Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Workplace: Serum Cotinine by Occupation
To examine workplace exposure to secondhand smoke by occupation, we analyzed data from The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (1988 to 1994), a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population. The analysis was restricted to 4952 employed nonsm...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2002-06, Vol.44 (6), p.503-509 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 509 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 503 |
| container_title | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Wortley, Pascale M. Caraballo, Ralph S. Pederson, Linda L. Pechacek, Terry F. |
| description | To examine workplace exposure to secondhand smoke by occupation, we analyzed data from The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (1988 to 1994), a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population. The analysis was restricted to 4952 employed nonsmoking adults who reported no home exposure to cigarette smoke. Occupations were assigned to 40 groups and 7 categories. Among the categories, geometric mean serum cotinine (ng/mL) ranged from 0.09 for farming/forestry/fishing occupations to 0.22 for operators/fabricators/laborers (median, 0.16). The lowest values were observed among farmers and nursery workers (0.06) and the highest among waiters (0.47). Between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994, the overall geometric mean cotinine and the proportion reporting that they could smell smoke at work decreased significantly. In conclusion, workplace exposure to secondhand smoke varied by occupation, and decreases in exposure occurred between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00043764-200206000-00010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18471330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44996144</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44996144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4660-226f54a0d0347d7f2359ecfa98d3266ecad9d34602050f733a190c4264fe71a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhgex2Fr9CUoQ9G7syffEu7LUDyz0ooqXIc2cYWd3JhmTGWr_vdnu2oLQi3ASeN735LynqgiFjxSMPgMAwbUSNQNgoMqzLofCs-qESq5qaUTzvNxBq5ppyY6rlzlvCiEpyBfVMWXQSKHlSfX94s8U85KQzJFco4-hXbvQkusxbpH0gcxrJL9i2k6D8_ipIGkZySrOfegDkps7cuX9Mrm5j-FVddS5IePrQz2tfn6--LH6Wl9effm2Or-svVAKasZUJ4WDFrjQre4YlwZ950zTcqYUetealgtVJpPQac4dNeAFU6JDTZ3gp9WHve-U4u8F82zHPnscBhcwLtnSRmjKORTw3X_gJi4plL9ZRpneNVAFavaQTzHnhJ2dUj-6dGcp2F3a9l_a9iFte592kb49-C83I7aPwkO8BXh_AFz2buiSC77PjxzXzHC9m0jsuds4zJjydlhuMdk1umFe26e2XWRv9rJNnmN6sBXCGEWF4H8BZJudwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212702056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Workplace: Serum Cotinine by Occupation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Wortley, Pascale M. ; Caraballo, Ralph S. ; Pederson, Linda L. ; Pechacek, Terry F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wortley, Pascale M. ; Caraballo, Ralph S. ; Pederson, Linda L. ; Pechacek, Terry F.</creatorcontrib><description>To examine workplace exposure to secondhand smoke by occupation, we analyzed data from The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (1988 to 1994), a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population. The analysis was restricted to 4952 employed nonsmoking adults who reported no home exposure to cigarette smoke. Occupations were assigned to 40 groups and 7 categories. Among the categories, geometric mean serum cotinine (ng/mL) ranged from 0.09 for farming/forestry/fishing occupations to 0.22 for operators/fabricators/laborers (median, 0.16). The lowest values were observed among farmers and nursery workers (0.06) and the highest among waiters (0.47). Between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994, the overall geometric mean cotinine and the proportion reporting that they could smell smoke at work decreased significantly. In conclusion, workplace exposure to secondhand smoke varied by occupation, and decreases in exposure occurred between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-2752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200206000-00010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12085475</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOEMFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cotinine - blood ; Environmental Monitoring ; Female ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Occupational Exposure - prevention & control ; Occupational health ; Occupations ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Risk Factors ; Smoke inhalation ; Studies ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - adverse effects ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2002-06, Vol.44 (6), p.503-509</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>2002The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jun 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4660-226f54a0d0347d7f2359ecfa98d3266ecad9d34602050f733a190c4264fe71a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4660-226f54a0d0347d7f2359ecfa98d3266ecad9d34602050f733a190c4264fe71a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44996144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44996144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13729374$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12085475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wortley, Pascale M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caraballo, Ralph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederson, Linda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pechacek, Terry F.</creatorcontrib><title>Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Workplace: Serum Cotinine by Occupation</title><title>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</title><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>To examine workplace exposure to secondhand smoke by occupation, we analyzed data from The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (1988 to 1994), a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population. The analysis was restricted to 4952 employed nonsmoking adults who reported no home exposure to cigarette smoke. Occupations were assigned to 40 groups and 7 categories. Among the categories, geometric mean serum cotinine (ng/mL) ranged from 0.09 for farming/forestry/fishing occupations to 0.22 for operators/fabricators/laborers (median, 0.16). The lowest values were observed among farmers and nursery workers (0.06) and the highest among waiters (0.47). Between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994, the overall geometric mean cotinine and the proportion reporting that they could smell smoke at work decreased significantly. In conclusion, workplace exposure to secondhand smoke varied by occupation, and decreases in exposure occurred between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cotinine - blood</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Smoke inhalation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1076-2752</issn><issn>1536-5948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhgex2Fr9CUoQ9G7syffEu7LUDyz0ooqXIc2cYWd3JhmTGWr_vdnu2oLQi3ASeN735LynqgiFjxSMPgMAwbUSNQNgoMqzLofCs-qESq5qaUTzvNxBq5ppyY6rlzlvCiEpyBfVMWXQSKHlSfX94s8U85KQzJFco4-hXbvQkusxbpH0gcxrJL9i2k6D8_ipIGkZySrOfegDkps7cuX9Mrm5j-FVddS5IePrQz2tfn6--LH6Wl9effm2Or-svVAKasZUJ4WDFrjQre4YlwZ950zTcqYUetealgtVJpPQac4dNeAFU6JDTZ3gp9WHve-U4u8F82zHPnscBhcwLtnSRmjKORTw3X_gJi4plL9ZRpneNVAFavaQTzHnhJ2dUj-6dGcp2F3a9l_a9iFte592kb49-C83I7aPwkO8BXh_AFz2buiSC77PjxzXzHC9m0jsuds4zJjydlhuMdk1umFe26e2XWRv9rJNnmN6sBXCGEWF4H8BZJudwQ</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>Wortley, Pascale M.</creator><creator>Caraballo, Ralph S.</creator><creator>Pederson, Linda L.</creator><creator>Pechacek, Terry F.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Workplace: Serum Cotinine by Occupation</title><author>Wortley, Pascale M. ; Caraballo, Ralph S. ; Pederson, Linda L. ; Pechacek, Terry F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4660-226f54a0d0347d7f2359ecfa98d3266ecad9d34602050f733a190c4264fe71a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cotinine - blood</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Smoke inhalation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wortley, Pascale M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caraballo, Ralph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederson, Linda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pechacek, Terry F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wortley, Pascale M.</au><au>Caraballo, Ralph S.</au><au>Pederson, Linda L.</au><au>Pechacek, Terry F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Workplace: Serum Cotinine by Occupation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>503-509</pages><issn>1076-2752</issn><eissn>1536-5948</eissn><coden>JOEMFM</coden><abstract>To examine workplace exposure to secondhand smoke by occupation, we analyzed data from The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (1988 to 1994), a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population. The analysis was restricted to 4952 employed nonsmoking adults who reported no home exposure to cigarette smoke. Occupations were assigned to 40 groups and 7 categories. Among the categories, geometric mean serum cotinine (ng/mL) ranged from 0.09 for farming/forestry/fishing occupations to 0.22 for operators/fabricators/laborers (median, 0.16). The lowest values were observed among farmers and nursery workers (0.06) and the highest among waiters (0.47). Between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994, the overall geometric mean cotinine and the proportion reporting that they could smell smoke at work decreased significantly. In conclusion, workplace exposure to secondhand smoke varied by occupation, and decreases in exposure occurred between 1988 to 1991 and 1991 to 1994.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>12085475</pmid><doi>10.1097/00043764-200206000-00010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1076-2752 |
| ispartof | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2002-06, Vol.44 (6), p.503-509 |
| issn | 1076-2752 1536-5948 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18471330 |
| source | MEDLINE; JSTOR; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Cotinine - blood Environmental Monitoring Female Health Surveys Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Occupational Exposure - adverse effects Occupational Exposure - prevention & control Occupational health Occupations ORIGINAL ARTICLES Risk Factors Smoke inhalation Studies Tobacco Smoke Pollution - adverse effects Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology Workplace |
| title | Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Workplace: Serum Cotinine by Occupation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A19%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exposure%20to%20Secondhand%20Smoke%20in%20the%20Workplace:%20Serum%20Cotinine%20by%20Occupation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine&rft.au=Wortley,%20Pascale%20M.&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=503-509&rft.issn=1076-2752&rft.eissn=1536-5948&rft.coden=JOEMFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00043764-200206000-00010&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44996144%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212702056&rft_id=info:pmid/12085475&rft_jstor_id=44996144&rfr_iscdi=true |