Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S

This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2016-12, Vol.170, p.133-142
Hauptverfasser: Yoon, Jangho, Luck, Jeff
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue
container_start_page 133
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 170
creator Yoon, Jangho
Luck, Jeff
description This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending. •Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1857377903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953616305834</els_id><sourcerecordid>1857377903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCK4AlNmyS-iexE3ZVRUulSkWCri3HudE4SuzBdkbMY_DGOJopC4REV7bP_e65tg9C7ykpKaHiciyjN9HYGfqSZSGrJaH1C7ShjeRFzSv5Em0Ik7Joay7O0esYR0IIJQ1_hc6zLmldiQ36decShHiICWYcIC3BYe-wdXuIaQaX8hbvlm6yBq9HPeEt6CltP-GvPtpk94DhZ7ZwerLpgP3wTzozO3C9zf6ABx9w2gIetZ3waXSeskqP5bc36GzQU4S3p_UCPd58_n79pbh_uL27vrovTMVZKijTjHBCjGmobLuhE1wORA-kM7KijWj7TjINTAgjpOg6LiUxwGWlWVcL0fIL9PHouwv-x5Jfq2YbDUyTduCXqGhTy9zUEv4MlNc1a0XbZPTDX-jol_VzVqrK920aLjMlj5QJPsYAg9oFO-twUJSoNWA1qj8BqzXgtZADzp3vTv5Lt9ae-p4SzcDVEYD8d3sLQWUXcAZ6G8Ak1Xv73yG_Af1uvKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1843008837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending. •Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27771546</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Community mental health services ; Expenditures ; Health care expenditures ; Health Expenditures - trends ; Humans ; Imprisonment ; Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems ; Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems ; Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health ; Investments - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Mental health ; Mental Health Services - economics ; Mental Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Panel data ; Per capita ; Prisoners ; Prisoners - psychology ; Prisoners - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prisons - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Public health ; Public Health - economics ; Public Health - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Regression Analysis ; Return on investment ; Return on investment in public mental health ; The United States ; United States</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2016-12, Vol.170, p.133-142</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Dec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7385-4515</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953616305834$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,33751,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27771546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><title>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending. •Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending.</description><subject>Community mental health services</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems</subject><subject>Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems</subject><subject>Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health</subject><subject>Investments - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - economics</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisoners - psychology</subject><subject>Prisoners - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prisons - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health - economics</subject><subject>Public Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Return on investment in public mental health</subject><subject>The United States</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCK4AlNmyS-iexE3ZVRUulSkWCri3HudE4SuzBdkbMY_DGOJopC4REV7bP_e65tg9C7ykpKaHiciyjN9HYGfqSZSGrJaH1C7ShjeRFzSv5Em0Ik7Joay7O0esYR0IIJQ1_hc6zLmldiQ36decShHiICWYcIC3BYe-wdXuIaQaX8hbvlm6yBq9HPeEt6CltP-GvPtpk94DhZ7ZwerLpgP3wTzozO3C9zf6ABx9w2gIetZ3waXSeskqP5bc36GzQU4S3p_UCPd58_n79pbh_uL27vrovTMVZKijTjHBCjGmobLuhE1wORA-kM7KijWj7TjINTAgjpOg6LiUxwGWlWVcL0fIL9PHouwv-x5Jfq2YbDUyTduCXqGhTy9zUEv4MlNc1a0XbZPTDX-jol_VzVqrK920aLjMlj5QJPsYAg9oFO-twUJSoNWA1qj8BqzXgtZADzp3vTv5Lt9ae-p4SzcDVEYD8d3sLQWUXcAZ6G8Ak1Xv73yG_Af1uvKY</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Yoon, Jangho</creator><creator>Luck, Jeff</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-4515</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</title><author>Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-12a20300cc8179bfb637f0af0bc741869db72ae266c676bb3770ce374a2b56693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Community mental health services</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems</topic><topic>Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems</topic><topic>Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health</topic><topic>Investments - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - economics</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisoners - psychology</topic><topic>Prisoners - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prisons - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health - economics</topic><topic>Public Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Return on investment in public mental health</topic><topic>The United States</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoon, Jangho</au><au>Luck, Jeff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>170</volume><spage>133</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>133-142</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>This study examines the extent to which increased public mental health expenditures lead to a reduction in jail populations and computes the associated intersystem return on investment (ROI). We analyze unique panel data on 44 U.S. states and D.C. for years 2001–2009. To isolate the intersystem spillover effect, we exploit variations across states and over time within states in per capita public mental health expenditures and average daily jail inmates. Regression models control for a comprehensive set of determinants of jail incarcerations as well as unobserved determinants specific to state and year. Findings show a positive spillover benefit of increased public mental health spending on the jail system: a 10% increase in per capita public inpatient mental health expenditure on average leads to a 1.5% reduction in jail inmates. We also find that the positive intersystem externality of increased public inpatient mental health expenditure is greater when the level of community mental health spending is lower. Similarly, the intersystem spillover effect of community mental health expenditure is larger when inpatient mental health spending is lower. We compute that overall an extra dollar in public inpatient mental health expenditure by a state would yield an intersystem ROI of a quarter dollar for the jail system. There is significant cross-state variation in the intersystem ROI in both public inpatient and community mental health expenditures, and the ROI overall is greater for inpatient mental health spending than for community mental health spending. •Greater public inpatient mental health spending reduces jail populations.•Greater community mental health spending also decreases jail inmates.•There is an intersystem return on investment (ROI) in public mental health.•The intersystem ROI is larger for public inpatient mental health spending.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27771546</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-4515</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2016-12, Vol.170, p.133-142
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1857377903
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Community mental health services
Expenditures
Health care expenditures
Health Expenditures - trends
Humans
Imprisonment
Interplay of public inpatient and outpatient mental health systems
Intersection of the mental health and criminal justice systems
Intersystem spillover effect of public mental health
Investments - statistics & numerical data
Mental health
Mental Health Services - economics
Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data
Panel data
Per capita
Prisoners
Prisoners - psychology
Prisoners - statistics & numerical data
Prisons - statistics & numerical data
Public health
Public Health - economics
Public Health - statistics & numerical data
Regression Analysis
Return on investment
Return on investment in public mental health
The United States
United States
title Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A45%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intersystem%20return%20on%20investment%20in%20public%20mental%20health:%20Positive%20externality%20of%20public%20mental%20health%20expenditure%20for%20the%20jail%20system%20in%20the%20U.S&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Yoon,%20Jangho&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=133-142&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1857377903%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1843008837&rft_id=info:pmid/27771546&rft_els_id=S0277953616305834&rfr_iscdi=true