Comparisons of Nitrification and Denitrification in Prairie and Agriculturally Influenced Streams

Whole-stream nitrification and denitrification rates were calculated from field incubation studies of representative substrata in Kings Creek and Shane Creek watersheds at the Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, USA. Substrata from a relatively pristine upstream and an agriculturally influence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2002-08, Vol.12 (4), p.998-1009
Hauptverfasser: Kemp, Melody J., Dodds, Walter K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1009
container_issue 4
container_start_page 998
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 12
creator Kemp, Melody J.
Dodds, Walter K.
description Whole-stream nitrification and denitrification rates were calculated from field incubation studies of representative substrata in Kings Creek and Shane Creek watersheds at the Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, USA. Substrata from a relatively pristine upstream and an agriculturally influenced downstream reach were measured in both watersheds. Rates were scaled to the whole stream by the mass of each substratum in the stream reach. Substrata sampled included epilithon, leaf packs and wood (coarse benthic organic matter, CBOM), filamentous green algae, bryophytes, fine benthic organic matter (FBOM), and suspended particulate organic matter. Upstream sites had significantly lower nitrification and denitrification rates than downstream sites. Nitrification rates were dominated by nitrification associated with epilithon and filamentous green algae. Downstream sites had a higher proportion of nitrification occurring in the water column relative to upstream sites. Whole-stream denitrification was dominated by denitrification associated with FBOM and CBOM and was higher downstream. Water column ammonium (NH4 +)and nitrate (NO3 -)concentrations were correlated with whole-stream nitrification rates but not whole-stream denitrification rates. Whole-stream nitrification rates were positively correlated with whole-stream denitrification rates, being coupled at the whole-stream level, but not at the substratum level. Relative to the amount of NO3 -produced through nitrification, the proportion of NO3 -denitrified was 1.4-4.6 times greater in the downstream sites compared to the upstream sites, but the proportion of the in-stream NO3 -load denitrified was ~10 times greater in the upstream sites. These data indicate that changes in stream nitrogen cycling related to increased dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations do not result in a large enough increase in denitrification (the stream's capacity to retain nitrogen) to compensate for the increased nitrogen loading. Data also suggest that whole-stream nitrification and denitrification may be decoupled at the reach level by factors that decrease habitat heterogeneity (the variety of substrata types) in stream channels. This indicates that anthropogenic disturbances of small streams, such as channelization and removal of riparian vegetation, would be expected to decrease the capacity of streams to retain nitrogen.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0998:CONADI]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18585817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3061032</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3061032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j2038-2bfe0250006ad9aa441a10205028f75e55a379d0501a56924864cff86ab351c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhosoOKf_oRcietF5ctL0Q69GN3UwtuHHlUg461LJ6NqZtMj-valT0OTiPSfnPS_h8bxrBgOWpOBUsADiiF0iAF4Bw1dI0-Qmm8-Go8kbDmCQzW_xwOuxlKeBEAkeuvp369g7sXYN7iBiz6Os3mzJaFtX1q8Lf6YbowudU6Pryqdq5Y9U9e9NV_7CkDZafY-H70bnbdm0hspy50-qomxVlauV_9QYRRt76h0VVFp19qN97-Vu_Jw9BNP5_SQbToM1Ak8CXBYKULh_RbRKicKQEQMEAZgUsVBCEI_TlesZiSjFMInCvCiSiJZcsJzzvnexz92a-qNVtpEbbXNVllSpurWSJcJdFjvj4974qUu1k1ujN2R2koHs-MqOlOxIyY6vdHxlx1fu-UrXudLJeLjoDAxDN3Wh5_vQtW1q8zcUOcSSQ8SAI_8C0-SAIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18585817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparisons of Nitrification and Denitrification in Prairie and Agriculturally Influenced Streams</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kemp, Melody J. ; Dodds, Walter K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Melody J. ; Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><description>Whole-stream nitrification and denitrification rates were calculated from field incubation studies of representative substrata in Kings Creek and Shane Creek watersheds at the Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, USA. Substrata from a relatively pristine upstream and an agriculturally influenced downstream reach were measured in both watersheds. Rates were scaled to the whole stream by the mass of each substratum in the stream reach. Substrata sampled included epilithon, leaf packs and wood (coarse benthic organic matter, CBOM), filamentous green algae, bryophytes, fine benthic organic matter (FBOM), and suspended particulate organic matter. Upstream sites had significantly lower nitrification and denitrification rates than downstream sites. Nitrification rates were dominated by nitrification associated with epilithon and filamentous green algae. Downstream sites had a higher proportion of nitrification occurring in the water column relative to upstream sites. Whole-stream denitrification was dominated by denitrification associated with FBOM and CBOM and was higher downstream. Water column ammonium (NH4 +)and nitrate (NO3 -)concentrations were correlated with whole-stream nitrification rates but not whole-stream denitrification rates. Whole-stream nitrification rates were positively correlated with whole-stream denitrification rates, being coupled at the whole-stream level, but not at the substratum level. Relative to the amount of NO3 -produced through nitrification, the proportion of NO3 -denitrified was 1.4-4.6 times greater in the downstream sites compared to the upstream sites, but the proportion of the in-stream NO3 -load denitrified was ~10 times greater in the upstream sites. These data indicate that changes in stream nitrogen cycling related to increased dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations do not result in a large enough increase in denitrification (the stream's capacity to retain nitrogen) to compensate for the increased nitrogen loading. Data also suggest that whole-stream nitrification and denitrification may be decoupled at the reach level by factors that decrease habitat heterogeneity (the variety of substrata types) in stream channels. This indicates that anthropogenic disturbances of small streams, such as channelization and removal of riparian vegetation, would be expected to decrease the capacity of streams to retain nitrogen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0998:CONADI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Abbreviations ; Agriculture ; ammonium ; Creeks ; denitrification ; Green algae ; Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas ; N loading ; nitrate ; Nitrates ; Nitrification ; Nitrogen ; prairie streams ; Prairies ; Sediments ; Streams</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2002-08, Vol.12 (4), p.998-1009</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2002 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3061032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3061032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Melody J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparisons of Nitrification and Denitrification in Prairie and Agriculturally Influenced Streams</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>Whole-stream nitrification and denitrification rates were calculated from field incubation studies of representative substrata in Kings Creek and Shane Creek watersheds at the Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, USA. Substrata from a relatively pristine upstream and an agriculturally influenced downstream reach were measured in both watersheds. Rates were scaled to the whole stream by the mass of each substratum in the stream reach. Substrata sampled included epilithon, leaf packs and wood (coarse benthic organic matter, CBOM), filamentous green algae, bryophytes, fine benthic organic matter (FBOM), and suspended particulate organic matter. Upstream sites had significantly lower nitrification and denitrification rates than downstream sites. Nitrification rates were dominated by nitrification associated with epilithon and filamentous green algae. Downstream sites had a higher proportion of nitrification occurring in the water column relative to upstream sites. Whole-stream denitrification was dominated by denitrification associated with FBOM and CBOM and was higher downstream. Water column ammonium (NH4 +)and nitrate (NO3 -)concentrations were correlated with whole-stream nitrification rates but not whole-stream denitrification rates. Whole-stream nitrification rates were positively correlated with whole-stream denitrification rates, being coupled at the whole-stream level, but not at the substratum level. Relative to the amount of NO3 -produced through nitrification, the proportion of NO3 -denitrified was 1.4-4.6 times greater in the downstream sites compared to the upstream sites, but the proportion of the in-stream NO3 -load denitrified was ~10 times greater in the upstream sites. These data indicate that changes in stream nitrogen cycling related to increased dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations do not result in a large enough increase in denitrification (the stream's capacity to retain nitrogen) to compensate for the increased nitrogen loading. Data also suggest that whole-stream nitrification and denitrification may be decoupled at the reach level by factors that decrease habitat heterogeneity (the variety of substrata types) in stream channels. This indicates that anthropogenic disturbances of small streams, such as channelization and removal of riparian vegetation, would be expected to decrease the capacity of streams to retain nitrogen.</description><subject>Abbreviations</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>ammonium</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>denitrification</subject><subject>Green algae</subject><subject>Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas</subject><subject>N loading</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>prairie streams</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Streams</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhosoOKf_oRcietF5ctL0Q69GN3UwtuHHlUg461LJ6NqZtMj-valT0OTiPSfnPS_h8bxrBgOWpOBUsADiiF0iAF4Bw1dI0-Qmm8-Go8kbDmCQzW_xwOuxlKeBEAkeuvp369g7sXYN7iBiz6Os3mzJaFtX1q8Lf6YbowudU6Pryqdq5Y9U9e9NV_7CkDZafY-H70bnbdm0hspy50-qomxVlauV_9QYRRt76h0VVFp19qN97-Vu_Jw9BNP5_SQbToM1Ak8CXBYKULh_RbRKicKQEQMEAZgUsVBCEI_TlesZiSjFMInCvCiSiJZcsJzzvnexz92a-qNVtpEbbXNVllSpurWSJcJdFjvj4974qUu1k1ujN2R2koHs-MqOlOxIyY6vdHxlx1fu-UrXudLJeLjoDAxDN3Wh5_vQtW1q8zcUOcSSQ8SAI_8C0-SAIg</recordid><startdate>200208</startdate><enddate>200208</enddate><creator>Kemp, Melody J.</creator><creator>Dodds, Walter K.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200208</creationdate><title>Comparisons of Nitrification and Denitrification in Prairie and Agriculturally Influenced Streams</title><author>Kemp, Melody J. ; Dodds, Walter K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j2038-2bfe0250006ad9aa441a10205028f75e55a379d0501a56924864cff86ab351c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Abbreviations</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>ammonium</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>denitrification</topic><topic>Green algae</topic><topic>Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas</topic><topic>N loading</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>prairie streams</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Streams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Melody J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kemp, Melody J.</au><au>Dodds, Walter K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparisons of Nitrification and Denitrification in Prairie and Agriculturally Influenced Streams</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>2002-08</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>998</spage><epage>1009</epage><pages>998-1009</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Whole-stream nitrification and denitrification rates were calculated from field incubation studies of representative substrata in Kings Creek and Shane Creek watersheds at the Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, USA. Substrata from a relatively pristine upstream and an agriculturally influenced downstream reach were measured in both watersheds. Rates were scaled to the whole stream by the mass of each substratum in the stream reach. Substrata sampled included epilithon, leaf packs and wood (coarse benthic organic matter, CBOM), filamentous green algae, bryophytes, fine benthic organic matter (FBOM), and suspended particulate organic matter. Upstream sites had significantly lower nitrification and denitrification rates than downstream sites. Nitrification rates were dominated by nitrification associated with epilithon and filamentous green algae. Downstream sites had a higher proportion of nitrification occurring in the water column relative to upstream sites. Whole-stream denitrification was dominated by denitrification associated with FBOM and CBOM and was higher downstream. Water column ammonium (NH4 +)and nitrate (NO3 -)concentrations were correlated with whole-stream nitrification rates but not whole-stream denitrification rates. Whole-stream nitrification rates were positively correlated with whole-stream denitrification rates, being coupled at the whole-stream level, but not at the substratum level. Relative to the amount of NO3 -produced through nitrification, the proportion of NO3 -denitrified was 1.4-4.6 times greater in the downstream sites compared to the upstream sites, but the proportion of the in-stream NO3 -load denitrified was ~10 times greater in the upstream sites. These data indicate that changes in stream nitrogen cycling related to increased dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations do not result in a large enough increase in denitrification (the stream's capacity to retain nitrogen) to compensate for the increased nitrogen loading. Data also suggest that whole-stream nitrification and denitrification may be decoupled at the reach level by factors that decrease habitat heterogeneity (the variety of substrata types) in stream channels. This indicates that anthropogenic disturbances of small streams, such as channelization and removal of riparian vegetation, would be expected to decrease the capacity of streams to retain nitrogen.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0998:CONADI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2002-08, Vol.12 (4), p.998-1009
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18585817
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Abbreviations
Agriculture
ammonium
Creeks
denitrification
Green algae
Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas
N loading
nitrate
Nitrates
Nitrification
Nitrogen
prairie streams
Prairies
Sediments
Streams
title Comparisons of Nitrification and Denitrification in Prairie and Agriculturally Influenced Streams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T23%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparisons%20of%20Nitrification%20and%20Denitrification%20in%20Prairie%20and%20Agriculturally%20Influenced%20Streams&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Kemp,%20Melody%20J.&rft.date=2002-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=998&rft.epage=1009&rft.pages=998-1009&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012%5B0998:CONADI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3061032%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18585817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3061032&rfr_iscdi=true