Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project
Objective To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence. Patients and methods This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2016-12, Vol.118 (6), p.935-939 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 939 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 935 |
container_title | BJU international |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Hurle, Rodolfo Pasini, Luisa Lazzeri, Massimo Colombo, Piergiuseppe Buffi, NicolòMaria Lughezzani, Giovanni Casale, Paolo Morenghi, Emanuela Peschechera, Roberto Zandegiacomo, Silvia Benetti, Alessio Saita, Alberto Cardone, Pasquale Guazzoni, Giorgio |
description | Objective
To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence.
Patients and methods
This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed.
Results
The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%.
Conclusion
Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bju.13536 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850774551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826687859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1O5DAQhS3EiP8FF0CW2MCiwXb8k7DrRsxMIyQWgMQucpyKcOMkYCeN2HEEjjBn4yS4pxsESEh441L5q_fKeghtU3JA4zksJv0BTUQil9Aa5ZIPOCXXy281yeQqWg9hQkhsSLGCVpliRCWpWkP_hqazU8Ch91OwzunGAK5aj1378PL07G24xU3bxLLug3EQC9tMdZjNFE6XJXhsZkP-CNe2jM8d-Bp7CL3rAq58W-PuBvDoE4vHnXZWN3jhfvHRfW80Hl7s4zvfTsB0m-hXpV2ArcW9ga5-n1we_x2cnf8ZHw_PBiZJpRyUnBBDaCkqKTmRiitTxH5WVYplMiVG6JIyQjjjtEgzbRJZMG5MwoDqgqtkA-3NdaPvfQ-hy2sbDMx2grYPOU0FUYoLQX-AMilTlYosortf0Enb-yZ-JFKcK0EY5ZHan1PGtyF4qPI7b2vtH3NK8lnCeUw4_59wZHcWin1RQ_lOvkUagcM58GAdPH6vlI9Or-aSr_pVs-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844750214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hurle, Rodolfo ; Pasini, Luisa ; Lazzeri, Massimo ; Colombo, Piergiuseppe ; Buffi, NicolòMaria ; Lughezzani, Giovanni ; Casale, Paolo ; Morenghi, Emanuela ; Peschechera, Roberto ; Zandegiacomo, Silvia ; Benetti, Alessio ; Saita, Alberto ; Cardone, Pasquale ; Guazzoni, Giorgio</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurle, Rodolfo ; Pasini, Luisa ; Lazzeri, Massimo ; Colombo, Piergiuseppe ; Buffi, NicolòMaria ; Lughezzani, Giovanni ; Casale, Paolo ; Morenghi, Emanuela ; Peschechera, Roberto ; Zandegiacomo, Silvia ; Benetti, Alessio ; Saita, Alberto ; Cardone, Pasquale ; Guazzoni, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence.
Patients and methods
This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed.
Results
The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%.
Conclusion
Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.13536</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27207387</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJINFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>active surveillance ; Aged ; Bladder cancer ; Cellular biology ; Female ; Humans ; Italy ; Male ; Muscle, Smooth ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; NMIBC ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; recurrence ; Risk Assessment ; Surveillance ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; TURBT ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy ; Watchful Waiting</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2016-12, Vol.118 (6), p.935-939</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>BJUI © 2016 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.13536$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.13536$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurle, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasini, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzeri, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, NicolòMaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lughezzani, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casale, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morenghi, Emanuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschechera, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benetti, Alessio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saita, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardone, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guazzoni, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><title>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objective
To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence.
Patients and methods
This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed.
Results
The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%.
Conclusion
Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers.</description><subject>active surveillance</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle, Smooth</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>NMIBC</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>TURBT</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Watchful Waiting</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1O5DAQhS3EiP8FF0CW2MCiwXb8k7DrRsxMIyQWgMQucpyKcOMkYCeN2HEEjjBn4yS4pxsESEh441L5q_fKeghtU3JA4zksJv0BTUQil9Aa5ZIPOCXXy281yeQqWg9hQkhsSLGCVpliRCWpWkP_hqazU8Ch91OwzunGAK5aj1378PL07G24xU3bxLLug3EQC9tMdZjNFE6XJXhsZkP-CNe2jM8d-Bp7CL3rAq58W-PuBvDoE4vHnXZWN3jhfvHRfW80Hl7s4zvfTsB0m-hXpV2ArcW9ga5-n1we_x2cnf8ZHw_PBiZJpRyUnBBDaCkqKTmRiitTxH5WVYplMiVG6JIyQjjjtEgzbRJZMG5MwoDqgqtkA-3NdaPvfQ-hy2sbDMx2grYPOU0FUYoLQX-AMilTlYosortf0Enb-yZ-JFKcK0EY5ZHan1PGtyF4qPI7b2vtH3NK8lnCeUw4_59wZHcWin1RQ_lOvkUagcM58GAdPH6vlI9Or-aSr_pVs-I</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Hurle, Rodolfo</creator><creator>Pasini, Luisa</creator><creator>Lazzeri, Massimo</creator><creator>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</creator><creator>Buffi, NicolòMaria</creator><creator>Lughezzani, Giovanni</creator><creator>Casale, Paolo</creator><creator>Morenghi, Emanuela</creator><creator>Peschechera, Roberto</creator><creator>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</creator><creator>Benetti, Alessio</creator><creator>Saita, Alberto</creator><creator>Cardone, Pasquale</creator><creator>Guazzoni, Giorgio</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</title><author>Hurle, Rodolfo ; Pasini, Luisa ; Lazzeri, Massimo ; Colombo, Piergiuseppe ; Buffi, NicolòMaria ; Lughezzani, Giovanni ; Casale, Paolo ; Morenghi, Emanuela ; Peschechera, Roberto ; Zandegiacomo, Silvia ; Benetti, Alessio ; Saita, Alberto ; Cardone, Pasquale ; Guazzoni, Giorgio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-d400c01d5f66406747cb8669ff729680c5ad12004241b89ac36b24cc32e1ab473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>active surveillance</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle, Smooth</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>NMIBC</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>TURBT</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Watchful Waiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurle, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasini, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzeri, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, NicolòMaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lughezzani, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casale, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morenghi, Emanuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschechera, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benetti, Alessio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saita, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardone, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guazzoni, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurle, Rodolfo</au><au>Pasini, Luisa</au><au>Lazzeri, Massimo</au><au>Colombo, Piergiuseppe</au><au>Buffi, NicolòMaria</au><au>Lughezzani, Giovanni</au><au>Casale, Paolo</au><au>Morenghi, Emanuela</au><au>Peschechera, Roberto</au><au>Zandegiacomo, Silvia</au><au>Benetti, Alessio</au><au>Saita, Alberto</au><au>Cardone, Pasquale</au><au>Guazzoni, Giorgio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>935</spage><epage>939</epage><pages>935-939</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><coden>BJINFO</coden><abstract>Objective
To report the oncological safety and the risk of progression for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) included in an active surveillance (AS) programme after the diagnosis of recurrence.
Patients and methods
This is a prospective study enrolling patients with history of pathologically confirmed low grade pTa–pT1a NMIBC and diagnosed with a tumour recurrence. Inclusion criteria consisted of negative urine cytology, presence of ≤5 lesions with a diameter of ≤10 mm, absence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) or persistent gross haematuria. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to AS. Need to proceed with treatment was defined as progression in number/dimension/positive cytology/symptoms (gross haematuria persistent) or any further intervention (resection or electro‐fulguration). Finally, we assessed the up‐grading and up‐staging when transurethral resection of bladder tumour was performed.
Results
The study population consisted of 55 patients with a previous diagnosis of NMIBC (70 AS events) prospectively recruited since 2008. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The median follow‐up was 53 months. The median time patients remained under AS was 12.5 months. There was disease progression in 28 patients (51%). No patient progressed to muscle‐invasive disease. In all, 15 patients (27.3%) had an increase in the number and/or size of the tumour, nine (16.4%) had haematuria, and four (7.3%) had a positive cytology. Only five (9%) patients in the whole series progressed to a high‐grade tumour (Grade 3) or presented with associated CIS. The overall adherence to the follow‐up schedule was 95%.
Conclusion
Our data show that an AS protocol for NMIBC could be a reasonable option in a select group of patients with small, recurrent cancers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27207387</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.13536</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4096 |
ispartof | BJU international, 2016-12, Vol.118 (6), p.935-939 |
issn | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850774551 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | active surveillance Aged Bladder cancer Cellular biology Female Humans Italy Male Muscle, Smooth Neoplasm Invasiveness NMIBC Patients Prospective Studies recurrence Risk Assessment Surveillance Time Factors Treatment Outcome TURBT Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - therapy Watchful Waiting |
title | Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A25%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Active%20surveillance%20for%20low%E2%80%90risk%20non%E2%80%90muscle%E2%80%90invasive%20bladder%20cancer:%20mid%E2%80%90term%20results%20from%20the%20Bladder%20cancer%20Italian%20Active%20Surveillance%20(BIAS)%20project&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Hurle,%20Rodolfo&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=935&rft.epage=939&rft.pages=935-939&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft.coden=BJINFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.13536&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826687859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844750214&rft_id=info:pmid/27207387&rfr_iscdi=true |