1.4 SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER

Objectives: Social information processing encompasses many behaviors, including emotion recognition. For normal social interactions and effective communication, the ability to collect relevant information from faces and correctly interpret facial expressions in real time is crucial. Common errors in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S100-S101
Hauptverfasser: Back, Diana J., BS, Francis, Sunday M., PhD, Skankland, Emma, BS, Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA, Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S101
container_issue 10
container_start_page S100
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
container_volume 55
creator Back, Diana J., BS
Francis, Sunday M., PhD
Skankland, Emma, BS
Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA
Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD
description Objectives: Social information processing encompasses many behaviors, including emotion recognition. For normal social interactions and effective communication, the ability to collect relevant information from faces and correctly interpret facial expressions in real time is crucial. Common errors include the misinterpretation of anger and disgust or fear and surprise. This study examined differences in identification of facial expressions of individuals with and without ASD. Methods: Two groups of male participants (ages 8-18 years) were recruited to perform the dynamic affect recognition evaluation (DARE; affects: happy, sad, anger, fear, surprise, disgust). Twenty-three individuals with ASD (ages 12.65 ± ≥ 2.06 years) and 18 individuals without ASD (ages 11.83 ± ≥ 2.41 years) completed the study. Results: To date, in the sample group of patients with ASD, there was a significant difference in the identification of happy and surprise versus anger, disgust, and fear. Happy (anger: P - 0.003; disgust: P < 0.001; fear: P - 0.003) and surprise (anger: P - 0.005; disgust: P < 0.001; fear: P - 0.005) were identified correctly more often than anger, disgust, and fear. ANOVA showed that the group with ASD made significantly less fear/surprise (P - 0.025) errors, and the control group made significantly fewer anger/disgust (P - 0.038) errors. In addition, eye-tracking data on how participants viewed each face were collected. Results from the eye-tracking analysis will be evaluated to examine correlations with accuracy in task performance. Conclusions: When examining performance on the DARE, we found that children and adolescents with ASD were better able to identify several negative affective emotions better than positive ones. These finding may allude to differences in social information processing, specifically emotion recognition. Further understanding of the variation in emotion processing among individuals with and without ASD may prove beneficial in the design of effective and personalized interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850789393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890856716312345</els_id><sourcerecordid>4256030771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2123-af239df077a7539236f597c9cc2ab1af187b7c9dd069666698d80da6985a60743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOD_-gFcFb7xpPUmaJgEVRp1a2FZpt-sQ0xRa66rNJvjvTZkgeGFuThKeN5w8B6ELDBEGnFy3Uau1iYjfRyAjAHaAJpgRHrIYi0M0ASEhFCzhx-jEuRYAMBdigm5xFAdlnmbTeZAtH_JiMV1l-TJ4LvJ0VpbZ8tFfB9P1KisXQfk8S1fFehHcZ2Ve3M-KM3RU687Z8596itYPs1X6FM7zxyydzkNDMKGhrgmVVQ2ca86oJDSpmeRGGkP0C9Y1FvzFH6sKEpn4JUUloNK-Mp0Aj-kputq_-z70HzvrtuqtccZ2nd7YfucUFgy4kFRSj17-Qdt-N2x8d56KMQeIGfMU2VNm6J0bbK3eh-ZND18KgxqNqlaNRtVoVIFU3qgP3exD1n_1s7GDcqaxG2OrZrBmq6q--T9-9yduumbTGN292i_rfttUjihQ5TiycWI4oV5izOg352KLUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841700455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1.4 SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Back, Diana J., BS ; Francis, Sunday M., PhD ; Skankland, Emma, BS ; Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA ; Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Back, Diana J., BS ; Francis, Sunday M., PhD ; Skankland, Emma, BS ; Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA ; Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Social information processing encompasses many behaviors, including emotion recognition. For normal social interactions and effective communication, the ability to collect relevant information from faces and correctly interpret facial expressions in real time is crucial. Common errors include the misinterpretation of anger and disgust or fear and surprise. This study examined differences in identification of facial expressions of individuals with and without ASD. Methods: Two groups of male participants (ages 8-18 years) were recruited to perform the dynamic affect recognition evaluation (DARE; affects: happy, sad, anger, fear, surprise, disgust). Twenty-three individuals with ASD (ages 12.65 ± ≥ 2.06 years) and 18 individuals without ASD (ages 11.83 ± ≥ 2.41 years) completed the study. Results: To date, in the sample group of patients with ASD, there was a significant difference in the identification of happy and surprise versus anger, disgust, and fear. Happy (anger: P - 0.003; disgust: P &lt; 0.001; fear: P - 0.003) and surprise (anger: P - 0.005; disgust: P &lt; 0.001; fear: P - 0.005) were identified correctly more often than anger, disgust, and fear. ANOVA showed that the group with ASD made significantly less fear/surprise (P - 0.025) errors, and the control group made significantly fewer anger/disgust (P - 0.038) errors. In addition, eye-tracking data on how participants viewed each face were collected. Results from the eye-tracking analysis will be evaluated to examine correlations with accuracy in task performance. Conclusions: When examining performance on the DARE, we found that children and adolescents with ASD were better able to identify several negative affective emotions better than positive ones. These finding may allude to differences in social information processing, specifically emotion recognition. Further understanding of the variation in emotion processing among individuals with and without ASD may prove beneficial in the design of effective and personalized interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-8567</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-5418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAAPEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Acknowledgment ; Adolescents ; Anger ; Autism ; Autism Spectrum Disorders ; Autistic children ; Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry ; Children ; Control Groups ; Disgust ; Emotion recognition ; Emotions ; Facial expressions ; Fear ; Fear &amp; phobias ; Identification ; Individualized ; Information processing ; Pediatrics ; Psychiatry ; Recognition ; Social information ; Social information processing ; Social interaction ; Social interactions ; Task performance ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S100-S101</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856716312345$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Back, Diana J., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sunday M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skankland, Emma, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>1.4 SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</title><description>Objectives: Social information processing encompasses many behaviors, including emotion recognition. For normal social interactions and effective communication, the ability to collect relevant information from faces and correctly interpret facial expressions in real time is crucial. Common errors include the misinterpretation of anger and disgust or fear and surprise. This study examined differences in identification of facial expressions of individuals with and without ASD. Methods: Two groups of male participants (ages 8-18 years) were recruited to perform the dynamic affect recognition evaluation (DARE; affects: happy, sad, anger, fear, surprise, disgust). Twenty-three individuals with ASD (ages 12.65 ± ≥ 2.06 years) and 18 individuals without ASD (ages 11.83 ± ≥ 2.41 years) completed the study. Results: To date, in the sample group of patients with ASD, there was a significant difference in the identification of happy and surprise versus anger, disgust, and fear. Happy (anger: P - 0.003; disgust: P &lt; 0.001; fear: P - 0.003) and surprise (anger: P - 0.005; disgust: P &lt; 0.001; fear: P - 0.005) were identified correctly more often than anger, disgust, and fear. ANOVA showed that the group with ASD made significantly less fear/surprise (P - 0.025) errors, and the control group made significantly fewer anger/disgust (P - 0.038) errors. In addition, eye-tracking data on how participants viewed each face were collected. Results from the eye-tracking analysis will be evaluated to examine correlations with accuracy in task performance. Conclusions: When examining performance on the DARE, we found that children and adolescents with ASD were better able to identify several negative affective emotions better than positive ones. These finding may allude to differences in social information processing, specifically emotion recognition. Further understanding of the variation in emotion processing among individuals with and without ASD may prove beneficial in the design of effective and personalized interventions.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Acknowledgment</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autism Spectrum Disorders</subject><subject>Autistic children</subject><subject>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Disgust</subject><subject>Emotion recognition</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Facial expressions</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Fear &amp; phobias</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Individualized</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Social information</subject><subject>Social information processing</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Task performance</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>0890-8567</issn><issn>1527-5418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOD_-gFcFb7xpPUmaJgEVRp1a2FZpt-sQ0xRa66rNJvjvTZkgeGFuThKeN5w8B6ELDBEGnFy3Uau1iYjfRyAjAHaAJpgRHrIYi0M0ASEhFCzhx-jEuRYAMBdigm5xFAdlnmbTeZAtH_JiMV1l-TJ4LvJ0VpbZ8tFfB9P1KisXQfk8S1fFehHcZ2Ve3M-KM3RU687Z8596itYPs1X6FM7zxyydzkNDMKGhrgmVVQ2ca86oJDSpmeRGGkP0C9Y1FvzFH6sKEpn4JUUloNK-Mp0Aj-kputq_-z70HzvrtuqtccZ2nd7YfucUFgy4kFRSj17-Qdt-N2x8d56KMQeIGfMU2VNm6J0bbK3eh-ZND18KgxqNqlaNRtVoVIFU3qgP3exD1n_1s7GDcqaxG2OrZrBmq6q--T9-9yduumbTGN292i_rfttUjihQ5TiycWI4oV5izOg352KLUA</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Back, Diana J., BS</creator><creator>Francis, Sunday M., PhD</creator><creator>Skankland, Emma, BS</creator><creator>Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA</creator><creator>Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>1.4 SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER</title><author>Back, Diana J., BS ; Francis, Sunday M., PhD ; Skankland, Emma, BS ; Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA ; Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2123-af239df077a7539236f597c9cc2ab1af187b7c9dd069666698d80da6985a60743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Acknowledgment</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autism Spectrum Disorders</topic><topic>Autistic children</topic><topic>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Disgust</topic><topic>Emotion recognition</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Facial expressions</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Fear &amp; phobias</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Individualized</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Social information</topic><topic>Social information processing</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Task performance</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Back, Diana J., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Sunday M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skankland, Emma, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Back, Diana J., BS</au><au>Francis, Sunday M., PhD</au><au>Skankland, Emma, BS</au><au>Wasserburg, Lucinda H., BA</au><au>Jacob, Suma, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1.4 SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>S100</spage><epage>S101</epage><pages>S100-S101</pages><issn>0890-8567</issn><eissn>1527-5418</eissn><coden>JAAPEE</coden><abstract>Objectives: Social information processing encompasses many behaviors, including emotion recognition. For normal social interactions and effective communication, the ability to collect relevant information from faces and correctly interpret facial expressions in real time is crucial. Common errors include the misinterpretation of anger and disgust or fear and surprise. This study examined differences in identification of facial expressions of individuals with and without ASD. Methods: Two groups of male participants (ages 8-18 years) were recruited to perform the dynamic affect recognition evaluation (DARE; affects: happy, sad, anger, fear, surprise, disgust). Twenty-three individuals with ASD (ages 12.65 ± ≥ 2.06 years) and 18 individuals without ASD (ages 11.83 ± ≥ 2.41 years) completed the study. Results: To date, in the sample group of patients with ASD, there was a significant difference in the identification of happy and surprise versus anger, disgust, and fear. Happy (anger: P - 0.003; disgust: P &lt; 0.001; fear: P - 0.003) and surprise (anger: P - 0.005; disgust: P &lt; 0.001; fear: P - 0.005) were identified correctly more often than anger, disgust, and fear. ANOVA showed that the group with ASD made significantly less fear/surprise (P - 0.025) errors, and the control group made significantly fewer anger/disgust (P - 0.038) errors. In addition, eye-tracking data on how participants viewed each face were collected. Results from the eye-tracking analysis will be evaluated to examine correlations with accuracy in task performance. Conclusions: When examining performance on the DARE, we found that children and adolescents with ASD were better able to identify several negative affective emotions better than positive ones. These finding may allude to differences in social information processing, specifically emotion recognition. Further understanding of the variation in emotion processing among individuals with and without ASD may prove beneficial in the design of effective and personalized interventions.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-8567
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S100-S101
issn 0890-8567
1527-5418
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850789393
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Acknowledgment
Adolescents
Anger
Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorders
Autistic children
Child & adolescent psychiatry
Children
Control Groups
Disgust
Emotion recognition
Emotions
Facial expressions
Fear
Fear & phobias
Identification
Individualized
Information processing
Pediatrics
Psychiatry
Recognition
Social information
Social information processing
Social interaction
Social interactions
Task performance
Tracking
title 1.4 SOCIAL INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A10%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1.4%20SOCIAL%20INFORMATION%20PROCESSING%20IN%20AUTISM%20SPECTRUM%20DISORDER&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Child%20and%20Adolescent%20Psychiatry&rft.au=Back,%20Diana%20J.,%20BS&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=S100&rft.epage=S101&rft.pages=S100-S101&rft.issn=0890-8567&rft.eissn=1527-5418&rft.coden=JAAPEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4256030771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841700455&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0890856716312345&rfr_iscdi=true