Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Current guidelines recommend 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Whether the duration of DAPT can be safely shortened with use of second-generation DESs is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of invasive cardiology 2016-12, Vol.28 (12), p.E203-E210
Hauptverfasser: Wassef, Anthony W A, Khafaji, Hadi, Syed, Ishba, Yan, Andrew T, Udell, Jacob A, Goodman, Shaun G, Cheema, Asim N, Bagai, Akshay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E210
container_issue 12
container_start_page E203
container_title The Journal of invasive cardiology
container_volume 28
creator Wassef, Anthony W A
Khafaji, Hadi
Syed, Ishba
Yan, Andrew T
Udell, Jacob A
Goodman, Shaun G
Cheema, Asim N
Bagai, Akshay
description Current guidelines recommend 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Whether the duration of DAPT can be safely shortened with use of second-generation DESs is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short duration (SD) (3-6 months) with standard longer duration (LD) (≥12 months) DAPT in patients treated with primarily second-generation DES implantation. Meta-regression was performed to explore the relationship between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the effect of DAPT duration. Six studies were included, with 12,752/13,928 (91.5%) patients receiving second-generation DESs. A total of 5367 patients (39%) had PCI in the setting of ACS. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (1.1% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.18; P=.36) or cardiac mortality (0.9% vs 1.0%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61-1.39; P=.69) with SD-DAPT vs LD-DAPT, respectively. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.3%; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.75-2.34; P=.51), myocardial infarction (1.5% vs 1.3%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88-1.56; P=.29), and stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60-1.81; P=.88) were similar between the groups. Compared with LD-DAPT, SD-DAPT was associated with lower clinically significant bleeding (0.9% vs 1.4%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.89; P=.01). Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between the proportion of ACS patients in trials and duration of DAPT for the outcomes of mortality (P=.95), myocardial infarction (P=.98), or stent thrombosis (P=.89). In low-risk patients treated with contemporary second-generation DES implantation, SD-DAPT has similar rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, with lower rates of bleeding compared with LD-DAPT.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846722001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1846722001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-76b7ee84921a4dc0d700c0dad6e1fdb33792fa878d7379b347a57e18b21e41e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkctOwzAQRSMkRMvjF5CXLIhkOw-ny6rlJYFATRHLyIknrZFjB9spKj_OFkNbsfFczRxfX42PojHJMhbTDJNRdOrcO8aUJBNyEo0oyxNM0nwcfZdrYz2aD5Z7aTTaOFR6rgW34r9p2qC5iqfay15xDwo8Wq7B8n6Lpq0Hi17ANkO4CGZwaGas0dxu0YMOsw3oP5c36deohMZoEd-Bhr353A6r-EYNXupVeDvADsVoisqt89AFpkEL2Ej4vEZP4HkIwdXWSXeNQsxdawErC879uh2mv5kXATCd_AIREmlvjVJBLq3kyp1Hx20ocLGvZ9Hr7c1ydh8_Pt89zKaPcU8J8THLawZQpBNKeCoaLBjG4eQiB9KKOknYhLa8YIVgQdZJynjGgBQ1JZASyJKz6Grn21vzMYDzVSddA0rtVlWRIs0ZpRiTgF7u0aHuQFS9lV1YYnX4rOQHODmVcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1846722001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wassef, Anthony W A ; Khafaji, Hadi ; Syed, Ishba ; Yan, Andrew T ; Udell, Jacob A ; Goodman, Shaun G ; Cheema, Asim N ; Bagai, Akshay</creator><creatorcontrib>Wassef, Anthony W A ; Khafaji, Hadi ; Syed, Ishba ; Yan, Andrew T ; Udell, Jacob A ; Goodman, Shaun G ; Cheema, Asim N ; Bagai, Akshay</creatorcontrib><description>Current guidelines recommend 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Whether the duration of DAPT can be safely shortened with use of second-generation DESs is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short duration (SD) (3-6 months) with standard longer duration (LD) (≥12 months) DAPT in patients treated with primarily second-generation DES implantation. Meta-regression was performed to explore the relationship between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the effect of DAPT duration. Six studies were included, with 12,752/13,928 (91.5%) patients receiving second-generation DESs. A total of 5367 patients (39%) had PCI in the setting of ACS. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (1.1% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.18; P=.36) or cardiac mortality (0.9% vs 1.0%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61-1.39; P=.69) with SD-DAPT vs LD-DAPT, respectively. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.3%; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.75-2.34; P=.51), myocardial infarction (1.5% vs 1.3%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88-1.56; P=.29), and stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60-1.81; P=.88) were similar between the groups. Compared with LD-DAPT, SD-DAPT was associated with lower clinically significant bleeding (0.9% vs 1.4%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.89; P=.01). Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between the proportion of ACS patients in trials and duration of DAPT for the outcomes of mortality (P=.95), myocardial infarction (P=.98), or stent thrombosis (P=.89). In low-risk patients treated with contemporary second-generation DES implantation, SD-DAPT has similar rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, with lower rates of bleeding compared with LD-DAPT.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1557-2501</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27630146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Coronary Disease - surgery ; Coronary Restenosis - prevention &amp; control ; Drug Therapy, Combination - methods ; Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of invasive cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.28 (12), p.E203-E210</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wassef, Anthony W A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khafaji, Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syed, Ishba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Jacob A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Shaun G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheema, Asim N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagai, Akshay</creatorcontrib><title>Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><title>The Journal of invasive cardiology</title><addtitle>J Invasive Cardiol</addtitle><description>Current guidelines recommend 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Whether the duration of DAPT can be safely shortened with use of second-generation DESs is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short duration (SD) (3-6 months) with standard longer duration (LD) (≥12 months) DAPT in patients treated with primarily second-generation DES implantation. Meta-regression was performed to explore the relationship between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the effect of DAPT duration. Six studies were included, with 12,752/13,928 (91.5%) patients receiving second-generation DESs. A total of 5367 patients (39%) had PCI in the setting of ACS. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (1.1% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.18; P=.36) or cardiac mortality (0.9% vs 1.0%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61-1.39; P=.69) with SD-DAPT vs LD-DAPT, respectively. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.3%; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.75-2.34; P=.51), myocardial infarction (1.5% vs 1.3%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88-1.56; P=.29), and stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60-1.81; P=.88) were similar between the groups. Compared with LD-DAPT, SD-DAPT was associated with lower clinically significant bleeding (0.9% vs 1.4%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.89; P=.01). Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between the proportion of ACS patients in trials and duration of DAPT for the outcomes of mortality (P=.95), myocardial infarction (P=.98), or stent thrombosis (P=.89). In low-risk patients treated with contemporary second-generation DES implantation, SD-DAPT has similar rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, with lower rates of bleeding compared with LD-DAPT.</description><subject>Coronary Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination - methods</subject><subject>Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1557-2501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkctOwzAQRSMkRMvjF5CXLIhkOw-ny6rlJYFATRHLyIknrZFjB9spKj_OFkNbsfFczRxfX42PojHJMhbTDJNRdOrcO8aUJBNyEo0oyxNM0nwcfZdrYz2aD5Z7aTTaOFR6rgW34r9p2qC5iqfay15xDwo8Wq7B8n6Lpq0Hi17ANkO4CGZwaGas0dxu0YMOsw3oP5c36deohMZoEd-Bhr353A6r-EYNXupVeDvADsVoisqt89AFpkEL2Ej4vEZP4HkIwdXWSXeNQsxdawErC879uh2mv5kXATCd_AIREmlvjVJBLq3kyp1Hx20ocLGvZ9Hr7c1ydh8_Pt89zKaPcU8J8THLawZQpBNKeCoaLBjG4eQiB9KKOknYhLa8YIVgQdZJynjGgBQ1JZASyJKz6Grn21vzMYDzVSddA0rtVlWRIs0ZpRiTgF7u0aHuQFS9lV1YYnX4rOQHODmVcg</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Wassef, Anthony W A</creator><creator>Khafaji, Hadi</creator><creator>Syed, Ishba</creator><creator>Yan, Andrew T</creator><creator>Udell, Jacob A</creator><creator>Goodman, Shaun G</creator><creator>Cheema, Asim N</creator><creator>Bagai, Akshay</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><author>Wassef, Anthony W A ; Khafaji, Hadi ; Syed, Ishba ; Yan, Andrew T ; Udell, Jacob A ; Goodman, Shaun G ; Cheema, Asim N ; Bagai, Akshay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-76b7ee84921a4dc0d700c0dad6e1fdb33792fa878d7379b347a57e18b21e41e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Coronary Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination - methods</topic><topic>Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wassef, Anthony W A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khafaji, Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syed, Ishba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Jacob A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Shaun G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheema, Asim N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagai, Akshay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of invasive cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wassef, Anthony W A</au><au>Khafaji, Hadi</au><au>Syed, Ishba</au><au>Yan, Andrew T</au><au>Udell, Jacob A</au><au>Goodman, Shaun G</au><au>Cheema, Asim N</au><au>Bagai, Akshay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of invasive cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Invasive Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>E203</spage><epage>E210</epage><pages>E203-E210</pages><eissn>1557-2501</eissn><abstract>Current guidelines recommend 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Whether the duration of DAPT can be safely shortened with use of second-generation DESs is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short duration (SD) (3-6 months) with standard longer duration (LD) (≥12 months) DAPT in patients treated with primarily second-generation DES implantation. Meta-regression was performed to explore the relationship between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the effect of DAPT duration. Six studies were included, with 12,752/13,928 (91.5%) patients receiving second-generation DESs. A total of 5367 patients (39%) had PCI in the setting of ACS. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (1.1% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.18; P=.36) or cardiac mortality (0.9% vs 1.0%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61-1.39; P=.69) with SD-DAPT vs LD-DAPT, respectively. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.3%; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.75-2.34; P=.51), myocardial infarction (1.5% vs 1.3%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88-1.56; P=.29), and stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60-1.81; P=.88) were similar between the groups. Compared with LD-DAPT, SD-DAPT was associated with lower clinically significant bleeding (0.9% vs 1.4%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.89; P=.01). Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between the proportion of ACS patients in trials and duration of DAPT for the outcomes of mortality (P=.95), myocardial infarction (P=.98), or stent thrombosis (P=.89). In low-risk patients treated with contemporary second-generation DES implantation, SD-DAPT has similar rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, with lower rates of bleeding compared with LD-DAPT.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27630146</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1557-2501
ispartof The Journal of invasive cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.28 (12), p.E203-E210
issn 1557-2501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846722001
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Coronary Disease - surgery
Coronary Restenosis - prevention & control
Drug Therapy, Combination - methods
Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects
Humans
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - pharmacology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Time Factors
title Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A41%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20Duration%20vs%20Standard%20Duration%20of%20Dual-Antiplatelet%20Therapy%20After%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Intervention%20With%20Second-Generation%20Drug-Eluting%20Stents%20-%20A%20Systematic%20Review,%20Meta-Analysis,%20and%20Meta-Regression%20Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trials&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20invasive%20cardiology&rft.au=Wassef,%20Anthony%20W%20A&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=E203&rft.epage=E210&rft.pages=E203-E210&rft.eissn=1557-2501&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1846722001%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1846722001&rft_id=info:pmid/27630146&rfr_iscdi=true