Does Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment Alleviate Poverty? Impacts of Rwanda’s Electricity Access Roll-Out Program

•We study impacts of grid electrification on households, SMEs, health centers and schools.•We find only weak impacts on classical poverty indicators.•The median electricity consumption of households is very low at 6kWh per month.•Productive take-up is low among households and heterogeneous among ent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World development 2017-01, Vol.89, p.88-110
Hauptverfasser: Lenz, Luciane, Munyehirwe, Anicet, Peters, Jörg, Sievert, Maximiliane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue
container_start_page 88
container_title World development
container_volume 89
creator Lenz, Luciane
Munyehirwe, Anicet
Peters, Jörg
Sievert, Maximiliane
description •We study impacts of grid electrification on households, SMEs, health centers and schools.•We find only weak impacts on classical poverty indicators.•The median electricity consumption of households is very low at 6kWh per month.•Productive take-up is low among households and heterogeneous among enterprise types.•We call for cost–benefit comparisons between on-grid and off-grid energy solutions. The objective of the United Nations Sustainable Energy for All initiative (SE4All) is to provide electricity by 2030 to the 1.1 billion people in developing countries that hitherto lack access. The OECD/IEA quantifies the investment requirements of this to be at 640 billion USD. Little evidence exists on socio-economic impacts of electrification. The present paper is the first to causally investigate the effects of electrification in Africa on all beneficiary groups. The electrification program under research, the Rwandan Electricity Access Role-Out Program (EARP), is one of the largest in the world. Our analysis is based on a panel of 974 households, a full-census survey among health centers, and qualitative surveys among 83 micro-enterprises and 50 schools. We find that EARP has been remarkably effective in increasing the connection numbers among all beneficiary types. Around 3.5years after electrification, the quantity of consumed electricity and the uptake of appliances, though, remain low. Noteworthy impacts are decreasing energy expenditures and a considerable reduction in dry-cell battery consumption with potential environmental benefits. Beyond this, electricity mostly facilitates people’s life, but there is only weak evidence for impacts on classical poverty indicators such as income, health, and education. We conclude by calling for more research on the comparison of on-grid and off-grid electrification with respect to impact potentials, costs, and people’s willingness to pay in order to inform the way forward within the SE4All endeavor.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847487794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X16304387</els_id><sourcerecordid>1847487794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b0bfef5691e7e30ab9c7a41a2f018822acb53367ffe7a0dc6a7ca7fee7cd98803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhiMEEmXhFZAlLlwSxnESOyeolgUqVdrVAhI3y3XGK1dOXGwnVW-8Bq_Hk-CqcOHCafRL3_yaf_6ieEmhokC7N_vq6IMbBlyqOusKRAXAHhUrKjgr276nj4sVMGhL3sK3p8WzGPcA0LKer4rje4-RbFV4wPKzVg7JZjJBxRRmneZwlgvGNOKUyNo5XKxKSO78giGd3pLNeFA6ReINuT-qaVC_fvyM5MahTsFqm05krTXGSO69c-XtnMhd8A9Bjc-LJ0a5iC_-zKvi64ebL9efyu3tx831elvqRnSp3MHOoGm7niJHBmrXa64aqmoDVIi6VnrXMtZxY5ArGHSnuFbcIHI99EIAuypeX3wPwX-fcxI52qjROTWhn6OkouGN4LxvMvrqH3Tv5zDl6zLFGFDaiDpT3YXSwccY0MhDsKMKJ0lBnvuQe_m3D3nuQ4KQuY-8-O6yiDnuYjHIqC1OGgcb8rvk4O3_LH4DcOqapw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833011482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment Alleviate Poverty? Impacts of Rwanda’s Electricity Access Roll-Out Program</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lenz, Luciane ; Munyehirwe, Anicet ; Peters, Jörg ; Sievert, Maximiliane</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Luciane ; Munyehirwe, Anicet ; Peters, Jörg ; Sievert, Maximiliane</creatorcontrib><description>•We study impacts of grid electrification on households, SMEs, health centers and schools.•We find only weak impacts on classical poverty indicators.•The median electricity consumption of households is very low at 6kWh per month.•Productive take-up is low among households and heterogeneous among enterprise types.•We call for cost–benefit comparisons between on-grid and off-grid energy solutions. The objective of the United Nations Sustainable Energy for All initiative (SE4All) is to provide electricity by 2030 to the 1.1 billion people in developing countries that hitherto lack access. The OECD/IEA quantifies the investment requirements of this to be at 640 billion USD. Little evidence exists on socio-economic impacts of electrification. The present paper is the first to causally investigate the effects of electrification in Africa on all beneficiary groups. The electrification program under research, the Rwandan Electricity Access Role-Out Program (EARP), is one of the largest in the world. Our analysis is based on a panel of 974 households, a full-census survey among health centers, and qualitative surveys among 83 micro-enterprises and 50 schools. We find that EARP has been remarkably effective in increasing the connection numbers among all beneficiary types. Around 3.5years after electrification, the quantity of consumed electricity and the uptake of appliances, though, remain low. Noteworthy impacts are decreasing energy expenditures and a considerable reduction in dry-cell battery consumption with potential environmental benefits. Beyond this, electricity mostly facilitates people’s life, but there is only weak evidence for impacts on classical poverty indicators such as income, health, and education. We conclude by calling for more research on the comparison of on-grid and off-grid electrification with respect to impact potentials, costs, and people’s willingness to pay in order to inform the way forward within the SE4All endeavor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>African cultural groups ; Alternative energy ; Antipoverty programs ; Beneficiaries ; Censuses ; Developing countries ; difference-in-differences ; Economic impact ; Electric appliances ; Electricity ; Electricity consumption ; Electricity distribution ; Electrification ; energy access ; Energy consumption ; Expenditures ; Health care policy ; Health education ; Household appliances ; Households ; Indexes ; Infrastructure ; International economic organizations ; Investment ; Investments ; LDCs ; mixed-methods ; Poverty ; Power consumption ; Public infrastructure ; Qualitative research ; Rwanda ; Schools ; Studies ; Sub-Saharan Africa ; Sustainable energy ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>World development, 2017-01, Vol.89, p.88-110</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b0bfef5691e7e30ab9c7a41a2f018822acb53367ffe7a0dc6a7ca7fee7cd98803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b0bfef5691e7e30ab9c7a41a2f018822acb53367ffe7a0dc6a7ca7fee7cd98803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Luciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munyehirwe, Anicet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievert, Maximiliane</creatorcontrib><title>Does Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment Alleviate Poverty? Impacts of Rwanda’s Electricity Access Roll-Out Program</title><title>World development</title><description>•We study impacts of grid electrification on households, SMEs, health centers and schools.•We find only weak impacts on classical poverty indicators.•The median electricity consumption of households is very low at 6kWh per month.•Productive take-up is low among households and heterogeneous among enterprise types.•We call for cost–benefit comparisons between on-grid and off-grid energy solutions. The objective of the United Nations Sustainable Energy for All initiative (SE4All) is to provide electricity by 2030 to the 1.1 billion people in developing countries that hitherto lack access. The OECD/IEA quantifies the investment requirements of this to be at 640 billion USD. Little evidence exists on socio-economic impacts of electrification. The present paper is the first to causally investigate the effects of electrification in Africa on all beneficiary groups. The electrification program under research, the Rwandan Electricity Access Role-Out Program (EARP), is one of the largest in the world. Our analysis is based on a panel of 974 households, a full-census survey among health centers, and qualitative surveys among 83 micro-enterprises and 50 schools. We find that EARP has been remarkably effective in increasing the connection numbers among all beneficiary types. Around 3.5years after electrification, the quantity of consumed electricity and the uptake of appliances, though, remain low. Noteworthy impacts are decreasing energy expenditures and a considerable reduction in dry-cell battery consumption with potential environmental benefits. Beyond this, electricity mostly facilitates people’s life, but there is only weak evidence for impacts on classical poverty indicators such as income, health, and education. We conclude by calling for more research on the comparison of on-grid and off-grid electrification with respect to impact potentials, costs, and people’s willingness to pay in order to inform the way forward within the SE4All endeavor.</description><subject>African cultural groups</subject><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Antipoverty programs</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>difference-in-differences</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Electric appliances</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity consumption</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Electrification</subject><subject>energy access</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Household appliances</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>International economic organizations</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>mixed-methods</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Power consumption</subject><subject>Public infrastructure</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Rwanda</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sub-Saharan Africa</subject><subject>Sustainable energy</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhiMEEmXhFZAlLlwSxnESOyeolgUqVdrVAhI3y3XGK1dOXGwnVW-8Bq_Hk-CqcOHCafRL3_yaf_6ieEmhokC7N_vq6IMbBlyqOusKRAXAHhUrKjgr276nj4sVMGhL3sK3p8WzGPcA0LKer4rje4-RbFV4wPKzVg7JZjJBxRRmneZwlgvGNOKUyNo5XKxKSO78giGd3pLNeFA6ReINuT-qaVC_fvyM5MahTsFqm05krTXGSO69c-XtnMhd8A9Bjc-LJ0a5iC_-zKvi64ebL9efyu3tx831elvqRnSp3MHOoGm7niJHBmrXa64aqmoDVIi6VnrXMtZxY5ArGHSnuFbcIHI99EIAuypeX3wPwX-fcxI52qjROTWhn6OkouGN4LxvMvrqH3Tv5zDl6zLFGFDaiDpT3YXSwccY0MhDsKMKJ0lBnvuQe_m3D3nuQ4KQuY-8-O6yiDnuYjHIqC1OGgcb8rvk4O3_LH4DcOqapw</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Lenz, Luciane</creator><creator>Munyehirwe, Anicet</creator><creator>Peters, Jörg</creator><creator>Sievert, Maximiliane</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Does Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment Alleviate Poverty? Impacts of Rwanda’s Electricity Access Roll-Out Program</title><author>Lenz, Luciane ; Munyehirwe, Anicet ; Peters, Jörg ; Sievert, Maximiliane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-b0bfef5691e7e30ab9c7a41a2f018822acb53367ffe7a0dc6a7ca7fee7cd98803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>African cultural groups</topic><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Antipoverty programs</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>difference-in-differences</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Electric appliances</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity consumption</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Electrification</topic><topic>energy access</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Household appliances</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>International economic organizations</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>mixed-methods</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Power consumption</topic><topic>Public infrastructure</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Rwanda</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sub-Saharan Africa</topic><topic>Sustainable energy</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Luciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munyehirwe, Anicet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievert, Maximiliane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenz, Luciane</au><au>Munyehirwe, Anicet</au><au>Peters, Jörg</au><au>Sievert, Maximiliane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment Alleviate Poverty? Impacts of Rwanda’s Electricity Access Roll-Out Program</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>89</volume><spage>88</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>88-110</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>•We study impacts of grid electrification on households, SMEs, health centers and schools.•We find only weak impacts on classical poverty indicators.•The median electricity consumption of households is very low at 6kWh per month.•Productive take-up is low among households and heterogeneous among enterprise types.•We call for cost–benefit comparisons between on-grid and off-grid energy solutions. The objective of the United Nations Sustainable Energy for All initiative (SE4All) is to provide electricity by 2030 to the 1.1 billion people in developing countries that hitherto lack access. The OECD/IEA quantifies the investment requirements of this to be at 640 billion USD. Little evidence exists on socio-economic impacts of electrification. The present paper is the first to causally investigate the effects of electrification in Africa on all beneficiary groups. The electrification program under research, the Rwandan Electricity Access Role-Out Program (EARP), is one of the largest in the world. Our analysis is based on a panel of 974 households, a full-census survey among health centers, and qualitative surveys among 83 micro-enterprises and 50 schools. We find that EARP has been remarkably effective in increasing the connection numbers among all beneficiary types. Around 3.5years after electrification, the quantity of consumed electricity and the uptake of appliances, though, remain low. Noteworthy impacts are decreasing energy expenditures and a considerable reduction in dry-cell battery consumption with potential environmental benefits. Beyond this, electricity mostly facilitates people’s life, but there is only weak evidence for impacts on classical poverty indicators such as income, health, and education. We conclude by calling for more research on the comparison of on-grid and off-grid electrification with respect to impact potentials, costs, and people’s willingness to pay in order to inform the way forward within the SE4All endeavor.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.003</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-750X
ispartof World development, 2017-01, Vol.89, p.88-110
issn 0305-750X
1873-5991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847487794
source PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects African cultural groups
Alternative energy
Antipoverty programs
Beneficiaries
Censuses
Developing countries
difference-in-differences
Economic impact
Electric appliances
Electricity
Electricity consumption
Electricity distribution
Electrification
energy access
Energy consumption
Expenditures
Health care policy
Health education
Household appliances
Households
Indexes
Infrastructure
International economic organizations
Investment
Investments
LDCs
mixed-methods
Poverty
Power consumption
Public infrastructure
Qualitative research
Rwanda
Schools
Studies
Sub-Saharan Africa
Sustainable energy
Willingness to pay
title Does Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment Alleviate Poverty? Impacts of Rwanda’s Electricity Access Roll-Out Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A46%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Large-Scale%20Infrastructure%20Investment%20Alleviate%20Poverty?%20Impacts%20of%20Rwanda%E2%80%99s%20Electricity%20Access%20Roll-Out%20Program&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Lenz,%20Luciane&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=89&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=88-110&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1847487794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833011482&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305750X16304387&rfr_iscdi=true