EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY
LIDAR is relatively new in the commercial market for remote sensing of topography and it is difficult to find objective reporting on the accuracy of LIDAR measurements in an applied context. Accuracy specifications for LIDAR data in published evaluations range from 1 to 2 m root mean square error (R...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2002-02, Vol.38 (1), p.33-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Journal of the American Water Resources Association |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Bowen, Zachary H. Waltermire, Robert G. |
description | LIDAR is relatively new in the commercial market for remote sensing of topography and it is difficult to find objective reporting on the accuracy of LIDAR measurements in an applied context. Accuracy specifications for LIDAR data in published evaluations range from 1 to 2 m root mean square error (RMSEx,y) and 15 to 20 cm RMSEz. Most of these estimates are based on measurements over relatively flat, homogeneous terrain. This study evaluated the accuracy of one LIDAR data set over a range of terrain types in a western river corridor. Elevation errors based on measurements over all terrain types were larger (RMSEz equals 43 cm) than values typically reported. This result is largely attributable to horizontal positioning limitations (1 to 2 m RMSEx,y) in areas with variable terrain and large topographic relief. Cross-sectional profiles indicated algorithms that were effective for removing vegetation in relatively flat terrain were less effective near the active channel where dense vegetation was found in a narrow band along a low terrace. LIDAR provides relatively accurate data at densities (50,000 to 100,000 points per km super(2)) not feasible with other survey technologies. Other options for projects requiring higher accuracy include low-altitude aerial photography and intensive ground surveying. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01532.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18557259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>110704161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i279t-e9fd3d232d564d1b4ab6643e034f4cbaab776eed56ce2b7ad01099d83393d7803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkFtPhDAQhRujibr6H4iJRh_AXiiFRwQWiAimsl6emgLdhHVv0t1k_fd21fjgvMzknC8nMwPABYIOMnU7cxCj2Eae7zsYQuxsGogowc7uAJz8WYdmhgGxXea-HoNTrWfQUMgnJ-AteQ6LSVjnVWlVY6vI06y24qROom8pLGOLh2Wal6l1XeRxyG-sccWthyR8mvC9yvPnhFtRxXkeG6OuHquUh4_Z2xk4msq5Vue_fQQm46SOMruo0jwKC7vHLNjYKph2pMMEd9RzO9S4svE8lyhI3KnbNlI2jHlKGbdVuGGyg-aUoPMJCUjHfEhG4Oondz2sPrZKb8Si162az-VSrbZaIJ9ShmlgwIt_4Gy1HZZmN4EhIijwzUdG4PIXkrqV8-kgl22vxXroF3L4FIhQGlC8D7N_uF5v1O7Pl8O78BhhVLyUqUjv72hWwCfByReZbXeK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201319818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bowen, Zachary H. ; Waltermire, Robert G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Zachary H. ; Waltermire, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><description>LIDAR is relatively new in the commercial market for remote sensing of topography and it is difficult to find objective reporting on the accuracy of LIDAR measurements in an applied context. Accuracy specifications for LIDAR data in published evaluations range from 1 to 2 m root mean square error (RMSEx,y) and 15 to 20 cm RMSEz. Most of these estimates are based on measurements over relatively flat, homogeneous terrain. This study evaluated the accuracy of one LIDAR data set over a range of terrain types in a western river corridor. Elevation errors based on measurements over all terrain types were larger (RMSEz equals 43 cm) than values typically reported. This result is largely attributable to horizontal positioning limitations (1 to 2 m RMSEx,y) in areas with variable terrain and large topographic relief. Cross-sectional profiles indicated algorithms that were effective for removing vegetation in relatively flat terrain were less effective near the active channel where dense vegetation was found in a narrow band along a low terrace. LIDAR provides relatively accurate data at densities (50,000 to 100,000 points per km super(2)) not feasible with other survey technologies. Other options for projects requiring higher accuracy include low-altitude aerial photography and intensive ground surveying.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01532.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWRAF5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; aquatic ecosystems ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; Geographic Information Systems ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; instream flow studies ; Internal geophysics ; LIDAR - remote sensing ; surveying ; watershed management</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002-02, Vol.38 (1), p.33-41</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Resources Association Feb 2002</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13559529$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Zachary H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltermire, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><title>EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>LIDAR is relatively new in the commercial market for remote sensing of topography and it is difficult to find objective reporting on the accuracy of LIDAR measurements in an applied context. Accuracy specifications for LIDAR data in published evaluations range from 1 to 2 m root mean square error (RMSEx,y) and 15 to 20 cm RMSEz. Most of these estimates are based on measurements over relatively flat, homogeneous terrain. This study evaluated the accuracy of one LIDAR data set over a range of terrain types in a western river corridor. Elevation errors based on measurements over all terrain types were larger (RMSEz equals 43 cm) than values typically reported. This result is largely attributable to horizontal positioning limitations (1 to 2 m RMSEx,y) in areas with variable terrain and large topographic relief. Cross-sectional profiles indicated algorithms that were effective for removing vegetation in relatively flat terrain were less effective near the active channel where dense vegetation was found in a narrow band along a low terrace. LIDAR provides relatively accurate data at densities (50,000 to 100,000 points per km super(2)) not feasible with other survey technologies. Other options for projects requiring higher accuracy include low-altitude aerial photography and intensive ground surveying.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>instream flow studies</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>LIDAR - remote sensing</subject><subject>surveying</subject><subject>watershed management</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkFtPhDAQhRujibr6H4iJRh_AXiiFRwQWiAimsl6emgLdhHVv0t1k_fd21fjgvMzknC8nMwPABYIOMnU7cxCj2Eae7zsYQuxsGogowc7uAJz8WYdmhgGxXea-HoNTrWfQUMgnJ-AteQ6LSVjnVWlVY6vI06y24qROom8pLGOLh2Wal6l1XeRxyG-sccWthyR8mvC9yvPnhFtRxXkeG6OuHquUh4_Z2xk4msq5Vue_fQQm46SOMruo0jwKC7vHLNjYKph2pMMEd9RzO9S4svE8lyhI3KnbNlI2jHlKGbdVuGGyg-aUoPMJCUjHfEhG4Oondz2sPrZKb8Si162az-VSrbZaIJ9ShmlgwIt_4Gy1HZZmN4EhIijwzUdG4PIXkrqV8-kgl22vxXroF3L4FIhQGlC8D7N_uF5v1O7Pl8O78BhhVLyUqUjv72hWwCfByReZbXeK</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>Bowen, Zachary H.</creator><creator>Waltermire, Robert G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Water Resources Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY</title><author>Bowen, Zachary H. ; Waltermire, Robert G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i279t-e9fd3d232d564d1b4ab6643e034f4cbaab776eed56ce2b7ad01099d83393d7803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>instream flow studies</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>LIDAR - remote sensing</topic><topic>surveying</topic><topic>watershed management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Zachary H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltermire, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowen, Zachary H.</au><au>Waltermire, Robert G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>33-41</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><coden>JWRAF5</coden><abstract>LIDAR is relatively new in the commercial market for remote sensing of topography and it is difficult to find objective reporting on the accuracy of LIDAR measurements in an applied context. Accuracy specifications for LIDAR data in published evaluations range from 1 to 2 m root mean square error (RMSEx,y) and 15 to 20 cm RMSEz. Most of these estimates are based on measurements over relatively flat, homogeneous terrain. This study evaluated the accuracy of one LIDAR data set over a range of terrain types in a western river corridor. Elevation errors based on measurements over all terrain types were larger (RMSEz equals 43 cm) than values typically reported. This result is largely attributable to horizontal positioning limitations (1 to 2 m RMSEx,y) in areas with variable terrain and large topographic relief. Cross-sectional profiles indicated algorithms that were effective for removing vegetation in relatively flat terrain were less effective near the active channel where dense vegetation was found in a narrow band along a low terrace. LIDAR provides relatively accurate data at densities (50,000 to 100,000 points per km super(2)) not feasible with other survey technologies. Other options for projects requiring higher accuracy include low-altitude aerial photography and intensive ground surveying.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01532.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1093-474X |
ispartof | Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002-02, Vol.38 (1), p.33-41 |
issn | 1093-474X 1752-1688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18557259 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Applied geophysics aquatic ecosystems Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Freshwater Geographic Information Systems Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology instream flow studies Internal geophysics LIDAR - remote sensing surveying watershed management |
title | EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EVALUATION%20OF%20LIGHT%20DETECTION%20AND%20RANGING%20(LIDAR)%20FOR%20MEASURING%20RIVER%20CORRIDOR%20TOPOGRAPHY&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Bowen,%20Zachary%20H.&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=33-41&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft.coden=JWRAF5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01532.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E110704161%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201319818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |