Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses
In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N ret...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecosystems (New York) 2016-12, Vol.19 (8), p.1345-1361 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1361 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1345 |
container_title | Ecosystems (New York) |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Weitzman, Julie N. Kaye, Jason P. |
description | In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846419202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713731005</galeid><jstor_id>48719347</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713731005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhgepoFV_gBdCwJte7GxPPmYmc7ksXRWWFtTVy5DJJEuW2cQmGdB_36wjUnpRAvk4vE_y5rxFcYlhjgGa7zHPBJeA6xLyuXw9Kk4xo1UJNWm_vO9J2XIGJ8XXGHcAuOKMnRbPTzJY2dnBpjdkHXrwdkA_bQp-qx2610m7ZL1DCxV8jGjlg45phjahk26GpOvRYhusGoc0Bjmg9aGyiTqeF8dGDlFffKxnxWb143F5W65_3dwtF-tSMQyplJw3FQbJCVfc1Boq0rGW6Z4aTJRsa5wtd0b2Err8BdYTSpSB2piu0YwZelZ8m-59Cf73mL2JvY1KD4N02o9RZL5muCVAsvT6H-nOj8FldwcVbmtOAbJqPqm2ctDCOuNTkCqPXu-t8k4bm-uLBtOG5p5XGcAT8N6hoI14CXYvw5vAIA7ZiCkbkbMRh2zEa2bIxMSsdVsd_rLyH-hqgnYx-fD5CuMNbilr6B8z65nO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841968300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Weitzman, Julie N. ; Kaye, Jason P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Julie N. ; Kaye, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><description>In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecology ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural industry ; Agricultural land ; Biogeochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Farming systems ; Forests ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Original Articles ; Plant Sciences ; Retention ; Soils ; Urban agriculture ; Urban areas ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2016-12, Vol.19 (8), p.1345-1361</ispartof><rights>2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Ecosystems is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48719347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48719347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Julie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><title>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><addtitle>Ecosystems</addtitle><description>In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools.</description><subject>Agricultural ecology</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhgepoFV_gBdCwJte7GxPPmYmc7ksXRWWFtTVy5DJJEuW2cQmGdB_36wjUnpRAvk4vE_y5rxFcYlhjgGa7zHPBJeA6xLyuXw9Kk4xo1UJNWm_vO9J2XIGJ8XXGHcAuOKMnRbPTzJY2dnBpjdkHXrwdkA_bQp-qx2610m7ZL1DCxV8jGjlg45phjahk26GpOvRYhusGoc0Bjmg9aGyiTqeF8dGDlFffKxnxWb143F5W65_3dwtF-tSMQyplJw3FQbJCVfc1Boq0rGW6Z4aTJRsa5wtd0b2Err8BdYTSpSB2piu0YwZelZ8m-59Cf73mL2JvY1KD4N02o9RZL5muCVAsvT6H-nOj8FldwcVbmtOAbJqPqm2ctDCOuNTkCqPXu-t8k4bm-uLBtOG5p5XGcAT8N6hoI14CXYvw5vAIA7ZiCkbkbMRh2zEa2bIxMSsdVsd_rLyH-hqgnYx-fD5CuMNbilr6B8z65nO</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Weitzman, Julie N.</creator><creator>Kaye, Jason P.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</title><author>Weitzman, Julie N. ; Kaye, Jason P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecology</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Julie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weitzman, Julie N.</au><au>Kaye, Jason P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Ecosystems</stitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1345</spage><epage>1361</epage><pages>1345-1361</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1432-9840 |
ispartof | Ecosystems (New York), 2016-12, Vol.19 (8), p.1345-1361 |
issn | 1432-9840 1435-0629 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846419202 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural ecology Agricultural ecosystems Agricultural industry Agricultural land Biogeochemistry Biomedical and Life Sciences Ecology Environmental impact Environmental Management Farming systems Forests Geoecology/Natural Processes Hydrology/Water Resources Land use Life Sciences Original Articles Plant Sciences Retention Soils Urban agriculture Urban areas Zoology |
title | Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A39%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20in%20Soil%20Nitrogen%20Retention%20Across%20Forest,%20Urban,%20and%20Agricultural%20Land%20Uses&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Weitzman,%20Julie%20N.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1345&rft.epage=1361&rft.pages=1345-1361&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713731005%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841968300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713731005&rft_jstor_id=48719347&rfr_iscdi=true |