The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2017-02, Vol.38, p.119-122
Hauptverfasser: Slover, James, Mullaly, Kathleen, Karia, Raj, Bendo, John, Ursomanno, Patricia, Galloway, Aubrey, Iorio, Richard, Bosco, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue
container_start_page 119
container_title International journal of surgery (London, England)
container_volume 38
creator Slover, James
Mullaly, Kathleen
Karia, Raj
Bendo, John
Ursomanno, Patricia
Galloway, Aubrey
Iorio, Richard
Bosco, Joseph
description Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: 9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1854614775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743919116312043</els_id><sourcerecordid>1854614775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpadK0f6CHomMv62oseS1DKSShH4FAlmRzFrI0m8qxrVRjF_bfV-6mOeTQk17E-wzMM4y9B1GAgPWnrggdzUWZcwFlIaR-wY6hVnLVQNW8fMoNHLE3RJ0QSmjQr9lRqYVUda2Omd_-RH5LyOOOTzleB7rnp0RINOA4cTt6vknog5tCHPk2xp6Hkd_M6S442_ONnULu0fJp-dk8-h4zYfd_6U2Kd8kOb9mrne0J3z2-J-z229ft-Y_V5dX3i_PTy5VTANMKKl35pm29rCvZtBZg7ZvaNkKhsEJb4Z1G7VrQvvYt-kbsXNVaJbGpoapbecI-HuY-pPhrRprMEMhh39sR40wGdKXWkBevcrU8VF2KRAl35iGFwaa9AWEWu6Yzi12z2DVQmmw3Qx8e58_tgP4J-aczFz4fCpi3_B0wGXJZj8v-ErrJ-Bj-P__LM9z1YVw83-MeqYtzGrM_A4YyYG6W-y7nhbWEUigp_wAff6Bc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854614775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Slover, James ; Mullaly, Kathleen ; Karia, Raj ; Bendo, John ; Ursomanno, Patricia ; Galloway, Aubrey ; Iorio, Richard ; Bosco, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Slover, James ; Mullaly, Kathleen ; Karia, Raj ; Bendo, John ; Ursomanno, Patricia ; Galloway, Aubrey ; Iorio, Richard ; Bosco, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: &lt;6=’high risk’, between 6 and 9 =’medium risk’, and &gt;9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-9191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28034774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation ; Bundled payment ; Cardiac valve replacement ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Health Expenditures ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; New York City ; Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool ; Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation ; Spinal fusions ; Surgery ; Total joint replacement ; Value base care</subject><ispartof>International journal of surgery (London, England), 2017-02, Vol.38, p.119-122</ispartof><rights>2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919116312043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28034774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slover, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullaly, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karia, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursomanno, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</title><title>International journal of surgery (London, England)</title><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: &lt;6=’high risk’, between 6 and 9 =’medium risk’, and &gt;9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Bundled payment</subject><subject>Cardiac valve replacement</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>New York City</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spinal fusions</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Total joint replacement</subject><subject>Value base care</subject><issn>1743-9191</issn><issn>1743-9159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpadK0f6CHomMv62oseS1DKSShH4FAlmRzFrI0m8qxrVRjF_bfV-6mOeTQk17E-wzMM4y9B1GAgPWnrggdzUWZcwFlIaR-wY6hVnLVQNW8fMoNHLE3RJ0QSmjQr9lRqYVUda2Omd_-RH5LyOOOTzleB7rnp0RINOA4cTt6vknog5tCHPk2xp6Hkd_M6S442_ONnULu0fJp-dk8-h4zYfd_6U2Kd8kOb9mrne0J3z2-J-z229ft-Y_V5dX3i_PTy5VTANMKKl35pm29rCvZtBZg7ZvaNkKhsEJb4Z1G7VrQvvYt-kbsXNVaJbGpoapbecI-HuY-pPhrRprMEMhh39sR40wGdKXWkBevcrU8VF2KRAl35iGFwaa9AWEWu6Yzi12z2DVQmmw3Qx8e58_tgP4J-aczFz4fCpi3_B0wGXJZj8v-ErrJ-Bj-P__LM9z1YVw83-MeqYtzGrM_A4YyYG6W-y7nhbWEUigp_wAff6Bc</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Slover, James</creator><creator>Mullaly, Kathleen</creator><creator>Karia, Raj</creator><creator>Bendo, John</creator><creator>Ursomanno, Patricia</creator><creator>Galloway, Aubrey</creator><creator>Iorio, Richard</creator><creator>Bosco, Joseph</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</title><author>Slover, James ; Mullaly, Kathleen ; Karia, Raj ; Bendo, John ; Ursomanno, Patricia ; Galloway, Aubrey ; Iorio, Richard ; Bosco, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1585d9bbd37539ba116d97a904e0a08a0dc8e8cb18d7dbed90fc5ba43e97157b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Bundled payment</topic><topic>Cardiac valve replacement</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>New York City</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spinal fusions</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Total joint replacement</topic><topic>Value base care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slover, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullaly, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karia, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursomanno, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slover, James</au><au>Mullaly, Kathleen</au><au>Karia, Raj</au><au>Bendo, John</au><au>Ursomanno, Patricia</au><au>Galloway, Aubrey</au><au>Iorio, Richard</au><au>Bosco, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program</atitle><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>119</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>119-122</pages><issn>1743-9191</issn><eissn>1743-9159</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) and patient discharge disposition in an institution participating in bundled payment program for total joint replacement, spine fusion and cardiac valve surgery patients. Method Between April 2014 and April 2015, RAPT scores of 767 patients (535 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasty; 150 cardiac valve replacement; 82 spinal fusions) were prospectively captured. Total RAPT scores were grouped into three levels for risk of complications: &lt;6=’high risk’, between 6 and 9 =’medium risk’, and &gt;9=’low risk’ for discharge to a post-acute facility. Associations between RAPT categories and patient discharge to home versus any facility were conducted. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if there was any correlation between RAPT score and discharge to any facility. Results 70.5% of total joint patients, 80.7% of cardiac valve surgery patients and 70.7% of spine surgery patients were discharged home rather than to a post-acute facility. RAPT risk categories were related to discharge disposition as 72% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 91% in the low risk group were discharged to home in the total joint replacement cohort. In the cardiac cohort, only 33% of the high risk group was discharged to a facility, and 94% of the low risk group was discharged to home. In the spinal fusion cohort, 60% of those in the high risk group were discharged to a facility and 86% in the low risk group were discharged to home. Multivariate analysis showed that being in the high risk category versus low risk category was significantly associated with substantially increased odds of discharge to a facility. Conclusion The RAPT tool has shown the ability to predict discharge disposition for total joint and spine surgery patients, but not cardiac valve surgery patients, where the majority of patients in all categories were discharged home, at an institution participating in a bundled payment program. The ability to identify discharge disposition pre-operatively is valuable for improving care coordination, directing care resources and establishing and maintaining patient and family expectations</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28034774</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-9191
ispartof International journal of surgery (London, England), 2017-02, Vol.38, p.119-122
issn 1743-9191
1743-9159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1854614775
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - rehabilitation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation
Bundled payment
Cardiac valve replacement
Disability Evaluation
Female
Health Expenditures
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - rehabilitation
Humans
Insurance, Health
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
New York City
Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool
Spinal Fusion - rehabilitation
Spinal fusions
Surgery
Total joint replacement
Value base care
title The Use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Surgical Patients in a Bundled Payment Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20the%20Risk%20Assessment%20and%20Prediction%20Tool%20in%20Surgical%20Patients%20in%20a%20Bundled%20Payment%20Program&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20surgery%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Slover,%20James&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=119-122&rft.issn=1743-9191&rft.eissn=1743-9159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1854614775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854614775&rft_id=info:pmid/28034774&rft_els_id=S1743919116312043&rfr_iscdi=true