Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

Objectives To explore the utility of Prostate Health Index (PHI) density for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary cohort of men presenting for diagnostic evaluation of PCa. Patients and Methods The study cohort included patients with elevated prostate‐speci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2017-12, Vol.120 (6), p.793-798
Hauptverfasser: Tosoian, Jeffrey J., Druskin, Sasha C., Andreas, Darian, Mullane, Patrick, Chappidi, Meera, Joo, Sarah, Ghabili, Kamyar, Mamawala, Mufaddal, Agostino, Joseph, Carter, Herbert B., Partin, Alan W., Sokoll, Lori J., Ross, Ashley E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 798
container_issue 6
container_start_page 793
container_title BJU international
container_volume 120
creator Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
Druskin, Sasha C.
Andreas, Darian
Mullane, Patrick
Chappidi, Meera
Joo, Sarah
Ghabili, Kamyar
Mamawala, Mufaddal
Agostino, Joseph
Carter, Herbert B.
Partin, Alan W.
Sokoll, Lori J.
Ross, Ashley E.
description Objectives To explore the utility of Prostate Health Index (PHI) density for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary cohort of men presenting for diagnostic evaluation of PCa. Patients and Methods The study cohort included patients with elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA; >2 ng/mL) and negative digital rectal examination who underwent PHI testing and prostate biopsy at our institution in 2015. Serum markers were prospectively measured per standard clinical pathway. PHI was calculated as ([{−2}proPSA/free PSA] × [PSA]½), and density calculations were performed using prostate volume as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of serum markers to predict clinically significant PCa, defined as any Gleason score ≥7 cancer or Gleason score 6 cancer in >2 cores or >50% of any positive core. Results Of 118 men with PHI testing who underwent biopsy, 47 (39.8%) were found to have clinically significant PCa on biopsy. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) PHI density was 0.70 (0.43–1.21), and was 0.53 (0.36–0.75) in men with negative biopsy or clinically insignificant PCa and 1.21 (0.74–1.88) in men with clinically significant PCa (P < 0.001). Clinically significant PCa was detected in 3.6% of men in the first quartile of PHI density (1.21 (P < 0.001). Using a threshold of 0.43, PHI density was 97.9% sensitive and 38.0% specific for clinically significant PCa, and 100% sensitive for Gleason score ≥7 disease. Compared with PSA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.52), PSA density (AUC 0.70), %free PSA (AUC 0.75), the product of %free PSA and prostate volume (AUC 0.79), and PHI (AUC 0.76), PHI density had the highest discriminative ability for clinically significant PCa (AUC 0.84). Conclusions Based on the present prospective single‐centre experience, PHI density could be used to avoid 38% of unnecessary biopsies, while failing to detect only 2% of clinically significant cancers.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bju.13762
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856595899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1856595899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8819090820233ee5b8414cf3ccfbcf297afe28ce3cddf32af92a57e3f0db92d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQJBYY2vojTuwRKqBFlWCgEmKxHOcMrtKkxAnQf49LWwYkvNh3evTc-UXolOABCWeYzdsBYWlC91CXxEncjwl-3t-9sUw66Mj7OcahkfBD1KECc5HytIteHuvKN7qBaAy6aN6iSZnDV5RD6V2zitxiWVcf4EOjAdO4qowqG5nClc7oolhF3r2WzoaibKLlThUqA_UxOrC68HCyvXtodnvzNBr3pw93k9HVtG-YELQvBJFYYkExZQyAZyImsbHMGJsZS2WqLVBhgJk8t4xqK6nmKTCL80zSnLMeuth4w_z3FnyjFs4bKApdQtV6RQRPuORCyoCe_0HnVVuXYTtFZJJSEVOyFl5uKBM-5Guwalm7ha5XimC1DlyFwNVP4IE92xrbbAH5L7lLOADDDfDpClj9b1LX97ON8hvfcYs3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1967284215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Tosoian, Jeffrey J. ; Druskin, Sasha C. ; Andreas, Darian ; Mullane, Patrick ; Chappidi, Meera ; Joo, Sarah ; Ghabili, Kamyar ; Mamawala, Mufaddal ; Agostino, Joseph ; Carter, Herbert B. ; Partin, Alan W. ; Sokoll, Lori J. ; Ross, Ashley E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tosoian, Jeffrey J. ; Druskin, Sasha C. ; Andreas, Darian ; Mullane, Patrick ; Chappidi, Meera ; Joo, Sarah ; Ghabili, Kamyar ; Mamawala, Mufaddal ; Agostino, Joseph ; Carter, Herbert B. ; Partin, Alan W. ; Sokoll, Lori J. ; Ross, Ashley E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To explore the utility of Prostate Health Index (PHI) density for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary cohort of men presenting for diagnostic evaluation of PCa. Patients and Methods The study cohort included patients with elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA; &gt;2 ng/mL) and negative digital rectal examination who underwent PHI testing and prostate biopsy at our institution in 2015. Serum markers were prospectively measured per standard clinical pathway. PHI was calculated as ([{−2}proPSA/free PSA] × [PSA]½), and density calculations were performed using prostate volume as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of serum markers to predict clinically significant PCa, defined as any Gleason score ≥7 cancer or Gleason score 6 cancer in &gt;2 cores or &gt;50% of any positive core. Results Of 118 men with PHI testing who underwent biopsy, 47 (39.8%) were found to have clinically significant PCa on biopsy. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) PHI density was 0.70 (0.43–1.21), and was 0.53 (0.36–0.75) in men with negative biopsy or clinically insignificant PCa and 1.21 (0.74–1.88) in men with clinically significant PCa (P &lt; 0.001). Clinically significant PCa was detected in 3.6% of men in the first quartile of PHI density (&lt;0.43), 36.7% of men in the IQR of PHI density (0.43–1.21), and 80.0% of men with PHI density &gt;1.21 (P &lt; 0.001). Using a threshold of 0.43, PHI density was 97.9% sensitive and 38.0% specific for clinically significant PCa, and 100% sensitive for Gleason score ≥7 disease. Compared with PSA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.52), PSA density (AUC 0.70), %free PSA (AUC 0.75), the product of %free PSA and prostate volume (AUC 0.79), and PHI (AUC 0.76), PHI density had the highest discriminative ability for clinically significant PCa (AUC 0.84). Conclusions Based on the present prospective single‐centre experience, PHI density could be used to avoid 38% of unnecessary biopsies, while failing to detect only 2% of clinically significant cancers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.13762</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28058757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Clinical significance ; diagnosis ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Male ; Mens health ; MRI ; PCSM ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-specific antigen ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; ProstateCancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; protein isoforms ; Rectum ; ROC Curve ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2017-12, Vol.120 (6), p.793-798</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>BJUI © 2017 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8819090820233ee5b8414cf3ccfbcf297afe28ce3cddf32af92a57e3f0db92d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8819090820233ee5b8414cf3ccfbcf297afe28ce3cddf32af92a57e3f0db92d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.13762$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.13762$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28058757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tosoian, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Druskin, Sasha C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreas, Darian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullane, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappidi, Meera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghabili, Kamyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamawala, Mufaddal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostino, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Herbert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partin, Alan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokoll, Lori J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Ashley E.</creatorcontrib><title>Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objectives To explore the utility of Prostate Health Index (PHI) density for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary cohort of men presenting for diagnostic evaluation of PCa. Patients and Methods The study cohort included patients with elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA; &gt;2 ng/mL) and negative digital rectal examination who underwent PHI testing and prostate biopsy at our institution in 2015. Serum markers were prospectively measured per standard clinical pathway. PHI was calculated as ([{−2}proPSA/free PSA] × [PSA]½), and density calculations were performed using prostate volume as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of serum markers to predict clinically significant PCa, defined as any Gleason score ≥7 cancer or Gleason score 6 cancer in &gt;2 cores or &gt;50% of any positive core. Results Of 118 men with PHI testing who underwent biopsy, 47 (39.8%) were found to have clinically significant PCa on biopsy. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) PHI density was 0.70 (0.43–1.21), and was 0.53 (0.36–0.75) in men with negative biopsy or clinically insignificant PCa and 1.21 (0.74–1.88) in men with clinically significant PCa (P &lt; 0.001). Clinically significant PCa was detected in 3.6% of men in the first quartile of PHI density (&lt;0.43), 36.7% of men in the IQR of PHI density (0.43–1.21), and 80.0% of men with PHI density &gt;1.21 (P &lt; 0.001). Using a threshold of 0.43, PHI density was 97.9% sensitive and 38.0% specific for clinically significant PCa, and 100% sensitive for Gleason score ≥7 disease. Compared with PSA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.52), PSA density (AUC 0.70), %free PSA (AUC 0.75), the product of %free PSA and prostate volume (AUC 0.79), and PHI (AUC 0.76), PHI density had the highest discriminative ability for clinically significant PCa (AUC 0.84). Conclusions Based on the present prospective single‐centre experience, PHI density could be used to avoid 38% of unnecessary biopsies, while failing to detect only 2% of clinically significant cancers.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>PCSM</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-specific antigen</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>ProstateCancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>protein isoforms</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQJBYY2vojTuwRKqBFlWCgEmKxHOcMrtKkxAnQf49LWwYkvNh3evTc-UXolOABCWeYzdsBYWlC91CXxEncjwl-3t-9sUw66Mj7OcahkfBD1KECc5HytIteHuvKN7qBaAy6aN6iSZnDV5RD6V2zitxiWVcf4EOjAdO4qowqG5nClc7oolhF3r2WzoaibKLlThUqA_UxOrC68HCyvXtodnvzNBr3pw93k9HVtG-YELQvBJFYYkExZQyAZyImsbHMGJsZS2WqLVBhgJk8t4xqK6nmKTCL80zSnLMeuth4w_z3FnyjFs4bKApdQtV6RQRPuORCyoCe_0HnVVuXYTtFZJJSEVOyFl5uKBM-5Guwalm7ha5XimC1DlyFwNVP4IE92xrbbAH5L7lLOADDDfDpClj9b1LX97ON8hvfcYs3</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Tosoian, Jeffrey J.</creator><creator>Druskin, Sasha C.</creator><creator>Andreas, Darian</creator><creator>Mullane, Patrick</creator><creator>Chappidi, Meera</creator><creator>Joo, Sarah</creator><creator>Ghabili, Kamyar</creator><creator>Mamawala, Mufaddal</creator><creator>Agostino, Joseph</creator><creator>Carter, Herbert B.</creator><creator>Partin, Alan W.</creator><creator>Sokoll, Lori J.</creator><creator>Ross, Ashley E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer</title><author>Tosoian, Jeffrey J. ; Druskin, Sasha C. ; Andreas, Darian ; Mullane, Patrick ; Chappidi, Meera ; Joo, Sarah ; Ghabili, Kamyar ; Mamawala, Mufaddal ; Agostino, Joseph ; Carter, Herbert B. ; Partin, Alan W. ; Sokoll, Lori J. ; Ross, Ashley E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8819090820233ee5b8414cf3ccfbcf297afe28ce3cddf32af92a57e3f0db92d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>PCSM</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-specific antigen</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>ProstateCancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>protein isoforms</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tosoian, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Druskin, Sasha C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreas, Darian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullane, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappidi, Meera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghabili, Kamyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamawala, Mufaddal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostino, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Herbert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partin, Alan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokoll, Lori J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Ashley E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tosoian, Jeffrey J.</au><au>Druskin, Sasha C.</au><au>Andreas, Darian</au><au>Mullane, Patrick</au><au>Chappidi, Meera</au><au>Joo, Sarah</au><au>Ghabili, Kamyar</au><au>Mamawala, Mufaddal</au><au>Agostino, Joseph</au><au>Carter, Herbert B.</au><au>Partin, Alan W.</au><au>Sokoll, Lori J.</au><au>Ross, Ashley E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>793</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>793-798</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objectives To explore the utility of Prostate Health Index (PHI) density for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary cohort of men presenting for diagnostic evaluation of PCa. Patients and Methods The study cohort included patients with elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA; &gt;2 ng/mL) and negative digital rectal examination who underwent PHI testing and prostate biopsy at our institution in 2015. Serum markers were prospectively measured per standard clinical pathway. PHI was calculated as ([{−2}proPSA/free PSA] × [PSA]½), and density calculations were performed using prostate volume as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of serum markers to predict clinically significant PCa, defined as any Gleason score ≥7 cancer or Gleason score 6 cancer in &gt;2 cores or &gt;50% of any positive core. Results Of 118 men with PHI testing who underwent biopsy, 47 (39.8%) were found to have clinically significant PCa on biopsy. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) PHI density was 0.70 (0.43–1.21), and was 0.53 (0.36–0.75) in men with negative biopsy or clinically insignificant PCa and 1.21 (0.74–1.88) in men with clinically significant PCa (P &lt; 0.001). Clinically significant PCa was detected in 3.6% of men in the first quartile of PHI density (&lt;0.43), 36.7% of men in the IQR of PHI density (0.43–1.21), and 80.0% of men with PHI density &gt;1.21 (P &lt; 0.001). Using a threshold of 0.43, PHI density was 97.9% sensitive and 38.0% specific for clinically significant PCa, and 100% sensitive for Gleason score ≥7 disease. Compared with PSA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.52), PSA density (AUC 0.70), %free PSA (AUC 0.75), the product of %free PSA and prostate volume (AUC 0.79), and PHI (AUC 0.76), PHI density had the highest discriminative ability for clinically significant PCa (AUC 0.84). Conclusions Based on the present prospective single‐centre experience, PHI density could be used to avoid 38% of unnecessary biopsies, while failing to detect only 2% of clinically significant cancers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28058757</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.13762</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2017-12, Vol.120 (6), p.793-798
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856595899
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Biopsy
Clinical significance
diagnosis
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Male
Mens health
MRI
PCSM
Prospective Studies
Prostate - pathology
Prostate cancer
Prostate-specific antigen
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
ProstateCancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
protein isoforms
Rectum
ROC Curve
Ultrasound
title Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T05%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prostate%20Health%20Index%20density%20improves%20detection%20of%20clinically%20significant%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Tosoian,%20Jeffrey%20J.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=793-798&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.13762&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1856595899%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1967284215&rft_id=info:pmid/28058757&rfr_iscdi=true