Removal of anionic pollutants by pine bark is influenced by the mechanism of retention
The use of organic biosorbents for anion removal from water has been less studied than for cationic compounds. In this work, the removal capacity of pine bark for potential anionic pollutants (fluoride, phosphate, arsenate and dichromate) was assessed in column experiments, designed to study the pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2017-01, Vol.167, p.139-145 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 145 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 167 |
creator | Paradelo, R. Conde-Cid, M. Arias-Estévez, M. Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C. Álvarez-Rodríguez, E. Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J. Núñez-Delgado, A. |
description | The use of organic biosorbents for anion removal from water has been less studied than for cationic compounds. In this work, the removal capacity of pine bark for potential anionic pollutants (fluoride, phosphate, arsenate and dichromate) was assessed in column experiments, designed to study the process of transport. The results showed that pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride, and in turn, very high for dichromate, with retention values close to 100% and less than 2% desorption of the adsorbed dichromate. The large differences observed between anions suggest that differences in the retention mechanism of each anion exist. In the case of phosphate and arsenate, electrostatic interactions with the mostly negatively charged functional groups of the pine bark determine the low retention capacity. Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction of chromium (VI) to chromium (III), what improves the efficiency of the removal.
•Pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride.•In turn, pine bark removal capacity for dichromate was very high.•Large differences between anions suggest different retention mechanisms for each one.•Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction to Cr(III) and precipitation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.158 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846408794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653516313704</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835390192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f84d76d840ff97a602cf14572a6cc57dcd23c5f99555d7567cc7d82a42bce78b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9rHSEUxaUkNK9Jv0Kxu2xmqo6OugyPJikECiHtVhy98nydf9WZQL59fHlp6DKrK9ffORfOQegrJTUltP22r90OhinPO0hQs7Kqia6pUB_QhiqpK8q0OkEbQrioWtGIM_Qp5z0hhRT6IzpjUpaXajfo930xerQ9ngK2Y5zG6PA89f262HHJuHvCcxwBdzb9wTHjOIZ-hdGBP3wtO8ADuF0R5uHgkGCBcSkuF-g02D7D59d5jn5df3_Y3lZ3P29-bK_uKscpWaqguJetV5yEoKVtCXOBciGZbZ0T0jvPGieC1kIIL0UrnZNeMctZ50CqrjlHl0ffOU1_V8iLGWJ20Pd2hGnNhireclIi4e9AG9FoQjUrqD6iLk05JwhmTnGw6clQYg4NmL35rwFzaMAQbUoDRfvl9czaDeDflP8iL8D2CEDJ5TFCMtnFl0hjArcYP8V3nHkGU96d-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835390192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of anionic pollutants by pine bark is influenced by the mechanism of retention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Paradelo, R. ; Conde-Cid, M. ; Arias-Estévez, M. ; Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C. ; Álvarez-Rodríguez, E. ; Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J. ; Núñez-Delgado, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paradelo, R. ; Conde-Cid, M. ; Arias-Estévez, M. ; Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C. ; Álvarez-Rodríguez, E. ; Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J. ; Núñez-Delgado, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of organic biosorbents for anion removal from water has been less studied than for cationic compounds. In this work, the removal capacity of pine bark for potential anionic pollutants (fluoride, phosphate, arsenate and dichromate) was assessed in column experiments, designed to study the process of transport. The results showed that pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride, and in turn, very high for dichromate, with retention values close to 100% and less than 2% desorption of the adsorbed dichromate. The large differences observed between anions suggest that differences in the retention mechanism of each anion exist. In the case of phosphate and arsenate, electrostatic interactions with the mostly negatively charged functional groups of the pine bark determine the low retention capacity. Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction of chromium (VI) to chromium (III), what improves the efficiency of the removal.
•Pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride.•In turn, pine bark removal capacity for dichromate was very high.•Large differences between anions suggest different retention mechanisms for each one.•Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction to Cr(III) and precipitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.158</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27716586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Arsenates - chemistry ; Chromates - chemistry ; Fluorides - chemistry ; Laboratory column ; Organic matter ; Phosphates ; Pinus ; Plant Bark - chemistry ; Transport experiment ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water Purification - methods</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2017-01, Vol.167, p.139-145</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f84d76d840ff97a602cf14572a6cc57dcd23c5f99555d7567cc7d82a42bce78b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f84d76d840ff97a602cf14572a6cc57dcd23c5f99555d7567cc7d82a42bce78b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4165-177X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paradelo, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde-Cid, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias-Estévez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-Rodríguez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez-Delgado, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of anionic pollutants by pine bark is influenced by the mechanism of retention</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>The use of organic biosorbents for anion removal from water has been less studied than for cationic compounds. In this work, the removal capacity of pine bark for potential anionic pollutants (fluoride, phosphate, arsenate and dichromate) was assessed in column experiments, designed to study the process of transport. The results showed that pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride, and in turn, very high for dichromate, with retention values close to 100% and less than 2% desorption of the adsorbed dichromate. The large differences observed between anions suggest that differences in the retention mechanism of each anion exist. In the case of phosphate and arsenate, electrostatic interactions with the mostly negatively charged functional groups of the pine bark determine the low retention capacity. Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction of chromium (VI) to chromium (III), what improves the efficiency of the removal.
•Pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride.•In turn, pine bark removal capacity for dichromate was very high.•Large differences between anions suggest different retention mechanisms for each one.•Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction to Cr(III) and precipitation.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Arsenates - chemistry</subject><subject>Chromates - chemistry</subject><subject>Fluorides - chemistry</subject><subject>Laboratory column</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>Plant Bark - chemistry</subject><subject>Transport experiment</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9rHSEUxaUkNK9Jv0Kxu2xmqo6OugyPJikECiHtVhy98nydf9WZQL59fHlp6DKrK9ffORfOQegrJTUltP22r90OhinPO0hQs7Kqia6pUB_QhiqpK8q0OkEbQrioWtGIM_Qp5z0hhRT6IzpjUpaXajfo930xerQ9ngK2Y5zG6PA89f262HHJuHvCcxwBdzb9wTHjOIZ-hdGBP3wtO8ADuF0R5uHgkGCBcSkuF-g02D7D59d5jn5df3_Y3lZ3P29-bK_uKscpWaqguJetV5yEoKVtCXOBciGZbZ0T0jvPGieC1kIIL0UrnZNeMctZ50CqrjlHl0ffOU1_V8iLGWJ20Pd2hGnNhireclIi4e9AG9FoQjUrqD6iLk05JwhmTnGw6clQYg4NmL35rwFzaMAQbUoDRfvl9czaDeDflP8iL8D2CEDJ5TFCMtnFl0hjArcYP8V3nHkGU96d-Q</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Paradelo, R.</creator><creator>Conde-Cid, M.</creator><creator>Arias-Estévez, M.</creator><creator>Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C.</creator><creator>Álvarez-Rodríguez, E.</creator><creator>Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J.</creator><creator>Núñez-Delgado, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4165-177X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Removal of anionic pollutants by pine bark is influenced by the mechanism of retention</title><author>Paradelo, R. ; Conde-Cid, M. ; Arias-Estévez, M. ; Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C. ; Álvarez-Rodríguez, E. ; Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J. ; Núñez-Delgado, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f84d76d840ff97a602cf14572a6cc57dcd23c5f99555d7567cc7d82a42bce78b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Arsenates - chemistry</topic><topic>Chromates - chemistry</topic><topic>Fluorides - chemistry</topic><topic>Laboratory column</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>Plant Bark - chemistry</topic><topic>Transport experiment</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paradelo, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde-Cid, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias-Estévez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-Rodríguez, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez-Delgado, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paradelo, R.</au><au>Conde-Cid, M.</au><au>Arias-Estévez, M.</au><au>Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C.</au><au>Álvarez-Rodríguez, E.</au><au>Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.J.</au><au>Núñez-Delgado, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of anionic pollutants by pine bark is influenced by the mechanism of retention</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>167</volume><spage>139</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>139-145</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><abstract>The use of organic biosorbents for anion removal from water has been less studied than for cationic compounds. In this work, the removal capacity of pine bark for potential anionic pollutants (fluoride, phosphate, arsenate and dichromate) was assessed in column experiments, designed to study the process of transport. The results showed that pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride, and in turn, very high for dichromate, with retention values close to 100% and less than 2% desorption of the adsorbed dichromate. The large differences observed between anions suggest that differences in the retention mechanism of each anion exist. In the case of phosphate and arsenate, electrostatic interactions with the mostly negatively charged functional groups of the pine bark determine the low retention capacity. Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction of chromium (VI) to chromium (III), what improves the efficiency of the removal.
•Pine bark has a very low retention capacity for phosphate, arsenate or fluoride.•In turn, pine bark removal capacity for dichromate was very high.•Large differences between anions suggest different retention mechanisms for each one.•Dichromate retention might proceed through reduction to Cr(III) and precipitation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27716586</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.158</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4165-177X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2017-01, Vol.167, p.139-145 |
issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846408794 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adsorption Arsenates - chemistry Chromates - chemistry Fluorides - chemistry Laboratory column Organic matter Phosphates Pinus Plant Bark - chemistry Transport experiment Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry Water Purification - methods |
title | Removal of anionic pollutants by pine bark is influenced by the mechanism of retention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20anionic%20pollutants%20by%20pine%20bark%20is%20influenced%20by%20the%20mechanism%20of%20retention&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Paradelo,%20R.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=167&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=139-145&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835390192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835390192&rft_id=info:pmid/27716586&rft_els_id=S0045653516313704&rfr_iscdi=true |