Myofascial Induction Effects on Neck-Shoulder Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors: Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Design

Abstract Objectives To (1) investigate the immediate effects of myofascial induction (MI), with placebo electrotherapy as a control, on perceived pain, cervical/shoulder range of motion (ROM), and mood state in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) with shoulder/arm morbidity; and (2) examine the relations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2017-05, Vol.98 (5), p.832-840
Hauptverfasser: Castro-Martín, Eduardo, MSc, Ortiz-Comino, Lucía, MSc, Gallart-Aragón, Tania, MSc, Esteban-Moreno, Bernabé, PhD, Arroyo-Morales, Manuel, PhD, Galiano-Castillo, Noelia, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives To (1) investigate the immediate effects of myofascial induction (MI), with placebo electrotherapy as a control, on perceived pain, cervical/shoulder range of motion (ROM), and mood state in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) with shoulder/arm morbidity; and (2) examine the relationships between pain modifications and cervical/shoulder ROM on the side affected by breast cancer. Design Randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Setting Physical therapy laboratory. Participants BCSs (N=21) who had a diagnosis of stage I–IIIA breast cancer and had completed adjuvant therapy (except hormonal treatment). Intervention During each session, the BCSs received either an MI (fascial unwinding) intervention focused on the upper limb area following the Pilat approach or placebo pulsed shortwave therapy (control group). Each session lasted 30 minutes, and an adequate washout period of 4 weeks between sessions was established. Main Outcome Measures The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and anxiety, shoulder-cervical goniometry for ROM, the Profile of Mood States for psychological distress, and the Attitudes Towards Massage Scale were used. Results An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed significant time × group interactions for VAS affected arm ( P =.031) but not for VAS cervical ( P =.332), VAS nonaffected arm ( P =.698), or VAS anxiety ( P =.266). The ANCOVA also revealed significant interactions for affected shoulder flexion ( P
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.019