Hospital Outcomes in Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Medicare Patients

OBJECTIVE:To compare the risk-adjusted outcomes of hospitals in inpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND:Reduced length-of-stay for inpatient surgical care requires the inclusion of objective postdischarge outcomes to provide a comprehensive assessment of hospital and surgeon perf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2017-01, Vol.265 (1), p.178-184
Hauptverfasser: Fry, Donald E, Pine, Michael, Nedza, Susan, Locke, David, Reband, Agnes, Pine, Gregory
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 1
container_start_page 178
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 265
creator Fry, Donald E
Pine, Michael
Nedza, Susan
Locke, David
Reband, Agnes
Pine, Gregory
description OBJECTIVE:To compare the risk-adjusted outcomes of hospitals in inpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND:Reduced length-of-stay for inpatient surgical care requires the inclusion of objective postdischarge outcomes to provide a comprehensive assessment of hospital and surgeon performance for quality improvement. METHODS:The 2010 to 2012 Medicare Limited Data Set was used to develop risk-adjusted prediction models of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day postdischarge deaths, and 90-day readmissions for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To define the opportunity for improved performance, prediction models were used to compute z scores and risk-adjusted adverse outcome rates for all hospitals in the database that had 20 or more evaluable cases for the study period. RESULTS:A total of 83,274 patients from 1570 hospitals had an overall adverse outcome rate of 20.7%; 48 hospitals had outcomes that were 2 z scores better than predicted and 76 had 2 z scores poorer than predicted. Risk-adjusted adverse outcomes were 10.0 % in the best performing decile of hospitals and were 32.1% in the poorest performing decile. Gastrointestinal, infectious, and cardiopulmonary complications of care were the most common causes of readmissions with 46.3% occurring between days 30 and 90 after discharge. CONCLUSIONS:Comparative analysis of overall risk-adjusted inpatient and 90-day postdischarge adverse outcomes identifies considerable opportunity for improved care in this high-risk population of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001653
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852786329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1852786329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-c789cdb6ccb646b49d9550d0bf2d01a3c36f29bcf6b0a19be5497d00e5dda5533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUNtKw0AQXUSxtfoHInn0JXWvSfaxFLVCpQX1OWx2JzSadGN2Q-nfuyX1ggPDMMM5Z2YOQtcETwmW6d3LcjbFf4Ikgp2gMRE0iwnh-BSNw5TFXDI6QhfOvQcMz3B6jkY0w0GC8zFaL6xrK6_qaNV7bRtwUbWNnrat8hVsfbRUreqs07atdDTf2Br03nnQ3jb7A_IZTKVVB9F6ILhLdFaq2sHVsU7Q28P963wRL1ePT_PZMtZMUBnrNJPaFInWRcKTgksjhcAGFyU1mCimWVJSWegyKbAisgDBZWowBmGMEoKxCboddNvOfvbgfN5UTkNdqy3Y3uUkEzTNEkZlgPIBqsMnroMyb7uqUd0-Jzg_eJkHL_P_XgbazXFDXzRgfkjf5v3q7mztoXMfdb-DLt-Aqv1m0EtEFlNMUkxCE4cM53wB39t_Yw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852786329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hospital Outcomes in Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Medicare Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Fry, Donald E ; Pine, Michael ; Nedza, Susan ; Locke, David ; Reband, Agnes ; Pine, Gregory</creator><creatorcontrib>Fry, Donald E ; Pine, Michael ; Nedza, Susan ; Locke, David ; Reband, Agnes ; Pine, Gregory</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:To compare the risk-adjusted outcomes of hospitals in inpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND:Reduced length-of-stay for inpatient surgical care requires the inclusion of objective postdischarge outcomes to provide a comprehensive assessment of hospital and surgeon performance for quality improvement. METHODS:The 2010 to 2012 Medicare Limited Data Set was used to develop risk-adjusted prediction models of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day postdischarge deaths, and 90-day readmissions for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To define the opportunity for improved performance, prediction models were used to compute z scores and risk-adjusted adverse outcome rates for all hospitals in the database that had 20 or more evaluable cases for the study period. RESULTS:A total of 83,274 patients from 1570 hospitals had an overall adverse outcome rate of 20.7%; 48 hospitals had outcomes that were 2 z scores better than predicted and 76 had 2 z scores poorer than predicted. Risk-adjusted adverse outcomes were 10.0 % in the best performing decile of hospitals and were 32.1% in the poorest performing decile. Gastrointestinal, infectious, and cardiopulmonary complications of care were the most common causes of readmissions with 46.3% occurring between days 30 and 90 after discharge. CONCLUSIONS:Comparative analysis of overall risk-adjusted inpatient and 90-day postdischarge adverse outcomes identifies considerable opportunity for improved care in this high-risk population of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001653</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28009744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Benchmarking ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - mortality ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medicare ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Quality Improvement ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Risk Adjustment ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2017-01, Vol.265 (1), p.178-184</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-c789cdb6ccb646b49d9550d0bf2d01a3c36f29bcf6b0a19be5497d00e5dda5533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-c789cdb6ccb646b49d9550d0bf2d01a3c36f29bcf6b0a19be5497d00e5dda5533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fry, Donald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pine, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedza, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locke, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reband, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pine, Gregory</creatorcontrib><title>Hospital Outcomes in Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Medicare Patients</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:To compare the risk-adjusted outcomes of hospitals in inpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND:Reduced length-of-stay for inpatient surgical care requires the inclusion of objective postdischarge outcomes to provide a comprehensive assessment of hospital and surgeon performance for quality improvement. METHODS:The 2010 to 2012 Medicare Limited Data Set was used to develop risk-adjusted prediction models of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day postdischarge deaths, and 90-day readmissions for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To define the opportunity for improved performance, prediction models were used to compute z scores and risk-adjusted adverse outcome rates for all hospitals in the database that had 20 or more evaluable cases for the study period. RESULTS:A total of 83,274 patients from 1570 hospitals had an overall adverse outcome rate of 20.7%; 48 hospitals had outcomes that were 2 z scores better than predicted and 76 had 2 z scores poorer than predicted. Risk-adjusted adverse outcomes were 10.0 % in the best performing decile of hospitals and were 32.1% in the poorest performing decile. Gastrointestinal, infectious, and cardiopulmonary complications of care were the most common causes of readmissions with 46.3% occurring between days 30 and 90 after discharge. CONCLUSIONS:Comparative analysis of overall risk-adjusted inpatient and 90-day postdischarge adverse outcomes identifies considerable opportunity for improved care in this high-risk population of patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - mortality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Adjustment</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUNtKw0AQXUSxtfoHInn0JXWvSfaxFLVCpQX1OWx2JzSadGN2Q-nfuyX1ggPDMMM5Z2YOQtcETwmW6d3LcjbFf4Ikgp2gMRE0iwnh-BSNw5TFXDI6QhfOvQcMz3B6jkY0w0GC8zFaL6xrK6_qaNV7bRtwUbWNnrat8hVsfbRUreqs07atdDTf2Br03nnQ3jb7A_IZTKVVB9F6ILhLdFaq2sHVsU7Q28P963wRL1ePT_PZMtZMUBnrNJPaFInWRcKTgksjhcAGFyU1mCimWVJSWegyKbAisgDBZWowBmGMEoKxCboddNvOfvbgfN5UTkNdqy3Y3uUkEzTNEkZlgPIBqsMnroMyb7uqUd0-Jzg_eJkHL_P_XgbazXFDXzRgfkjf5v3q7mztoXMfdb-DLt-Aqv1m0EtEFlNMUkxCE4cM53wB39t_Yw</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Fry, Donald E</creator><creator>Pine, Michael</creator><creator>Nedza, Susan</creator><creator>Locke, David</creator><creator>Reband, Agnes</creator><creator>Pine, Gregory</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Hospital Outcomes in Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Medicare Patients</title><author>Fry, Donald E ; Pine, Michael ; Nedza, Susan ; Locke, David ; Reband, Agnes ; Pine, Gregory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-c789cdb6ccb646b49d9550d0bf2d01a3c36f29bcf6b0a19be5497d00e5dda5533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - mortality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Adjustment</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fry, Donald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pine, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedza, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locke, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reband, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pine, Gregory</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fry, Donald E</au><au>Pine, Michael</au><au>Nedza, Susan</au><au>Locke, David</au><au>Reband, Agnes</au><au>Pine, Gregory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hospital Outcomes in Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Medicare Patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>265</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>178-184</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:To compare the risk-adjusted outcomes of hospitals in inpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND:Reduced length-of-stay for inpatient surgical care requires the inclusion of objective postdischarge outcomes to provide a comprehensive assessment of hospital and surgeon performance for quality improvement. METHODS:The 2010 to 2012 Medicare Limited Data Set was used to develop risk-adjusted prediction models of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay outliers, 90-day postdischarge deaths, and 90-day readmissions for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To define the opportunity for improved performance, prediction models were used to compute z scores and risk-adjusted adverse outcome rates for all hospitals in the database that had 20 or more evaluable cases for the study period. RESULTS:A total of 83,274 patients from 1570 hospitals had an overall adverse outcome rate of 20.7%; 48 hospitals had outcomes that were 2 z scores better than predicted and 76 had 2 z scores poorer than predicted. Risk-adjusted adverse outcomes were 10.0 % in the best performing decile of hospitals and were 32.1% in the poorest performing decile. Gastrointestinal, infectious, and cardiopulmonary complications of care were the most common causes of readmissions with 46.3% occurring between days 30 and 90 after discharge. CONCLUSIONS:Comparative analysis of overall risk-adjusted inpatient and 90-day postdischarge adverse outcomes identifies considerable opportunity for improved care in this high-risk population of patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>28009744</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000001653</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2017-01, Vol.265 (1), p.178-184
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852786329
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Benchmarking
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - mortality
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Logistic Models
Male
Medicare
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Quality Improvement
Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Risk Adjustment
United States
title Hospital Outcomes in Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Medicare Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A44%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital%20Outcomes%20in%20Inpatient%20Laparoscopic%20Cholecystectomy%20in%20Medicare%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Fry,%20Donald%20E&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=265&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=178-184&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001653&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1852786329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852786329&rft_id=info:pmid/28009744&rfr_iscdi=true