Storm Track Dynamics
This paper reviews the current state of observational, theoretical, and modeling knowledge of the midlatitude storm tracks of the Northern Hemisphere cool season. Observed storm track structures and variations form the first part of the review. The climatological storm track structure is described,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of climate 2002-08, Vol.15 (16), p.2163-2183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 2163 |
container_title | Journal of climate |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Chang, Edmund K. M. Lee, Sukyoung Swanson, Kyle L. |
description | This paper reviews the current state of observational, theoretical, and modeling knowledge of the midlatitude storm tracks of the Northern Hemisphere cool season.
Observed storm track structures and variations form the first part of the review. The climatological storm track structure is described, and the seasonal, interannual, and interdecadal storm track variations are discussed. In particular, the observation that the Pacific storm track exhibits a marked minimum during midwinter when the background baroclinicity is strongest, and a new finding that storm tracks exhibit notable variations in their intensity on decadal timescales, are highlighted as challenges that any comprehensive storm track theory or model has to be able to address.
Physical processes important to storm track dynamics make up the second part of the review. The roles played by baroclinic processes, linear instability, downstream development, barotropic modulation, and diabatic heating are discussed. Understanding of these processes forms the core of our current theoretical knowledge of storm track dynamics, and provides a context within which both observational and modeling results can be interpreted. The eddy energy budget is presented to show that all of these processes are important in the maintenance of the storm tracks.
The final part of the review deals with the ability to model storm tracks. The success as well as remaining problems in idealized storm track modeling, which is based on a linearized dynamical system, are discussed. Perhaps on a more pragmatic side, it is pointed out that while the current generation of atmospheric general circulation models faithfully reproduce the climatological storm track structure, and to a certain extent, the seasonal and ENSO-related interannual variations of storm tracks, in-depth comparisons between observed and modeled storm track variations are still lacking. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<02163:STD>2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18547067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26249394</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26249394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-96cb9897a8b1ca6d74b400643ecae869e167a8fb95ef07807a882a250473fac43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3r0IRFD1snUyy-VARpK0fUOih9RyyMQut3W5N2kP_vVlbKngaXubhneEhJKPQpVTmdzRHyIBzvEEAvAWaPwJSwe7Hk_4TdqHbGz3gAWntuUPSAqV5pmSeH5OTGGcAFAVAi5yPV3WoOpNg3Venv1nYauriKTkq7Tz6s91sk4-XwaT3lg1Hr--952HmmFKrTAtXaKWlVQV1VnxKXnAAwZl31iuhPRVpVxY69yVIBSkotJgDl6y0jrM2ud72LkP9vfZxZappdH4-twtfr6OhKucShEzg5T9wVq_DIv1mEFEpoEonaLCFXKhjDL40yzCtbNgYCqYRZxohphFiGnEmiTO_4kwSZ1I2vZHB1HO1O2ajs_My2IWbxr8ypjhSyRJ3seVmMTnc71Eg10xz9gO66Xa6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222880189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Storm Track Dynamics</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Chang, Edmund K. M. ; Lee, Sukyoung ; Swanson, Kyle L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M. ; Lee, Sukyoung ; Swanson, Kyle L.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews the current state of observational, theoretical, and modeling knowledge of the midlatitude storm tracks of the Northern Hemisphere cool season.
Observed storm track structures and variations form the first part of the review. The climatological storm track structure is described, and the seasonal, interannual, and interdecadal storm track variations are discussed. In particular, the observation that the Pacific storm track exhibits a marked minimum during midwinter when the background baroclinicity is strongest, and a new finding that storm tracks exhibit notable variations in their intensity on decadal timescales, are highlighted as challenges that any comprehensive storm track theory or model has to be able to address.
Physical processes important to storm track dynamics make up the second part of the review. The roles played by baroclinic processes, linear instability, downstream development, barotropic modulation, and diabatic heating are discussed. Understanding of these processes forms the core of our current theoretical knowledge of storm track dynamics, and provides a context within which both observational and modeling results can be interpreted. The eddy energy budget is presented to show that all of these processes are important in the maintenance of the storm tracks.
The final part of the review deals with the ability to model storm tracks. The success as well as remaining problems in idealized storm track modeling, which is based on a linearized dynamical system, are discussed. Perhaps on a more pragmatic side, it is pointed out that while the current generation of atmospheric general circulation models faithfully reproduce the climatological storm track structure, and to a certain extent, the seasonal and ENSO-related interannual variations of storm tracks, in-depth comparisons between observed and modeled storm track variations are still lacking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<02163:STD>2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Atmospheric circulation ; Atmospherics ; Baroclinic waves ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Cyclones ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology ; Meteors ; Modeling ; Storms ; Storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms ; Temperate regions ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2002-08, Vol.15 (16), p.2163-2183</ispartof><rights>2002 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Aug 15, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-96cb9897a8b1ca6d74b400643ecae869e167a8fb95ef07807a882a250473fac43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26249394$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26249394$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13842173$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sukyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Kyle L.</creatorcontrib><title>Storm Track Dynamics</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>This paper reviews the current state of observational, theoretical, and modeling knowledge of the midlatitude storm tracks of the Northern Hemisphere cool season.
Observed storm track structures and variations form the first part of the review. The climatological storm track structure is described, and the seasonal, interannual, and interdecadal storm track variations are discussed. In particular, the observation that the Pacific storm track exhibits a marked minimum during midwinter when the background baroclinicity is strongest, and a new finding that storm tracks exhibit notable variations in their intensity on decadal timescales, are highlighted as challenges that any comprehensive storm track theory or model has to be able to address.
Physical processes important to storm track dynamics make up the second part of the review. The roles played by baroclinic processes, linear instability, downstream development, barotropic modulation, and diabatic heating are discussed. Understanding of these processes forms the core of our current theoretical knowledge of storm track dynamics, and provides a context within which both observational and modeling results can be interpreted. The eddy energy budget is presented to show that all of these processes are important in the maintenance of the storm tracks.
The final part of the review deals with the ability to model storm tracks. The success as well as remaining problems in idealized storm track modeling, which is based on a linearized dynamical system, are discussed. Perhaps on a more pragmatic side, it is pointed out that while the current generation of atmospheric general circulation models faithfully reproduce the climatological storm track structure, and to a certain extent, the seasonal and ENSO-related interannual variations of storm tracks, in-depth comparisons between observed and modeled storm track variations are still lacking.</description><subject>Atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Baroclinic waves</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Meteors</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms</subject><subject>Temperate regions</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3r0IRFD1snUyy-VARpK0fUOih9RyyMQut3W5N2kP_vVlbKngaXubhneEhJKPQpVTmdzRHyIBzvEEAvAWaPwJSwe7Hk_4TdqHbGz3gAWntuUPSAqV5pmSeH5OTGGcAFAVAi5yPV3WoOpNg3Venv1nYauriKTkq7Tz6s91sk4-XwaT3lg1Hr--952HmmFKrTAtXaKWlVQV1VnxKXnAAwZl31iuhPRVpVxY69yVIBSkotJgDl6y0jrM2ud72LkP9vfZxZappdH4-twtfr6OhKucShEzg5T9wVq_DIv1mEFEpoEonaLCFXKhjDL40yzCtbNgYCqYRZxohphFiGnEmiTO_4kwSZ1I2vZHB1HO1O2ajs_My2IWbxr8ypjhSyRJ3seVmMTnc71Eg10xz9gO66Xa6</recordid><startdate>20020815</startdate><enddate>20020815</enddate><creator>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creator><creator>Lee, Sukyoung</creator><creator>Swanson, Kyle L.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020815</creationdate><title>Storm Track Dynamics</title><author>Chang, Edmund K. M. ; Lee, Sukyoung ; Swanson, Kyle L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-96cb9897a8b1ca6d74b400643ecae869e167a8fb95ef07807a882a250473fac43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Baroclinic waves</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Meteors</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms</topic><topic>Temperate regions</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sukyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Kyle L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Edmund K. M.</au><au>Lee, Sukyoung</au><au>Swanson, Kyle L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Storm Track Dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2002-08-15</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2163</spage><epage>2183</epage><pages>2163-2183</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>This paper reviews the current state of observational, theoretical, and modeling knowledge of the midlatitude storm tracks of the Northern Hemisphere cool season.
Observed storm track structures and variations form the first part of the review. The climatological storm track structure is described, and the seasonal, interannual, and interdecadal storm track variations are discussed. In particular, the observation that the Pacific storm track exhibits a marked minimum during midwinter when the background baroclinicity is strongest, and a new finding that storm tracks exhibit notable variations in their intensity on decadal timescales, are highlighted as challenges that any comprehensive storm track theory or model has to be able to address.
Physical processes important to storm track dynamics make up the second part of the review. The roles played by baroclinic processes, linear instability, downstream development, barotropic modulation, and diabatic heating are discussed. Understanding of these processes forms the core of our current theoretical knowledge of storm track dynamics, and provides a context within which both observational and modeling results can be interpreted. The eddy energy budget is presented to show that all of these processes are important in the maintenance of the storm tracks.
The final part of the review deals with the ability to model storm tracks. The success as well as remaining problems in idealized storm track modeling, which is based on a linearized dynamical system, are discussed. Perhaps on a more pragmatic side, it is pointed out that while the current generation of atmospheric general circulation models faithfully reproduce the climatological storm track structure, and to a certain extent, the seasonal and ENSO-related interannual variations of storm tracks, in-depth comparisons between observed and modeled storm track variations are still lacking.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<02163:STD>2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-8755 |
ispartof | Journal of climate, 2002-08, Vol.15 (16), p.2163-2183 |
issn | 0894-8755 1520-0442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18547067 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Atmospheric circulation Atmospherics Baroclinic waves Climate change Climate models Cyclones Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Meteorology Meteors Modeling Storms Storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms Temperate regions Theory |
title | Storm Track Dynamics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T15%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Storm%20Track%20Dynamics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Chang,%20Edmund%20K.%20M.&rft.date=2002-08-15&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2163&rft.epage=2183&rft.pages=2163-2183&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3C02163:STD%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26249394%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222880189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26249394&rfr_iscdi=true |