Budget impact of polio immunization strategy for India: introduction of one dose of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine and reductions in supplemental polio immunization

Abstract Objectives To conduct a budget impact analysis (BIA) of introducing the immunization recommendations of India Expert Advisory Group (IEAG) for the years 2015–2017. The recommendations include introduction of one inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine (IPV) dose in the regular child immunization...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health (London) 2017-01, Vol.142, p.31-38
Hauptverfasser: Khan, M.M, Sharma, S, Tripathi, B, Alvarez, F.P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue
container_start_page 31
container_title Public health (London)
container_volume 142
creator Khan, M.M
Sharma, S
Tripathi, B
Alvarez, F.P
description Abstract Objectives To conduct a budget impact analysis (BIA) of introducing the immunization recommendations of India Expert Advisory Group (IEAG) for the years 2015–2017. The recommendations include introduction of one inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine (IPV) dose in the regular child immunization programme along with reductions in oral polio vaccine (OPV) doses in supplemental programmes. Study design This is a national level analysis of budget impact of new polio immunization recommendations. Since the states of India vary widely in terms of size, vaccine coverage and supplemental vaccine needs, the study estimated the budget impact for each of the states of India separately to derive the national level budget impact. Methods Based on the recommendations of IEAG, the BIA assumes that all children in India will get an IPV dose at 14 weeks of age in addition to the OPV and DPT (or Pentavalent-3) doses. Cost of introducing the IPV dose was estimated by considering vaccine price and vaccine delivery and administration costs. The cost savings associated with the reduction in number of doses of OPV in supplemental immunization were also estimated. The analysis used India-specific or international cost parameters to estimate the budget impact. Results Introduction of one IPV dose will increase the cost of vaccines in the regular immunization programme from $20 million to $47 million. Since IEAG recommends lower intensity of supplemental OPV vaccination, polio vaccine cost of supplemental programme is expected to decline from $72 million to $53 million. Cost of administering polio vaccines will also decline from $124 million to $105 million mainly due to the significantly lower intensity of supplemental polio vaccination. The net effect of adopting IEAG's recommendations on polio immunization turns out to be cost saving for India, reducing total polio immunization cost by $6 million. Additional savings could be achieved if India adopts the new policy regarding the handling of multi-dose vials after opening. Introduction of three doses of IPV with the existing polio immunization schedule will increase the budget requirement by $102 million but replacing OPV doses with IPV will increase the budget by about $59 million. Discontinuation of supplemental OPV immunization with replacement of OPV by IPV will reduce the Government of India's (GOI) polio immunization budget by $99 million. Conclusion Although the overall cost of polio programme will decline with the adop
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856594068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0033350616303183</els_id><sourcerecordid>1856594068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-481159d4e05f9d326fb84df64750891ca980919d8180da7f4bf8e5805abd8d9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNtUlVUpWIDOjgZWDAhboOqeTUmLYqKZNUQ_tCvqYpu53FIK7OyeH7f84lCD2lZEsJbV_utvPyDbZ1yUthW8I9tKGsayve0vY-2hDSNFXDSXuGHqW0I4TUXcMforNaEN5RyTbo19vF3kDGbpq1yTgMeA6jC-U9Ld791NkFj1OOOsPNAQ8h4itvnX6Fnc8x2MX8AYoseMA2JFhz54uX2xeNPdpNBxhddgnvtTGukNpbHOEkT0WA0zLPI0zgsx7_0cNj9GDQY4Inp3iOvr5_9-XyY3X96cPV5ZvryrBG5ooJSrm0DAgfpG3qdugFs0PLOk6EpEZLQSSVVlBBrO4G1g8CeNmG7q2wsm_O0Yuj7xzDjwVSVpNLBsZRewhLUlTwlktGWlHQ53fQXViiL92pmpSlU8LoStVHysSQUoRBzdFNOh4UJWo9o9qp9YxqPeNaK6GInp2sl34Ceyv5e7cCvD4CUHaxdxBVMg68AesimKxscP_3v7gjN6PzzujxOxwg3c5BVaoVUZ_Xj7T-oyIlTRmq-Q2Uc8b2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2050610418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Budget impact of polio immunization strategy for India: introduction of one dose of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine and reductions in supplemental polio immunization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Khan, M.M ; Sharma, S ; Tripathi, B ; Alvarez, F.P</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, M.M ; Sharma, S ; Tripathi, B ; Alvarez, F.P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To conduct a budget impact analysis (BIA) of introducing the immunization recommendations of India Expert Advisory Group (IEAG) for the years 2015–2017. The recommendations include introduction of one inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine (IPV) dose in the regular child immunization programme along with reductions in oral polio vaccine (OPV) doses in supplemental programmes. Study design This is a national level analysis of budget impact of new polio immunization recommendations. Since the states of India vary widely in terms of size, vaccine coverage and supplemental vaccine needs, the study estimated the budget impact for each of the states of India separately to derive the national level budget impact. Methods Based on the recommendations of IEAG, the BIA assumes that all children in India will get an IPV dose at 14 weeks of age in addition to the OPV and DPT (or Pentavalent-3) doses. Cost of introducing the IPV dose was estimated by considering vaccine price and vaccine delivery and administration costs. The cost savings associated with the reduction in number of doses of OPV in supplemental immunization were also estimated. The analysis used India-specific or international cost parameters to estimate the budget impact. Results Introduction of one IPV dose will increase the cost of vaccines in the regular immunization programme from $20 million to $47 million. Since IEAG recommends lower intensity of supplemental OPV vaccination, polio vaccine cost of supplemental programme is expected to decline from $72 million to $53 million. Cost of administering polio vaccines will also decline from $124 million to $105 million mainly due to the significantly lower intensity of supplemental polio vaccination. The net effect of adopting IEAG's recommendations on polio immunization turns out to be cost saving for India, reducing total polio immunization cost by $6 million. Additional savings could be achieved if India adopts the new policy regarding the handling of multi-dose vials after opening. Introduction of three doses of IPV with the existing polio immunization schedule will increase the budget requirement by $102 million but replacing OPV doses with IPV will increase the budget by about $59 million. Discontinuation of supplemental OPV immunization with replacement of OPV by IPV will reduce the Government of India's (GOI) polio immunization budget by $99 million. Conclusion Although the overall cost of polio programme will decline with the adoption of IEAG's recommendations, state-level costs will vary widely. In states like Kerala, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh, cost of polio immunization will increase while in Punjab and Jharkhand the costs will remain more or less constant. Significant cost reductions will happen in states with high intensity of supplemental polio immunizations (Bihar, Haryana and Delhi). The cost of procuring polio vaccines will more than double from $20 million to about $47 million requiring allocation of additional foreign exchanges. In some states (like Bihar), the decline in polio-related employment will be very high requiring reallocation of personnel from polio to other programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28057194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advisory groups ; Budget impact ; Budgets ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Cost engineering ; Cost Savings ; Costs ; Delivery scheduling ; Discontinued ; Dosage ; Drug delivery systems ; Employment ; Government ; Health initiatives ; Humans ; Immunization ; Immunization Programs - economics ; Immunization Schedule ; Impact analysis ; India ; Infant ; Infectious Disease ; Internal Medicine ; IPV ; OPV ; Parameter estimation ; Polio eradication ; Polio immunization ; Poliomyelitis ; Poliomyelitis - prevention &amp; control ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration &amp; dosage ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration &amp; dosage ; Savings ; Vaccination - methods ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Public health (London), 2017-01, Vol.142, p.31-38</ispartof><rights>The Royal Society for Public Health</rights><rights>2016 The Royal Society for Public Health</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-481159d4e05f9d326fb84df64750891ca980919d8180da7f4bf8e5805abd8d9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-481159d4e05f9d326fb84df64750891ca980919d8180da7f4bf8e5805abd8d9b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3915-482X ; 0000-0002-3357-9827 ; 0000-0002-9629-7069</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, F.P</creatorcontrib><title>Budget impact of polio immunization strategy for India: introduction of one dose of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine and reductions in supplemental polio immunization</title><title>Public health (London)</title><addtitle>Public Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To conduct a budget impact analysis (BIA) of introducing the immunization recommendations of India Expert Advisory Group (IEAG) for the years 2015–2017. The recommendations include introduction of one inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine (IPV) dose in the regular child immunization programme along with reductions in oral polio vaccine (OPV) doses in supplemental programmes. Study design This is a national level analysis of budget impact of new polio immunization recommendations. Since the states of India vary widely in terms of size, vaccine coverage and supplemental vaccine needs, the study estimated the budget impact for each of the states of India separately to derive the national level budget impact. Methods Based on the recommendations of IEAG, the BIA assumes that all children in India will get an IPV dose at 14 weeks of age in addition to the OPV and DPT (or Pentavalent-3) doses. Cost of introducing the IPV dose was estimated by considering vaccine price and vaccine delivery and administration costs. The cost savings associated with the reduction in number of doses of OPV in supplemental immunization were also estimated. The analysis used India-specific or international cost parameters to estimate the budget impact. Results Introduction of one IPV dose will increase the cost of vaccines in the regular immunization programme from $20 million to $47 million. Since IEAG recommends lower intensity of supplemental OPV vaccination, polio vaccine cost of supplemental programme is expected to decline from $72 million to $53 million. Cost of administering polio vaccines will also decline from $124 million to $105 million mainly due to the significantly lower intensity of supplemental polio vaccination. The net effect of adopting IEAG's recommendations on polio immunization turns out to be cost saving for India, reducing total polio immunization cost by $6 million. Additional savings could be achieved if India adopts the new policy regarding the handling of multi-dose vials after opening. Introduction of three doses of IPV with the existing polio immunization schedule will increase the budget requirement by $102 million but replacing OPV doses with IPV will increase the budget by about $59 million. Discontinuation of supplemental OPV immunization with replacement of OPV by IPV will reduce the Government of India's (GOI) polio immunization budget by $99 million. Conclusion Although the overall cost of polio programme will decline with the adoption of IEAG's recommendations, state-level costs will vary widely. In states like Kerala, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh, cost of polio immunization will increase while in Punjab and Jharkhand the costs will remain more or less constant. Significant cost reductions will happen in states with high intensity of supplemental polio immunizations (Bihar, Haryana and Delhi). The cost of procuring polio vaccines will more than double from $20 million to about $47 million requiring allocation of additional foreign exchanges. In some states (like Bihar), the decline in polio-related employment will be very high requiring reallocation of personnel from polio to other programmes.</description><subject>Advisory groups</subject><subject>Budget impact</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Delivery scheduling</subject><subject>Discontinued</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Health initiatives</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Programs - economics</subject><subject>Immunization Schedule</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>IPV</subject><subject>OPV</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Polio eradication</subject><subject>Polio immunization</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Savings</subject><subject>Vaccination - methods</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0033-3506</issn><issn>1476-5616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNtUlVUpWIDOjgZWDAhboOqeTUmLYqKZNUQ_tCvqYpu53FIK7OyeH7f84lCD2lZEsJbV_utvPyDbZ1yUthW8I9tKGsayve0vY-2hDSNFXDSXuGHqW0I4TUXcMforNaEN5RyTbo19vF3kDGbpq1yTgMeA6jC-U9Ld791NkFj1OOOsPNAQ8h4itvnX6Fnc8x2MX8AYoseMA2JFhz54uX2xeNPdpNBxhddgnvtTGukNpbHOEkT0WA0zLPI0zgsx7_0cNj9GDQY4Inp3iOvr5_9-XyY3X96cPV5ZvryrBG5ooJSrm0DAgfpG3qdugFs0PLOk6EpEZLQSSVVlBBrO4G1g8CeNmG7q2wsm_O0Yuj7xzDjwVSVpNLBsZRewhLUlTwlktGWlHQ53fQXViiL92pmpSlU8LoStVHysSQUoRBzdFNOh4UJWo9o9qp9YxqPeNaK6GInp2sl34Ceyv5e7cCvD4CUHaxdxBVMg68AesimKxscP_3v7gjN6PzzujxOxwg3c5BVaoVUZ_Xj7T-oyIlTRmq-Q2Uc8b2</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Khan, M.M</creator><creator>Sharma, S</creator><creator>Tripathi, B</creator><creator>Alvarez, F.P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3915-482X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3357-9827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-7069</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Budget impact of polio immunization strategy for India: introduction of one dose of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine and reductions in supplemental polio immunization</title><author>Khan, M.M ; Sharma, S ; Tripathi, B ; Alvarez, F.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-481159d4e05f9d326fb84df64750891ca980919d8180da7f4bf8e5805abd8d9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Advisory groups</topic><topic>Budget impact</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Delivery scheduling</topic><topic>Discontinued</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Health initiatives</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Programs - economics</topic><topic>Immunization Schedule</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>IPV</topic><topic>OPV</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Polio eradication</topic><topic>Polio immunization</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Savings</topic><topic>Vaccination - methods</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, F.P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public health (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, M.M</au><au>Sharma, S</au><au>Tripathi, B</au><au>Alvarez, F.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Budget impact of polio immunization strategy for India: introduction of one dose of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine and reductions in supplemental polio immunization</atitle><jtitle>Public health (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>142</volume><spage>31</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>31-38</pages><issn>0033-3506</issn><eissn>1476-5616</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To conduct a budget impact analysis (BIA) of introducing the immunization recommendations of India Expert Advisory Group (IEAG) for the years 2015–2017. The recommendations include introduction of one inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine (IPV) dose in the regular child immunization programme along with reductions in oral polio vaccine (OPV) doses in supplemental programmes. Study design This is a national level analysis of budget impact of new polio immunization recommendations. Since the states of India vary widely in terms of size, vaccine coverage and supplemental vaccine needs, the study estimated the budget impact for each of the states of India separately to derive the national level budget impact. Methods Based on the recommendations of IEAG, the BIA assumes that all children in India will get an IPV dose at 14 weeks of age in addition to the OPV and DPT (or Pentavalent-3) doses. Cost of introducing the IPV dose was estimated by considering vaccine price and vaccine delivery and administration costs. The cost savings associated with the reduction in number of doses of OPV in supplemental immunization were also estimated. The analysis used India-specific or international cost parameters to estimate the budget impact. Results Introduction of one IPV dose will increase the cost of vaccines in the regular immunization programme from $20 million to $47 million. Since IEAG recommends lower intensity of supplemental OPV vaccination, polio vaccine cost of supplemental programme is expected to decline from $72 million to $53 million. Cost of administering polio vaccines will also decline from $124 million to $105 million mainly due to the significantly lower intensity of supplemental polio vaccination. The net effect of adopting IEAG's recommendations on polio immunization turns out to be cost saving for India, reducing total polio immunization cost by $6 million. Additional savings could be achieved if India adopts the new policy regarding the handling of multi-dose vials after opening. Introduction of three doses of IPV with the existing polio immunization schedule will increase the budget requirement by $102 million but replacing OPV doses with IPV will increase the budget by about $59 million. Discontinuation of supplemental OPV immunization with replacement of OPV by IPV will reduce the Government of India's (GOI) polio immunization budget by $99 million. Conclusion Although the overall cost of polio programme will decline with the adoption of IEAG's recommendations, state-level costs will vary widely. In states like Kerala, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh, cost of polio immunization will increase while in Punjab and Jharkhand the costs will remain more or less constant. Significant cost reductions will happen in states with high intensity of supplemental polio immunizations (Bihar, Haryana and Delhi). The cost of procuring polio vaccines will more than double from $20 million to about $47 million requiring allocation of additional foreign exchanges. In some states (like Bihar), the decline in polio-related employment will be very high requiring reallocation of personnel from polio to other programmes.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28057194</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3915-482X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3357-9827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-7069</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3506
ispartof Public health (London), 2017-01, Vol.142, p.31-38
issn 0033-3506
1476-5616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856594068
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Advisory groups
Budget impact
Budgets
Child, Preschool
Children
Cost analysis
Cost control
Cost engineering
Cost Savings
Costs
Delivery scheduling
Discontinued
Dosage
Drug delivery systems
Employment
Government
Health initiatives
Humans
Immunization
Immunization Programs - economics
Immunization Schedule
Impact analysis
India
Infant
Infectious Disease
Internal Medicine
IPV
OPV
Parameter estimation
Polio eradication
Polio immunization
Poliomyelitis
Poliomyelitis - prevention & control
Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration & dosage
Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration & dosage
Savings
Vaccination - methods
Vaccines
title Budget impact of polio immunization strategy for India: introduction of one dose of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine and reductions in supplemental polio immunization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Budget%20impact%20of%20polio%20immunization%20strategy%20for%20India:%20introduction%20of%20one%20dose%20of%20inactivated%20poliomyelitis%20vaccine%20and%20reductions%20in%20supplemental%20polio%20immunization&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20(London)&rft.au=Khan,%20M.M&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=142&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=31-38&rft.issn=0033-3506&rft.eissn=1476-5616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1856594068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2050610418&rft_id=info:pmid/28057194&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0033350616303183&rfr_iscdi=true