Microbiology and resistance in first episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: implications for management and prognosis

Purpose International guidelines for antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are based on studies conducted decades ago and do not reflect regional differences of bacterial epidemiology. Methods We retrospectively analyzed epidemiology of agents, antibiotic resistance pattern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2016-06, Vol.31 (6), p.1191-1195
Hauptverfasser: Friedrich, Kilian, Nüssle, Simone, Rehlen, Tobias, Stremmel, Wolfgang, Mischnik, Alexander, Eisenbach, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1195
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1191
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 31
creator Friedrich, Kilian
Nüssle, Simone
Rehlen, Tobias
Stremmel, Wolfgang
Mischnik, Alexander
Eisenbach, Christoph
description Purpose International guidelines for antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are based on studies conducted decades ago and do not reflect regional differences of bacterial epidemiology. Methods We retrospectively analyzed epidemiology of agents, antibiotic resistance patterns, and survival in liver cirrhosis patients with their first episode of SBP during the years 2007–2013. Results Of the 311 patients included, 114 patients had a positive ascites culture, and 197 had an ascitic neutrophil count >250 μL. Gram‐positive bacteria (47.8%) were more frequently found than Gram‐negatives (44.9%), fungi in 7.2%. Enterobacter spp. (40.6%), Enterococcus spp. (26.1%), and Staphylcoccus spp. (13.8%) were the most frequently isolated agents. Third‐generation cephalosporins covered 70.2% of non‐nosocomial and 56.3% of nosocomial‐acquired SBP cases.When SBP was diagnosed by a positive ascitic culture, survival was highly significantly reduced (mean: 13.9 ± 2.9 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–19.8) compared with culture‐negative SBP patients (mean: 44.1 ± 5.4 months; 95% CI: 33.4–54.9; P = 0.000). Along with model of end‐stage liver disease score and intensive care unit contact, a positive ascites culture remained an independent risk factor associated with poor survival (odds ratio: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.09–2.03) in multivariate analysis; piperacillin/tazobactam proved to be an adequate antibiotic for nosocomial and non‐nosocomial SBP in 85.1% and 92.5%, respectively. SBP infection with Enterococcus spp. was associated with poor patient survival (P = 0.048). Conclusions Third‐generation cephalosporins have poor microbial coverage for treatment of SBP. Current guidelines need to adapt for the emerging number of Gram‐positive infectious agents in SBP patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgh.13266
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846410671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1846410671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3966-96faaa5d6459f28b9ccb0e2c8d3a8ef7fd9eb08ecdc6749cb63a1dd42e401f393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhonR2LV68A8YjvYwLQwMM3gzjd1qqsZEXW-EgY-VOgMjzKbuof9d7LS9NXL5Djzf-wYehF5SckzLObnc_jymrBbiEVpRzklFWy4eoxXpaFNJRuUBepbzJSGEk7Z5ig4K2oqmYSt0_dGbFHsfh7jdYx0sTpB9nnUwgH3Azqc8Y5h8jhYyjg7nKYZyDXGXca_NDMnrAU9lzDH42ec32I_T4I2efQwZu5jwqIPewghhvqmYUtyGWGqeoydODxle3M5D9O3s3dfT8-ri8_r96duLyjApRCWF01o3VvBGurrrpTE9gdp0lukOXOushJ50YKwRLZemF0xTa3kNnFDHJDtEr5fc0vx7B3lWo88GhmF5h6IdF5wS0dL_o61kNRVU8oIeLWj5wZwTODUlP-q0V5Sof2JUEaNuxBT21W3srh_B3pN3JgpwsgBXfoD9w0nqw_r8LrJaNoou-HO_odMvJVrWNmrzaa02a3bGN19-qO_sL2p_qoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793216194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbiology and resistance in first episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: implications for management and prognosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Friedrich, Kilian ; Nüssle, Simone ; Rehlen, Tobias ; Stremmel, Wolfgang ; Mischnik, Alexander ; Eisenbach, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Kilian ; Nüssle, Simone ; Rehlen, Tobias ; Stremmel, Wolfgang ; Mischnik, Alexander ; Eisenbach, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose International guidelines for antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are based on studies conducted decades ago and do not reflect regional differences of bacterial epidemiology. Methods We retrospectively analyzed epidemiology of agents, antibiotic resistance patterns, and survival in liver cirrhosis patients with their first episode of SBP during the years 2007–2013. Results Of the 311 patients included, 114 patients had a positive ascites culture, and 197 had an ascitic neutrophil count &gt;250 μL. Gram‐positive bacteria (47.8%) were more frequently found than Gram‐negatives (44.9%), fungi in 7.2%. Enterobacter spp. (40.6%), Enterococcus spp. (26.1%), and Staphylcoccus spp. (13.8%) were the most frequently isolated agents. Third‐generation cephalosporins covered 70.2% of non‐nosocomial and 56.3% of nosocomial‐acquired SBP cases.When SBP was diagnosed by a positive ascitic culture, survival was highly significantly reduced (mean: 13.9 ± 2.9 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–19.8) compared with culture‐negative SBP patients (mean: 44.1 ± 5.4 months; 95% CI: 33.4–54.9; P = 0.000). Along with model of end‐stage liver disease score and intensive care unit contact, a positive ascites culture remained an independent risk factor associated with poor survival (odds ratio: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.09–2.03) in multivariate analysis; piperacillin/tazobactam proved to be an adequate antibiotic for nosocomial and non‐nosocomial SBP in 85.1% and 92.5%, respectively. SBP infection with Enterococcus spp. was associated with poor patient survival (P = 0.048). Conclusions Third‐generation cephalosporins have poor microbial coverage for treatment of SBP. Current guidelines need to adapt for the emerging number of Gram‐positive infectious agents in SBP patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13266</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26676553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; antibiotic resistance ; Ascitic Fluid - microbiology ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Bacterial Infections - mortality ; Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis ; Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy ; Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology ; Community-Acquired Infections - mortality ; Cross Infection - diagnosis ; Cross Infection - drug therapy ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Cross Infection - mortality ; culture-positive SBP ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Female ; Germany - epidemiology ; Gram-positive SBP ; Hospital Bed Capacity ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Leukocyte Count ; Liver Cirrhosis - complications ; Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis ; Liver Cirrhosis - mortality ; Male ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neutrophils ; Odds Ratio ; Peritonitis - diagnosis ; Peritonitis - drug therapy ; Peritonitis - microbiology ; Peritonitis - mortality ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis ; third-generation cephalosporins ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2016-06, Vol.31 (6), p.1191-1195</ispartof><rights>2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3966-96faaa5d6459f28b9ccb0e2c8d3a8ef7fd9eb08ecdc6749cb63a1dd42e401f393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3966-96faaa5d6459f28b9ccb0e2c8d3a8ef7fd9eb08ecdc6749cb63a1dd42e401f393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgh.13266$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgh.13266$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Kilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nüssle, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehlen, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stremmel, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mischnik, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenbach, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Microbiology and resistance in first episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: implications for management and prognosis</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology</addtitle><description>Purpose International guidelines for antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are based on studies conducted decades ago and do not reflect regional differences of bacterial epidemiology. Methods We retrospectively analyzed epidemiology of agents, antibiotic resistance patterns, and survival in liver cirrhosis patients with their first episode of SBP during the years 2007–2013. Results Of the 311 patients included, 114 patients had a positive ascites culture, and 197 had an ascitic neutrophil count &gt;250 μL. Gram‐positive bacteria (47.8%) were more frequently found than Gram‐negatives (44.9%), fungi in 7.2%. Enterobacter spp. (40.6%), Enterococcus spp. (26.1%), and Staphylcoccus spp. (13.8%) were the most frequently isolated agents. Third‐generation cephalosporins covered 70.2% of non‐nosocomial and 56.3% of nosocomial‐acquired SBP cases.When SBP was diagnosed by a positive ascitic culture, survival was highly significantly reduced (mean: 13.9 ± 2.9 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–19.8) compared with culture‐negative SBP patients (mean: 44.1 ± 5.4 months; 95% CI: 33.4–54.9; P = 0.000). Along with model of end‐stage liver disease score and intensive care unit contact, a positive ascites culture remained an independent risk factor associated with poor survival (odds ratio: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.09–2.03) in multivariate analysis; piperacillin/tazobactam proved to be an adequate antibiotic for nosocomial and non‐nosocomial SBP in 85.1% and 92.5%, respectively. SBP infection with Enterococcus spp. was associated with poor patient survival (P = 0.048). Conclusions Third‐generation cephalosporins have poor microbial coverage for treatment of SBP. Current guidelines need to adapt for the emerging number of Gram‐positive infectious agents in SBP patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Ascitic Fluid - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - mortality</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - mortality</subject><subject>Cross Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cross Infection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - mortality</subject><subject>culture-positive SBP</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gram-positive SBP</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - mortality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Peritonitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Peritonitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Peritonitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Peritonitis - mortality</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>spontaneous bacterial peritonitis</subject><subject>third-generation cephalosporins</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhonR2LV68A8YjvYwLQwMM3gzjd1qqsZEXW-EgY-VOgMjzKbuof9d7LS9NXL5Djzf-wYehF5SckzLObnc_jymrBbiEVpRzklFWy4eoxXpaFNJRuUBepbzJSGEk7Z5ig4K2oqmYSt0_dGbFHsfh7jdYx0sTpB9nnUwgH3Azqc8Y5h8jhYyjg7nKYZyDXGXca_NDMnrAU9lzDH42ec32I_T4I2efQwZu5jwqIPewghhvqmYUtyGWGqeoydODxle3M5D9O3s3dfT8-ri8_r96duLyjApRCWF01o3VvBGurrrpTE9gdp0lukOXOushJ50YKwRLZemF0xTa3kNnFDHJDtEr5fc0vx7B3lWo88GhmF5h6IdF5wS0dL_o61kNRVU8oIeLWj5wZwTODUlP-q0V5Sof2JUEaNuxBT21W3srh_B3pN3JgpwsgBXfoD9w0nqw_r8LrJaNoou-HO_odMvJVrWNmrzaa02a3bGN19-qO_sL2p_qoc</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Friedrich, Kilian</creator><creator>Nüssle, Simone</creator><creator>Rehlen, Tobias</creator><creator>Stremmel, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Mischnik, Alexander</creator><creator>Eisenbach, Christoph</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Microbiology and resistance in first episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: implications for management and prognosis</title><author>Friedrich, Kilian ; Nüssle, Simone ; Rehlen, Tobias ; Stremmel, Wolfgang ; Mischnik, Alexander ; Eisenbach, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3966-96faaa5d6459f28b9ccb0e2c8d3a8ef7fd9eb08ecdc6749cb63a1dd42e401f393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Ascitic Fluid - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - mortality</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - mortality</topic><topic>Cross Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cross Infection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - mortality</topic><topic>culture-positive SBP</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gram-positive SBP</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - mortality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Peritonitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Peritonitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Peritonitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Peritonitis - mortality</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>spontaneous bacterial peritonitis</topic><topic>third-generation cephalosporins</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Kilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nüssle, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehlen, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stremmel, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mischnik, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenbach, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedrich, Kilian</au><au>Nüssle, Simone</au><au>Rehlen, Tobias</au><au>Stremmel, Wolfgang</au><au>Mischnik, Alexander</au><au>Eisenbach, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbiology and resistance in first episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: implications for management and prognosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1195</epage><pages>1191-1195</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Purpose International guidelines for antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are based on studies conducted decades ago and do not reflect regional differences of bacterial epidemiology. Methods We retrospectively analyzed epidemiology of agents, antibiotic resistance patterns, and survival in liver cirrhosis patients with their first episode of SBP during the years 2007–2013. Results Of the 311 patients included, 114 patients had a positive ascites culture, and 197 had an ascitic neutrophil count &gt;250 μL. Gram‐positive bacteria (47.8%) were more frequently found than Gram‐negatives (44.9%), fungi in 7.2%. Enterobacter spp. (40.6%), Enterococcus spp. (26.1%), and Staphylcoccus spp. (13.8%) were the most frequently isolated agents. Third‐generation cephalosporins covered 70.2% of non‐nosocomial and 56.3% of nosocomial‐acquired SBP cases.When SBP was diagnosed by a positive ascitic culture, survival was highly significantly reduced (mean: 13.9 ± 2.9 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–19.8) compared with culture‐negative SBP patients (mean: 44.1 ± 5.4 months; 95% CI: 33.4–54.9; P = 0.000). Along with model of end‐stage liver disease score and intensive care unit contact, a positive ascites culture remained an independent risk factor associated with poor survival (odds ratio: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.09–2.03) in multivariate analysis; piperacillin/tazobactam proved to be an adequate antibiotic for nosocomial and non‐nosocomial SBP in 85.1% and 92.5%, respectively. SBP infection with Enterococcus spp. was associated with poor patient survival (P = 0.048). Conclusions Third‐generation cephalosporins have poor microbial coverage for treatment of SBP. Current guidelines need to adapt for the emerging number of Gram‐positive infectious agents in SBP patients.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26676553</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgh.13266</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2016-06, Vol.31 (6), p.1191-1195
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846410671
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
antibiotic resistance
Ascitic Fluid - microbiology
Bacterial Infections - diagnosis
Bacterial Infections - drug therapy
Bacterial Infections - microbiology
Bacterial Infections - mortality
Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis
Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy
Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology
Community-Acquired Infections - mortality
Cross Infection - diagnosis
Cross Infection - drug therapy
Cross Infection - microbiology
Cross Infection - mortality
culture-positive SBP
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Female
Germany - epidemiology
Gram-positive SBP
Hospital Bed Capacity
Hospitals, University
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Leukocyte Count
Liver Cirrhosis - complications
Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis
Liver Cirrhosis - mortality
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neutrophils
Odds Ratio
Peritonitis - diagnosis
Peritonitis - drug therapy
Peritonitis - microbiology
Peritonitis - mortality
Predictive Value of Tests
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
third-generation cephalosporins
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Microbiology and resistance in first episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: implications for management and prognosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T21%3A54%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiology%20and%20resistance%20in%20first%20episodes%20of%20spontaneous%20bacterial%20peritonitis:%20implications%20for%20management%20and%20prognosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Friedrich,%20Kilian&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1195&rft.pages=1191-1195&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgh.13266&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1846410671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793216194&rft_id=info:pmid/26676553&rfr_iscdi=true