The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program
Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2017-02, Vol.38, p.119-122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 122 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 119 |
container_title | International journal of surgery (London, England) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Slover, James Mullaly, Kathleen Karia, Raj Bendo, John Ursomanno, Patricia Galloway, Aubrey Iorio, Richard Bosco, Joseph |
description | Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: 9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1854614775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743919116312043</els_id><sourcerecordid>1854614775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpadK0f6CHomMv62oseS1DKSShH4FAlmRzFrI0m8qxrVRjF_bfV-6mOeTQk17E-wzMM4y9B1GAgPWnrggdzUWZcwFlIaR-wY6hVnLVQNW8fMoNHLE3RJ0QSmjQr9lRqYVUda2Omd_-RH5LyOOOTzleB7rnp0RINOA4cTt6vknog5tCHPk2xp6Hkd_M6S442_ONnULu0fJp-dk8-h4zYfd_6U2Kd8kOb9mrne0J3z2-J-z229ft-Y_V5dX3i_PTy5VTANMKKl35pm29rCvZtBZg7ZvaNkKhsEJb4Z1G7VrQvvYt-kbsXNVaJbGpoapbecI-HuY-pPhrRprMEMhh39sR40wGdKXWkBevcrU8VF2KRAl35iGFwaa9AWEWu6Yzi12z2DVQmmw3Qx8e58_tgP4J-aczFz4fCpi3_B0wGXJZj8v-ErrJ-Bj-P__LM9z1YVw83-MeqYtzGrM_A4YyYG6W-y7nhbWEUigp_wAff6Bc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854614775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Slover, James ; Mullaly, Kathleen ; Karia, Raj ; Bendo, John ; Ursomanno, Patricia ; Galloway, Aubrey ; Iorio, Richard ; Bosco, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Slover, James ; Mullaly, Kathleen ; Karia, Raj ; Bendo, John ; Ursomanno, Patricia ; Galloway, Aubrey ; Iorio, Richard ; Bosco, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: <6=’high risk’, between 6 and 9 =’medium risk’, and >9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-9191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28034774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation ; Bundled payment ; Cardiac valve replacement ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Health Expenditures ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; New York City ; Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool ; Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation ; Spinal fusions ; Surgery ; Total joint replacement ; Value base care</subject><ispartof>International journal of surgery (London, England), 2017-02, Vol.38, p.119-122</ispartof><rights>2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919116312043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28034774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slover, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullaly, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karia, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursomanno, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</title><title>International journal of surgery (London, England)</title><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: <6=’high risk’, between 6 and 9 =’medium risk’, and >9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Bundled payment</subject><subject>Cardiac valve replacement</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>New York City</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spinal fusions</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Total joint replacement</subject><subject>Value base care</subject><issn>1743-9191</issn><issn>1743-9159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpadK0f6CHomMv62oseS1DKSShH4FAlmRzFrI0m8qxrVRjF_bfV-6mOeTQk17E-wzMM4y9B1GAgPWnrggdzUWZcwFlIaR-wY6hVnLVQNW8fMoNHLE3RJ0QSmjQr9lRqYVUda2Omd_-RH5LyOOOTzleB7rnp0RINOA4cTt6vknog5tCHPk2xp6Hkd_M6S442_ONnULu0fJp-dk8-h4zYfd_6U2Kd8kOb9mrne0J3z2-J-z229ft-Y_V5dX3i_PTy5VTANMKKl35pm29rCvZtBZg7ZvaNkKhsEJb4Z1G7VrQvvYt-kbsXNVaJbGpoapbecI-HuY-pPhrRprMEMhh39sR40wGdKXWkBevcrU8VF2KRAl35iGFwaa9AWEWu6Yzi12z2DVQmmw3Qx8e58_tgP4J-aczFz4fCpi3_B0wGXJZj8v-ErrJ-Bj-P__LM9z1YVw83-MeqYtzGrM_A4YyYG6W-y7nhbWEUigp_wAff6Bc</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Slover, James</creator><creator>Mullaly, Kathleen</creator><creator>Karia, Raj</creator><creator>Bendo, John</creator><creator>Ursomanno, Patricia</creator><creator>Galloway, Aubrey</creator><creator>Iorio, Richard</creator><creator>Bosco, Joseph</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</title><author>Slover, James ; Mullaly, Kathleen ; Karia, Raj ; Bendo, John ; Ursomanno, Patricia ; Galloway, Aubrey ; Iorio, Richard ; Bosco, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Bundled payment</topic><topic>Cardiac valve replacement</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>New York City</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spinal fusions</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Total joint replacement</topic><topic>Value base care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slover, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullaly, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karia, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursomanno, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slover, James</au><au>Mullaly, Kathleen</au><au>Karia, Raj</au><au>Bendo, John</au><au>Ursomanno, Patricia</au><au>Galloway, Aubrey</au><au>Iorio, Richard</au><au>Bosco, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</atitle><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>119</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>119-122</pages><issn>1743-9191</issn><eissn>1743-9159</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: <6=’high risk’, between 6 and 9 =’medium risk’, and >9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28034774</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1743-9191 |
ispartof | International journal of surgery (London, England), 2017-02, Vol.38, p.119-122 |
issn | 1743-9191 1743-9159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1854614775 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Arthroplasty Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation Bundled payment Cardiac valve replacement Disability Evaluation Female Health Expenditures Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation Humans Insurance, Health Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis New York City Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data Predictive Value of Tests Risk Assessment Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation Spinal fusions Surgery Total joint replacement Value base care |
title | The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20the%20Risk%20Assessment%20and%20Prediction%20Tool%20in%20Surgical%20Patients%20in%20a%20Bundled%20Payment%20Program&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20surgery%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Slover,%20James&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=119-122&rft.issn=1743-9191&rft.eissn=1743-9159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1854614775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854614775&rft_id=info:pmid/28034774&rft_els_id=S1743919116312043&rfr_iscdi=true |