Ultrastructure of the midgut in Heteroptera (Hemiptera) with different feeding habits

Heteroptera have diverse feeding habits with phytophagous, zoophagous, and haematophagous species. This dietary diversity associated with the monophyly of Heteroptera makes these insects a good object for comparative studies of the digestive tract. This work compares the ultrastructure of the middle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Protoplasma 2017-07, Vol.254 (4), p.1743-1753
Hauptverfasser: Santos, Helen Pinto, Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena, Vilimova, Jitka, Serrão, José Eduardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1753
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1743
container_title Protoplasma
container_volume 254
creator Santos, Helen Pinto
Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena
Vilimova, Jitka
Serrão, José Eduardo
description Heteroptera have diverse feeding habits with phytophagous, zoophagous, and haematophagous species. This dietary diversity associated with the monophyly of Heteroptera makes these insects a good object for comparative studies of the digestive tract. This work compares the ultrastructure of the middle midgut region in the phytophagous Coptosoma scutellatum (Plataspidae), Graphosoma lineatum (Pentatomidae), Kleidocerys resedae (Lygaeidae), and zoophagous Rhynocoris iracundus (Reduviidae), Nabis rugosus (Nabidae), and Himacerus apterus (Nabidae), to verify if diet affects midgut cells in phylogenetically related insects. The middle region of the midgut was used for comparison because it is the main site for digestion and absorption of the midgut. The digestive cell ultrastructure was similar in the six species, with features of secretory, absorptive, transport, storage, and excretory cells, suggesting a stronger correlation of middle digestive cell ultrastructure with the phylogeny of these species than with the different heteropteran feeding habits.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00709-016-1051-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856864476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1856864476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-8d9a2abd0097afb44dd8a1fad25042827cb711a0818d6e3e1e260662a81fa73b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFq3DAQhkVpaDZpH6CXIOhlc3AyI9uSfCyh7RYCuWQhNyFb412Ftb2VZELevko2DaEQHUaC-ebX8DH2FeECAdRlzAWaAlAWCDUW4gNboMS6kAjiI1sAlGWBurw7Zicx3gNALaD-xI6FBlmVZbNg6_UuBRtTmLs0B-JTz9OW-ODdZk7cj3xFicK0z8Xy5YoG__w85w8-bbnzfU-BxsR7IufHDd_a1qf4mR31dhfpy8t9ytY_f9xerYrrm1-_r75fF12FdSq0a6ywrQNolO3bqnJOW-ytEzVUQgvVtQrRgkbtJJWEJCRIKazOkCrb8pQtD7n7MP2ZKSYz-NjRbmdHmuZoUNdSy6pSMqPf_kPvpzmMeTuDDeYjlFKZwgPVhSnGQL3ZBz_Y8GgQzJNzc3BusnPz5NyIPHP2kjy3A7nXiX-SMyAOQMytcUPhzdfvpv4FFJ-LhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1911112777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrastructure of the midgut in Heteroptera (Hemiptera) with different feeding habits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Santos, Helen Pinto ; Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena ; Vilimova, Jitka ; Serrão, José Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos, Helen Pinto ; Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena ; Vilimova, Jitka ; Serrão, José Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>Heteroptera have diverse feeding habits with phytophagous, zoophagous, and haematophagous species. This dietary diversity associated with the monophyly of Heteroptera makes these insects a good object for comparative studies of the digestive tract. This work compares the ultrastructure of the middle midgut region in the phytophagous Coptosoma scutellatum (Plataspidae), Graphosoma lineatum (Pentatomidae), Kleidocerys resedae (Lygaeidae), and zoophagous Rhynocoris iracundus (Reduviidae), Nabis rugosus (Nabidae), and Himacerus apterus (Nabidae), to verify if diet affects midgut cells in phylogenetically related insects. The middle region of the midgut was used for comparison because it is the main site for digestion and absorption of the midgut. The digestive cell ultrastructure was similar in the six species, with features of secretory, absorptive, transport, storage, and excretory cells, suggesting a stronger correlation of middle digestive cell ultrastructure with the phylogeny of these species than with the different heteropteran feeding habits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00709-016-1051-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28064339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carnivory ; Cell Biology ; Digestion ; Feeding ; Gastrointestinal tract ; Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology ; Gastrointestinal Tract - ultrastructure ; Herbivory ; Heteroptera - ultrastructure ; Life Sciences ; Midgut ; Original Article ; Phylogeny ; Plant Sciences ; Regeneration ; Species ; Ultrastructure ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Protoplasma, 2017-07, Vol.254 (4), p.1743-1753</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Wien 2017</rights><rights>Protoplasma is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-8d9a2abd0097afb44dd8a1fad25042827cb711a0818d6e3e1e260662a81fa73b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-8d9a2abd0097afb44dd8a1fad25042827cb711a0818d6e3e1e260662a81fa73b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00709-016-1051-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00709-016-1051-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28064339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos, Helen Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilimova, Jitka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrão, José Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrastructure of the midgut in Heteroptera (Hemiptera) with different feeding habits</title><title>Protoplasma</title><addtitle>Protoplasma</addtitle><addtitle>Protoplasma</addtitle><description>Heteroptera have diverse feeding habits with phytophagous, zoophagous, and haematophagous species. This dietary diversity associated with the monophyly of Heteroptera makes these insects a good object for comparative studies of the digestive tract. This work compares the ultrastructure of the middle midgut region in the phytophagous Coptosoma scutellatum (Plataspidae), Graphosoma lineatum (Pentatomidae), Kleidocerys resedae (Lygaeidae), and zoophagous Rhynocoris iracundus (Reduviidae), Nabis rugosus (Nabidae), and Himacerus apterus (Nabidae), to verify if diet affects midgut cells in phylogenetically related insects. The middle region of the midgut was used for comparison because it is the main site for digestion and absorption of the midgut. The digestive cell ultrastructure was similar in the six species, with features of secretory, absorptive, transport, storage, and excretory cells, suggesting a stronger correlation of middle digestive cell ultrastructure with the phylogeny of these species than with the different heteropteran feeding habits.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carnivory</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal tract</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Heteroptera - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Midgut</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Ultrastructure</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0033-183X</issn><issn>1615-6102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFq3DAQhkVpaDZpH6CXIOhlc3AyI9uSfCyh7RYCuWQhNyFb412Ftb2VZELevko2DaEQHUaC-ebX8DH2FeECAdRlzAWaAlAWCDUW4gNboMS6kAjiI1sAlGWBurw7Zicx3gNALaD-xI6FBlmVZbNg6_UuBRtTmLs0B-JTz9OW-ODdZk7cj3xFicK0z8Xy5YoG__w85w8-bbnzfU-BxsR7IufHDd_a1qf4mR31dhfpy8t9ytY_f9xerYrrm1-_r75fF12FdSq0a6ywrQNolO3bqnJOW-ytEzVUQgvVtQrRgkbtJJWEJCRIKazOkCrb8pQtD7n7MP2ZKSYz-NjRbmdHmuZoUNdSy6pSMqPf_kPvpzmMeTuDDeYjlFKZwgPVhSnGQL3ZBz_Y8GgQzJNzc3BusnPz5NyIPHP2kjy3A7nXiX-SMyAOQMytcUPhzdfvpv4FFJ-LhQ</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Santos, Helen Pinto</creator><creator>Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena</creator><creator>Vilimova, Jitka</creator><creator>Serrão, José Eduardo</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Ultrastructure of the midgut in Heteroptera (Hemiptera) with different feeding habits</title><author>Santos, Helen Pinto ; Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena ; Vilimova, Jitka ; Serrão, José Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-8d9a2abd0097afb44dd8a1fad25042827cb711a0818d6e3e1e260662a81fa73b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carnivory</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal tract</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Heteroptera - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Midgut</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Ultrastructure</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos, Helen Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilimova, Jitka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrão, José Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Protoplasma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos, Helen Pinto</au><au>Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena</au><au>Vilimova, Jitka</au><au>Serrão, José Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrastructure of the midgut in Heteroptera (Hemiptera) with different feeding habits</atitle><jtitle>Protoplasma</jtitle><stitle>Protoplasma</stitle><addtitle>Protoplasma</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>254</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1743</spage><epage>1753</epage><pages>1743-1753</pages><issn>0033-183X</issn><eissn>1615-6102</eissn><abstract>Heteroptera have diverse feeding habits with phytophagous, zoophagous, and haematophagous species. This dietary diversity associated with the monophyly of Heteroptera makes these insects a good object for comparative studies of the digestive tract. This work compares the ultrastructure of the middle midgut region in the phytophagous Coptosoma scutellatum (Plataspidae), Graphosoma lineatum (Pentatomidae), Kleidocerys resedae (Lygaeidae), and zoophagous Rhynocoris iracundus (Reduviidae), Nabis rugosus (Nabidae), and Himacerus apterus (Nabidae), to verify if diet affects midgut cells in phylogenetically related insects. The middle region of the midgut was used for comparison because it is the main site for digestion and absorption of the midgut. The digestive cell ultrastructure was similar in the six species, with features of secretory, absorptive, transport, storage, and excretory cells, suggesting a stronger correlation of middle digestive cell ultrastructure with the phylogeny of these species than with the different heteropteran feeding habits.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>28064339</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00709-016-1051-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-183X
ispartof Protoplasma, 2017-07, Vol.254 (4), p.1743-1753
issn 0033-183X
1615-6102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856864476
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carnivory
Cell Biology
Digestion
Feeding
Gastrointestinal tract
Gastrointestinal Tract - physiology
Gastrointestinal Tract - ultrastructure
Herbivory
Heteroptera - ultrastructure
Life Sciences
Midgut
Original Article
Phylogeny
Plant Sciences
Regeneration
Species
Ultrastructure
Zoology
title Ultrastructure of the midgut in Heteroptera (Hemiptera) with different feeding habits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A20%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrastructure%20of%20the%20midgut%20in%20Heteroptera%20(Hemiptera)%20with%20different%20feeding%20habits&rft.jtitle=Protoplasma&rft.au=Santos,%20Helen%20Pinto&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=254&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1743&rft.epage=1753&rft.pages=1743-1753&rft.issn=0033-183X&rft.eissn=1615-6102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00709-016-1051-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1856864476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1911112777&rft_id=info:pmid/28064339&rfr_iscdi=true