A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Dry Powder Inhalation Efficiency in Asthma Patients

A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Dry Powder Inhalation Efficiency in Asthma Patients

Many methods have been developed to evaluate dry powder inhalation techniques and their efficiency for disease control in asthma patients. However, it is difficult to apply these methods to clinical practice and research. In this study, we introduce a simple new method that can be applied to dry pow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of aerosol medicine 2016-10, Vol.29 (5), p.432-438
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Yasha, Hu, Hefang, Tian, Cuijie, Lei, Yi, Liu, Chuntao, Luo, Fengming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 438
container_issue 5
container_start_page 432
container_title Journal of aerosol medicine
container_volume 29
creator Liang, Yasha
Hu, Hefang
Tian, Cuijie
Lei, Yi
Liu, Chuntao
Luo, Fengming
description Many methods have been developed to evaluate dry powder inhalation techniques and their efficiency for disease control in asthma patients. However, it is difficult to apply these methods to clinical practice and research. In this study, we introduce a simple new method that can be applied to dry powder inhalation techniques to evaluate their efficiency in clinical practice. Twenty volunteers were recruited to evaluate the reliability of this new method. One hundred one asthma patients who met the inclusion criteria participated in this study. A dark cloth covered the outlet of the inhaler during dry powder inhalation. The image formed by the inhalation process was evaluated using analysis software and converted into integrated optical density (IOD). Inhalation techniques were scored before and after inhalation technique training, and asthma control was evaluated using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) before inhalation technique training. The relative standard deviation of IOD ranged from 3.8% to 7.8%. In patients with or without inhaler prior use, both the IOD and inhalation technique scores improved significantly after inhalation technique training (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1089/jamp.2014.1193
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846420382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1846420382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-5fe4c517e36d630a8e72ee7e680b105ca997fe17f81f5707543008e0a496ffb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtPwzAMgCME4jG4ckSRuHDZsJs0aY8TjIfEU4IbUpV1DuvUpiNpQfv3tNrgwImTLfuzJftj7BhhhJCk5wtTLUcRoBwhpmKL7WMqcRhpENu_OeIeOwhhAaBQKrHL9iItQWgF--xtzB_oiz-3xjVFY5rik_g9NfN6xm3t-eTTlG1Xde_80q_4U_01I89v3dyUXbV2fGJtkRfk8hUvHB-HZl4Z_tT1yDXhkO1YUwY62sQBe72avFzcDO8er28vxnfDXCA2w9iSzGPUJNRMCTAJ6YhIk0pgihDnJk21JdQ2QRtr0LEUAAmBkamydhqJATtb7136-qOl0GRVEXIqS-OobkOGiVQyApH8B42Uxhhj0aGnf9BF3XrXHdJTUqURdN8csNGayn0dgiebLX1RGb_KELJeUdYrynpFWa-oGzjZrG2nFc1-8R8n4ht54Yrd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824692046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Dry Powder Inhalation Efficiency in Asthma Patients</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Liang, Yasha ; Hu, Hefang ; Tian, Cuijie ; Lei, Yi ; Liu, Chuntao ; Luo, Fengming</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yasha ; Hu, Hefang ; Tian, Cuijie ; Lei, Yi ; Liu, Chuntao ; Luo, Fengming</creatorcontrib><description>Many methods have been developed to evaluate dry powder inhalation techniques and their efficiency for disease control in asthma patients. However, it is difficult to apply these methods to clinical practice and research. In this study, we introduce a simple new method that can be applied to dry powder inhalation techniques to evaluate their efficiency in clinical practice. Twenty volunteers were recruited to evaluate the reliability of this new method. One hundred one asthma patients who met the inclusion criteria participated in this study. A dark cloth covered the outlet of the inhaler during dry powder inhalation. The image formed by the inhalation process was evaluated using analysis software and converted into integrated optical density (IOD). Inhalation techniques were scored before and after inhalation technique training, and asthma control was evaluated using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) before inhalation technique training. The relative standard deviation of IOD ranged from 3.8% to 7.8%. In patients with or without inhaler prior use, both the IOD and inhalation technique scores improved significantly after inhalation technique training (p &lt; 0.05). Inhalation technique scores were positively correlated with IOD before (r = 0.80, p &lt; 0.001) and after inhalation technique training (r = 0.52, p &lt; 0.001). In patients with prior inhaler experience, ACQ results were negatively correlated with inhalation technique scores (r = -0.44; p &lt; 0.05) and IOD (r = -0.52; p &lt; 0.05). The results from this study demonstrated that this quantitative method is equivalent to traditional methods for dry powder inhalation evaluation. This study also indicated that training significantly improved the inhalation technique and efficiency in asthma patients with or without prior inhaler use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-2711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2014.1193</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27403760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of aerosol medicine, 2016-10, Vol.29 (5), p.432-438</ispartof><rights>(©) Copyright 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-5fe4c517e36d630a8e72ee7e680b105ca997fe17f81f5707543008e0a496ffb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hefang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Cuijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chuntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Fengming</creatorcontrib><title>A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Dry Powder Inhalation Efficiency in Asthma Patients</title><title>Journal of aerosol medicine</title><addtitle>J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv</addtitle><description>Many methods have been developed to evaluate dry powder inhalation techniques and their efficiency for disease control in asthma patients. However, it is difficult to apply these methods to clinical practice and research. In this study, we introduce a simple new method that can be applied to dry powder inhalation techniques to evaluate their efficiency in clinical practice. Twenty volunteers were recruited to evaluate the reliability of this new method. One hundred one asthma patients who met the inclusion criteria participated in this study. A dark cloth covered the outlet of the inhaler during dry powder inhalation. The image formed by the inhalation process was evaluated using analysis software and converted into integrated optical density (IOD). Inhalation techniques were scored before and after inhalation technique training, and asthma control was evaluated using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) before inhalation technique training. The relative standard deviation of IOD ranged from 3.8% to 7.8%. In patients with or without inhaler prior use, both the IOD and inhalation technique scores improved significantly after inhalation technique training (p &lt; 0.05). Inhalation technique scores were positively correlated with IOD before (r = 0.80, p &lt; 0.001) and after inhalation technique training (r = 0.52, p &lt; 0.001). In patients with prior inhaler experience, ACQ results were negatively correlated with inhalation technique scores (r = -0.44; p &lt; 0.05) and IOD (r = -0.52; p &lt; 0.05). The results from this study demonstrated that this quantitative method is equivalent to traditional methods for dry powder inhalation evaluation. This study also indicated that training significantly improved the inhalation technique and efficiency in asthma patients with or without prior inhaler use.</description><issn>1941-2711</issn><issn>1941-2703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtPwzAMgCME4jG4ckSRuHDZsJs0aY8TjIfEU4IbUpV1DuvUpiNpQfv3tNrgwImTLfuzJftj7BhhhJCk5wtTLUcRoBwhpmKL7WMqcRhpENu_OeIeOwhhAaBQKrHL9iItQWgF--xtzB_oiz-3xjVFY5rik_g9NfN6xm3t-eTTlG1Xde_80q_4U_01I89v3dyUXbV2fGJtkRfk8hUvHB-HZl4Z_tT1yDXhkO1YUwY62sQBe72avFzcDO8er28vxnfDXCA2w9iSzGPUJNRMCTAJ6YhIk0pgihDnJk21JdQ2QRtr0LEUAAmBkamydhqJATtb7136-qOl0GRVEXIqS-OobkOGiVQyApH8B42Uxhhj0aGnf9BF3XrXHdJTUqURdN8csNGayn0dgiebLX1RGb_KELJeUdYrynpFWa-oGzjZrG2nFc1-8R8n4ht54Yrd</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Liang, Yasha</creator><creator>Hu, Hefang</creator><creator>Tian, Cuijie</creator><creator>Lei, Yi</creator><creator>Liu, Chuntao</creator><creator>Luo, Fengming</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Dry Powder Inhalation Efficiency in Asthma Patients</title><author>Liang, Yasha ; Hu, Hefang ; Tian, Cuijie ; Lei, Yi ; Liu, Chuntao ; Luo, Fengming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-5fe4c517e36d630a8e72ee7e680b105ca997fe17f81f5707543008e0a496ffb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hefang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Cuijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chuntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Fengming</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of aerosol medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Yasha</au><au>Hu, Hefang</au><au>Tian, Cuijie</au><au>Lei, Yi</au><au>Liu, Chuntao</au><au>Luo, Fengming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Dry Powder Inhalation Efficiency in Asthma Patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aerosol medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>432</spage><epage>438</epage><pages>432-438</pages><issn>1941-2711</issn><eissn>1941-2703</eissn><abstract>Many methods have been developed to evaluate dry powder inhalation techniques and their efficiency for disease control in asthma patients. However, it is difficult to apply these methods to clinical practice and research. In this study, we introduce a simple new method that can be applied to dry powder inhalation techniques to evaluate their efficiency in clinical practice. Twenty volunteers were recruited to evaluate the reliability of this new method. One hundred one asthma patients who met the inclusion criteria participated in this study. A dark cloth covered the outlet of the inhaler during dry powder inhalation. The image formed by the inhalation process was evaluated using analysis software and converted into integrated optical density (IOD). Inhalation techniques were scored before and after inhalation technique training, and asthma control was evaluated using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) before inhalation technique training. The relative standard deviation of IOD ranged from 3.8% to 7.8%. In patients with or without inhaler prior use, both the IOD and inhalation technique scores improved significantly after inhalation technique training (p &lt; 0.05). Inhalation technique scores were positively correlated with IOD before (r = 0.80, p &lt; 0.001) and after inhalation technique training (r = 0.52, p &lt; 0.001). In patients with prior inhaler experience, ACQ results were negatively correlated with inhalation technique scores (r = -0.44; p &lt; 0.05) and IOD (r = -0.52; p &lt; 0.05). The results from this study demonstrated that this quantitative method is equivalent to traditional methods for dry powder inhalation evaluation. This study also indicated that training significantly improved the inhalation technique and efficiency in asthma patients with or without prior inhaler use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>27403760</pmid><doi>10.1089/jamp.2014.1193</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-2711
ispartof Journal of aerosol medicine, 2016-10, Vol.29 (5), p.432-438
issn 1941-2711
1941-2703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846420382
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Dry Powder Inhalation Efficiency in Asthma Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20New%20Quantitative%20Method%20for%20Evaluating%20Dry%20Powder%20Inhalation%20Efficiency%20in%20Asthma%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aerosol%20medicine&rft.au=Liang,%20Yasha&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=438&rft.pages=432-438&rft.issn=1941-2711&rft.eissn=1941-2703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/jamp.2014.1193&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1846420382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824692046&rft_id=info:pmid/27403760&rfr_iscdi=true