When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea

Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of European social policy 2016-10, Vol.26 (4), p.344-357
Hauptverfasser: León, Margarita, Choi, Young Jun, Ahn, Jong-soon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 357
container_issue 4
container_start_page 344
container_title Journal of European social policy
container_volume 26
creator León, Margarita
Choi, Young Jun
Ahn, Jong-soon
description Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0958928716657278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847479935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0958928716657278</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1847479935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvgpeiFy_RnU12dvYoxS8oeFE8hs3uRFOSpmZTsP-9kXgoBecyM_B7j8cT4hzkDYAxt9JqsooMIGqjDB2ICWQIiVFoD3fuY3ES41JKQKXVRFy-f_JqVtb8XRVVXfXbWcPcx1npmuF1dRWbU3FUujry2d-eireH-9f5U7J4eXye3y0Sn6LqEx9IutR7CgVgAEdYSAg2K9lpIuORiCEtSEvMVNCpYtKZQuUCs8-sS6fievRdd-3XhmOfN1X0XNduxe0m5kCZyYy1qR7Qqz102W661ZBuoAjREBAOlBwp37Uxdlzm665qXLfNQea_peX7pQ2SZJRE98E7pv_zFyMfqvWO_TBGQfoDZe9ylg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1886678186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>León, Margarita ; Choi, Young Jun ; Ahn, Jong-soon</creator><creatorcontrib>León, Margarita ; Choi, Young Jun ; Ahn, Jong-soon</creatorcontrib><description>Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-7269</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0958-9287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0958928716657278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alter ; Arbeitsmarkt ; Atypische Beschäftigung ; Beruf ; Berufsverlauf ; Child care ; Childbearing ; Childbearing age ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Children ; Commitment ; Cultural change ; Educational attainment ; Einkommensunterschied ; Employment policies ; Equality ; Erwerbsquote ; Erwerbstätigkeit ; Familie ; Family work relationship ; Females ; Flexibility ; Frau ; Frauenerwerbstätigkeit ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Gender pay gap ; Geschlechtsspezifik ; Gleichstellungspolitik ; Income inequality ; Institution ; Internationaler Vergleich ; Investments ; Kultur ; Labor force participation ; Labor market ; Labour market ; Market shares ; Markets ; Mutter ; Occupational choice ; Political culture ; Political systems ; Politics ; Prospects ; Protection ; Qualifikation ; Reconciliation ; Sexes ; Social protection ; South Korea ; Spain ; Spanien ; Südkorea ; Temporary employment ; Welfare state ; Wohlfahrtsstaat ; Women ; Women's education ; Work ; Working hours ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Journal of European social policy, 2016-10, Vol.26 (4), p.344-357</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0958928716657278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958928716657278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27845,27903,27904,33753,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1111721$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>León, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jong-soon</creatorcontrib><title>When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea</title><title>Journal of European social policy</title><description>Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices.</description><subject>Alter</subject><subject>Arbeitsmarkt</subject><subject>Atypische Beschäftigung</subject><subject>Beruf</subject><subject>Berufsverlauf</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Childbearing</subject><subject>Childbearing age</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Commitment</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Einkommensunterschied</subject><subject>Employment policies</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Erwerbsquote</subject><subject>Erwerbstätigkeit</subject><subject>Familie</subject><subject>Family work relationship</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Frau</subject><subject>Frauenerwerbstätigkeit</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Gender pay gap</subject><subject>Geschlechtsspezifik</subject><subject>Gleichstellungspolitik</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Institution</subject><subject>Internationaler Vergleich</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Kultur</subject><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Market shares</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mutter</subject><subject>Occupational choice</subject><subject>Political culture</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Qualifikation</subject><subject>Reconciliation</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Social protection</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Spanien</subject><subject>Südkorea</subject><subject>Temporary employment</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><subject>Wohlfahrtsstaat</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's education</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>1461-7269</issn><issn>0958-9287</issn><issn>1461-7269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvgpeiFy_RnU12dvYoxS8oeFE8hs3uRFOSpmZTsP-9kXgoBecyM_B7j8cT4hzkDYAxt9JqsooMIGqjDB2ICWQIiVFoD3fuY3ES41JKQKXVRFy-f_JqVtb8XRVVXfXbWcPcx1npmuF1dRWbU3FUujry2d-eireH-9f5U7J4eXye3y0Sn6LqEx9IutR7CgVgAEdYSAg2K9lpIuORiCEtSEvMVNCpYtKZQuUCs8-sS6fievRdd-3XhmOfN1X0XNduxe0m5kCZyYy1qR7Qqz102W661ZBuoAjREBAOlBwp37Uxdlzm665qXLfNQea_peX7pQ2SZJRE98E7pv_zFyMfqvWO_TBGQfoDZe9ylg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>León, Margarita</creator><creator>Choi, Young Jun</creator><creator>Ahn, Jong-soon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>When flexibility meets familialism</title><author>León, Margarita ; Choi, Young Jun ; Ahn, Jong-soon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-cd80a3cc8db16d1a86b01d94fea5887c688e13b850642d532e854262adeec49a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alter</topic><topic>Arbeitsmarkt</topic><topic>Atypische Beschäftigung</topic><topic>Beruf</topic><topic>Berufsverlauf</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Childbearing</topic><topic>Childbearing age</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Commitment</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Einkommensunterschied</topic><topic>Employment policies</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Erwerbsquote</topic><topic>Erwerbstätigkeit</topic><topic>Familie</topic><topic>Family work relationship</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Frau</topic><topic>Frauenerwerbstätigkeit</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Gender pay gap</topic><topic>Geschlechtsspezifik</topic><topic>Gleichstellungspolitik</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Institution</topic><topic>Internationaler Vergleich</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Kultur</topic><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Market shares</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mutter</topic><topic>Occupational choice</topic><topic>Political culture</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Qualifikation</topic><topic>Reconciliation</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Social protection</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Spanien</topic><topic>Südkorea</topic><topic>Temporary employment</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><topic>Wohlfahrtsstaat</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's education</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>León, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jong-soon</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of European social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>León, Margarita</au><au>Choi, Young Jun</au><au>Ahn, Jong-soon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of European social policy</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>344-357</pages><issn>1461-7269</issn><issn>0958-9287</issn><eissn>1461-7269</eissn><abstract>Korea and Spain share crucial labour market and welfare state characteristics that converge to produce similar outcomes: strongly dualized labour markets, weak social protection, and features that are archetypical of familialist states. Labour market flexibility in both countries has recently increased through unusually high levels of temporary employment. Yet, when we analyse female labour force participation, we observe a significant divergence: Korean women interrupt their participation in the labour market when they are of childbearing age, while Spanish women do not. Furthermore, the level of education of women in Spain matters for their career prospects, but in Korea, it does not. In this article, we explore the causes of this divergence by analysing (1) structural characteristics of the labour market, (2) policies that facilitate the reconciliation of work and family and (3) gender equality politics. We argue that the combination of these three factors have different impacts on the career choices of women in Spain and Korea. Some aspects of working culture – long working hours in particular – the unavailability to women of good quality jobs and a high gender pay gap contribute towards labour market interruption of highly educated women in Korea when they have children. Policy developments have been important in the two countries, but high levels of childcare investment in Korea have not improved female employment prospects. Furthermore, we observe greater political commitment to gender equality in Spain than in Korea. Fundamental changes in the Spanish political culture, which were the result of a combination of domestic and supranational dynamics, played a major role in the political endorsement of gender equality and a rejection of familialistic policies and practices.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0958928716657278</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-7269
ispartof Journal of European social policy, 2016-10, Vol.26 (4), p.344-357
issn 1461-7269
0958-9287
1461-7269
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1847479935
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Journals Online
subjects Alter
Arbeitsmarkt
Atypische Beschäftigung
Beruf
Berufsverlauf
Child care
Childbearing
Childbearing age
Childbirth & labor
Children
Commitment
Cultural change
Educational attainment
Einkommensunterschied
Employment policies
Equality
Erwerbsquote
Erwerbstätigkeit
Familie
Family work relationship
Females
Flexibility
Frau
Frauenerwerbstätigkeit
Gender equity
Gender inequality
Gender pay gap
Geschlechtsspezifik
Gleichstellungspolitik
Income inequality
Institution
Internationaler Vergleich
Investments
Kultur
Labor force participation
Labor market
Labour market
Market shares
Markets
Mutter
Occupational choice
Political culture
Political systems
Politics
Prospects
Protection
Qualifikation
Reconciliation
Sexes
Social protection
South Korea
Spain
Spanien
Südkorea
Temporary employment
Welfare state
Wohlfahrtsstaat
Women
Women's education
Work
Working hours
Working women
title When flexibility meets familialism: Two tales of gendered labour markets in Spain and South Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A16%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20flexibility%20meets%20familialism:%20Two%20tales%20of%20gendered%20labour%20markets%20in%20Spain%20and%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20European%20social%20policy&rft.au=Le%C3%B3n,%20Margarita&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=344-357&rft.issn=1461-7269&rft.eissn=1461-7269&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0958928716657278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1847479935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1886678186&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0958928716657278&rfr_iscdi=true