4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS

Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligib...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S177-S177
Hauptverfasser: Payne, Monica W., MA, Jones, Lauren H., BS, Nash, Ken C., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S177
container_issue 10
container_start_page S177
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
container_volume 55
creator Payne, Monica W., MA
Jones, Lauren H., BS
Nash, Ken C., MD
description Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850771901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0890856716314708</els_id><sourcerecordid>4256045261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2611-a8b647f8bf39eea44047977e85b8bd8c263adb5767fccf926f81f270b89b867d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1podu0f6AnQQ_txY5ky_qAUjC73ljgtZfY23RPQpZlsOusEytbyL-vzAYKOfQ0w8zzDjPveN5nBAMEEbkegkEpHYQuDyAPQozeeCsUh9SPMWJvvRVkHPosJvS998HaAUKIKGMrT-MAE1BnKRC7fbKuQbkFmbjJwFZs0lzUR3B3m-yT2_JQbEBZgH1aFNUx_5kUIvlagWN5qDOQuN422YlcpBW4E66yLnf7PP0FijTdVB-9d50arfn0Eq-8wzat15mflzdineS-DglCvmINwbRjTRdxYxTGEFNOqWFxw5qWOShSbRNTQjutOx6SjqEupLBhvGGEttGV9-0y92GeHs_GPsn73mozjupkprOViMWQUsQhcuiXV-gwneeT285RGFGIGY8dFV4oPU_WzqaTD3N_r-ZniaBcfJeDXHyXi-8Scul8d6LvF5Fxp_7pzSyt7s1Jm7afjX6S7dT_X_7jlVyP_anXavxtno39t6a0oYSyWh67_BWRCGEKWfQX_1eWBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841704895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Payne, Monica W., MA ; Jones, Lauren H., BS ; Nash, Ken C., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Monica W., MA ; Jones, Lauren H., BS ; Nash, Ken C., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-8567</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-5418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAAPEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety-Depression ; At risk ; Behavior disorders ; Behavior problems ; Behavior Rating Scales ; Caregiver burden ; Caregivers ; Check Lists ; Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry ; Child Behavior ; Child Behaviour Checklist ; Children ; Coordination ; Day treatment ; Delinquency ; Depression ; Depression (Psychology) ; Drugs ; Externalizing behaviour ; Family (Sociological Unit) ; Family planning ; Fidelity ; Functional impairment ; Health behavior ; Hospitalization ; Individual therapy ; Inpatient care ; Internalization ; Juvenile delinquency ; Medical diagnosis ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental health care ; Pediatrics ; Psychiatry ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Residential treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S177-S177</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2611-a8b647f8bf39eea44047977e85b8bd8c263adb5767fccf926f81f270b89b867d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Monica W., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lauren H., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Ken C., MD</creatorcontrib><title>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</title><description>Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety-Depression</subject><subject>At risk</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scales</subject><subject>Caregiver burden</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child Behaviour Checklist</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Day treatment</subject><subject>Delinquency</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Externalizing behaviour</subject><subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Functional impairment</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Individual therapy</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Internalization</subject><subject>Juvenile delinquency</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Residential treatment</subject><issn>0890-8567</issn><issn>1527-5418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1podu0f6AnQQ_txY5ky_qAUjC73ljgtZfY23RPQpZlsOusEytbyL-vzAYKOfQ0w8zzDjPveN5nBAMEEbkegkEpHYQuDyAPQozeeCsUh9SPMWJvvRVkHPosJvS998HaAUKIKGMrT-MAE1BnKRC7fbKuQbkFmbjJwFZs0lzUR3B3m-yT2_JQbEBZgH1aFNUx_5kUIvlagWN5qDOQuN422YlcpBW4E66yLnf7PP0FijTdVB-9d50arfn0Eq-8wzat15mflzdineS-DglCvmINwbRjTRdxYxTGEFNOqWFxw5qWOShSbRNTQjutOx6SjqEupLBhvGGEttGV9-0y92GeHs_GPsn73mozjupkprOViMWQUsQhcuiXV-gwneeT285RGFGIGY8dFV4oPU_WzqaTD3N_r-ZniaBcfJeDXHyXi-8Scul8d6LvF5Fxp_7pzSyt7s1Jm7afjX6S7dT_X_7jlVyP_anXavxtno39t6a0oYSyWh67_BWRCGEKWfQX_1eWBw</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Payne, Monica W., MA</creator><creator>Jones, Lauren H., BS</creator><creator>Nash, Ken C., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</title><author>Payne, Monica W., MA ; Jones, Lauren H., BS ; Nash, Ken C., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2611-a8b647f8bf39eea44047977e85b8bd8c263adb5767fccf926f81f270b89b867d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety-Depression</topic><topic>At risk</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scales</topic><topic>Caregiver burden</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child Behaviour Checklist</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Day treatment</topic><topic>Delinquency</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Externalizing behaviour</topic><topic>Family (Sociological Unit)</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Functional impairment</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Individual therapy</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Internalization</topic><topic>Juvenile delinquency</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Residential treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Monica W., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lauren H., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Ken C., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Monica W., MA</au><au>Jones, Lauren H., BS</au><au>Nash, Ken C., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>S177</spage><epage>S177</epage><pages>S177-S177</pages><issn>0890-8567</issn><eissn>1527-5418</eissn><coden>JAAPEE</coden><abstract>Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-8567
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S177-S177
issn 0890-8567
1527-5418
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850771901
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Anxiety
Anxiety-Depression
At risk
Behavior disorders
Behavior problems
Behavior Rating Scales
Caregiver burden
Caregivers
Check Lists
Child & adolescent psychiatry
Child Behavior
Child Behaviour Checklist
Children
Coordination
Day treatment
Delinquency
Depression
Depression (Psychology)
Drugs
Externalizing behaviour
Family (Sociological Unit)
Family planning
Fidelity
Functional impairment
Health behavior
Hospitalization
Individual therapy
Inpatient care
Internalization
Juvenile delinquency
Medical diagnosis
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mental health care
Pediatrics
Psychiatry
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Residential treatment
title 4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A07%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=4.46%20THE%20IMPACT%20OF%20HIGH%20FIDELITY%20WRAPAROUND%20ON%20PENNSYLVANIA'S%20YOUTH%20AND%20FAMILIES%20WITH%20COMPLEX%20NEEDS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Child%20and%20Adolescent%20Psychiatry&rft.au=Payne,%20Monica%20W.,%20MA&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=S177&rft.epage=S177&rft.pages=S177-S177&rft.issn=0890-8567&rft.eissn=1527-5418&rft.coden=JAAPEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4256045261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841704895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0890856716314708&rfr_iscdi=true