Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestation with short cervix: a retrospective cohort study

ABSTRACT Objective To determine if cervical cerclage reduces the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth in cases of dichorionic–diamniotic (DCDA) twin gestation with an ultrasound‐detected short cervix. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 consecutive DCDA twin gestations at Saint Pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2016-12, Vol.48 (6), p.752-756
Hauptverfasser: Houlihan, C., Poon, L. C. Y., Ciarlo, M., Kim, E., Guzman, E. R., Nicolaides, K. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 756
container_issue 6
container_start_page 752
container_title Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 48
creator Houlihan, C.
Poon, L. C. Y.
Ciarlo, M.
Kim, E.
Guzman, E. R.
Nicolaides, K. H.
description ABSTRACT Objective To determine if cervical cerclage reduces the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth in cases of dichorionic–diamniotic (DCDA) twin gestation with an ultrasound‐detected short cervix. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 consecutive DCDA twin gestations at Saint Peter's University Hospital from November 2006 to November 2014 in which cervical cerclage was performed for an ultrasound‐determined cervical length of 1–24 mm at 16–24 weeks' gestation. The cases were matched with 40 controls without cerclage for cervical length and gestational age at cervical assessment. The primary outcome measure was spontaneous birth < 32 weeks. Results There was no difference between the two groups in maternal age, body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, use of in‐vitro fertilization (IVF), parity and prior spontaneous preterm birth. There were more Caucasian women among the controls compared with cases. In the cases, compared with controls, spontaneous delivery < 32 weeks was significantly less frequent (20.0% vs 50.0%; relative risk, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20–0.80)). In the prediction of spontaneous delivery < 32 weeks, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the risk was reduced with the insertion of cervical cerclage (odds ratio, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.058–0.835); P = 0.026), corrected for maternal age, BMI, racial origin, cigarette smoking, IVF, parity and previous preterm birth. Conclusion In DCDA twin gestation with a short cervix, treatment with cervical cerclage may reduce the rate of early preterm birth. The findings suggest the need for adequate randomized controlled trials on cerclage in twin gestations with a short cervix. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/uog.15918
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1855077432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1855077432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4218-2b5e994072c0c47d6c9fb08a5e86b8388f4ad8ec5b5339aea11500c987b0d7763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2qCBbaQ_9AZamXcgiMk_iLG1rxUQmJC5wjx5ksRtk42Mlu99_j3QUOlZB68ciex4_Gfgn5weCMAeTnk1-cMa6Z-kJmrBQ6Awn8K5mBFpBJofMjchzjMwCIshCH5CgXWgMrxIwMcwwrZ01HLQbbmQXS1gc6BBwxLGntwvi03a2wH53vqevpuE7LAuNodidrl4j45MO4Vazc3wtqaLoefBzQjm6F1PpdO45Ts_lGDlrTRfz-Vk_I4_XVw_w2u7u_-TO_vMtsmTOV5TVHrUuQuQVbykZY3dagDEclalUo1ZamUWh5zYtCGzSMcQCrlayhkVIUJ-T33jsE_zKlaaulixa7zvTop1gxxTlIWRb5f6C5EAIUyIT--gd99lPo00MSVcpCcam2wtM9ZdMnxIBtNQS3NGFTMai2iVUpsWqXWGJ_vhmneonNB_keUQLO98Dadbj53FQ93t_sla_ZqqBq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1847385782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestation with short cervix: a retrospective cohort study</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Houlihan, C. ; Poon, L. C. Y. ; Ciarlo, M. ; Kim, E. ; Guzman, E. R. ; Nicolaides, K. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Houlihan, C. ; Poon, L. C. Y. ; Ciarlo, M. ; Kim, E. ; Guzman, E. R. ; Nicolaides, K. H.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective To determine if cervical cerclage reduces the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth in cases of dichorionic–diamniotic (DCDA) twin gestation with an ultrasound‐detected short cervix. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 consecutive DCDA twin gestations at Saint Peter's University Hospital from November 2006 to November 2014 in which cervical cerclage was performed for an ultrasound‐determined cervical length of 1–24 mm at 16–24 weeks' gestation. The cases were matched with 40 controls without cerclage for cervical length and gestational age at cervical assessment. The primary outcome measure was spontaneous birth &lt; 32 weeks. Results There was no difference between the two groups in maternal age, body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, use of in‐vitro fertilization (IVF), parity and prior spontaneous preterm birth. There were more Caucasian women among the controls compared with cases. In the cases, compared with controls, spontaneous delivery &lt; 32 weeks was significantly less frequent (20.0% vs 50.0%; relative risk, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20–0.80)). In the prediction of spontaneous delivery &lt; 32 weeks, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the risk was reduced with the insertion of cervical cerclage (odds ratio, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.058–0.835); P = 0.026), corrected for maternal age, BMI, racial origin, cigarette smoking, IVF, parity and previous preterm birth. Conclusion In DCDA twin gestation with a short cervix, treatment with cervical cerclage may reduce the rate of early preterm birth. The findings suggest the need for adequate randomized controlled trials on cerclage in twin gestations with a short cervix. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.15918</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26990136</identifier><identifier>CODEN: UOGYFJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; cerclage ; Cerclage, Cervical - methods ; cervical ultrasound ; cervix ; Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Maternal Age ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Twin ; Premature Birth - prevention &amp; control ; prematurity ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; twins ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2016-12, Vol.48 (6), p.752-756</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4218-2b5e994072c0c47d6c9fb08a5e86b8388f4ad8ec5b5339aea11500c987b0d7763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4218-2b5e994072c0c47d6c9fb08a5e86b8388f4ad8ec5b5339aea11500c987b0d7763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.15918$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.15918$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26990136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Houlihan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, L. C. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciarlo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaides, K. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestation with short cervix: a retrospective cohort study</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective To determine if cervical cerclage reduces the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth in cases of dichorionic–diamniotic (DCDA) twin gestation with an ultrasound‐detected short cervix. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 consecutive DCDA twin gestations at Saint Peter's University Hospital from November 2006 to November 2014 in which cervical cerclage was performed for an ultrasound‐determined cervical length of 1–24 mm at 16–24 weeks' gestation. The cases were matched with 40 controls without cerclage for cervical length and gestational age at cervical assessment. The primary outcome measure was spontaneous birth &lt; 32 weeks. Results There was no difference between the two groups in maternal age, body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, use of in‐vitro fertilization (IVF), parity and prior spontaneous preterm birth. There were more Caucasian women among the controls compared with cases. In the cases, compared with controls, spontaneous delivery &lt; 32 weeks was significantly less frequent (20.0% vs 50.0%; relative risk, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20–0.80)). In the prediction of spontaneous delivery &lt; 32 weeks, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the risk was reduced with the insertion of cervical cerclage (odds ratio, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.058–0.835); P = 0.026), corrected for maternal age, BMI, racial origin, cigarette smoking, IVF, parity and previous preterm birth. Conclusion In DCDA twin gestation with a short cervix, treatment with cervical cerclage may reduce the rate of early preterm birth. The findings suggest the need for adequate randomized controlled trials on cerclage in twin gestations with a short cervix. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>cerclage</subject><subject>Cerclage, Cervical - methods</subject><subject>cervical ultrasound</subject><subject>cervix</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Twin</subject><subject>Premature Birth - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>prematurity</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>twins</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2qCBbaQ_9AZamXcgiMk_iLG1rxUQmJC5wjx5ksRtk42Mlu99_j3QUOlZB68ciex4_Gfgn5weCMAeTnk1-cMa6Z-kJmrBQ6Awn8K5mBFpBJofMjchzjMwCIshCH5CgXWgMrxIwMcwwrZ01HLQbbmQXS1gc6BBwxLGntwvi03a2wH53vqevpuE7LAuNodidrl4j45MO4Vazc3wtqaLoefBzQjm6F1PpdO45Ts_lGDlrTRfz-Vk_I4_XVw_w2u7u_-TO_vMtsmTOV5TVHrUuQuQVbykZY3dagDEclalUo1ZamUWh5zYtCGzSMcQCrlayhkVIUJ-T33jsE_zKlaaulixa7zvTop1gxxTlIWRb5f6C5EAIUyIT--gd99lPo00MSVcpCcam2wtM9ZdMnxIBtNQS3NGFTMai2iVUpsWqXWGJ_vhmneonNB_keUQLO98Dadbj53FQ93t_sla_ZqqBq</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Houlihan, C.</creator><creator>Poon, L. C. Y.</creator><creator>Ciarlo, M.</creator><creator>Kim, E.</creator><creator>Guzman, E. R.</creator><creator>Nicolaides, K. H.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestation with short cervix: a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Houlihan, C. ; Poon, L. C. Y. ; Ciarlo, M. ; Kim, E. ; Guzman, E. R. ; Nicolaides, K. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4218-2b5e994072c0c47d6c9fb08a5e86b8388f4ad8ec5b5339aea11500c987b0d7763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>cerclage</topic><topic>Cerclage, Cervical - methods</topic><topic>cervical ultrasound</topic><topic>cervix</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Twin</topic><topic>Premature Birth - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>prematurity</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>twins</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Houlihan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, L. C. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciarlo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaides, K. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Houlihan, C.</au><au>Poon, L. C. Y.</au><au>Ciarlo, M.</au><au>Kim, E.</au><au>Guzman, E. R.</au><au>Nicolaides, K. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestation with short cervix: a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>752</spage><epage>756</epage><pages>752-756</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><coden>UOGYFJ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective To determine if cervical cerclage reduces the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth in cases of dichorionic–diamniotic (DCDA) twin gestation with an ultrasound‐detected short cervix. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 consecutive DCDA twin gestations at Saint Peter's University Hospital from November 2006 to November 2014 in which cervical cerclage was performed for an ultrasound‐determined cervical length of 1–24 mm at 16–24 weeks' gestation. The cases were matched with 40 controls without cerclage for cervical length and gestational age at cervical assessment. The primary outcome measure was spontaneous birth &lt; 32 weeks. Results There was no difference between the two groups in maternal age, body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, use of in‐vitro fertilization (IVF), parity and prior spontaneous preterm birth. There were more Caucasian women among the controls compared with cases. In the cases, compared with controls, spontaneous delivery &lt; 32 weeks was significantly less frequent (20.0% vs 50.0%; relative risk, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20–0.80)). In the prediction of spontaneous delivery &lt; 32 weeks, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the risk was reduced with the insertion of cervical cerclage (odds ratio, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.058–0.835); P = 0.026), corrected for maternal age, BMI, racial origin, cigarette smoking, IVF, parity and previous preterm birth. Conclusion In DCDA twin gestation with a short cervix, treatment with cervical cerclage may reduce the rate of early preterm birth. The findings suggest the need for adequate randomized controlled trials on cerclage in twin gestations with a short cervix. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>26990136</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.15918</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7692
ispartof Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2016-12, Vol.48 (6), p.752-756
issn 0960-7692
1469-0705
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1855077432
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
cerclage
Cerclage, Cervical - methods
cervical ultrasound
cervix
Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Maternal Age
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Twin
Premature Birth - prevention & control
prematurity
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
twins
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods
title Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestation with short cervix: a retrospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A01%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20cerclage%20for%20preterm%20birth%20prevention%20in%20twin%20gestation%20with%20short%20cervix:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Houlihan,%20C.&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=752&rft.epage=756&rft.pages=752-756&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft.coden=UOGYFJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.15918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1855077432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1847385782&rft_id=info:pmid/26990136&rfr_iscdi=true