Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses

In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N ret...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosystems (New York) 2016-12, Vol.19 (8), p.1345-1361
Hauptverfasser: Weitzman, Julie N., Kaye, Jason P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1361
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1345
container_title Ecosystems (New York)
container_volume 19
creator Weitzman, Julie N.
Kaye, Jason P.
description In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846419202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713731005</galeid><jstor_id>48719347</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713731005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhgepoFV_gBdCwJte7GxPPmYmc7ksXRWWFtTVy5DJJEuW2cQmGdB_36wjUnpRAvk4vE_y5rxFcYlhjgGa7zHPBJeA6xLyuXw9Kk4xo1UJNWm_vO9J2XIGJ8XXGHcAuOKMnRbPTzJY2dnBpjdkHXrwdkA_bQp-qx2610m7ZL1DCxV8jGjlg45phjahk26GpOvRYhusGoc0Bjmg9aGyiTqeF8dGDlFffKxnxWb143F5W65_3dwtF-tSMQyplJw3FQbJCVfc1Boq0rGW6Z4aTJRsa5wtd0b2Err8BdYTSpSB2piu0YwZelZ8m-59Cf73mL2JvY1KD4N02o9RZL5muCVAsvT6H-nOj8FldwcVbmtOAbJqPqm2ctDCOuNTkCqPXu-t8k4bm-uLBtOG5p5XGcAT8N6hoI14CXYvw5vAIA7ZiCkbkbMRh2zEa2bIxMSsdVsd_rLyH-hqgnYx-fD5CuMNbilr6B8z65nO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841968300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Weitzman, Julie N. ; Kaye, Jason P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Julie N. ; Kaye, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><description>In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecology ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural industry ; Agricultural land ; Biogeochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Farming systems ; Forests ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Original Articles ; Plant Sciences ; Retention ; Soils ; Urban agriculture ; Urban areas ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2016-12, Vol.19 (8), p.1345-1361</ispartof><rights>2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Ecosystems is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48719347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48719347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Julie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><title>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><addtitle>Ecosystems</addtitle><description>In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools.</description><subject>Agricultural ecology</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhgepoFV_gBdCwJte7GxPPmYmc7ksXRWWFtTVy5DJJEuW2cQmGdB_36wjUnpRAvk4vE_y5rxFcYlhjgGa7zHPBJeA6xLyuXw9Kk4xo1UJNWm_vO9J2XIGJ8XXGHcAuOKMnRbPTzJY2dnBpjdkHXrwdkA_bQp-qx2610m7ZL1DCxV8jGjlg45phjahk26GpOvRYhusGoc0Bjmg9aGyiTqeF8dGDlFffKxnxWb143F5W65_3dwtF-tSMQyplJw3FQbJCVfc1Boq0rGW6Z4aTJRsa5wtd0b2Err8BdYTSpSB2piu0YwZelZ8m-59Cf73mL2JvY1KD4N02o9RZL5muCVAsvT6H-nOj8FldwcVbmtOAbJqPqm2ctDCOuNTkCqPXu-t8k4bm-uLBtOG5p5XGcAT8N6hoI14CXYvw5vAIA7ZiCkbkbMRh2zEa2bIxMSsdVsd_rLyH-hqgnYx-fD5CuMNbilr6B8z65nO</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Weitzman, Julie N.</creator><creator>Kaye, Jason P.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</title><author>Weitzman, Julie N. ; Kaye, Jason P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a887510a828c8f6e052b494ed3f12ca961840bfada0b1434d232cf06ffb7e44f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecology</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Julie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weitzman, Julie N.</au><au>Kaye, Jason P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Ecosystems</stitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1345</spage><epage>1361</epage><pages>1345-1361</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>In regions of mixed land use, some ecosystems are sinks for N pollution and others are sources. Yet, beyond this gross characterization, we have little understanding of how adjacent land-use types vary in mechanisms of N cycling and retention. This study assessed the rate and magnitude of soil N retention pathways in forest, urban, and agricultural ecosystems. Soil plots in each land use were labeled with inorganic ¹⁵N and cored at 15 min, 2 days, and 20 days following injection. Subsamples were biologically fractionated to differentiate labile and stable pools, while gross N transformations were assessed via the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method. Stable soil organic ¹⁵N formed rapidly (within 15 min) in all land uses when added as ¹⁵NH₄⁺, and became a proportionally larger sink for inorganic ¹⁵N over time. Forests had the lowest gross immobilization rates, but the greatest amount of stable N formation. Rapid retention of NH₄⁺ in forests may be driven by abiotic processes, with root uptake becoming a more important mechanism of retention over time. Urban sites, on the other hand, had the highest gross microbial immobilization rates and highest root N uptake, suggesting that high short-term N retention may be due to rapid biological processing. Agricultural systems, with low root uptake and the lowest stable N formation, had little capacity for retention of added N. These apparently distinct land-use cases can be understood by synthesizing several emerging aspects of N retention theory that (1) distinguish kinetic and capacity N saturation, (2) recognize links between soil C saturation on minerals and N retention, and (3) account for rapid transfers of NH₄⁺ to stable organic pools.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-9840
ispartof Ecosystems (New York), 2016-12, Vol.19 (8), p.1345-1361
issn 1432-9840
1435-0629
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846419202
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural ecology
Agricultural ecosystems
Agricultural industry
Agricultural land
Biogeochemistry
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecology
Environmental impact
Environmental Management
Farming systems
Forests
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Hydrology/Water Resources
Land use
Life Sciences
Original Articles
Plant Sciences
Retention
Soils
Urban agriculture
Urban areas
Zoology
title Variability in Soil Nitrogen Retention Across Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Land Uses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A39%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20in%20Soil%20Nitrogen%20Retention%20Across%20Forest,%20Urban,%20and%20Agricultural%20Land%20Uses&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Weitzman,%20Julie%20N.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1345&rft.epage=1361&rft.pages=1345-1361&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-016-0007-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713731005%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841968300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713731005&rft_jstor_id=48719347&rfr_iscdi=true