In defense of a supernatural foundation to morality: reply to Shermer
In my original paper, I claimed that our moral obligations are real, objective, and grounded in the supernatural. In particular, I endorsed the claim that God's will is the basis or source of our moral obligations, where “God” is to be understood as the theistic being who is omnibenevolent, omn...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2016-11, Vol.1384 (1), p.91-96 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 96 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |
| container_volume | 1384 |
| creator | Miller, Christian B. |
| description | In my original paper, I claimed that our moral obligations are real, objective, and grounded in the supernatural. In particular, I endorsed the claim that God's will is the basis or source of our moral obligations, where “God” is to be understood as the theistic being who is omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent, who created the universe, and who is still actively involved in the universe after creating it. In his critical article, Michael Shermer has raised a number of important challenges to my view. Here I try to defend the position and respond to at least his most serious objections. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nyas.13072 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850786316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1850786316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3872-d50ef44eead292c433a3acd483138063a7442aff8b26820ee82be37011ec5de73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1L7DAUxYMoOvrexj9ACm5EqC_JTZPU3TD4BcPIw_eBq5Bpb7HaNmPSov3vbR114UK8mwuX3zkXziFkn9ETNsyvprfhhAFVfINMmBJpLCXwTTKhVKlYpxx2yG4I95QyroXaJjtcsVQnoCfk7KqJciywCRi5IrJR6FboG9t23lZR4bomt23pmqh1Ue2GW9n2p5HHVdWPp5s79DX6H2SrsFXAn297j_w9P_szu4zn1xdXs-k8zkArHucJxUIIRJvzlGcCwILNcqGBgaYSrBKC26LQSy41p4iaLxEUZQyzJEcFe-Ro7bvy7rHD0Jq6DBlWlW3QdcEwnVClJTD5DZRLmTIF6YAefkLvXTdkUI2USIQAloy_j9dU5l0IHguz8mVtfW8YNWMPZuzBvPYwwAdvlt2yxvwDfQ9-ANgaeCor7L-wMovb6c27abzWlKHF5w-N9Q9GKlCJ-b-4MLPzxTwV_7T5DS-1taA7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845443157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In defense of a supernatural foundation to morality: reply to Shermer</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Miller, Christian B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Christian B.</creatorcontrib><description>In my original paper, I claimed that our moral obligations are real, objective, and grounded in the supernatural. In particular, I endorsed the claim that God's will is the basis or source of our moral obligations, where “God” is to be understood as the theistic being who is omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent, who created the universe, and who is still actively involved in the universe after creating it. In his critical article, Michael Shermer has raised a number of important challenges to my view. Here I try to defend the position and respond to at least his most serious objections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27198538</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANYAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bible ; divine will theory ; ethics ; Evolutionary ethics ; God ; Humans ; Michael Shermer ; Moral Obligations ; Morality ; Morals ; Religion ; Ten Commandments ; theological voluntarism ; theological voluntarism; morality</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2016-11, Vol.1384 (1), p.91-96</ispartof><rights>2016 New York Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2016 The New York Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3872-d50ef44eead292c433a3acd483138063a7442aff8b26820ee82be37011ec5de73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnyas.13072$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnyas.13072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27198538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Christian B.</creatorcontrib><title>In defense of a supernatural foundation to morality: reply to Shermer</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci</addtitle><description>In my original paper, I claimed that our moral obligations are real, objective, and grounded in the supernatural. In particular, I endorsed the claim that God's will is the basis or source of our moral obligations, where “God” is to be understood as the theistic being who is omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent, who created the universe, and who is still actively involved in the universe after creating it. In his critical article, Michael Shermer has raised a number of important challenges to my view. Here I try to defend the position and respond to at least his most serious objections.</description><subject>Bible</subject><subject>divine will theory</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>Evolutionary ethics</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Michael Shermer</subject><subject>Moral Obligations</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Ten Commandments</subject><subject>theological voluntarism</subject><subject>theological voluntarism; morality</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1L7DAUxYMoOvrexj9ACm5EqC_JTZPU3TD4BcPIw_eBq5Bpb7HaNmPSov3vbR114UK8mwuX3zkXziFkn9ETNsyvprfhhAFVfINMmBJpLCXwTTKhVKlYpxx2yG4I95QyroXaJjtcsVQnoCfk7KqJciywCRi5IrJR6FboG9t23lZR4bomt23pmqh1Ue2GW9n2p5HHVdWPp5s79DX6H2SrsFXAn297j_w9P_szu4zn1xdXs-k8zkArHucJxUIIRJvzlGcCwILNcqGBgaYSrBKC26LQSy41p4iaLxEUZQyzJEcFe-Ro7bvy7rHD0Jq6DBlWlW3QdcEwnVClJTD5DZRLmTIF6YAefkLvXTdkUI2USIQAloy_j9dU5l0IHguz8mVtfW8YNWMPZuzBvPYwwAdvlt2yxvwDfQ9-ANgaeCor7L-wMovb6c27abzWlKHF5w-N9Q9GKlCJ-b-4MLPzxTwV_7T5DS-1taA7</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Miller, Christian B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>In defense of a supernatural foundation to morality: reply to Shermer</title><author>Miller, Christian B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3872-d50ef44eead292c433a3acd483138063a7442aff8b26820ee82be37011ec5de73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bible</topic><topic>divine will theory</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>Evolutionary ethics</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Michael Shermer</topic><topic>Moral Obligations</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Ten Commandments</topic><topic>theological voluntarism</topic><topic>theological voluntarism; morality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Christian B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Christian B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In defense of a supernatural foundation to morality: reply to Shermer</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>1384</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>91-96</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><coden>ANYAA9</coden><abstract>In my original paper, I claimed that our moral obligations are real, objective, and grounded in the supernatural. In particular, I endorsed the claim that God's will is the basis or source of our moral obligations, where “God” is to be understood as the theistic being who is omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent, who created the universe, and who is still actively involved in the universe after creating it. In his critical article, Michael Shermer has raised a number of important challenges to my view. Here I try to defend the position and respond to at least his most serious objections.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27198538</pmid><doi>10.1111/nyas.13072</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0077-8923 |
| ispartof | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2016-11, Vol.1384 (1), p.91-96 |
| issn | 0077-8923 1749-6632 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850786316 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Bible divine will theory ethics Evolutionary ethics God Humans Michael Shermer Moral Obligations Morality Morals Religion Ten Commandments theological voluntarism theological voluntarism morality |
| title | In defense of a supernatural foundation to morality: reply to Shermer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A55%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20defense%20of%20a%20supernatural%20foundation%20to%20morality:%20reply%20to%20Shermer&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=Miller,%20Christian%20B.&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=1384&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=91-96&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft.coden=ANYAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nyas.13072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1850786316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845443157&rft_id=info:pmid/27198538&rfr_iscdi=true |