Flight-level thermodynamic instrument wetting errors in hurricanes. Part I: Observations

Flight-level thermodynamic errors caused by the wetting of temperature and moisture sensors immersed within the airstream are studied using data from 666 radial legs collected in 31 hurricanes at pressure levels ranging from 850 to 500 mb. Concurrent measurements from a modified Barnes radiometer an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly weather review 2002-04, Vol.130 (4), p.825-841
Hauptverfasser: EASTIN, Matthew D, BLACK, Peter G, GRAY, William M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 841
container_issue 4
container_start_page 825
container_title Monthly weather review
container_volume 130
creator EASTIN, Matthew D
BLACK, Peter G
GRAY, William M
description Flight-level thermodynamic errors caused by the wetting of temperature and moisture sensors immersed within the airstream are studied using data from 666 radial legs collected in 31 hurricanes at pressure levels ranging from 850 to 500 mb. Concurrent measurements from a modified Barnes radiometer and a Rosemount 102 immersion thermometer are compared to identify regions, called instrument wetting events (IWE), in which Rosemount temperatures are significantly cooler than radiometer-derived temperatures by a specified amount. A total of 420 IWE are identified in the dataset. Roughly 50% of the radial legs contain at least one instrument wetting event. More than 90% of IWE are associated with updrafts containing cloud water and are confined to scales less than 10 km. IWE are also found to be more frequent in eyewalls and intense hurricanes. Thermodynamic errors within IWE and convective updrafts and downdrafts are summarized as distributions of average temperature, specific humidity, virtual potential temperature, and equivalent potential temperature error. Distributions are skewed toward larger error values at all levels. Median average errors within IWE indicate that the thermodynamic quantities are typically too low by similar to 1 degree C, similar to 1 g kg super(-1), similar to 1.5 K, and similar to 5 K, respectively. The largest errors (>90% of the distribution) are nearly twice the median values. Error magnitudes tend to increase with height, but rarely achieve theoretical predictions. In addition, more than 65% of updrafts and 35% of downdrafts are found to contain significant thermodynamic errors. A correction method used in earlier studies was found to be inadequate at removing the majority of errors, but reduced the errors by similar to 30%-50% on average.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0825:FLTIWE>2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18562090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>110694344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-918cf57b3e2eac503a4adddabe05f54e9a0431a486209be41d93085471c0e1c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkFtrGzEQRkVoIK6T_7AUWpqHdUa3vbilEEycGAzOQ0LyJmTtbCyzl0TSpvjfV4tDC30Y5mHOfDMcQq4ozCjN5RWVDFIQJf_OANgl5fATCibny_XD6unmF5vBbLH5wU7I5C_5iUwimqeQCXFGPnu_B4AsE2xCnpeNfdmFtMF3bJKwQ9f21aHTrTWJ7XxwQ4tdSH5jCLZ7SdC53vk4SXaDc9boDv0sudcuJKt5stl6dO862L7z5-S01o3Hi48-JY_Lm4fFXbre3K4W1-vU8BxCWtLC1DLfcmSojQSuha6qSm8RZC0FlhoEp1oUGYNyi4JWJYdCipwaQGokn5Jvx9xX178N6INqrTfYNPG1fvCKFnJchQh--Q_c94Pr4m-KlgUVWawI3R4h43rvHdbq1dlWu4OioEb9apSqRqlq1K-ifjXqV0f9iilQi41iMenrxzntjW5qpztj_b84LkWZg-R_ABekiQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198146814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flight-level thermodynamic instrument wetting errors in hurricanes. Part I: Observations</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AMS Journals (Meteorology)</source><creator>EASTIN, Matthew D ; BLACK, Peter G ; GRAY, William M</creator><creatorcontrib>EASTIN, Matthew D ; BLACK, Peter G ; GRAY, William M</creatorcontrib><description>Flight-level thermodynamic errors caused by the wetting of temperature and moisture sensors immersed within the airstream are studied using data from 666 radial legs collected in 31 hurricanes at pressure levels ranging from 850 to 500 mb. Concurrent measurements from a modified Barnes radiometer and a Rosemount 102 immersion thermometer are compared to identify regions, called instrument wetting events (IWE), in which Rosemount temperatures are significantly cooler than radiometer-derived temperatures by a specified amount. A total of 420 IWE are identified in the dataset. Roughly 50% of the radial legs contain at least one instrument wetting event. More than 90% of IWE are associated with updrafts containing cloud water and are confined to scales less than 10 km. IWE are also found to be more frequent in eyewalls and intense hurricanes. Thermodynamic errors within IWE and convective updrafts and downdrafts are summarized as distributions of average temperature, specific humidity, virtual potential temperature, and equivalent potential temperature error. Distributions are skewed toward larger error values at all levels. Median average errors within IWE indicate that the thermodynamic quantities are typically too low by similar to 1 degree C, similar to 1 g kg super(-1), similar to 1.5 K, and similar to 5 K, respectively. The largest errors (&gt;90% of the distribution) are nearly twice the median values. Error magnitudes tend to increase with height, but rarely achieve theoretical predictions. In addition, more than 65% of updrafts and 35% of downdrafts are found to contain significant thermodynamic errors. A correction method used in earlier studies was found to be inadequate at removing the majority of errors, but reduced the errors by similar to 30%-50% on average.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130&lt;0825:FLTIWE&gt;2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models ; Hurricanes</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2002-04, Vol.130 (4), p.825-841</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-918cf57b3e2eac503a4adddabe05f54e9a0431a486209be41d93085471c0e1c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3681,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13549705$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>EASTIN, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLACK, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRAY, William M</creatorcontrib><title>Flight-level thermodynamic instrument wetting errors in hurricanes. Part I: Observations</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>Flight-level thermodynamic errors caused by the wetting of temperature and moisture sensors immersed within the airstream are studied using data from 666 radial legs collected in 31 hurricanes at pressure levels ranging from 850 to 500 mb. Concurrent measurements from a modified Barnes radiometer and a Rosemount 102 immersion thermometer are compared to identify regions, called instrument wetting events (IWE), in which Rosemount temperatures are significantly cooler than radiometer-derived temperatures by a specified amount. A total of 420 IWE are identified in the dataset. Roughly 50% of the radial legs contain at least one instrument wetting event. More than 90% of IWE are associated with updrafts containing cloud water and are confined to scales less than 10 km. IWE are also found to be more frequent in eyewalls and intense hurricanes. Thermodynamic errors within IWE and convective updrafts and downdrafts are summarized as distributions of average temperature, specific humidity, virtual potential temperature, and equivalent potential temperature error. Distributions are skewed toward larger error values at all levels. Median average errors within IWE indicate that the thermodynamic quantities are typically too low by similar to 1 degree C, similar to 1 g kg super(-1), similar to 1.5 K, and similar to 5 K, respectively. The largest errors (&gt;90% of the distribution) are nearly twice the median values. Error magnitudes tend to increase with height, but rarely achieve theoretical predictions. In addition, more than 65% of updrafts and 35% of downdrafts are found to contain significant thermodynamic errors. A correction method used in earlier studies was found to be inadequate at removing the majority of errors, but reduced the errors by similar to 30%-50% on average.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkFtrGzEQRkVoIK6T_7AUWpqHdUa3vbilEEycGAzOQ0LyJmTtbCyzl0TSpvjfV4tDC30Y5mHOfDMcQq4ozCjN5RWVDFIQJf_OANgl5fATCibny_XD6unmF5vBbLH5wU7I5C_5iUwimqeQCXFGPnu_B4AsE2xCnpeNfdmFtMF3bJKwQ9f21aHTrTWJ7XxwQ4tdSH5jCLZ7SdC53vk4SXaDc9boDv0sudcuJKt5stl6dO862L7z5-S01o3Hi48-JY_Lm4fFXbre3K4W1-vU8BxCWtLC1DLfcmSojQSuha6qSm8RZC0FlhoEp1oUGYNyi4JWJYdCipwaQGokn5Jvx9xX178N6INqrTfYNPG1fvCKFnJchQh--Q_c94Pr4m-KlgUVWawI3R4h43rvHdbq1dlWu4OioEb9apSqRqlq1K-ifjXqV0f9iilQi41iMenrxzntjW5qpztj_b84LkWZg-R_ABekiQI</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>EASTIN, Matthew D</creator><creator>BLACK, Peter G</creator><creator>GRAY, William M</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Flight-level thermodynamic instrument wetting errors in hurricanes. Part I: Observations</title><author>EASTIN, Matthew D ; BLACK, Peter G ; GRAY, William M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-918cf57b3e2eac503a4adddabe05f54e9a0431a486209be41d93085471c0e1c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>EASTIN, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLACK, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRAY, William M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>EASTIN, Matthew D</au><au>BLACK, Peter G</au><au>GRAY, William M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flight-level thermodynamic instrument wetting errors in hurricanes. Part I: Observations</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>825</spage><epage>841</epage><pages>825-841</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>Flight-level thermodynamic errors caused by the wetting of temperature and moisture sensors immersed within the airstream are studied using data from 666 radial legs collected in 31 hurricanes at pressure levels ranging from 850 to 500 mb. Concurrent measurements from a modified Barnes radiometer and a Rosemount 102 immersion thermometer are compared to identify regions, called instrument wetting events (IWE), in which Rosemount temperatures are significantly cooler than radiometer-derived temperatures by a specified amount. A total of 420 IWE are identified in the dataset. Roughly 50% of the radial legs contain at least one instrument wetting event. More than 90% of IWE are associated with updrafts containing cloud water and are confined to scales less than 10 km. IWE are also found to be more frequent in eyewalls and intense hurricanes. Thermodynamic errors within IWE and convective updrafts and downdrafts are summarized as distributions of average temperature, specific humidity, virtual potential temperature, and equivalent potential temperature error. Distributions are skewed toward larger error values at all levels. Median average errors within IWE indicate that the thermodynamic quantities are typically too low by similar to 1 degree C, similar to 1 g kg super(-1), similar to 1.5 K, and similar to 5 K, respectively. The largest errors (&gt;90% of the distribution) are nearly twice the median values. Error magnitudes tend to increase with height, but rarely achieve theoretical predictions. In addition, more than 65% of updrafts and 35% of downdrafts are found to contain significant thermodynamic errors. A correction method used in earlier studies was found to be inadequate at removing the majority of errors, but reduced the errors by similar to 30%-50% on average.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130&lt;0825:FLTIWE&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-0644
ispartof Monthly weather review, 2002-04, Vol.130 (4), p.825-841
issn 0027-0644
1520-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18562090
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Alma/SFX Local Collection; AMS Journals (Meteorology)
subjects Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models
Hurricanes
title Flight-level thermodynamic instrument wetting errors in hurricanes. Part I: Observations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A33%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flight-level%20thermodynamic%20instrument%20wetting%20errors%20in%20hurricanes.%20Part%20I:%20Observations&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=EASTIN,%20Matthew%20D&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=825&rft.epage=841&rft.pages=825-841&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130%3C0825:FLTIWE%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E110694344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198146814&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true