Pregnancy and the Plastic Surgery Resident
Combining pregnancy with plastic surgery residency has historically been difficult. Two decades ago, 36 percent of plastic surgery program directors surveyed actively discouraged pregnancy among residents, and 33 percent of women plastic surgeons suffered from infertility. Most alarmingly, 26 percen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2017-01, Vol.139 (1), p.245-252 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 245 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 139 |
creator | Garza, Rebecca M. Weston, Jane S. Furnas, Heather J. |
description | Combining pregnancy with plastic surgery residency has historically been difficult. Two decades ago, 36 percent of plastic surgery program directors surveyed actively discouraged pregnancy among residents, and 33 percent of women plastic surgeons suffered from infertility. Most alarmingly, 26 percent of plastic surgery trainees had had an elective abortion during residency. With increasing numbers of women training in plastic surgery, this historical lack of support for pregnancy deserves further attention.
To explore the current accommodations made for the pregnant plastic surgery resident, an electronic survey was sent to 88 plastic surgery program directors in the United States.
Fifty-four responded, for a response rate of 61.36 percent. On average, a director trained a total of 7.91 women among 17.28 residents trained over 8.19 years. Of the women residents, 1.43 were pregnant during a director's tenure, with 1.35 of those residents taking maternity leave. An average 1.75 male residents took paternity leave. Approximately one-third of programs had a formal maternity/paternity leave policy (36.54 percent) which, in most cases, was limited to defining allowed weeks of leave, time required to fulfill program requirements, and remuneration during leave.
This survey of plastic surgery directors is a first step in defining the challenges training programs face in supporting the pregnant resident. Directors provided comments describing their challenges accommodating an absent resident in a small program and complying with the American Board of Plastic Surgery's required weeks of training per year. A discussion of these challenges is followed by suggested solutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002861 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1853741664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1853741664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-b9aa7fb98267a9357731ee5c023c5fed361af11f0611de43c3cad451da8aed133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUguRUjd2WNyKcUTFCytXi_bzaSNpkndTSh9e6OtBxwYhoH_AB8h50CHQFN9PZnOhvTPsETBAemDZGksmGCHpE8pZzFQyXrkJIRXSkFzJY9JjyWUaaZ4n1xNPC4qW7ltZKssapYYTUobmsJFs9Yv0G-jKYYiw6o5JUe5LQOe7e-AvNzdPo8e4vHT_ePoZhw7LpmI56m1Op-nCVPaplxqzQFROsq4kzlmXIHNAXKqADIU3HFnMyEhs4nFDDgfkMtd7trX7y2GxqyK4LAsbYV1GwwkkmsBSolOKnZS5-sQPOZm7YuV9VsD1HxSMh0l859SZ7vYN7TzFWY_pm8sv7mbumzQh7ey3aA3S7Rls_zKU5KLmHVAKXRf3K0U_ANJSnBm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1853741664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pregnancy and the Plastic Surgery Resident</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Garza, Rebecca M. ; Weston, Jane S. ; Furnas, Heather J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garza, Rebecca M. ; Weston, Jane S. ; Furnas, Heather J.</creatorcontrib><description>Combining pregnancy with plastic surgery residency has historically been difficult. Two decades ago, 36 percent of plastic surgery program directors surveyed actively discouraged pregnancy among residents, and 33 percent of women plastic surgeons suffered from infertility. Most alarmingly, 26 percent of plastic surgery trainees had had an elective abortion during residency. With increasing numbers of women training in plastic surgery, this historical lack of support for pregnancy deserves further attention.
To explore the current accommodations made for the pregnant plastic surgery resident, an electronic survey was sent to 88 plastic surgery program directors in the United States.
Fifty-four responded, for a response rate of 61.36 percent. On average, a director trained a total of 7.91 women among 17.28 residents trained over 8.19 years. Of the women residents, 1.43 were pregnant during a director's tenure, with 1.35 of those residents taking maternity leave. An average 1.75 male residents took paternity leave. Approximately one-third of programs had a formal maternity/paternity leave policy (36.54 percent) which, in most cases, was limited to defining allowed weeks of leave, time required to fulfill program requirements, and remuneration during leave.
This survey of plastic surgery directors is a first step in defining the challenges training programs face in supporting the pregnant resident. Directors provided comments describing their challenges accommodating an absent resident in a small program and complying with the American Board of Plastic Surgery's required weeks of training per year. A discussion of these challenges is followed by suggested solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28027263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Female ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - organization & administration ; Parental Leave ; Pregnancy ; Social Support ; Surgery, Plastic - education ; Surgery, Plastic - organization & administration ; Surgery, Plastic - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Work-Life Balance</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2017-01, Vol.139 (1), p.245-252</ispartof><rights>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-b9aa7fb98267a9357731ee5c023c5fed361af11f0611de43c3cad451da8aed133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-b9aa7fb98267a9357731ee5c023c5fed361af11f0611de43c3cad451da8aed133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28027263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garza, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, Jane S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furnas, Heather J.</creatorcontrib><title>Pregnancy and the Plastic Surgery Resident</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Combining pregnancy with plastic surgery residency has historically been difficult. Two decades ago, 36 percent of plastic surgery program directors surveyed actively discouraged pregnancy among residents, and 33 percent of women plastic surgeons suffered from infertility. Most alarmingly, 26 percent of plastic surgery trainees had had an elective abortion during residency. With increasing numbers of women training in plastic surgery, this historical lack of support for pregnancy deserves further attention.
To explore the current accommodations made for the pregnant plastic surgery resident, an electronic survey was sent to 88 plastic surgery program directors in the United States.
Fifty-four responded, for a response rate of 61.36 percent. On average, a director trained a total of 7.91 women among 17.28 residents trained over 8.19 years. Of the women residents, 1.43 were pregnant during a director's tenure, with 1.35 of those residents taking maternity leave. An average 1.75 male residents took paternity leave. Approximately one-third of programs had a formal maternity/paternity leave policy (36.54 percent) which, in most cases, was limited to defining allowed weeks of leave, time required to fulfill program requirements, and remuneration during leave.
This survey of plastic surgery directors is a first step in defining the challenges training programs face in supporting the pregnant resident. Directors provided comments describing their challenges accommodating an absent resident in a small program and complying with the American Board of Plastic Surgery's required weeks of training per year. A discussion of these challenges is followed by suggested solutions.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</subject><subject>Parental Leave</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - education</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - organization & administration</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Work-Life Balance</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUguRUjd2WNyKcUTFCytXi_bzaSNpkndTSh9e6OtBxwYhoH_AB8h50CHQFN9PZnOhvTPsETBAemDZGksmGCHpE8pZzFQyXrkJIRXSkFzJY9JjyWUaaZ4n1xNPC4qW7ltZKssapYYTUobmsJFs9Yv0G-jKYYiw6o5JUe5LQOe7e-AvNzdPo8e4vHT_ePoZhw7LpmI56m1Op-nCVPaplxqzQFROsq4kzlmXIHNAXKqADIU3HFnMyEhs4nFDDgfkMtd7trX7y2GxqyK4LAsbYV1GwwkkmsBSolOKnZS5-sQPOZm7YuV9VsD1HxSMh0l859SZ7vYN7TzFWY_pm8sv7mbumzQh7ey3aA3S7Rls_zKU5KLmHVAKXRf3K0U_ANJSnBm</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Garza, Rebecca M.</creator><creator>Weston, Jane S.</creator><creator>Furnas, Heather J.</creator><general>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Pregnancy and the Plastic Surgery Resident</title><author>Garza, Rebecca M. ; Weston, Jane S. ; Furnas, Heather J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-b9aa7fb98267a9357731ee5c023c5fed361af11f0611de43c3cad451da8aed133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</topic><topic>Parental Leave</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - education</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - organization & administration</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Work-Life Balance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garza, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, Jane S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furnas, Heather J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garza, Rebecca M.</au><au>Weston, Jane S.</au><au>Furnas, Heather J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pregnancy and the Plastic Surgery Resident</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>245-252</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Combining pregnancy with plastic surgery residency has historically been difficult. Two decades ago, 36 percent of plastic surgery program directors surveyed actively discouraged pregnancy among residents, and 33 percent of women plastic surgeons suffered from infertility. Most alarmingly, 26 percent of plastic surgery trainees had had an elective abortion during residency. With increasing numbers of women training in plastic surgery, this historical lack of support for pregnancy deserves further attention.
To explore the current accommodations made for the pregnant plastic surgery resident, an electronic survey was sent to 88 plastic surgery program directors in the United States.
Fifty-four responded, for a response rate of 61.36 percent. On average, a director trained a total of 7.91 women among 17.28 residents trained over 8.19 years. Of the women residents, 1.43 were pregnant during a director's tenure, with 1.35 of those residents taking maternity leave. An average 1.75 male residents took paternity leave. Approximately one-third of programs had a formal maternity/paternity leave policy (36.54 percent) which, in most cases, was limited to defining allowed weeks of leave, time required to fulfill program requirements, and remuneration during leave.
This survey of plastic surgery directors is a first step in defining the challenges training programs face in supporting the pregnant resident. Directors provided comments describing their challenges accommodating an absent resident in a small program and complying with the American Board of Plastic Surgery's required weeks of training per year. A discussion of these challenges is followed by suggested solutions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>28027263</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000002861</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2017-01, Vol.139 (1), p.245-252 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1853741664 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Female Humans Internship and Residency - organization & administration Parental Leave Pregnancy Social Support Surgery, Plastic - education Surgery, Plastic - organization & administration Surgery, Plastic - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires United States Work-Life Balance |
title | Pregnancy and the Plastic Surgery Resident |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pregnancy%20and%20the%20Plastic%20Surgery%20Resident&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Garza,%20Rebecca%20M.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=245-252&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1853741664%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1853741664&rft_id=info:pmid/28027263&rfr_iscdi=true |