Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT: A prospective randomized study
Highlights • We compared 24-gauge side-hole and conventional 22-gauge end-hole catheters in MDCT. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is noninferior to the 22-gauge end-hole catheter. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is safe and facilitates optimal enhancement quality. • The 24-gauge side-hole cathet...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2017-02, Vol.87, p.8-12 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 12 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 8 |
| container_title | European journal of radiology |
| container_volume | 87 |
| creator | Tamura, Akio Kato, Kenichi Kamata, Masayoshi Suzuki, Tomohiro Suzuki, Michiko Nakayama, Manabu Tomabechi, Makiko Nakasato, Tatsuhiko Ehara, Shigeru |
| description | Highlights • We compared 24-gauge side-hole and conventional 22-gauge end-hole catheters in MDCT. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is noninferior to the 22-gauge end-hole catheter. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is safe and facilitates optimal enhancement quality. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is suitable for patients with narrow or fragile veins. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856869040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X16303862</els_id><sourcerecordid>1856869040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-d9d1c5cf81d2267250101ededdf48a2718e356ec1f7ae364f983edd39ea73b3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhFyAhH7kk-COJHSSQquVTKuLQInGzXHvSOGTjYDuLlr_BH8bpLhy4cLJG87yemXcGoaeUlJTQ5sVQwhC0LVkOSspKQup7aEOlYIUQTNxHGyIYKUglv56hRzEOJBNVyx6iMyZJU3PRbtCvKxjBJOcn7Ds8Q3BzD0GP2E0p6D1MfonY6NRDghDxD5d6zKriVi-3gKOzUPR-hIj3OZvJ1PsIJ4qdKJjsHYQ7H_CnN9vrl_gCz8HHeS28Bxz0ZP3O_QSLY1rs4TF60OkxwpPTe46-vHt7vf1QXH5-_3F7cVmYilapsK2lpjadpJaxRrCaZFvAgrVdJTUTVAKvGzC0Exp4U3Wt5DnJW9CC33DNz9Hz47-5me8LxKR2LhoYRz1BHltRWTeyaUlFMsqPqMl9xwCdmoPb6XBQlKh1G2pQd9tQ6zYUZSp7nVXPTgWWmx3Yv5o_9mfg1RGAPObeQVDROJgMWBeyOcp6958Cr__Rm9FNzujxGxwgDn4JU3ZQURWzQF2tB7HeA2044bJh_DdiA7N9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1856869040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT: A prospective randomized study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Tamura, Akio ; Kato, Kenichi ; Kamata, Masayoshi ; Suzuki, Tomohiro ; Suzuki, Michiko ; Nakayama, Manabu ; Tomabechi, Makiko ; Nakasato, Tatsuhiko ; Ehara, Shigeru</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamura, Akio ; Kato, Kenichi ; Kamata, Masayoshi ; Suzuki, Tomohiro ; Suzuki, Michiko ; Nakayama, Manabu ; Tomabechi, Makiko ; Nakasato, Tatsuhiko ; Ehara, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • We compared 24-gauge side-hole and conventional 22-gauge end-hole catheters in MDCT. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is noninferior to the 22-gauge end-hole catheter. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is safe and facilitates optimal enhancement quality. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is suitable for patients with narrow or fragile veins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28065379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Access site complication ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation ; Catheterization, Peripheral - methods ; Contrast media ; Contrast Media - administration & dosage ; Extravasation ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous - instrumentation ; Injections, Intravenous - methods ; Iohexol - administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multi-detector computed tomography ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2017-02, Vol.87, p.8-12</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-d9d1c5cf81d2267250101ededdf48a2718e356ec1f7ae364f983edd39ea73b3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-d9d1c5cf81d2267250101ededdf48a2718e356ec1f7ae364f983edd39ea73b3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28065379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamura, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamata, Masayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomabechi, Makiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakasato, Tatsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehara, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><title>Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT: A prospective randomized study</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Highlights • We compared 24-gauge side-hole and conventional 22-gauge end-hole catheters in MDCT. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is noninferior to the 22-gauge end-hole catheter. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is safe and facilitates optimal enhancement quality. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is suitable for patients with narrow or fragile veins.</description><subject>Access site complication</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</subject><subject>Contrast media</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Extravasation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous - methods</subject><subject>Iohexol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multi-detector computed tomography</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhFyAhH7kk-COJHSSQquVTKuLQInGzXHvSOGTjYDuLlr_BH8bpLhy4cLJG87yemXcGoaeUlJTQ5sVQwhC0LVkOSspKQup7aEOlYIUQTNxHGyIYKUglv56hRzEOJBNVyx6iMyZJU3PRbtCvKxjBJOcn7Ds8Q3BzD0GP2E0p6D1MfonY6NRDghDxD5d6zKriVi-3gKOzUPR-hIj3OZvJ1PsIJ4qdKJjsHYQ7H_CnN9vrl_gCz8HHeS28Bxz0ZP3O_QSLY1rs4TF60OkxwpPTe46-vHt7vf1QXH5-_3F7cVmYilapsK2lpjadpJaxRrCaZFvAgrVdJTUTVAKvGzC0Exp4U3Wt5DnJW9CC33DNz9Hz47-5me8LxKR2LhoYRz1BHltRWTeyaUlFMsqPqMl9xwCdmoPb6XBQlKh1G2pQd9tQ6zYUZSp7nVXPTgWWmx3Yv5o_9mfg1RGAPObeQVDROJgMWBeyOcp6958Cr__Rm9FNzujxGxwgDn4JU3ZQURWzQF2tB7HeA2044bJh_DdiA7N9</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Tamura, Akio</creator><creator>Kato, Kenichi</creator><creator>Kamata, Masayoshi</creator><creator>Suzuki, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Suzuki, Michiko</creator><creator>Nakayama, Manabu</creator><creator>Tomabechi, Makiko</creator><creator>Nakasato, Tatsuhiko</creator><creator>Ehara, Shigeru</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT: A prospective randomized study</title><author>Tamura, Akio ; Kato, Kenichi ; Kamata, Masayoshi ; Suzuki, Tomohiro ; Suzuki, Michiko ; Nakayama, Manabu ; Tomabechi, Makiko ; Nakasato, Tatsuhiko ; Ehara, Shigeru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-d9d1c5cf81d2267250101ededdf48a2718e356ec1f7ae364f983edd39ea73b3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Access site complication</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</topic><topic>Contrast media</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Extravasation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous - methods</topic><topic>Iohexol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multi-detector computed tomography</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamura, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamata, Masayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomabechi, Makiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakasato, Tatsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehara, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamura, Akio</au><au>Kato, Kenichi</au><au>Kamata, Masayoshi</au><au>Suzuki, Tomohiro</au><au>Suzuki, Michiko</au><au>Nakayama, Manabu</au><au>Tomabechi, Makiko</au><au>Nakasato, Tatsuhiko</au><au>Ehara, Shigeru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT: A prospective randomized study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>8-12</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>Highlights • We compared 24-gauge side-hole and conventional 22-gauge end-hole catheters in MDCT. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is noninferior to the 22-gauge end-hole catheter. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is safe and facilitates optimal enhancement quality. • The 24-gauge side-hole catheter is suitable for patients with narrow or fragile veins.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28065379</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
| ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2017-02, Vol.87, p.8-12 |
| issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856869040 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Access site complication Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation Catheterization, Peripheral - methods Contrast media Contrast Media - administration & dosage Extravasation Female Humans Injections, Intravenous - instrumentation Injections, Intravenous - methods Iohexol - administration & dosage Male Middle Aged Multi-detector computed tomography Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods Prospective Studies Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Radiology Young Adult |
| title | Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT: A prospective randomized study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A24%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selection%20of%20peripheral%20intravenous%20catheters%20with%2024-gauge%20side-holes%20versus%20those%20with%2022-gauge%20end-hole%20for%20MDCT:%20A%20prospective%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Tamura,%20Akio&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=8-12&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1856869040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1856869040&rft_id=info:pmid/28065379&rft_els_id=S0720048X16303862&rfr_iscdi=true |