4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS
Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligib...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S177-S177 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S177 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | S177 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Payne, Monica W., MA Jones, Lauren H., BS Nash, Ken C., MD |
description | Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850771901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0890856716314708</els_id><sourcerecordid>4256045261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2611-a8b647f8bf39eea44047977e85b8bd8c263adb5767fccf926f81f270b89b867d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1podu0f6AnQQ_txY5ky_qAUjC73ljgtZfY23RPQpZlsOusEytbyL-vzAYKOfQ0w8zzDjPveN5nBAMEEbkegkEpHYQuDyAPQozeeCsUh9SPMWJvvRVkHPosJvS998HaAUKIKGMrT-MAE1BnKRC7fbKuQbkFmbjJwFZs0lzUR3B3m-yT2_JQbEBZgH1aFNUx_5kUIvlagWN5qDOQuN422YlcpBW4E66yLnf7PP0FijTdVB-9d50arfn0Eq-8wzat15mflzdineS-DglCvmINwbRjTRdxYxTGEFNOqWFxw5qWOShSbRNTQjutOx6SjqEupLBhvGGEttGV9-0y92GeHs_GPsn73mozjupkprOViMWQUsQhcuiXV-gwneeT285RGFGIGY8dFV4oPU_WzqaTD3N_r-ZniaBcfJeDXHyXi-8Scul8d6LvF5Fxp_7pzSyt7s1Jm7afjX6S7dT_X_7jlVyP_anXavxtno39t6a0oYSyWh67_BWRCGEKWfQX_1eWBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841704895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Payne, Monica W., MA ; Jones, Lauren H., BS ; Nash, Ken C., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Monica W., MA ; Jones, Lauren H., BS ; Nash, Ken C., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-8567</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-5418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAAPEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety-Depression ; At risk ; Behavior disorders ; Behavior problems ; Behavior Rating Scales ; Caregiver burden ; Caregivers ; Check Lists ; Child & adolescent psychiatry ; Child Behavior ; Child Behaviour Checklist ; Children ; Coordination ; Day treatment ; Delinquency ; Depression ; Depression (Psychology) ; Drugs ; Externalizing behaviour ; Family (Sociological Unit) ; Family planning ; Fidelity ; Functional impairment ; Health behavior ; Hospitalization ; Individual therapy ; Inpatient care ; Internalization ; Juvenile delinquency ; Medical diagnosis ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental health care ; Pediatrics ; Psychiatry ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Residential treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S177-S177</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2611-a8b647f8bf39eea44047977e85b8bd8c263adb5767fccf926f81f270b89b867d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Monica W., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lauren H., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Ken C., MD</creatorcontrib><title>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</title><description>Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety-Depression</subject><subject>At risk</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scales</subject><subject>Caregiver burden</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Child & adolescent psychiatry</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child Behaviour Checklist</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Day treatment</subject><subject>Delinquency</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Externalizing behaviour</subject><subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Functional impairment</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Individual therapy</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Internalization</subject><subject>Juvenile delinquency</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Residential treatment</subject><issn>0890-8567</issn><issn>1527-5418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1podu0f6AnQQ_txY5ky_qAUjC73ljgtZfY23RPQpZlsOusEytbyL-vzAYKOfQ0w8zzDjPveN5nBAMEEbkegkEpHYQuDyAPQozeeCsUh9SPMWJvvRVkHPosJvS998HaAUKIKGMrT-MAE1BnKRC7fbKuQbkFmbjJwFZs0lzUR3B3m-yT2_JQbEBZgH1aFNUx_5kUIvlagWN5qDOQuN422YlcpBW4E66yLnf7PP0FijTdVB-9d50arfn0Eq-8wzat15mflzdineS-DglCvmINwbRjTRdxYxTGEFNOqWFxw5qWOShSbRNTQjutOx6SjqEupLBhvGGEttGV9-0y92GeHs_GPsn73mozjupkprOViMWQUsQhcuiXV-gwneeT285RGFGIGY8dFV4oPU_WzqaTD3N_r-ZniaBcfJeDXHyXi-8Scul8d6LvF5Fxp_7pzSyt7s1Jm7afjX6S7dT_X_7jlVyP_anXavxtno39t6a0oYSyWh67_BWRCGEKWfQX_1eWBw</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Payne, Monica W., MA</creator><creator>Jones, Lauren H., BS</creator><creator>Nash, Ken C., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</title><author>Payne, Monica W., MA ; Jones, Lauren H., BS ; Nash, Ken C., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2611-a8b647f8bf39eea44047977e85b8bd8c263adb5767fccf926f81f270b89b867d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety-Depression</topic><topic>At risk</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scales</topic><topic>Caregiver burden</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Child & adolescent psychiatry</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child Behaviour Checklist</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Day treatment</topic><topic>Delinquency</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Externalizing behaviour</topic><topic>Family (Sociological Unit)</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Functional impairment</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Individual therapy</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Internalization</topic><topic>Juvenile delinquency</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Residential treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Monica W., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lauren H., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Ken C., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Monica W., MA</au><au>Jones, Lauren H., BS</au><au>Nash, Ken C., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>S177</spage><epage>S177</epage><pages>S177-S177</pages><issn>0890-8567</issn><eissn>1527-5418</eissn><coden>JAAPEE</coden><abstract>Objectives: The study examined functional outcomes resulting from high fidelity wraparound (HFW), a youth-guided and family-driven planning process that follows a series of phases, principles, and activities to help youth with complex mental health issues and multisystem involvement. Methods: Eligible youth were between the ages of 8 and 21 years, enrolled in the HFW process in their county (13 counties participated), had a primary mental health diagnosis, were also involved in other child-serving systems, and were at risk for out of home placement. This poster will focus on the baseline to 12 months (n = 40 families: youth and primary caregivers) in the following assessments: Child Behavior Checklist for youth ages 6 to 18 years (CBCL 6-18); Revised Children's Sample Manifest Anxiety Scale, 2nd Edition (RCMAS-2); Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2); Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ); Delinquency Survey, Revised (DS-R); and Multi- Sector Service Contacts (MSSC-R). Results: After 12 months of HFW, youth were shown to have a 22.8 percent improvement on the internalizing behavior scores and a 2.8 percent improvement on the externalizing behavior scores of the CBCL 6-18. Youth who scored in the clinical range on the RCMAS for anxiety decreased by 10.7 percent, and youth who scored in the clinical range on the RADS-2 for depression decreased by 16.7 percent. Caregivers experienced less stress and strain on the global strain score of the CGSQ. Youth experienced a 9.1 percent decrease in arrests and a 15.1 percent decrease in convictions. Better care coordination resulted in a 25.8 percent decrease in crisis stabilization services, a 9.1 percent decrease in medication monitoring, a 21.9 percent decrease in individual therapy, a 12.5 percent decrease in day treatment, a 21.9 percent decrease in psychiatric inpatient services, and a 15.6 percent decrease in residential treatment facilities, comparing the results from 6 months before baseline with results from 6-12 months. Conclusions: HFW is associated with significant improvement in mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, caregiver strain, delinquent behaviors, and less utilization of costly crisis stabilization, and outpatient, inpatient, and residential services after 12 months of participation. Findings indicate the importance of using the HFW process for youth and families who are the hardest to reach and who result in the highest cost to the child-serving systems.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-8567 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.55 (10), p.S177-S177 |
issn | 0890-8567 1527-5418 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850771901 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Anxiety Anxiety-Depression At risk Behavior disorders Behavior problems Behavior Rating Scales Caregiver burden Caregivers Check Lists Child & adolescent psychiatry Child Behavior Child Behaviour Checklist Children Coordination Day treatment Delinquency Depression Depression (Psychology) Drugs Externalizing behaviour Family (Sociological Unit) Family planning Fidelity Functional impairment Health behavior Hospitalization Individual therapy Inpatient care Internalization Juvenile delinquency Medical diagnosis Mental disorders Mental health Mental health care Pediatrics Psychiatry Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Residential treatment |
title | 4.46 THE IMPACT OF HIGH FIDELITY WRAPAROUND ON PENNSYLVANIA'S YOUTH AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX NEEDS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A07%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=4.46%20THE%20IMPACT%20OF%20HIGH%20FIDELITY%20WRAPAROUND%20ON%20PENNSYLVANIA'S%20YOUTH%20AND%20FAMILIES%20WITH%20COMPLEX%20NEEDS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Child%20and%20Adolescent%20Psychiatry&rft.au=Payne,%20Monica%20W.,%20MA&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=S177&rft.epage=S177&rft.pages=S177-S177&rft.issn=0890-8567&rft.eissn=1527-5418&rft.coden=JAAPEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4256045261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841704895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0890856716314708&rfr_iscdi=true |