Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation
OBJECTIVES:It is recommended that the intra-articular component of a supracondylar distal femoral fracture be stabilized by a lag screw to create interfragmental compression. Generally, it is thought that lag screw fixation should precede any positional screw or locking screw application. This study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2017-04, Vol.31 (4), p.210-213 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 213 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 210 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic trauma |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Au, Brigham Groundland, John Stoops, T Kyle Santoni, Brandon G Sagi, H Claude |
description | OBJECTIVES:It is recommended that the intra-articular component of a supracondylar distal femoral fracture be stabilized by a lag screw to create interfragmental compression. Generally, it is thought that lag screw fixation should precede any positional screw or locking screw application. This study compared 3 methods of maintaining interfragmentary compression after fracture reduction with a reduction clamp.
METHODS:Intra-articular vertical split fractures were created in synthetic femora. A force transducer was interposed between the medial and lateral condyles and 20 lbs of compression was applied to the fracture with a reduction clamp. 3.5-mm cortical lag screws (group 1), 3.5-mm cortical position screws (group 2), and 5.4-mm distal locking screws through a distal femur locking plate (group 3) were placed across the fracture (n = 4/group). After screw placement, the clamp was removed and the amount of residual interfragmentary compression was recorded. After 2 minutes, a final steady-state force was measured and compared across groups.
RESULTS:Locking screws placed through the plate (group 3) maintained 27% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.043), whereas positional screws (group 2) maintained 90% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.431). The steady-state compression force measured with lag screws (group 1) increased by 240% (P = 0.030) relative to the initial clamp force. The steady-state force in the lag screw group was significantly greater than groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS:When reducing intra-articular fractures and applying interfragmentary compression with reduction clamps, additional lag screws increase the amount of compression across the fracture interface. Compressing a fracture with reduction clamps and relying on locking screws to maintain the compression result in a loss of interfragmentary compression and should be avoided. This study lends biomechanical support that lag screws placed outside of the plate before locking screws for fracture fixation help maintain optimal interfragmentary compression. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000769 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852689546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1852689546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2719-55a73e0a4170db6808a9dbc228964eef0f7ff6557b43972c4ddb166396c794603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLxDAQhYMoul7-gUgefakmaa6Puri6oAiyPpe0nbjVtlmTFvXfm2VVxAcDIUzOOTPMh9AxJWeUGHV-eb84I7-PkmYLTajIacaYodtoQrQhmchzs4f2Y3xOHk0Y20V7TBnNuWAT9DL13cqGJvoee4dzfAfD0tcROx_wnW36Id2mf8LzfoCQzYJ96iB9hg-8TgaIsUnRC5dUnNRqGAPgB6jHalgLtq_xrHm36-IQ7TjbRjj6eg_Q4-xqMb3Jbu-v59OL26xiippMCKtyIJZTRepSaqKtqcuKMW0kB3DEKeekEKrkuVGs4nVdUilzIytluCT5ATrd9F0F_zpCHIquiRW0re3Bj7GgWjCpjeAyWfnGWgUfYwBXrELTpe0KSoo15iJhLv5iTrGTrwlj2UH9E_rmmgx6Y3jzbSITX9rxDUKxBNsOy_97fwL_0Il7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852689546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Au, Brigham ; Groundland, John ; Stoops, T Kyle ; Santoni, Brandon G ; Sagi, H Claude</creator><creatorcontrib>Au, Brigham ; Groundland, John ; Stoops, T Kyle ; Santoni, Brandon G ; Sagi, H Claude</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:It is recommended that the intra-articular component of a supracondylar distal femoral fracture be stabilized by a lag screw to create interfragmental compression. Generally, it is thought that lag screw fixation should precede any positional screw or locking screw application. This study compared 3 methods of maintaining interfragmentary compression after fracture reduction with a reduction clamp.
METHODS:Intra-articular vertical split fractures were created in synthetic femora. A force transducer was interposed between the medial and lateral condyles and 20 lbs of compression was applied to the fracture with a reduction clamp. 3.5-mm cortical lag screws (group 1), 3.5-mm cortical position screws (group 2), and 5.4-mm distal locking screws through a distal femur locking plate (group 3) were placed across the fracture (n = 4/group). After screw placement, the clamp was removed and the amount of residual interfragmentary compression was recorded. After 2 minutes, a final steady-state force was measured and compared across groups.
RESULTS:Locking screws placed through the plate (group 3) maintained 27% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.043), whereas positional screws (group 2) maintained 90% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.431). The steady-state compression force measured with lag screws (group 1) increased by 240% (P = 0.030) relative to the initial clamp force. The steady-state force in the lag screw group was significantly greater than groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS:When reducing intra-articular fractures and applying interfragmentary compression with reduction clamps, additional lag screws increase the amount of compression across the fracture interface. Compressing a fracture with reduction clamps and relying on locking screws to maintain the compression result in a loss of interfragmentary compression and should be avoided. This study lends biomechanical support that lag screws placed outside of the plate before locking screws for fracture fixation help maintain optimal interfragmentary compression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000769</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27984452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Bone Screws ; Combined Modality Therapy - instrumentation ; Combined Modality Therapy - methods ; Compressive Strength ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Femoral Fractures - physiopathology ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Friction ; Humans ; Open Fracture Reduction - instrumentation ; Open Fracture Reduction - methods ; Prosthesis Design ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2017-04, Vol.31 (4), p.210-213</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2719-55a73e0a4170db6808a9dbc228964eef0f7ff6557b43972c4ddb166396c794603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2719-55a73e0a4170db6808a9dbc228964eef0f7ff6557b43972c4ddb166396c794603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27984452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Au, Brigham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groundland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoops, T Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoni, Brandon G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagi, H Claude</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:It is recommended that the intra-articular component of a supracondylar distal femoral fracture be stabilized by a lag screw to create interfragmental compression. Generally, it is thought that lag screw fixation should precede any positional screw or locking screw application. This study compared 3 methods of maintaining interfragmentary compression after fracture reduction with a reduction clamp.
METHODS:Intra-articular vertical split fractures were created in synthetic femora. A force transducer was interposed between the medial and lateral condyles and 20 lbs of compression was applied to the fracture with a reduction clamp. 3.5-mm cortical lag screws (group 1), 3.5-mm cortical position screws (group 2), and 5.4-mm distal locking screws through a distal femur locking plate (group 3) were placed across the fracture (n = 4/group). After screw placement, the clamp was removed and the amount of residual interfragmentary compression was recorded. After 2 minutes, a final steady-state force was measured and compared across groups.
RESULTS:Locking screws placed through the plate (group 3) maintained 27% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.043), whereas positional screws (group 2) maintained 90% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.431). The steady-state compression force measured with lag screws (group 1) increased by 240% (P = 0.030) relative to the initial clamp force. The steady-state force in the lag screw group was significantly greater than groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS:When reducing intra-articular fractures and applying interfragmentary compression with reduction clamps, additional lag screws increase the amount of compression across the fracture interface. Compressing a fracture with reduction clamps and relying on locking screws to maintain the compression result in a loss of interfragmentary compression and should be avoided. This study lends biomechanical support that lag screws placed outside of the plate before locking screws for fracture fixation help maintain optimal interfragmentary compression.</description><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Compressive Strength</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Open Fracture Reduction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Open Fracture Reduction - methods</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLxDAQhYMoul7-gUgefakmaa6Puri6oAiyPpe0nbjVtlmTFvXfm2VVxAcDIUzOOTPMh9AxJWeUGHV-eb84I7-PkmYLTajIacaYodtoQrQhmchzs4f2Y3xOHk0Y20V7TBnNuWAT9DL13cqGJvoee4dzfAfD0tcROx_wnW36Id2mf8LzfoCQzYJ96iB9hg-8TgaIsUnRC5dUnNRqGAPgB6jHalgLtq_xrHm36-IQ7TjbRjj6eg_Q4-xqMb3Jbu-v59OL26xiippMCKtyIJZTRepSaqKtqcuKMW0kB3DEKeekEKrkuVGs4nVdUilzIytluCT5ATrd9F0F_zpCHIquiRW0re3Bj7GgWjCpjeAyWfnGWgUfYwBXrELTpe0KSoo15iJhLv5iTrGTrwlj2UH9E_rmmgx6Y3jzbSITX9rxDUKxBNsOy_97fwL_0Il7</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Au, Brigham</creator><creator>Groundland, John</creator><creator>Stoops, T Kyle</creator><creator>Santoni, Brandon G</creator><creator>Sagi, H Claude</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation</title><author>Au, Brigham ; Groundland, John ; Stoops, T Kyle ; Santoni, Brandon G ; Sagi, H Claude</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2719-55a73e0a4170db6808a9dbc228964eef0f7ff6557b43972c4ddb166396c794603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Compressive Strength</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Open Fracture Reduction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Open Fracture Reduction - methods</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Au, Brigham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groundland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoops, T Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoni, Brandon G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagi, H Claude</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Au, Brigham</au><au>Groundland, John</au><au>Stoops, T Kyle</au><au>Santoni, Brandon G</au><au>Sagi, H Claude</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>210-213</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:It is recommended that the intra-articular component of a supracondylar distal femoral fracture be stabilized by a lag screw to create interfragmental compression. Generally, it is thought that lag screw fixation should precede any positional screw or locking screw application. This study compared 3 methods of maintaining interfragmentary compression after fracture reduction with a reduction clamp.
METHODS:Intra-articular vertical split fractures were created in synthetic femora. A force transducer was interposed between the medial and lateral condyles and 20 lbs of compression was applied to the fracture with a reduction clamp. 3.5-mm cortical lag screws (group 1), 3.5-mm cortical position screws (group 2), and 5.4-mm distal locking screws through a distal femur locking plate (group 3) were placed across the fracture (n = 4/group). After screw placement, the clamp was removed and the amount of residual interfragmentary compression was recorded. After 2 minutes, a final steady-state force was measured and compared across groups.
RESULTS:Locking screws placed through the plate (group 3) maintained 27% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.043), whereas positional screws (group 2) maintained 90% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.431). The steady-state compression force measured with lag screws (group 1) increased by 240% (P = 0.030) relative to the initial clamp force. The steady-state force in the lag screw group was significantly greater than groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS:When reducing intra-articular fractures and applying interfragmentary compression with reduction clamps, additional lag screws increase the amount of compression across the fracture interface. Compressing a fracture with reduction clamps and relying on locking screws to maintain the compression result in a loss of interfragmentary compression and should be avoided. This study lends biomechanical support that lag screws placed outside of the plate before locking screws for fracture fixation help maintain optimal interfragmentary compression.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>27984452</pmid><doi>10.1097/BOT.0000000000000769</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-5339 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2017-04, Vol.31 (4), p.210-213 |
issn | 0890-5339 1531-2291 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852689546 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Bone Screws Combined Modality Therapy - instrumentation Combined Modality Therapy - methods Compressive Strength Equipment Failure Analysis Femoral Fractures - physiopathology Femoral Fractures - surgery Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Friction Humans Open Fracture Reduction - instrumentation Open Fracture Reduction - methods Prosthesis Design Stress, Mechanical |
title | Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A01%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%203%20Methods%20for%20Maintaining%20Inter-Fragmentary%20Compression%20After%20Fracture%20Reduction%20and%20Fixation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Au,%20Brigham&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=210-213&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000769&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1852689546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852689546&rft_id=info:pmid/27984452&rfr_iscdi=true |