Evaluating the effect of synchronized sea lice treatments in Chile
The sea louse is considered an important ectoparasite that affects farmed salmonids around the world. Sea lice control relies heavily on pharmacological treatments in several salmon-producing countries, including Chile. Among options for drug administration, immersion treatments represent the majori...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Preventive veterinary medicine 2017-01, Vol.136, p.1-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Preventive veterinary medicine |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Arriagada, G. Stryhn, H. Sanchez, J. Vanderstichel, R. Campistó, J.L. Rees, E.E. Ibarra, R. St-Hilaire, S. |
description | The sea louse is considered an important ectoparasite that affects farmed salmonids around the world. Sea lice control relies heavily on pharmacological treatments in several salmon-producing countries, including Chile. Among options for drug administration, immersion treatments represent the majority of antiparasitic control strategies used in Chile. As a topical procedure, immersion treatments do not induce a long lasting effect; therefore, re-infestation from neighbouring farms may undermine their efficacy. Synchronization of treatments has been proposed as a strategy to improve immersion treatment performance, but it has not been evaluated so far. Using a repeated-measures linear mixed-effect model, we evaluated the impact of treatment synchronization of neighbouring farms (within 10km seaway distance) on the adult lice mean abundance from weeks 2 to 8 post-treatment on rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon farms in Chile, while controlling for external and internal sources of lice before the treatments, and also for environmental and fish-related variables. Results indicate that treatment synchronization was significantly associated with lower adult lice levels from weeks 5 to 7 after treatment. This relationship appeared to be linear, suggesting that higher levels of synchronization may result in lower adult sea lice levels during these weeks. These findings suggest that synchronization can improve the performance of immersion delousing treatments by keeping sea lice levels low for a longer period of time. Our results may be applicable to other regions of the world where immersion treatments are widely used. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852785237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167587716305803</els_id><sourcerecordid>1852785237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c5d295fe1aa79836535ac228bdf84fc17641efd5f19fa9d50a8ac8ab26c394af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9PAjEQxRujEUS_gvboZddOl267RyT4JyHxouemdKdSsuxiu5Dgp7cE8ephMsm8N_MyP0LugOXAoHxY5ZuAO-zXWOc8DXKAnAGckSEoWWQgoTwnwyTITCgpB-QqxhVjrCyVuCQDrhiwivEheZztTLM1vW8_ab9Eis6h7WnnaNy3dhm61n9jTSMa2niLtA9oUmrbR-pbOl36Bq_JhTNNxJvfPiIfT7P36Us2f3t-nU7mmR1z1mdW1LwSDsEYWamiFIUwlnO1qJ0aOwuyHAO6WjionKlqwYwyVpkFL21RjY0rRuT-eHcTuq8txl6vfbTYNKbFbhs1KMFlqkImqzxabehiDOj0Jvi1CXsNTB8A6pX-A6gPADWATgDT5u1vyHZx0E57J2LJMDkaML268xh0tB5bi7UPiZyuO_9vyA_YvoZ7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852785237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effect of synchronized sea lice treatments in Chile</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Arriagada, G. ; Stryhn, H. ; Sanchez, J. ; Vanderstichel, R. ; Campistó, J.L. ; Rees, E.E. ; Ibarra, R. ; St-Hilaire, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arriagada, G. ; Stryhn, H. ; Sanchez, J. ; Vanderstichel, R. ; Campistó, J.L. ; Rees, E.E. ; Ibarra, R. ; St-Hilaire, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The sea louse is considered an important ectoparasite that affects farmed salmonids around the world. Sea lice control relies heavily on pharmacological treatments in several salmon-producing countries, including Chile. Among options for drug administration, immersion treatments represent the majority of antiparasitic control strategies used in Chile. As a topical procedure, immersion treatments do not induce a long lasting effect; therefore, re-infestation from neighbouring farms may undermine their efficacy. Synchronization of treatments has been proposed as a strategy to improve immersion treatment performance, but it has not been evaluated so far. Using a repeated-measures linear mixed-effect model, we evaluated the impact of treatment synchronization of neighbouring farms (within 10km seaway distance) on the adult lice mean abundance from weeks 2 to 8 post-treatment on rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon farms in Chile, while controlling for external and internal sources of lice before the treatments, and also for environmental and fish-related variables. Results indicate that treatment synchronization was significantly associated with lower adult lice levels from weeks 5 to 7 after treatment. This relationship appeared to be linear, suggesting that higher levels of synchronization may result in lower adult sea lice levels during these weeks. These findings suggest that synchronization can improve the performance of immersion delousing treatments by keeping sea lice levels low for a longer period of time. Our results may be applicable to other regions of the world where immersion treatments are widely used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28010902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antiparasitic treatment ; Aquaculture - methods ; Atlantic salmon ; Azamethiphos ; Chile ; Communicable Disease Control - methods ; Copepoda - drug effects ; Copepoda - physiology ; Ectoparasitic Infestations - parasitology ; Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control ; Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary ; Fish Diseases - parasitology ; Fish Diseases - prevention & control ; Linear mixed models ; Linear Models ; Oncorhynchus mykiss ; Pyrethroids ; Salmo salar ; Sea lice ; Treatment coordination ; Treatment synchronization</subject><ispartof>Preventive veterinary medicine, 2017-01, Vol.136, p.1-10</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c5d295fe1aa79836535ac228bdf84fc17641efd5f19fa9d50a8ac8ab26c394af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c5d295fe1aa79836535ac228bdf84fc17641efd5f19fa9d50a8ac8ab26c394af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28010902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arriagada, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stryhn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderstichel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campistó, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibarra, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St-Hilaire, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effect of synchronized sea lice treatments in Chile</title><title>Preventive veterinary medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><description>The sea louse is considered an important ectoparasite that affects farmed salmonids around the world. Sea lice control relies heavily on pharmacological treatments in several salmon-producing countries, including Chile. Among options for drug administration, immersion treatments represent the majority of antiparasitic control strategies used in Chile. As a topical procedure, immersion treatments do not induce a long lasting effect; therefore, re-infestation from neighbouring farms may undermine their efficacy. Synchronization of treatments has been proposed as a strategy to improve immersion treatment performance, but it has not been evaluated so far. Using a repeated-measures linear mixed-effect model, we evaluated the impact of treatment synchronization of neighbouring farms (within 10km seaway distance) on the adult lice mean abundance from weeks 2 to 8 post-treatment on rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon farms in Chile, while controlling for external and internal sources of lice before the treatments, and also for environmental and fish-related variables. Results indicate that treatment synchronization was significantly associated with lower adult lice levels from weeks 5 to 7 after treatment. This relationship appeared to be linear, suggesting that higher levels of synchronization may result in lower adult sea lice levels during these weeks. These findings suggest that synchronization can improve the performance of immersion delousing treatments by keeping sea lice levels low for a longer period of time. Our results may be applicable to other regions of the world where immersion treatments are widely used.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antiparasitic treatment</subject><subject>Aquaculture - methods</subject><subject>Atlantic salmon</subject><subject>Azamethiphos</subject><subject>Chile</subject><subject>Communicable Disease Control - methods</subject><subject>Copepoda - drug effects</subject><subject>Copepoda - physiology</subject><subject>Ectoparasitic Infestations - parasitology</subject><subject>Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Linear mixed models</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus mykiss</subject><subject>Pyrethroids</subject><subject>Salmo salar</subject><subject>Sea lice</subject><subject>Treatment coordination</subject><subject>Treatment synchronization</subject><issn>0167-5877</issn><issn>1873-1716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9PAjEQxRujEUS_gvboZddOl267RyT4JyHxouemdKdSsuxiu5Dgp7cE8ephMsm8N_MyP0LugOXAoHxY5ZuAO-zXWOc8DXKAnAGckSEoWWQgoTwnwyTITCgpB-QqxhVjrCyVuCQDrhiwivEheZztTLM1vW8_ab9Eis6h7WnnaNy3dhm61n9jTSMa2niLtA9oUmrbR-pbOl36Bq_JhTNNxJvfPiIfT7P36Us2f3t-nU7mmR1z1mdW1LwSDsEYWamiFIUwlnO1qJ0aOwuyHAO6WjionKlqwYwyVpkFL21RjY0rRuT-eHcTuq8txl6vfbTYNKbFbhs1KMFlqkImqzxabehiDOj0Jvi1CXsNTB8A6pX-A6gPADWATgDT5u1vyHZx0E57J2LJMDkaML268xh0tB5bi7UPiZyuO_9vyA_YvoZ7</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Arriagada, G.</creator><creator>Stryhn, H.</creator><creator>Sanchez, J.</creator><creator>Vanderstichel, R.</creator><creator>Campistó, J.L.</creator><creator>Rees, E.E.</creator><creator>Ibarra, R.</creator><creator>St-Hilaire, S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effect of synchronized sea lice treatments in Chile</title><author>Arriagada, G. ; Stryhn, H. ; Sanchez, J. ; Vanderstichel, R. ; Campistó, J.L. ; Rees, E.E. ; Ibarra, R. ; St-Hilaire, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-c5d295fe1aa79836535ac228bdf84fc17641efd5f19fa9d50a8ac8ab26c394af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antiparasitic treatment</topic><topic>Aquaculture - methods</topic><topic>Atlantic salmon</topic><topic>Azamethiphos</topic><topic>Chile</topic><topic>Communicable Disease Control - methods</topic><topic>Copepoda - drug effects</topic><topic>Copepoda - physiology</topic><topic>Ectoparasitic Infestations - parasitology</topic><topic>Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Linear mixed models</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</topic><topic>Pyrethroids</topic><topic>Salmo salar</topic><topic>Sea lice</topic><topic>Treatment coordination</topic><topic>Treatment synchronization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arriagada, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stryhn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderstichel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campistó, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibarra, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St-Hilaire, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arriagada, G.</au><au>Stryhn, H.</au><au>Sanchez, J.</au><au>Vanderstichel, R.</au><au>Campistó, J.L.</au><au>Rees, E.E.</au><au>Ibarra, R.</au><au>St-Hilaire, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effect of synchronized sea lice treatments in Chile</atitle><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0167-5877</issn><eissn>1873-1716</eissn><abstract>The sea louse is considered an important ectoparasite that affects farmed salmonids around the world. Sea lice control relies heavily on pharmacological treatments in several salmon-producing countries, including Chile. Among options for drug administration, immersion treatments represent the majority of antiparasitic control strategies used in Chile. As a topical procedure, immersion treatments do not induce a long lasting effect; therefore, re-infestation from neighbouring farms may undermine their efficacy. Synchronization of treatments has been proposed as a strategy to improve immersion treatment performance, but it has not been evaluated so far. Using a repeated-measures linear mixed-effect model, we evaluated the impact of treatment synchronization of neighbouring farms (within 10km seaway distance) on the adult lice mean abundance from weeks 2 to 8 post-treatment on rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon farms in Chile, while controlling for external and internal sources of lice before the treatments, and also for environmental and fish-related variables. Results indicate that treatment synchronization was significantly associated with lower adult lice levels from weeks 5 to 7 after treatment. This relationship appeared to be linear, suggesting that higher levels of synchronization may result in lower adult sea lice levels during these weeks. These findings suggest that synchronization can improve the performance of immersion delousing treatments by keeping sea lice levels low for a longer period of time. Our results may be applicable to other regions of the world where immersion treatments are widely used.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28010902</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.011</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-5877 |
ispartof | Preventive veterinary medicine, 2017-01, Vol.136, p.1-10 |
issn | 0167-5877 1873-1716 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852785237 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animals Antiparasitic treatment Aquaculture - methods Atlantic salmon Azamethiphos Chile Communicable Disease Control - methods Copepoda - drug effects Copepoda - physiology Ectoparasitic Infestations - parasitology Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control Ectoparasitic Infestations - veterinary Fish Diseases - parasitology Fish Diseases - prevention & control Linear mixed models Linear Models Oncorhynchus mykiss Pyrethroids Salmo salar Sea lice Treatment coordination Treatment synchronization |
title | Evaluating the effect of synchronized sea lice treatments in Chile |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A27%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effect%20of%20synchronized%20sea%20lice%20treatments%20in%20Chile&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20veterinary%20medicine&rft.au=Arriagada,%20G.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0167-5877&rft.eissn=1873-1716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1852785237%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852785237&rft_id=info:pmid/28010902&rft_els_id=S0167587716305803&rfr_iscdi=true |