RAI1 Alternate Probe Identifies Additional Breast Cancer Cases as Amplified Following Equivocal HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing: Experience From a National Reference Laboratory
-In 2013 the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists updated the HER2 guidelines and changed the equivocal category for HER2 in situ hybridization testing to an average HER2 copy number of 4.0 to 5.9 with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of less than 2.0 and proposed retesting,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2017-02, Vol.141 (2), p.274-278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 278 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 274 |
container_title | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Hui, Ling Geiersbach, Katherine B Downs-Kelly, Erinn Gulbahce, H Evin |
description | -In 2013 the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists updated the HER2 guidelines and changed the equivocal category for HER2 in situ hybridization testing to an average HER2 copy number of 4.0 to 5.9 with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of less than 2.0 and proposed retesting, with an option of using another control probe to avoid false-negative results. RAI1, located at band position 17p11.2, is a popular alternate probe locus for retesting equivocal changes.
-To review experience with the RAI1 alternate probe in HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal breast cancers.
-Primary and metastatic breast cancers with equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization, retested with an alternate (RAI1) probe, were identified. HER2, RAI1, and CEP17 copy numbers, HER2 to control probe ratios, and genetic heterogeneity were recorded. Hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides were reviewed for type and grade of cancer.
-Of 876 cases tested with CEP17 as the reference probe, 97 (11.1%) had equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Additional testing with the RAI1 probe classified 39.2% cases (38 of 97) as amplified with a HER2:RAI1 ratio ranging from 2.0 to 3.2 (mean, 2.37); 3.1% (3 of 97) were still unclassifiable because of a deletion of RAI1.
-RAI1 identified close to 40% of original HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal cases as amplified, making these patients eligible for targeted therapies. It is not known whether guidelines for US Food and Drug Administration-approved probes can be extrapolated to alternate probes when an alternate control probe shows losses or gains. Because of the lack of guidelines for reporting HER2 status with alternate probes, laboratories face challenges in interpreting results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5858/arpa.2016-0201-OA |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852674683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A510296540</galeid><sourcerecordid>A510296540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e44ecaff0327680984a7f877a9e8228d3c0680ed830a6aca7d3a09dc87b8ed633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt2O0zAQhSMEYpeFB-AGWUJC3KQ4Tpw43GWrllaqKCrLdTSNJ12vnLhrO0B5Oh4NZ7f8LKoseeSZ74zGoxNFLxM64YKLd2D3MGE0yWMa7nhdPYrOE56lMUty_jg6p5SmcVkKfhY9c-4mPEvGkqfRGStKXnLBzqOfm2qZkEp7tD14JJ-s2SJZSuy9ahU6UkmpvDI9aHJpEZwnU-gbtCG4UIZAdHs9spLMjdbmm-p3ZHY7qK-mCaLFbMPIXA_GomswKMmyJ5-VH8jisLVKqh8wtidX6HxQviez73u06o6cW9MRIB_hOMAGW7R3lRVsjQVv7OF59KQF7fDFMV5EX-azq-kiXq0_LKfVKm44FT7GLMMG2pamrMgFLUUGRSuKAkoUjAmZNjSkUYqUQg4NFDIFWspGFFuBMk_Ti-jtfd-9NbdDGLbuVPiQ1tCjGVydCM7yIsvFiL7-D70xQ1ivHqm8ZAnlZf6X2oHGWvWt8RaasWld8YSyMucZDVR8gtphjxa06bFVIf2An5zgw5HYqeak4M0_gmsE7a-d0cO4cvcQTO7BxhrnLLb13qoO7KFOaD3asR7tWI92rEc71usqaF4dNzFsO5R_FL_9l_4CfBjbNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1869210596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RAI1 Alternate Probe Identifies Additional Breast Cancer Cases as Amplified Following Equivocal HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing: Experience From a National Reference Laboratory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hui, Ling ; Geiersbach, Katherine B ; Downs-Kelly, Erinn ; Gulbahce, H Evin</creator><creatorcontrib>Hui, Ling ; Geiersbach, Katherine B ; Downs-Kelly, Erinn ; Gulbahce, H Evin</creatorcontrib><description>-In 2013 the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists updated the HER2 guidelines and changed the equivocal category for HER2 in situ hybridization testing to an average HER2 copy number of 4.0 to 5.9 with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of less than 2.0 and proposed retesting, with an option of using another control probe to avoid false-negative results. RAI1, located at band position 17p11.2, is a popular alternate probe locus for retesting equivocal changes.
-To review experience with the RAI1 alternate probe in HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal breast cancers.
-Primary and metastatic breast cancers with equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization, retested with an alternate (RAI1) probe, were identified. HER2, RAI1, and CEP17 copy numbers, HER2 to control probe ratios, and genetic heterogeneity were recorded. Hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides were reviewed for type and grade of cancer.
-Of 876 cases tested with CEP17 as the reference probe, 97 (11.1%) had equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Additional testing with the RAI1 probe classified 39.2% cases (38 of 97) as amplified with a HER2:RAI1 ratio ranging from 2.0 to 3.2 (mean, 2.37); 3.1% (3 of 97) were still unclassifiable because of a deletion of RAI1.
-RAI1 identified close to 40% of original HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal cases as amplified, making these patients eligible for targeted therapies. It is not known whether guidelines for US Food and Drug Administration-approved probes can be extrapolated to alternate probes when an alternate control probe shows losses or gains. Because of the lack of guidelines for reporting HER2 status with alternate probes, laboratories face challenges in interpreting results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0201-OA</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27959582</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APLMAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Gene Expression Profiling - methods ; Genetic aspects ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Innovations ; Molecular diagnostic techniques ; Molecular probes ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics ; Transcription Factors - analysis ; Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2017-02, Vol.141 (2), p.274-278</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e44ecaff0327680984a7f877a9e8228d3c0680ed830a6aca7d3a09dc87b8ed633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e44ecaff0327680984a7f877a9e8228d3c0680ed830a6aca7d3a09dc87b8ed633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27959582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hui, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiersbach, Katherine B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs-Kelly, Erinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulbahce, H Evin</creatorcontrib><title>RAI1 Alternate Probe Identifies Additional Breast Cancer Cases as Amplified Following Equivocal HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing: Experience From a National Reference Laboratory</title><title>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>-In 2013 the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists updated the HER2 guidelines and changed the equivocal category for HER2 in situ hybridization testing to an average HER2 copy number of 4.0 to 5.9 with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of less than 2.0 and proposed retesting, with an option of using another control probe to avoid false-negative results. RAI1, located at band position 17p11.2, is a popular alternate probe locus for retesting equivocal changes.
-To review experience with the RAI1 alternate probe in HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal breast cancers.
-Primary and metastatic breast cancers with equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization, retested with an alternate (RAI1) probe, were identified. HER2, RAI1, and CEP17 copy numbers, HER2 to control probe ratios, and genetic heterogeneity were recorded. Hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides were reviewed for type and grade of cancer.
-Of 876 cases tested with CEP17 as the reference probe, 97 (11.1%) had equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Additional testing with the RAI1 probe classified 39.2% cases (38 of 97) as amplified with a HER2:RAI1 ratio ranging from 2.0 to 3.2 (mean, 2.37); 3.1% (3 of 97) were still unclassifiable because of a deletion of RAI1.
-RAI1 identified close to 40% of original HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal cases as amplified, making these patients eligible for targeted therapies. It is not known whether guidelines for US Food and Drug Administration-approved probes can be extrapolated to alternate probes when an alternate control probe shows losses or gains. Because of the lack of guidelines for reporting HER2 status with alternate probes, laboratories face challenges in interpreting results.</description><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Molecular diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>Molecular probes</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</subject><subject>Transcription Factors - analysis</subject><subject>Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt2O0zAQhSMEYpeFB-AGWUJC3KQ4Tpw43GWrllaqKCrLdTSNJ12vnLhrO0B5Oh4NZ7f8LKoseeSZ74zGoxNFLxM64YKLd2D3MGE0yWMa7nhdPYrOE56lMUty_jg6p5SmcVkKfhY9c-4mPEvGkqfRGStKXnLBzqOfm2qZkEp7tD14JJ-s2SJZSuy9ahU6UkmpvDI9aHJpEZwnU-gbtCG4UIZAdHs9spLMjdbmm-p3ZHY7qK-mCaLFbMPIXA_GomswKMmyJ5-VH8jisLVKqh8wtidX6HxQviez73u06o6cW9MRIB_hOMAGW7R3lRVsjQVv7OF59KQF7fDFMV5EX-azq-kiXq0_LKfVKm44FT7GLMMG2pamrMgFLUUGRSuKAkoUjAmZNjSkUYqUQg4NFDIFWspGFFuBMk_Ti-jtfd-9NbdDGLbuVPiQ1tCjGVydCM7yIsvFiL7-D70xQ1ivHqm8ZAnlZf6X2oHGWvWt8RaasWld8YSyMucZDVR8gtphjxa06bFVIf2An5zgw5HYqeak4M0_gmsE7a-d0cO4cvcQTO7BxhrnLLb13qoO7KFOaD3asR7tWI92rEc71usqaF4dNzFsO5R_FL_9l_4CfBjbNg</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Hui, Ling</creator><creator>Geiersbach, Katherine B</creator><creator>Downs-Kelly, Erinn</creator><creator>Gulbahce, H Evin</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>RAI1 Alternate Probe Identifies Additional Breast Cancer Cases as Amplified Following Equivocal HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing: Experience From a National Reference Laboratory</title><author>Hui, Ling ; Geiersbach, Katherine B ; Downs-Kelly, Erinn ; Gulbahce, H Evin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e44ecaff0327680984a7f877a9e8228d3c0680ed830a6aca7d3a09dc87b8ed633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Molecular diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>Molecular probes</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</topic><topic>Transcription Factors - analysis</topic><topic>Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hui, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiersbach, Katherine B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs-Kelly, Erinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulbahce, H Evin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hui, Ling</au><au>Geiersbach, Katherine B</au><au>Downs-Kelly, Erinn</au><au>Gulbahce, H Evin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RAI1 Alternate Probe Identifies Additional Breast Cancer Cases as Amplified Following Equivocal HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing: Experience From a National Reference Laboratory</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>274-278</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><coden>APLMAS</coden><abstract>-In 2013 the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists updated the HER2 guidelines and changed the equivocal category for HER2 in situ hybridization testing to an average HER2 copy number of 4.0 to 5.9 with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of less than 2.0 and proposed retesting, with an option of using another control probe to avoid false-negative results. RAI1, located at band position 17p11.2, is a popular alternate probe locus for retesting equivocal changes.
-To review experience with the RAI1 alternate probe in HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal breast cancers.
-Primary and metastatic breast cancers with equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization, retested with an alternate (RAI1) probe, were identified. HER2, RAI1, and CEP17 copy numbers, HER2 to control probe ratios, and genetic heterogeneity were recorded. Hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides were reviewed for type and grade of cancer.
-Of 876 cases tested with CEP17 as the reference probe, 97 (11.1%) had equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Additional testing with the RAI1 probe classified 39.2% cases (38 of 97) as amplified with a HER2:RAI1 ratio ranging from 2.0 to 3.2 (mean, 2.37); 3.1% (3 of 97) were still unclassifiable because of a deletion of RAI1.
-RAI1 identified close to 40% of original HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal cases as amplified, making these patients eligible for targeted therapies. It is not known whether guidelines for US Food and Drug Administration-approved probes can be extrapolated to alternate probes when an alternate control probe shows losses or gains. Because of the lack of guidelines for reporting HER2 status with alternate probes, laboratories face challenges in interpreting results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>27959582</pmid><doi>10.5858/arpa.2016-0201-OA</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9985 |
ispartof | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2017-02, Vol.141 (2), p.274-278 |
issn | 0003-9985 1543-2165 1543-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852674683 |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - genetics Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics Diagnosis Female Gene Expression Profiling - methods Genetic aspects Humans In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Innovations Molecular diagnostic techniques Molecular probes Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics Transcription Factors - analysis Transcription Factors - genetics |
title | RAI1 Alternate Probe Identifies Additional Breast Cancer Cases as Amplified Following Equivocal HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing: Experience From a National Reference Laboratory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A10%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RAI1%20Alternate%20Probe%20Identifies%20Additional%20Breast%20Cancer%20Cases%20as%20Amplified%20Following%20Equivocal%20HER2%20Fluorescence%20In%20Situ%20Hybridization%20Testing:%20Experience%20From%20a%20National%20Reference%20Laboratory&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Hui,%20Ling&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=274-278&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft.coden=APLMAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/arpa.2016-0201-OA&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA510296540%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1869210596&rft_id=info:pmid/27959582&rft_galeid=A510296540&rfr_iscdi=true |