When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea
Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of European social policy 2016-10, Vol.26 (4), p.344-357 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 357 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 344 |
container_title | Journal of European social policy |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | León, Margarita Choi, Young Jun Ahn, Jong-soon |
description | Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0958928716657278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847479935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0958928716657278</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1847479935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvgpeiFy_RnU12dvYoxS8oeFE8hs3uRFOSpmZTsP-9kXgoBecyM_B7j8cT4hzkDYAxt9JqsooMIGqjDB2ICWQIiVFoD3fuY3ES41JKQKXVRFy-f_JqVtb8XRVVXfXbWcPcx1npmuF1dRWbU3FUujry2d-eireH-9f5U7J4eXye3y0Sn6LqEx9IutR7CgVgAEdYSAg2K9lpIuORiCEtSEvMVNCpYtKZQuUCs8-sS6fievRdd-3XhmOfN1X0XNduxe0m5kCZyYy1qR7Qqz102W661ZBuoAjREBAOlBwp37Uxdlzm665qXLfNQea_peX7pQ2SZJRE98E7pv_zFyMfqvWO_TBGQfoDZe9ylg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1886678186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>León, Margarita ; Choi, Young Jun ; Ahn, Jong-soon</creator><creatorcontrib>León, Margarita ; Choi, Young Jun ; Ahn, Jong-soon</creatorcontrib><description>Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-7269</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0958-9287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0958928716657278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alter ; Arbeitsmarkt ; Atypische Beschäftigung ; Beruf ; Berufsverlauf ; Child care ; Childbearing ; Childbearing age ; Childbirth & labor ; Children ; Commitment ; Cultural change ; Educational attainment ; Einkommensunterschied ; Employment policies ; Equality ; Erwerbsquote ; Erwerbstätigkeit ; Familie ; Family work relationship ; Females ; Flexibility ; Frau ; Frauenerwerbstätigkeit ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Gender pay gap ; Geschlechtsspezifik ; Gleichstellungspolitik ; Income inequality ; Institution ; Internationaler Vergleich ; Investments ; Kultur ; Labor force participation ; Labor market ; Labour market ; Market shares ; Markets ; Mutter ; Occupational choice ; Political culture ; Political systems ; Politics ; Prospects ; Protection ; Qualifikation ; Reconciliation ; Sexes ; Social protection ; South Korea ; Spain ; Spanien ; Südkorea ; Temporary employment ; Welfare state ; Wohlfahrtsstaat ; Women ; Women's education ; Work ; Working hours ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Journal of European social policy, 2016-10, Vol.26 (4), p.344-357</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0958928716657278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958928716657278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27845,27903,27904,33753,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1111721$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>León, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jong-soon</creatorcontrib><title>When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea</title><title>Journal of European social policy</title><description>Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices.</description><subject>Alter</subject><subject>Arbeitsmarkt</subject><subject>Atypische Beschäftigung</subject><subject>Beruf</subject><subject>Berufsverlauf</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Childbearing</subject><subject>Childbearing age</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Commitment</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Einkommensunterschied</subject><subject>Employment policies</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Erwerbsquote</subject><subject>Erwerbstätigkeit</subject><subject>Familie</subject><subject>Family work relationship</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Frau</subject><subject>Frauenerwerbstätigkeit</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Gender pay gap</subject><subject>Geschlechtsspezifik</subject><subject>Gleichstellungspolitik</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Institution</subject><subject>Internationaler Vergleich</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Kultur</subject><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Market shares</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mutter</subject><subject>Occupational choice</subject><subject>Political culture</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Qualifikation</subject><subject>Reconciliation</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Social protection</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Spanien</subject><subject>Südkorea</subject><subject>Temporary employment</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><subject>Wohlfahrtsstaat</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's education</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>1461-7269</issn><issn>0958-9287</issn><issn>1461-7269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvgpeiFy_RnU12dvYoxS8oeFE8hs3uRFOSpmZTsP-9kXgoBecyM_B7j8cT4hzkDYAxt9JqsooMIGqjDB2ICWQIiVFoD3fuY3ES41JKQKXVRFy-f_JqVtb8XRVVXfXbWcPcx1npmuF1dRWbU3FUujry2d-eireH-9f5U7J4eXye3y0Sn6LqEx9IutR7CgVgAEdYSAg2K9lpIuORiCEtSEvMVNCpYtKZQuUCs8-sS6fievRdd-3XhmOfN1X0XNduxe0m5kCZyYy1qR7Qqz102W661ZBuoAjREBAOlBwp37Uxdlzm665qXLfNQea_peX7pQ2SZJRE98E7pv_zFyMfqvWO_TBGQfoDZe9ylg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>León, Margarita</creator><creator>Choi, Young Jun</creator><creator>Ahn, Jong-soon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>When flexibility meets familialism</title><author>León, Margarita ; Choi, Young Jun ; Ahn, Jong-soon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alter</topic><topic>Arbeitsmarkt</topic><topic>Atypische Beschäftigung</topic><topic>Beruf</topic><topic>Berufsverlauf</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Childbearing</topic><topic>Childbearing age</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Commitment</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Einkommensunterschied</topic><topic>Employment policies</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Erwerbsquote</topic><topic>Erwerbstätigkeit</topic><topic>Familie</topic><topic>Family work relationship</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Frau</topic><topic>Frauenerwerbstätigkeit</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Gender pay gap</topic><topic>Geschlechtsspezifik</topic><topic>Gleichstellungspolitik</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Institution</topic><topic>Internationaler Vergleich</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Kultur</topic><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Market shares</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mutter</topic><topic>Occupational choice</topic><topic>Political culture</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Qualifikation</topic><topic>Reconciliation</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Social protection</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Spanien</topic><topic>Südkorea</topic><topic>Temporary employment</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><topic>Wohlfahrtsstaat</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's education</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>León, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jong-soon</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of European social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>León, Margarita</au><au>Choi, Young Jun</au><au>Ahn, Jong-soon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of European social policy</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>344-357</pages><issn>1461-7269</issn><issn>0958-9287</issn><eissn>1461-7269</eissn><abstract>Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0958928716657278</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-7269 |
ispartof | Journal of European social policy, 2016-10, Vol.26 (4), p.344-357 |
issn | 1461-7269 0958-9287 1461-7269 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847479935 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Journals Online |
subjects | Alter Arbeitsmarkt Atypische Beschäftigung Beruf Berufsverlauf Child care Childbearing Childbearing age Childbirth & labor Children Commitment Cultural change Educational attainment Einkommensunterschied Employment policies Equality Erwerbsquote Erwerbstätigkeit Familie Family work relationship Females Flexibility Frau Frauenerwerbstätigkeit Gender equity Gender inequality Gender pay gap Geschlechtsspezifik Gleichstellungspolitik Income inequality Institution Internationaler Vergleich Investments Kultur Labor force participation Labor market Labour market Market shares Markets Mutter Occupational choice Political culture Political systems Politics Prospects Protection Qualifikation Reconciliation Sexes Social protection South Korea Spain Spanien Südkorea Temporary employment Welfare state Wohlfahrtsstaat Women Women's education Work Working hours Working women |
title | When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A16%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20flexibility%20meets%20familialism:%20Two%20tales%20of%20gendered%20labour%20markets%20in%20Spain%20and%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20European%20social%20policy&rft.au=Le%C3%B3n,%20Margarita&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=344-357&rft.issn=1461-7269&rft.eissn=1461-7269&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0958928716657278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1847479935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1886678186&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0958928716657278&rfr_iscdi=true |