Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S
This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2016-12, Vol.170, p.133-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 170 |
creator | Yoon, Jangho Luck, Jeff |
description | This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending.
•Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1857377903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953616305834</els_id><sourcerecordid>1857377903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCK4AlNmyS-iexE3ZVRUulSkWCri3HudE4SuzBdkbMY_DGOJopC4REV7bP_e65tg9C7ykpKaHiciyjN9HYGfqSZSGrJaH1C7ShjeRFzSv5Em0Ik7Joay7O0esYR0IIJQ1_hc6zLmldiQ36decShHiICWYcIC3BYe-wdXuIaQaX8hbvlm6yBq9HPeEt6CltP-GvPtpk94DhZ7ZwerLpgP3wTzozO3C9zf6ABx9w2gIetZ3waXSeskqP5bc36GzQU4S3p_UCPd58_n79pbh_uL27vrovTMVZKijTjHBCjGmobLuhE1wORA-kM7KijWj7TjINTAgjpOg6LiUxwGWlWVcL0fIL9PHouwv-x5Jfq2YbDUyTduCXqGhTy9zUEv4MlNc1a0XbZPTDX-jol_VzVqrK920aLjMlj5QJPsYAg9oFO-twUJSoNWA1qj8BqzXgtZADzp3vTv5Lt9ae-p4SzcDVEYD8d3sLQWUXcAZ6G8Ak1Xv73yG_Af1uvKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1843008837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending.
•Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27771546</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Community mental health services ; Expenditures ; Health care expenditures ; Health Expenditures - trends ; Humans ; Imprisonment ; Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems ; Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems ; Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health ; Investments - statistics & numerical data ; Mental health ; Mental Health Services - economics ; Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data ; Panel data ; Per capita ; Prisoners ; Prisoners - psychology ; Prisoners - statistics & numerical data ; Prisons - statistics & numerical data ; Public health ; Public Health - economics ; Public Health - statistics & numerical data ; Regression Analysis ; Return on investment ; Return on investment in public mental health ; The United States ; United States</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2016-12, Vol.170, p.133-142</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Dec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7385-4515</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953616305834$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,33751,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27771546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><title>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending.
•Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending.</description><subject>Community mental health services</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems</subject><subject>Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems</subject><subject>Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health</subject><subject>Investments - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - economics</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisoners - psychology</subject><subject>Prisoners - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prisons - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health - economics</subject><subject>Public Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Return on investment in public mental health</subject><subject>The United States</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCK4AlNmyS-iexE3ZVRUulSkWCri3HudE4SuzBdkbMY_DGOJopC4REV7bP_e65tg9C7ykpKaHiciyjN9HYGfqSZSGrJaH1C7ShjeRFzSv5Em0Ik7Joay7O0esYR0IIJQ1_hc6zLmldiQ36decShHiICWYcIC3BYe-wdXuIaQaX8hbvlm6yBq9HPeEt6CltP-GvPtpk94DhZ7ZwerLpgP3wTzozO3C9zf6ABx9w2gIetZ3waXSeskqP5bc36GzQU4S3p_UCPd58_n79pbh_uL27vrovTMVZKijTjHBCjGmobLuhE1wORA-kM7KijWj7TjINTAgjpOg6LiUxwGWlWVcL0fIL9PHouwv-x5Jfq2YbDUyTduCXqGhTy9zUEv4MlNc1a0XbZPTDX-jol_VzVqrK920aLjMlj5QJPsYAg9oFO-twUJSoNWA1qj8BqzXgtZADzp3vTv5Lt9ae-p4SzcDVEYD8d3sLQWUXcAZ6G8Ak1Xv73yG_Af1uvKY</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Yoon, Jangho</creator><creator>Luck, Jeff</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-4515</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</title><author>Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Community mental health services</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems</topic><topic>Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems</topic><topic>Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health</topic><topic>Investments - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - economics</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisoners - psychology</topic><topic>Prisoners - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prisons - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health - economics</topic><topic>Public Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Return on investment in public mental health</topic><topic>The United States</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoon, Jangho</au><au>Luck, Jeff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>170</volume><spage>133</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>133-142</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending.
•Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27771546</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-4515</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2016-12, Vol.170, p.133-142 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1857377903 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Community mental health services Expenditures Health care expenditures Health Expenditures - trends Humans Imprisonment Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health Investments - statistics & numerical data Mental health Mental Health Services - economics Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data Panel data Per capita Prisoners Prisoners - psychology Prisoners - statistics & numerical data Prisons - statistics & numerical data Public health Public Health - economics Public Health - statistics & numerical data Regression Analysis Return on investment Return on investment in public mental health The United States United States |
title | Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A45%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intersystem%20return%20on%20investment%20in%20public%20mental%20health:%20Positive%20externality%20of%20public%20mental%20health%20expenditure%20for%20the%20jail%20system%20in%20the%20U.S&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Yoon,%20Jangho&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=133-142&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1857377903%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1843008837&rft_id=info:pmid/27771546&rft_els_id=S0277953616305834&rfr_iscdi=true |