Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery

Abstract Objectives To evaluate changes of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy by comparing serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) to those of non-laparoscopic hysterectomy (non-LH). Methods Prospectively, serum AMH levels were measured pre-operatively (AMH...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2017-03, Vol.210, p.54-57
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Hye-yon, Park, Sung Taek, Kyung, Min Sun, Park, Sung-ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue
container_start_page 54
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 210
creator Cho, Hye-yon
Park, Sung Taek
Kyung, Min Sun
Park, Sung-ho
description Abstract Objectives To evaluate changes of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy by comparing serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) to those of non-laparoscopic hysterectomy (non-LH). Methods Prospectively, serum AMH levels were measured pre-operatively (AMH0), 7 days (AMH1), 2 months (AMH2), and 6 months (AMH3) after LH (total laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy) and non-LH (vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy) in 91 premenopausal women (LH = 60, non-LH = 31). Changes of serum AMH levels were compared between the two groups. Results AMH0 was similar between the two groups ( P = 0.400). Also, AMH1, AMH2, and AMH3 were not different between the two groups ( P = 0.333, 0.534, and 0.726). A significant decrease of serum AMH level (30% decreases from AMH0) at 7 days, 2 months, and 6 months was observed in 44.4%, 34.8%, and 40% of all patients. Interestingly, the incidence of a significant decrease of serum AMH levels at postoperative 2 months was considerably higher in LH group compare to non-LH group (43.9% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis revealed that laparoscopic hysterectomy was an independent risk factor for the significant decrease of serum AMH at postoperative 2 months (Hazard ratio 4.147, 95% confidence interval 1.139–15.097). Conclusion Laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is associated with electro-thermal vessel ligation, might have negative effect on ovarian reserve after surgery. More large-scaled, long-term follow-up study is required.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852661264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0301211516310570</els_id><sourcerecordid>1852661264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-af6da8526d718edfddddb8d1b94de007391ffcafb04171d2fd13e35f7aac3a6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P1DAMhiMEYoeBf4BQj1xa4qQfUw5IqxWwK43EAThxiNLEWVLaZojbkfrvSTULQlzwxXL0-nX8mLGXwAvgUL_pC-zDfewKkaoCRMG5fMR2cGhE3tRV-ZjtuOSQC4Dqij0j6nkKKdun7Eo0bcllW-7Yt2siJBpxmrPgsnDW0espi0gYz5hpN2PMvq-UEpo5jOvb7KhPOgYy4eRNdqYim8KUD38_0hLvMa7P2ROnB8IXD3nPvn54_-XmNj9--nh3c33MTQnNnGtXW32oRG0bOKB1NkV3sNC1pUXOG9mCc0a7jic5WOEsSJSVa7Q2UtdG7tnri-8php8L0qxGTwaHQU8YFlKwmdcg6jJJy4vUpM9SRKdO0Y86rgq42rCqXl2wqg2rAqE2Znv26mHC0o1o_zT95pgE7y4CTHuePUZFxuNk0PqNm7LB_2_CvwZm8JM3eviBK1IfljglhgoUpQb1eTvtdlmoJfCq4fIXkLiiXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852661264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cho, Hye-yon ; Park, Sung Taek ; Kyung, Min Sun ; Park, Sung-ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hye-yon ; Park, Sung Taek ; Kyung, Min Sun ; Park, Sung-ho</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To evaluate changes of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy by comparing serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) to those of non-laparoscopic hysterectomy (non-LH). Methods Prospectively, serum AMH levels were measured pre-operatively (AMH0), 7 days (AMH1), 2 months (AMH2), and 6 months (AMH3) after LH (total laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy) and non-LH (vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy) in 91 premenopausal women (LH = 60, non-LH = 31). Changes of serum AMH levels were compared between the two groups. Results AMH0 was similar between the two groups ( P = 0.400). Also, AMH1, AMH2, and AMH3 were not different between the two groups ( P = 0.333, 0.534, and 0.726). A significant decrease of serum AMH level (30% decreases from AMH0) at 7 days, 2 months, and 6 months was observed in 44.4%, 34.8%, and 40% of all patients. Interestingly, the incidence of a significant decrease of serum AMH levels at postoperative 2 months was considerably higher in LH group compare to non-LH group (43.9% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis revealed that laparoscopic hysterectomy was an independent risk factor for the significant decrease of serum AMH at postoperative 2 months (Hazard ratio 4.147, 95% confidence interval 1.139–15.097). Conclusion Laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is associated with electro-thermal vessel ligation, might have negative effect on ovarian reserve after surgery. More large-scaled, long-term follow-up study is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27940394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; AMH ; Anti-Mullerian Hormone - blood ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovarian Reserve ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2017-03, Vol.210, p.54-57</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-af6da8526d718edfddddb8d1b94de007391ffcafb04171d2fd13e35f7aac3a6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-af6da8526d718edfddddb8d1b94de007391ffcafb04171d2fd13e35f7aac3a6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211516310570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hye-yon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyung, Min Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung-ho</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To evaluate changes of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy by comparing serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) to those of non-laparoscopic hysterectomy (non-LH). Methods Prospectively, serum AMH levels were measured pre-operatively (AMH0), 7 days (AMH1), 2 months (AMH2), and 6 months (AMH3) after LH (total laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy) and non-LH (vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy) in 91 premenopausal women (LH = 60, non-LH = 31). Changes of serum AMH levels were compared between the two groups. Results AMH0 was similar between the two groups ( P = 0.400). Also, AMH1, AMH2, and AMH3 were not different between the two groups ( P = 0.333, 0.534, and 0.726). A significant decrease of serum AMH level (30% decreases from AMH0) at 7 days, 2 months, and 6 months was observed in 44.4%, 34.8%, and 40% of all patients. Interestingly, the incidence of a significant decrease of serum AMH levels at postoperative 2 months was considerably higher in LH group compare to non-LH group (43.9% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis revealed that laparoscopic hysterectomy was an independent risk factor for the significant decrease of serum AMH at postoperative 2 months (Hazard ratio 4.147, 95% confidence interval 1.139–15.097). Conclusion Laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is associated with electro-thermal vessel ligation, might have negative effect on ovarian reserve after surgery. More large-scaled, long-term follow-up study is required.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>AMH</subject><subject>Anti-Mullerian Hormone - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy, Vaginal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovarian Reserve</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2P1DAMhiMEYoeBf4BQj1xa4qQfUw5IqxWwK43EAThxiNLEWVLaZojbkfrvSTULQlzwxXL0-nX8mLGXwAvgUL_pC-zDfewKkaoCRMG5fMR2cGhE3tRV-ZjtuOSQC4Dqij0j6nkKKdun7Eo0bcllW-7Yt2siJBpxmrPgsnDW0espi0gYz5hpN2PMvq-UEpo5jOvb7KhPOgYy4eRNdqYim8KUD38_0hLvMa7P2ROnB8IXD3nPvn54_-XmNj9--nh3c33MTQnNnGtXW32oRG0bOKB1NkV3sNC1pUXOG9mCc0a7jic5WOEsSJSVa7Q2UtdG7tnri-8php8L0qxGTwaHQU8YFlKwmdcg6jJJy4vUpM9SRKdO0Y86rgq42rCqXl2wqg2rAqE2Znv26mHC0o1o_zT95pgE7y4CTHuePUZFxuNk0PqNm7LB_2_CvwZm8JM3eviBK1IfljglhgoUpQb1eTvtdlmoJfCq4fIXkLiiXQ</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Cho, Hye-yon</creator><creator>Park, Sung Taek</creator><creator>Kyung, Min Sun</creator><creator>Park, Sung-ho</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery</title><author>Cho, Hye-yon ; Park, Sung Taek ; Kyung, Min Sun ; Park, Sung-ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-af6da8526d718edfddddb8d1b94de007391ffcafb04171d2fd13e35f7aac3a6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>AMH</topic><topic>Anti-Mullerian Hormone - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy, Vaginal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovarian Reserve</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hye-yon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyung, Min Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung-ho</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cho, Hye-yon</au><au>Park, Sung Taek</au><au>Kyung, Min Sun</au><au>Park, Sung-ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>210</volume><spage>54</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>54-57</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To evaluate changes of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy by comparing serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) to those of non-laparoscopic hysterectomy (non-LH). Methods Prospectively, serum AMH levels were measured pre-operatively (AMH0), 7 days (AMH1), 2 months (AMH2), and 6 months (AMH3) after LH (total laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy) and non-LH (vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy) in 91 premenopausal women (LH = 60, non-LH = 31). Changes of serum AMH levels were compared between the two groups. Results AMH0 was similar between the two groups ( P = 0.400). Also, AMH1, AMH2, and AMH3 were not different between the two groups ( P = 0.333, 0.534, and 0.726). A significant decrease of serum AMH level (30% decreases from AMH0) at 7 days, 2 months, and 6 months was observed in 44.4%, 34.8%, and 40% of all patients. Interestingly, the incidence of a significant decrease of serum AMH levels at postoperative 2 months was considerably higher in LH group compare to non-LH group (43.9% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis revealed that laparoscopic hysterectomy was an independent risk factor for the significant decrease of serum AMH at postoperative 2 months (Hazard ratio 4.147, 95% confidence interval 1.139–15.097). Conclusion Laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is associated with electro-thermal vessel ligation, might have negative effect on ovarian reserve after surgery. More large-scaled, long-term follow-up study is required.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27940394</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.003</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2017-03, Vol.210, p.54-57
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1852661264
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
AMH
Anti-Mullerian Hormone - blood
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy, Vaginal - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Middle Aged
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian Reserve
Prospective Studies
title Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A32%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20ovarian%20reserve%20after%20hysterectomy:%20Laparoscopic%20vs.%20non-laparoscopic%20surgery&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Cho,%20Hye-yon&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=210&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=54-57&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1852661264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852661264&rft_id=info:pmid/27940394&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0301211516310570&rfr_iscdi=true