Evolution of functionally conserved enhancers can be accelerated in large populations: a population–genetic model
The evolution of cis-regulatory elements (or enhancers) appears to proceed at dramatically different rates in different taxa. Vertebrate enhancers are often very highly conserved in their sequences, and relative positions, across distantly related taxa. In contrast, functionally equivalent enhancers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2002-05, Vol.269 (1494), p.953-960 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 960 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1494 |
container_start_page | 953 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 269 |
creator | Carter, A. J. R. Wagner, G. P. |
description | The evolution of cis-regulatory elements (or enhancers) appears to proceed at dramatically different rates in different taxa. Vertebrate enhancers are often very highly conserved in their sequences, and relative positions, across distantly related taxa. In contrast, functionally equivalent enhancers in closely related Drosophila species can differ greatly in their sequences and spatial organization. We present a population-genetic model to explain this difference. The model examines the dynamics of fixation of pairs of individually deleterious, but compensating, mutations. As expected, small populations are predicted to have a high rate of evolution, and the rate decreases with increasing population size. In contrast to previous models, however, this model predicts that the rate of evolution by pairs of compensatory mutations increases dramatically for population sizes above several thousand individuals, to the point of greatly exceeding the neutral rate. Application of this model predicts that species with moderate population sizes will have relatively conserved enhancers, whereas species with larger populations will be expected to evolve their enhancers at much higher rates. We propose that the different degree of conservation seen in vertebrate and Drosophila enhancers may be explained solely by differences in their population sizes and generation times. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2002.1968 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18501071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3067786</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3067786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-a49d8fb7f484ba8b36ba472d492924e76148c5af21976216bb8074d63d3990163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUruO1DAUjRCIXRZaKoRc0WWwHccPChBaLQ9pgIJHQWM5jjPjwWMHOxmYjn_gD_kSHGU07BRAZV-dh--9x0VxH8EFgoI_jqlvFhhCvECC8hvFOSIMlVjU5GZxDgXFJSc1PivupLSBEIqa17eLM4Qh5oyJ8yJd7YIbBxs8CB3oRq-nu3JuD3TwycSdaYHxa-W1iQlo5UFjgNLaOBPVkEHrgVNxZUAf-tGpSZ6eAHWt_PXj58p4M1gNtqE17m5xq1MumXuH86L4-OLqw-Wrcvnu5evL58tSU8SHUhHR8q5hHeGkUbypaKMIwy0RWGBiGEWE61p1GAlGMaJNwyEjLa3aSgiIaHVRPJ19-7HZmlYbP0TlZB_tVsW9DMrKU8TbtVyFnURUQMFENnh0MIjh62jSILc25cmd8iaMSTLEEIdV9V8i4jVEkKFMXMxEHUNK0XTHbhCUU6ByClROgcop0Cx4eH2GP_RDgplQzYQY9nmZQVsz7OUmjDGnmP5u-2BWbdIQ4tG1gpQxPm2unGGbBvP9CKv4RVJWsVp-4kSK5VuOP78R8n3mo5m_tqv1NxuNPOkmF31M-X0qJCIiS-tpZ8_-qZkazl9wyNmcCGU3uhxi21W_AS8E8tk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18501071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of functionally conserved enhancers can be accelerated in large populations: a population–genetic model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Carter, A. J. R. ; Wagner, G. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carter, A. J. R. ; Wagner, G. P.</creatorcontrib><description>The evolution of cis-regulatory elements (or enhancers) appears to proceed at dramatically different rates in different taxa. Vertebrate enhancers are often very highly conserved in their sequences, and relative positions, across distantly related taxa. In contrast, functionally equivalent enhancers in closely related Drosophila species can differ greatly in their sequences and spatial organization. We present a population-genetic model to explain this difference. The model examines the dynamics of fixation of pairs of individually deleterious, but compensating, mutations. As expected, small populations are predicted to have a high rate of evolution, and the rate decreases with increasing population size. In contrast to previous models, however, this model predicts that the rate of evolution by pairs of compensatory mutations increases dramatically for population sizes above several thousand individuals, to the point of greatly exceeding the neutral rate. Application of this model predicts that species with moderate population sizes will have relatively conserved enhancers, whereas species with larger populations will be expected to evolve their enhancers at much higher rates. We propose that the different degree of conservation seen in vertebrate and Drosophila enhancers may be explained solely by differences in their population sizes and generation times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12028779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Animals ; Biological evolution ; Compensatory Mutation ; Conserved Sequence ; Drosophila ; Ecological competition ; Enhancer Elements, Genetic ; Enhancer Evolution ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Fitness Valley ; Genetic mutation ; Genetics, Population ; Mathematical Computing ; Modeling ; Models, Genetic ; Population Size ; Taxa ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-05, Vol.269 (1494), p.953-960</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-a49d8fb7f484ba8b36ba472d492924e76148c5af21976216bb8074d63d3990163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-a49d8fb7f484ba8b36ba472d492924e76148c5af21976216bb8074d63d3990163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3067786$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3067786$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12028779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carter, A. J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, G. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of functionally conserved enhancers can be accelerated in large populations: a population–genetic model</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>The evolution of cis-regulatory elements (or enhancers) appears to proceed at dramatically different rates in different taxa. Vertebrate enhancers are often very highly conserved in their sequences, and relative positions, across distantly related taxa. In contrast, functionally equivalent enhancers in closely related Drosophila species can differ greatly in their sequences and spatial organization. We present a population-genetic model to explain this difference. The model examines the dynamics of fixation of pairs of individually deleterious, but compensating, mutations. As expected, small populations are predicted to have a high rate of evolution, and the rate decreases with increasing population size. In contrast to previous models, however, this model predicts that the rate of evolution by pairs of compensatory mutations increases dramatically for population sizes above several thousand individuals, to the point of greatly exceeding the neutral rate. Application of this model predicts that species with moderate population sizes will have relatively conserved enhancers, whereas species with larger populations will be expected to evolve their enhancers at much higher rates. We propose that the different degree of conservation seen in vertebrate and Drosophila enhancers may be explained solely by differences in their population sizes and generation times.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Compensatory Mutation</subject><subject>Conserved Sequence</subject><subject>Drosophila</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Enhancer Elements, Genetic</subject><subject>Enhancer Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Fitness Valley</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Mathematical Computing</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Population Size</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUruO1DAUjRCIXRZaKoRc0WWwHccPChBaLQ9pgIJHQWM5jjPjwWMHOxmYjn_gD_kSHGU07BRAZV-dh--9x0VxH8EFgoI_jqlvFhhCvECC8hvFOSIMlVjU5GZxDgXFJSc1PivupLSBEIqa17eLM4Qh5oyJ8yJd7YIbBxs8CB3oRq-nu3JuD3TwycSdaYHxa-W1iQlo5UFjgNLaOBPVkEHrgVNxZUAf-tGpSZ6eAHWt_PXj58p4M1gNtqE17m5xq1MumXuH86L4-OLqw-Wrcvnu5evL58tSU8SHUhHR8q5hHeGkUbypaKMIwy0RWGBiGEWE61p1GAlGMaJNwyEjLa3aSgiIaHVRPJ19-7HZmlYbP0TlZB_tVsW9DMrKU8TbtVyFnURUQMFENnh0MIjh62jSILc25cmd8iaMSTLEEIdV9V8i4jVEkKFMXMxEHUNK0XTHbhCUU6ByClROgcop0Cx4eH2GP_RDgplQzYQY9nmZQVsz7OUmjDGnmP5u-2BWbdIQ4tG1gpQxPm2unGGbBvP9CKv4RVJWsVp-4kSK5VuOP78R8n3mo5m_tqv1NxuNPOkmF31M-X0qJCIiS-tpZ8_-qZkazl9wyNmcCGU3uhxi21W_AS8E8tk</recordid><startdate>20020507</startdate><enddate>20020507</enddate><creator>Carter, A. J. R.</creator><creator>Wagner, G. P.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020507</creationdate><title>Evolution of functionally conserved enhancers can be accelerated in large populations: a population–genetic model</title><author>Carter, A. J. R. ; Wagner, G. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-a49d8fb7f484ba8b36ba472d492924e76148c5af21976216bb8074d63d3990163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Compensatory Mutation</topic><topic>Conserved Sequence</topic><topic>Drosophila</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Enhancer Elements, Genetic</topic><topic>Enhancer Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Fitness Valley</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Mathematical Computing</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Population Size</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carter, A. J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, G. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carter, A. J. R.</au><au>Wagner, G. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of functionally conserved enhancers can be accelerated in large populations: a population–genetic model</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2002-05-07</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>269</volume><issue>1494</issue><spage>953</spage><epage>960</epage><pages>953-960</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>The evolution of cis-regulatory elements (or enhancers) appears to proceed at dramatically different rates in different taxa. Vertebrate enhancers are often very highly conserved in their sequences, and relative positions, across distantly related taxa. In contrast, functionally equivalent enhancers in closely related Drosophila species can differ greatly in their sequences and spatial organization. We present a population-genetic model to explain this difference. The model examines the dynamics of fixation of pairs of individually deleterious, but compensating, mutations. As expected, small populations are predicted to have a high rate of evolution, and the rate decreases with increasing population size. In contrast to previous models, however, this model predicts that the rate of evolution by pairs of compensatory mutations increases dramatically for population sizes above several thousand individuals, to the point of greatly exceeding the neutral rate. Application of this model predicts that species with moderate population sizes will have relatively conserved enhancers, whereas species with larger populations will be expected to evolve their enhancers at much higher rates. We propose that the different degree of conservation seen in vertebrate and Drosophila enhancers may be explained solely by differences in their population sizes and generation times.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12028779</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2002.1968</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-05, Vol.269 (1494), p.953-960 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18501071 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Alleles Animals Biological evolution Compensatory Mutation Conserved Sequence Drosophila Ecological competition Enhancer Elements, Genetic Enhancer Evolution Evolution Evolution, Molecular Fitness Valley Genetic mutation Genetics, Population Mathematical Computing Modeling Models, Genetic Population Size Taxa Vertebrates |
title | Evolution of functionally conserved enhancers can be accelerated in large populations: a population–genetic model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A50%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20functionally%20conserved%20enhancers%20can%20be%20accelerated%20in%20large%20populations:%20a%20population%E2%80%93genetic%20model&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Carter,%20A.%20J.%20R.&rft.date=2002-05-07&rft.volume=269&rft.issue=1494&rft.spage=953&rft.epage=960&rft.pages=953-960&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.1968&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3067786%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18501071&rft_id=info:pmid/12028779&rft_jstor_id=3067786&rfr_iscdi=true |