External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents
This study summarizes the 20-year efforts for dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of the Techa riverside residents exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of radionuclide releases into the river in 1949–1956. It represents the first combined analysis of all the data available on EPR dosimetry with...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation and environmental biophysics 2016-11, Vol.55 (4), p.477-499 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 499 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 477 |
| container_title | Radiation and environmental biophysics |
| container_volume | 55 |
| creator | Shishkina, E. A. Volchkova, A. Yu Timofeev, Y. S. Fattibene, P. Wieser, A. Ivanov, D. V. Krivoschapov, V. A. Zalyapin, V. I. Della Monaca, S. De Coste, V. Degteva, M. O. Anspaugh, L. R. |
| description | This study summarizes the 20-year efforts for dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of the Techa riverside residents exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of radionuclide releases into the river in 1949–1956. It represents the first combined analysis of all the data available on EPR dosimetry with teeth of permanent residents of the Techa riverside territory. Results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of 302 teeth donated by 173 individuals living permanently in Techa riverside settlements over the period of 1950–1952 were analyzed. These people were residents of villages located at the free-flowing river stream or at the banks of stagnant reservoirs such as ponds or blind river forks. Cumulative absorbed doses measured using EPR are from several sources of exposure, viz., background radiation, internal exposure due to bone-seeking radionuclides (
89
Sr,
90
Sr/
90
Y), internal exposure due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba incorporated in soft tissues, and anthropogenic external exposure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of different sources of enamel exposure and to deduce external doses to be used for validation of the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS). Since various EPR methods were used, harmonization of these methods was critical. Overall, the mean cumulative background dose was found to be 63 ± 47 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
89
Sr and
90
Sr/
90
Y were within the range of 10–110 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba depend on the distance from the site of releases and varied from 1 mGy up to 90 mGy; mean external doses were maximum for settlements located at the banks of stagnant reservoirs (~500 mGy); in contrast, external doses for settlements located along the free-flowing river stream did not exceed 160 mGy and decreased downstream with increasing distance from the site of release. External enamel doses calculated using the TRDS code and derived from the EPR measurements were found to be in good agreement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00411-016-0666-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846405457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835516533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3dbb1dab525b575cc26704afbeb2fe91f66de1ef0c21a5af7c4016ebba29969a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxTAQhYMoen38ADdScOOmOpMm6e1SxBcIbhTchSSdaqW30aQV_femXhURBFezmO-cGc5hbBfhEAHKowggEHNAlYNSKscVNkNR8JxDVa2yGRSAuSrE3QbbjPERAEulqnW2wUsFoGQxY5enrwOF3nRZ7SNlgZzv4xBGN7S-z9o-G7wfHjLqzYK6zDfZDbkHk4X2hUJs60kxjX6I22ytMV2knc-5xW7PTm9OLvKr6_PLk-Or3AmQQ17U1mJtrOTSylI6x1UJwjSWLG-owkapmpAacByNNE2ZZKjIWsOrSlWm2GIHS9-n4J9HioNetNFR15me_Bg1zoVKl4Qs_4EWUmLKoUjo_i_00Y9TLh-UEHMBfJ4oXFIu-BgDNfoptAsT3jSCnirRy0p0ellPlWhMmr1P59EuqP5WfHWQAL4EYlr19xR-nP7T9R3l_5ZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1834484028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Shishkina, E. A. ; Volchkova, A. Yu ; Timofeev, Y. S. ; Fattibene, P. ; Wieser, A. ; Ivanov, D. V. ; Krivoschapov, V. A. ; Zalyapin, V. I. ; Della Monaca, S. ; De Coste, V. ; Degteva, M. O. ; Anspaugh, L. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shishkina, E. A. ; Volchkova, A. Yu ; Timofeev, Y. S. ; Fattibene, P. ; Wieser, A. ; Ivanov, D. V. ; Krivoschapov, V. A. ; Zalyapin, V. I. ; Della Monaca, S. ; De Coste, V. ; Degteva, M. O. ; Anspaugh, L. R.</creatorcontrib><description>This study summarizes the 20-year efforts for dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of the Techa riverside residents exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of radionuclide releases into the river in 1949–1956. It represents the first combined analysis of all the data available on EPR dosimetry with teeth of permanent residents of the Techa riverside territory. Results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of 302 teeth donated by 173 individuals living permanently in Techa riverside settlements over the period of 1950–1952 were analyzed. These people were residents of villages located at the free-flowing river stream or at the banks of stagnant reservoirs such as ponds or blind river forks. Cumulative absorbed doses measured using EPR are from several sources of exposure, viz., background radiation, internal exposure due to bone-seeking radionuclides (
89
Sr,
90
Sr/
90
Y), internal exposure due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba incorporated in soft tissues, and anthropogenic external exposure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of different sources of enamel exposure and to deduce external doses to be used for validation of the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS). Since various EPR methods were used, harmonization of these methods was critical. Overall, the mean cumulative background dose was found to be 63 ± 47 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
89
Sr and
90
Sr/
90
Y were within the range of 10–110 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba depend on the distance from the site of releases and varied from 1 mGy up to 90 mGy; mean external doses were maximum for settlements located at the banks of stagnant reservoirs (~500 mGy); in contrast, external doses for settlements located along the free-flowing river stream did not exceed 160 mGy and decreased downstream with increasing distance from the site of release. External enamel doses calculated using the TRDS code and derived from the EPR measurements were found to be in good agreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-634X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0666-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27600653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anthropogenic factors ; Background radiation ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biophysics ; Cesium radioisotopes ; Dental Enamel - radiation effects ; Dosimetry ; Ecosystems ; Effects of Radiation/Radiation Protection ; Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy ; Enamel ; Environmental Physics ; Exposure ; Female ; Human exposure ; Humans ; Ionizing radiation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Original Article ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Radiation Dosage ; Radioactive Waste ; Radioactive wastes ; Radiometry ; Reservoirs ; Rivers ; Russia ; Strontium radioisotopes ; Teeth ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2016-11, Vol.55 (4), p.477-499</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3dbb1dab525b575cc26704afbeb2fe91f66de1ef0c21a5af7c4016ebba29969a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3dbb1dab525b575cc26704afbeb2fe91f66de1ef0c21a5af7c4016ebba29969a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00411-016-0666-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00411-016-0666-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shishkina, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volchkova, A. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timofeev, Y. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattibene, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieser, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanov, D. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krivoschapov, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalyapin, V. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Monaca, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Coste, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degteva, M. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anspaugh, L. R.</creatorcontrib><title>External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents</title><title>Radiation and environmental biophysics</title><addtitle>Radiat Environ Biophys</addtitle><addtitle>Radiat Environ Biophys</addtitle><description>This study summarizes the 20-year efforts for dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of the Techa riverside residents exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of radionuclide releases into the river in 1949–1956. It represents the first combined analysis of all the data available on EPR dosimetry with teeth of permanent residents of the Techa riverside territory. Results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of 302 teeth donated by 173 individuals living permanently in Techa riverside settlements over the period of 1950–1952 were analyzed. These people were residents of villages located at the free-flowing river stream or at the banks of stagnant reservoirs such as ponds or blind river forks. Cumulative absorbed doses measured using EPR are from several sources of exposure, viz., background radiation, internal exposure due to bone-seeking radionuclides (
89
Sr,
90
Sr/
90
Y), internal exposure due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba incorporated in soft tissues, and anthropogenic external exposure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of different sources of enamel exposure and to deduce external doses to be used for validation of the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS). Since various EPR methods were used, harmonization of these methods was critical. Overall, the mean cumulative background dose was found to be 63 ± 47 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
89
Sr and
90
Sr/
90
Y were within the range of 10–110 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba depend on the distance from the site of releases and varied from 1 mGy up to 90 mGy; mean external doses were maximum for settlements located at the banks of stagnant reservoirs (~500 mGy); in contrast, external doses for settlements located along the free-flowing river stream did not exceed 160 mGy and decreased downstream with increasing distance from the site of release. External enamel doses calculated using the TRDS code and derived from the EPR measurements were found to be in good agreement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Background radiation</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Cesium radioisotopes</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Effects of Radiation/Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human exposure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radioactive Waste</subject><subject>Radioactive wastes</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Strontium radioisotopes</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0301-634X</issn><issn>1432-2099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxTAQhYMoen38ADdScOOmOpMm6e1SxBcIbhTchSSdaqW30aQV_femXhURBFezmO-cGc5hbBfhEAHKowggEHNAlYNSKscVNkNR8JxDVa2yGRSAuSrE3QbbjPERAEulqnW2wUsFoGQxY5enrwOF3nRZ7SNlgZzv4xBGN7S-z9o-G7wfHjLqzYK6zDfZDbkHk4X2hUJs60kxjX6I22ytMV2knc-5xW7PTm9OLvKr6_PLk-Or3AmQQ17U1mJtrOTSylI6x1UJwjSWLG-owkapmpAacByNNE2ZZKjIWsOrSlWm2GIHS9-n4J9HioNetNFR15me_Bg1zoVKl4Qs_4EWUmLKoUjo_i_00Y9TLh-UEHMBfJ4oXFIu-BgDNfoptAsT3jSCnirRy0p0ellPlWhMmr1P59EuqP5WfHWQAL4EYlr19xR-nP7T9R3l_5ZY</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Shishkina, E. A.</creator><creator>Volchkova, A. Yu</creator><creator>Timofeev, Y. S.</creator><creator>Fattibene, P.</creator><creator>Wieser, A.</creator><creator>Ivanov, D. V.</creator><creator>Krivoschapov, V. A.</creator><creator>Zalyapin, V. I.</creator><creator>Della Monaca, S.</creator><creator>De Coste, V.</creator><creator>Degteva, M. O.</creator><creator>Anspaugh, L. R.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents</title><author>Shishkina, E. A. ; Volchkova, A. Yu ; Timofeev, Y. S. ; Fattibene, P. ; Wieser, A. ; Ivanov, D. V. ; Krivoschapov, V. A. ; Zalyapin, V. I. ; Della Monaca, S. ; De Coste, V. ; Degteva, M. O. ; Anspaugh, L. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3dbb1dab525b575cc26704afbeb2fe91f66de1ef0c21a5af7c4016ebba29969a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Background radiation</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Cesium radioisotopes</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Effects of Radiation/Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human exposure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radioactive Waste</topic><topic>Radioactive wastes</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Strontium radioisotopes</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shishkina, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volchkova, A. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timofeev, Y. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattibene, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieser, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanov, D. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krivoschapov, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalyapin, V. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Monaca, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Coste, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degteva, M. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anspaugh, L. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Radiation and environmental biophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shishkina, E. A.</au><au>Volchkova, A. Yu</au><au>Timofeev, Y. S.</au><au>Fattibene, P.</au><au>Wieser, A.</au><au>Ivanov, D. V.</au><au>Krivoschapov, V. A.</au><au>Zalyapin, V. I.</au><au>Della Monaca, S.</au><au>De Coste, V.</au><au>Degteva, M. O.</au><au>Anspaugh, L. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents</atitle><jtitle>Radiation and environmental biophysics</jtitle><stitle>Radiat Environ Biophys</stitle><addtitle>Radiat Environ Biophys</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>477-499</pages><issn>0301-634X</issn><eissn>1432-2099</eissn><abstract>This study summarizes the 20-year efforts for dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of the Techa riverside residents exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of radionuclide releases into the river in 1949–1956. It represents the first combined analysis of all the data available on EPR dosimetry with teeth of permanent residents of the Techa riverside territory. Results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of 302 teeth donated by 173 individuals living permanently in Techa riverside settlements over the period of 1950–1952 were analyzed. These people were residents of villages located at the free-flowing river stream or at the banks of stagnant reservoirs such as ponds or blind river forks. Cumulative absorbed doses measured using EPR are from several sources of exposure, viz., background radiation, internal exposure due to bone-seeking radionuclides (
89
Sr,
90
Sr/
90
Y), internal exposure due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba incorporated in soft tissues, and anthropogenic external exposure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of different sources of enamel exposure and to deduce external doses to be used for validation of the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS). Since various EPR methods were used, harmonization of these methods was critical. Overall, the mean cumulative background dose was found to be 63 ± 47 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
89
Sr and
90
Sr/
90
Y were within the range of 10–110 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to
137
Cs/
137m
Ba depend on the distance from the site of releases and varied from 1 mGy up to 90 mGy; mean external doses were maximum for settlements located at the banks of stagnant reservoirs (~500 mGy); in contrast, external doses for settlements located along the free-flowing river stream did not exceed 160 mGy and decreased downstream with increasing distance from the site of release. External enamel doses calculated using the TRDS code and derived from the EPR measurements were found to be in good agreement.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27600653</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00411-016-0666-1</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-634X |
| ispartof | Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2016-11, Vol.55 (4), p.477-499 |
| issn | 0301-634X 1432-2099 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846405457 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anthropogenic factors Background radiation Biological and Medical Physics Biophysics Cesium radioisotopes Dental Enamel - radiation effects Dosimetry Ecosystems Effects of Radiation/Radiation Protection Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy Enamel Environmental Physics Exposure Female Human exposure Humans Ionizing radiation Male Middle Aged Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Original Article Physics Physics and Astronomy Radiation Dosage Radioactive Waste Radioactive wastes Radiometry Reservoirs Rivers Russia Strontium radioisotopes Teeth Water pollution |
| title | External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A55%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=External%20dose%20reconstruction%20in%20tooth%20enamel%20of%20Techa%20riverside%20residents&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20and%20environmental%20biophysics&rft.au=Shishkina,%20E.%20A.&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=477-499&rft.issn=0301-634X&rft.eissn=1432-2099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00411-016-0666-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835516533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1834484028&rft_id=info:pmid/27600653&rfr_iscdi=true |