Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project

Objective To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence. Patients and methods This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2016-12, Vol.118 (6), p.935-939
Hauptverfasser: Hurle, Rodolfo, Pasini, Luisa, Lazzeri, Massimo, Colombo, Piergiuseppe, Buffi, NicolòMaria, Lughezzani, Giovanni, Casale, Paolo, Morenghi, Emanuela, Peschechera, Roberto, Zandegiacomo, Silvia, Benetti, Alessio, Saita, Alberto, Cardone, Pasquale, Guazzoni, Giorgio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 939
container_issue 6
container_start_page 935
container_title BJU international
container_volume 118
creator Hurle, Rodolfo
Pasini, Luisa
Lazzeri, Massimo
Colombo, Piergiuseppe
Buffi, NicolòMaria
Lughezzani, Giovanni
Casale, Paolo
Morenghi, Emanuela
Peschechera, Roberto
Zandegiacomo, Silvia
Benetti, Alessio
Saita, Alberto
Cardone, Pasquale
Guazzoni, Giorgio
description Objective To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence. Patients and methods This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed. Results The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%. Conclusion Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bju.13536
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850774551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826687859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1O5DAQhS3EiP8FF0CW2MCiwXb8k7DrRsxMIyQWgMQucpyKcOMkYCeN2HEEjjBn4yS4pxsESEh441L5q_fKeghtU3JA4zksJv0BTUQil9Aa5ZIPOCXXy281yeQqWg9hQkhsSLGCVpliRCWpWkP_hqazU8Ch91OwzunGAK5aj1378PL07G24xU3bxLLug3EQC9tMdZjNFE6XJXhsZkP-CNe2jM8d-Bp7CL3rAq58W-PuBvDoE4vHnXZWN3jhfvHRfW80Hl7s4zvfTsB0m-hXpV2ArcW9ga5-n1we_x2cnf8ZHw_PBiZJpRyUnBBDaCkqKTmRiitTxH5WVYplMiVG6JIyQjjjtEgzbRJZMG5MwoDqgqtkA-3NdaPvfQ-hy2sbDMx2grYPOU0FUYoLQX-AMilTlYosortf0Enb-yZ-JFKcK0EY5ZHan1PGtyF4qPI7b2vtH3NK8lnCeUw4_59wZHcWin1RQ_lOvkUagcM58GAdPH6vlI9Or-aSr_pVs-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844750214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hurle, Rodolfo ; Pasini, Luisa ; Lazzeri, Massimo ; Colombo, Piergiuseppe ; Buffi, NicolòMaria ; Lughezzani, Giovanni ; Casale, Paolo ; Morenghi, Emanuela ; Peschechera, Roberto ; Zandegiacomo, Silvia ; Benetti, Alessio ; Saita, Alberto ; Cardone, Pasquale ; Guazzoni, Giorgio</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurle, Rodolfo ; Pasini, Luisa ; Lazzeri, Massimo ; Colombo, Piergiuseppe ; Buffi, NicolòMaria ; Lughezzani, Giovanni ; Casale, Paolo ; Morenghi, Emanuela ; Peschechera, Roberto ; Zandegiacomo, Silvia ; Benetti, Alessio ; Saita, Alberto ; Cardone, Pasquale ; Guazzoni, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence. Patients and methods This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed. Results The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%. Conclusion Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.13536</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27207387</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJINFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>active surveillance ; Aged ; Bladder cancer ; Cellular biology ; Female ; Humans ; Italy ; Male ; Muscle, Smooth ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; NMIBC ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; recurrence ; Risk Assessment ; Surveillance ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; TURBT ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy ; Watchful Waiting</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2016-12, Vol.118 (6), p.935-939</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>BJUI © 2016 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.13536$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.13536$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurle, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasini, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzeri, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, NicolòMaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lughezzani, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casale, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morenghi, Emanuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschechera, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benetti, Alessio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saita, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardone, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guazzoni, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><title>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objective To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence. Patients and methods This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed. Results The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%. Conclusion Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers.</description><subject>active surveillance</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle, Smooth</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>NMIBC</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>TURBT</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Watchful Waiting</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1O5DAQhS3EiP8FF0CW2MCiwXb8k7DrRsxMIyQWgMQucpyKcOMkYCeN2HEEjjBn4yS4pxsESEh441L5q_fKeghtU3JA4zksJv0BTUQil9Aa5ZIPOCXXy281yeQqWg9hQkhsSLGCVpliRCWpWkP_hqazU8Ch91OwzunGAK5aj1378PL07G24xU3bxLLug3EQC9tMdZjNFE6XJXhsZkP-CNe2jM8d-Bp7CL3rAq58W-PuBvDoE4vHnXZWN3jhfvHRfW80Hl7s4zvfTsB0m-hXpV2ArcW9ga5-n1we_x2cnf8ZHw_PBiZJpRyUnBBDaCkqKTmRiitTxH5WVYplMiVG6JIyQjjjtEgzbRJZMG5MwoDqgqtkA-3NdaPvfQ-hy2sbDMx2grYPOU0FUYoLQX-AMilTlYosortf0Enb-yZ-JFKcK0EY5ZHan1PGtyF4qPI7b2vtH3NK8lnCeUw4_59wZHcWin1RQ_lOvkUagcM58GAdPH6vlI9Or-aSr_pVs-I</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Hurle, Rodolfo</creator><creator>Pasini, Luisa</creator><creator>Lazzeri, Massimo</creator><creator>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</creator><creator>Buffi, NicolòMaria</creator><creator>Lughezzani, Giovanni</creator><creator>Casale, Paolo</creator><creator>Morenghi, Emanuela</creator><creator>Peschechera, Roberto</creator><creator>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</creator><creator>Benetti, Alessio</creator><creator>Saita, Alberto</creator><creator>Cardone, Pasquale</creator><creator>Guazzoni, Giorgio</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</title><author>Hurle, Rodolfo ; Pasini, Luisa ; Lazzeri, Massimo ; Colombo, Piergiuseppe ; Buffi, NicolòMaria ; Lughezzani, Giovanni ; Casale, Paolo ; Morenghi, Emanuela ; Peschechera, Roberto ; Zandegiacomo, Silvia ; Benetti, Alessio ; Saita, Alberto ; Cardone, Pasquale ; Guazzoni, Giorgio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>active surveillance</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle, Smooth</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>NMIBC</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>TURBT</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Watchful Waiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurle, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasini, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzeri, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, NicolòMaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lughezzani, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casale, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morenghi, Emanuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschechera, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benetti, Alessio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saita, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardone, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guazzoni, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurle, Rodolfo</au><au>Pasini, Luisa</au><au>Lazzeri, Massimo</au><au>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</au><au>Buffi, NicolòMaria</au><au>Lughezzani, Giovanni</au><au>Casale, Paolo</au><au>Morenghi, Emanuela</au><au>Peschechera, Roberto</au><au>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</au><au>Benetti, Alessio</au><au>Saita, Alberto</au><au>Cardone, Pasquale</au><au>Guazzoni, Giorgio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>935</spage><epage>939</epage><pages>935-939</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><coden>BJINFO</coden><abstract>Objective To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence. Patients and methods This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed. Results The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%. Conclusion Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27207387</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.13536</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2016-12, Vol.118 (6), p.935-939
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850774551
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects active surveillance
Aged
Bladder cancer
Cellular biology
Female
Humans
Italy
Male
Muscle, Smooth
Neoplasm Invasiveness
NMIBC
Patients
Prospective Studies
recurrence
Risk Assessment
Surveillance
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
TURBT
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy
Watchful Waiting
title Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A25%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Active%20surveillance%20for%20low%E2%80%90risk%20non%E2%80%90muscle%E2%80%90invasive%20bladder%20cancer:%20mid%E2%80%90term%20results%20from%20the%20Bladder%20cancer%20Italian%20Active%20Surveillance%20(BIAS)%20project&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Hurle,%20Rodolfo&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=935&rft.epage=939&rft.pages=935-939&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft.coden=BJINFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.13536&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826687859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844750214&rft_id=info:pmid/27207387&rfr_iscdi=true