9632470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creatorcontrib><title>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><description>In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Apidae</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAQgEVo2G7SXHsrmBJCcvBmNJZk-VhCXhBIDs1ZyPKIKnjtVFo35N9HZpc9FNrTMMw3r4-xrxxWHEBd2qGlFW-aegVK8QO25NDIUqPGT2wJAFVZiRo_s6OUXnKqJMgFWzSqQlHDkl082WhT2FAq7NAVvh_fKBbu1xgcFaMv2mnd9tQSpS_s0Ns-0ckuHrPnm-ufV3flw-Pt_dWPh9IJ1JvSdTzTnVW-Qk-urWzOEUCKpuYcW-Fc5xBQOKFJSk21qH3TcetVZbUS1TE73859jePvidLGrENy1Pd2oHFKhmvZcKkBMKNn_0drVCBAZvD7X-DLOMUhv2EQRb4ClM7Qagu5OKYUyZvXGNY2vhsOZnZtZtdmdm1m17nh227q1K6p2-M7ubl-uqvb5Gzvox1cSHsMkaOGea_eYpSt_gkUTXKBBkddiOQ2phvDvy74AHsAl7c</recordid><startdate>19980401</startdate><enddate>19980401</enddate><creator>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</creator><creator>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980401</creationdate><title>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</title><author>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL ; STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd1beeda6f32fecb3a1be2005497112b4ccdc2024c48e558e747f9d1af63a8643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Apidae</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHMID-HEMPEL, PAUL</au><au>STAUFFER, HANS-PETER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><date>1998-04-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>819</spage><epage>825</epage><pages>819-825</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>In a field experiment, we tested whether workers of bumblebees,Bombus pascuorumandB.humilis, parasitized by larvae of conopid flies,Physocephala rufipesandSicus ferrugineus, differ in their flower choice from unparasitized ones. We collected workers at random in the field and immediately tested them in experimental arenas that offered the choice of a reference plant (red clover,Trifolium pratense) versus a test plant (from five species). The choices of 396 workers were analysed with logistic regression models (logit analysis). We performed all tests in the same field and at the same time where the workers were foraging naturally. On average, the parasitized bees were less likely to visit the reference plant. In addition, they were more likely to switch plant species even after the first visit in the experimental sequence.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9632470</pmid><doi>10.1006/anbe.1997.0661</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3472 |
ispartof | Animal behaviour, 1998-04, Vol.55 (4), p.819-825 |
issn | 0003-3472 1095-8282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859158002 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal ethology Apidae Bees Biological and medical sciences Bombus Flowers & plants Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hymenoptera Parasites Protozoa. Invertebrata Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry |
title | Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parasites%20and%20flower%20choice%20of%20bumblebees&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=SCHMID-HEMPEL,%20PAUL&rft.date=1998-04-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=819&rft.epage=825&rft.pages=819-825&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/anbe.1997.0661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859158002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224558068&rft_id=info:pmid/9632470&rft_els_id=S0003347297906618&rfr_iscdi=true |