MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study

Objectives To describe the implementation and protocol of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the longitudinal BiDirect study and to report rates of study participation as well as management of incidental findings. Methods Data came from the BiDirect study that investigates the relationship...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2017, Vol.27 (1), p.231-238
Hauptverfasser: Teuber, Anja, Sundermann, Benedikt, Kugel, Harald, Schwindt, Wolfram, Heindel, Walter, Minnerup, Jens, Dannlowski, Udo, Berger, Klaus, Wersching, Heike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 238
container_issue 1
container_start_page 231
container_title European radiology
container_volume 27
creator Teuber, Anja
Sundermann, Benedikt
Kugel, Harald
Schwindt, Wolfram
Heindel, Walter
Minnerup, Jens
Dannlowski, Udo
Berger, Klaus
Wersching, Heike
description Objectives To describe the implementation and protocol of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the longitudinal BiDirect study and to report rates of study participation as well as management of incidental findings. Methods Data came from the BiDirect study that investigates the relationship between depression and arteriosclerosis and comprises 2258 participants in three cohorts: 999 patients with depression, 347 patients with manifest cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 912 population-based controls. The study program includes MRI of the brain. Reasons for non-participation were systematically collected. Incidental findings were categorized and disclosed according to clinical relevance. Results At baseline 2176 participants were offered MRI, of whom 1453 (67 %) completed it. Reasons for non-participation differed according to cohort, age and gender with controls showing the highest participation rate of 79 %. Patient cohorts had higher refusal rates and CVD patients a high prevalence of contraindications. In the first follow-up examination 69 % of participating subjects completed MRI. Incidental findings were disclosed to 246 participants (17 %). The majority of incidental findings were extensive white matter hyperintensities requiring further diagnostic work-up. Conclusions Knowledge about subjects and sensible definition of incidental findings are crucial for large-scale imaging projects. Our data offer practical and concrete information for the design of future studies. Key points • Willingness to participate in MRI is generally high, also in follow-up examinations. • Rates of refusal and prevalence of contraindications differ according to subject characteristics. • Extensive white matter hyperintensities considerably increase the disclosure rates of incidental findings. • MRI workflow requires continuous case-by-case handling by an interdisciplinary team.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850770856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1850770856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-33ec374f8ff54468fdaec0299a7ce852fd3df2f4adacb68b6f0f100da0cd4fba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7jj6A7yRgDfeRE-apEm809VdhRVB9Dqk-ZjN0mlq0iLz723pKCIIQiCB85znkPMi9JTCSwogX1UAxoAAbQlnwIi-h3aUs4ZQUPw-2oFmikit-QV6VOsdAGjK5UN00UgQWgm5Qz8-fcHpaA9pOOAc8XQbcFdsGvByelsOAbt8m8uE6zT7FOprHIOtqUt9mk64hHGtnRvHPM69nVIeCLaDx-PyDsNEOluDx2_Tu1SC20ynx-hBtH0NT873Hn27ev_18gO5-Xz98fLNDXFcsIkwFhyTPKoYBeetit4GB43WVrqgRBM987GJ3HrrulZ1bYS4rMZbcJ7HzrI9erF5x5K_z6FO5piqC31vh5DnaqgSICUo0f4HykUjWrVsdY-e_4Xe5bkMy0dWiguupV6FdKNcybWWEM1Yll2Xk6Fg1gDNFqBZAjRrgGY1Pzub5-4Y_O-OX4ktQLMBdSkNh1D-GP1P60_tkKb2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844549796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Teuber, Anja ; Sundermann, Benedikt ; Kugel, Harald ; Schwindt, Wolfram ; Heindel, Walter ; Minnerup, Jens ; Dannlowski, Udo ; Berger, Klaus ; Wersching, Heike</creator><creatorcontrib>Teuber, Anja ; Sundermann, Benedikt ; Kugel, Harald ; Schwindt, Wolfram ; Heindel, Walter ; Minnerup, Jens ; Dannlowski, Udo ; Berger, Klaus ; Wersching, Heike</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To describe the implementation and protocol of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the longitudinal BiDirect study and to report rates of study participation as well as management of incidental findings. Methods Data came from the BiDirect study that investigates the relationship between depression and arteriosclerosis and comprises 2258 participants in three cohorts: 999 patients with depression, 347 patients with manifest cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 912 population-based controls. The study program includes MRI of the brain. Reasons for non-participation were systematically collected. Incidental findings were categorized and disclosed according to clinical relevance. Results At baseline 2176 participants were offered MRI, of whom 1453 (67 %) completed it. Reasons for non-participation differed according to cohort, age and gender with controls showing the highest participation rate of 79 %. Patient cohorts had higher refusal rates and CVD patients a high prevalence of contraindications. In the first follow-up examination 69 % of participating subjects completed MRI. Incidental findings were disclosed to 246 participants (17 %). The majority of incidental findings were extensive white matter hyperintensities requiring further diagnostic work-up. Conclusions Knowledge about subjects and sensible definition of incidental findings are crucial for large-scale imaging projects. Our data offer practical and concrete information for the design of future studies. Key points • Willingness to participate in MRI is generally high, also in follow-up examinations. • Rates of refusal and prevalence of contraindications differ according to subject characteristics. • Extensive white matter hyperintensities considerably increase the disclosure rates of incidental findings. • MRI workflow requires continuous case-by-case handling by an interdisciplinary team.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27059857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Arteriosclerosis ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - pathology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Contraindications ; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnostic imaging ; Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Germany - epidemiology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Incidental Findings ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology ; Longitudinal Studies ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mental depression ; Middle Aged ; Neuro ; Neuroradiology ; Participation ; Patients ; Population-based studies ; Prevalence ; Radiology ; Refusal to Participate ; Sex Factors ; Truth Disclosure ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2017, Vol.27 (1), p.231-238</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2016</rights><rights>European Radiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-33ec374f8ff54468fdaec0299a7ce852fd3df2f4adacb68b6f0f100da0cd4fba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-33ec374f8ff54468fdaec0299a7ce852fd3df2f4adacb68b6f0f100da0cd4fba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teuber, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundermann, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kugel, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwindt, Wolfram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heindel, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minnerup, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannlowski, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wersching, Heike</creatorcontrib><title>MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives To describe the implementation and protocol of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the longitudinal BiDirect study and to report rates of study participation as well as management of incidental findings. Methods Data came from the BiDirect study that investigates the relationship between depression and arteriosclerosis and comprises 2258 participants in three cohorts: 999 patients with depression, 347 patients with manifest cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 912 population-based controls. The study program includes MRI of the brain. Reasons for non-participation were systematically collected. Incidental findings were categorized and disclosed according to clinical relevance. Results At baseline 2176 participants were offered MRI, of whom 1453 (67 %) completed it. Reasons for non-participation differed according to cohort, age and gender with controls showing the highest participation rate of 79 %. Patient cohorts had higher refusal rates and CVD patients a high prevalence of contraindications. In the first follow-up examination 69 % of participating subjects completed MRI. Incidental findings were disclosed to 246 participants (17 %). The majority of incidental findings were extensive white matter hyperintensities requiring further diagnostic work-up. Conclusions Knowledge about subjects and sensible definition of incidental findings are crucial for large-scale imaging projects. Our data offer practical and concrete information for the design of future studies. Key points • Willingness to participate in MRI is generally high, also in follow-up examinations. • Rates of refusal and prevalence of contraindications differ according to subject characteristics. • Extensive white matter hyperintensities considerably increase the disclosure rates of incidental findings. • MRI workflow requires continuous case-by-case handling by an interdisciplinary team.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arteriosclerosis</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Incidental Findings</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuro</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Refusal to Participate</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7jj6A7yRgDfeRE-apEm809VdhRVB9Dqk-ZjN0mlq0iLz723pKCIIQiCB85znkPMi9JTCSwogX1UAxoAAbQlnwIi-h3aUs4ZQUPw-2oFmikit-QV6VOsdAGjK5UN00UgQWgm5Qz8-fcHpaA9pOOAc8XQbcFdsGvByelsOAbt8m8uE6zT7FOprHIOtqUt9mk64hHGtnRvHPM69nVIeCLaDx-PyDsNEOluDx2_Tu1SC20ynx-hBtH0NT873Hn27ev_18gO5-Xz98fLNDXFcsIkwFhyTPKoYBeetit4GB43WVrqgRBM987GJ3HrrulZ1bYS4rMZbcJ7HzrI9erF5x5K_z6FO5piqC31vh5DnaqgSICUo0f4HykUjWrVsdY-e_4Xe5bkMy0dWiguupV6FdKNcybWWEM1Yll2Xk6Fg1gDNFqBZAjRrgGY1Pzub5-4Y_O-OX4ktQLMBdSkNh1D-GP1P60_tkKb2</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Teuber, Anja</creator><creator>Sundermann, Benedikt</creator><creator>Kugel, Harald</creator><creator>Schwindt, Wolfram</creator><creator>Heindel, Walter</creator><creator>Minnerup, Jens</creator><creator>Dannlowski, Udo</creator><creator>Berger, Klaus</creator><creator>Wersching, Heike</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study</title><author>Teuber, Anja ; Sundermann, Benedikt ; Kugel, Harald ; Schwindt, Wolfram ; Heindel, Walter ; Minnerup, Jens ; Dannlowski, Udo ; Berger, Klaus ; Wersching, Heike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-33ec374f8ff54468fdaec0299a7ce852fd3df2f4adacb68b6f0f100da0cd4fba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arteriosclerosis</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Incidental Findings</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuro</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Refusal to Participate</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teuber, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundermann, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kugel, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwindt, Wolfram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heindel, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minnerup, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannlowski, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wersching, Heike</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teuber, Anja</au><au>Sundermann, Benedikt</au><au>Kugel, Harald</au><au>Schwindt, Wolfram</au><au>Heindel, Walter</au><au>Minnerup, Jens</au><au>Dannlowski, Udo</au><au>Berger, Klaus</au><au>Wersching, Heike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>231-238</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives To describe the implementation and protocol of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the longitudinal BiDirect study and to report rates of study participation as well as management of incidental findings. Methods Data came from the BiDirect study that investigates the relationship between depression and arteriosclerosis and comprises 2258 participants in three cohorts: 999 patients with depression, 347 patients with manifest cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 912 population-based controls. The study program includes MRI of the brain. Reasons for non-participation were systematically collected. Incidental findings were categorized and disclosed according to clinical relevance. Results At baseline 2176 participants were offered MRI, of whom 1453 (67 %) completed it. Reasons for non-participation differed according to cohort, age and gender with controls showing the highest participation rate of 79 %. Patient cohorts had higher refusal rates and CVD patients a high prevalence of contraindications. In the first follow-up examination 69 % of participating subjects completed MRI. Incidental findings were disclosed to 246 participants (17 %). The majority of incidental findings were extensive white matter hyperintensities requiring further diagnostic work-up. Conclusions Knowledge about subjects and sensible definition of incidental findings are crucial for large-scale imaging projects. Our data offer practical and concrete information for the design of future studies. Key points • Willingness to participate in MRI is generally high, also in follow-up examinations. • Rates of refusal and prevalence of contraindications differ according to subject characteristics. • Extensive white matter hyperintensities considerably increase the disclosure rates of incidental findings. • MRI workflow requires continuous case-by-case handling by an interdisciplinary team.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27059857</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2017, Vol.27 (1), p.231-238
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1850770856
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Arteriosclerosis
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - pathology
Cardiovascular disease
Case-Control Studies
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Contraindications
Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnostic imaging
Depressive Disorder, Major - epidemiology
Diagnostic Radiology
Feasibility Studies
Female
Germany - epidemiology
Humans
Imaging
Incidental Findings
Interdisciplinary aspects
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology
Longitudinal Studies
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental depression
Middle Aged
Neuro
Neuroradiology
Participation
Patients
Population-based studies
Prevalence
Radiology
Refusal to Participate
Sex Factors
Truth Disclosure
Ultrasound
title MR imaging of the brain in large cohort studies: feasibility report of the population- and patient-based BiDirect study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A10%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20imaging%20of%20the%20brain%20in%20large%20cohort%20studies:%20feasibility%20report%20of%20the%20population-%20and%20patient-based%20BiDirect%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Teuber,%20Anja&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=231-238&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-016-4303-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1850770856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844549796&rft_id=info:pmid/27059857&rfr_iscdi=true