Sex differences in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in ischemic stroke

Stroke is not only a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide it also disproportionally affects women. There are currently over 500,000 more women stroke survivors in the US than men, and elderly women bear the brunt of stroke‐related disability. Stroke has dropped to the fifth leading cau...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroscience research 2017-01, Vol.95 (1-2), p.462-471
Hauptverfasser: Spychala, Monica S., Honarpisheh, Pedram, McCullough, Louise D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 471
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 462
container_title Journal of neuroscience research
container_volume 95
creator Spychala, Monica S.
Honarpisheh, Pedram
McCullough, Louise D.
description Stroke is not only a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide it also disproportionally affects women. There are currently over 500,000 more women stroke survivors in the US than men, and elderly women bear the brunt of stroke‐related disability. Stroke has dropped to the fifth leading cause of death in men, but remains the third in women. This review discusses sex differences in common stroke risk factors, the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies, acute treatment responses, and post‐stroke recovery in clinical populations. Women have an increased lifetime risk of stroke compared to men, largely due to a steep increase in stroke incidence in older postmenopausal women, yet most basic science studies continue to only evaluate young male animals. Women also have an increased lifetime prevalence of many common stroke risk factors, including hypertension and atrial fibrillation, as well as abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. None of these age‐related risk factors have been well modeled in the laboratory. Evidence from the bench has implicated genetic and epigenetic factors, differential activation of cell‐death programs, cell‐cell signaling pathways, and systemic immune responses as contributors to sex differences in ischemic stroke. The most recent basic scientific findings have been summarized in this review, with an emphasis on factors that differ between males and females that are pertinent to stroke outcomes. Identification and understanding of the underlying biological factors that contribute to sex differences will be critical to the development of translational targets to improve the treatment of women after stroke. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jnr.23962
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846400153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1846400153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-9d9e9f2e83805a1d4fe185176124ed2b175fef3a1412e4d083d8bf16e4ad7a7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V1rFTEQBuAgij1WL_wDsuCNXmw7k49NcimlfhYFP65DzmaCe9zN1uQstv--sVu9KFi8GhgeXmZ4GXuKcIQA_HiX8hEXtuP32AbB6lYqqe-zDYgOWgnID9ijUnYAYK0SD9kB10aDRNiwD1_ooglDjJQp9VSaITWJljwPKY5-mvx-mFPjU1i353neU3-9q3Ao_Xeahr4p-zz_oMfsQfRjoSc385B9e3369eRte_bpzbuTV2dtL6XlrQ2WbORkhAHlMchIaBTqDrmkwLeoVaQoPErkJAMYEcw2YkfSB-11Lw7ZizW3XvNzobJ3U72ExtEnmpfi0MhOAqAS_0O5UqDAVvr8Ft3NS071EYcWNDfSWHmnMqJTIJQ1Vb1cVZ_nUjJFd56HyedLh-B-V-ZqZe66smqf3SQu24nCX_mnowqOV_BrGOny30nu_cfPa-QVkWyeZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1836503598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex differences in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in ischemic stroke</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Spychala, Monica S. ; Honarpisheh, Pedram ; McCullough, Louise D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spychala, Monica S. ; Honarpisheh, Pedram ; McCullough, Louise D.</creatorcontrib><description>Stroke is not only a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide it also disproportionally affects women. There are currently over 500,000 more women stroke survivors in the US than men, and elderly women bear the brunt of stroke‐related disability. Stroke has dropped to the fifth leading cause of death in men, but remains the third in women. This review discusses sex differences in common stroke risk factors, the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies, acute treatment responses, and post‐stroke recovery in clinical populations. Women have an increased lifetime risk of stroke compared to men, largely due to a steep increase in stroke incidence in older postmenopausal women, yet most basic science studies continue to only evaluate young male animals. Women also have an increased lifetime prevalence of many common stroke risk factors, including hypertension and atrial fibrillation, as well as abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. None of these age‐related risk factors have been well modeled in the laboratory. Evidence from the bench has implicated genetic and epigenetic factors, differential activation of cell‐death programs, cell‐cell signaling pathways, and systemic immune responses as contributors to sex differences in ischemic stroke. The most recent basic scientific findings have been summarized in this review, with an emphasis on factors that differ between males and females that are pertinent to stroke outcomes. Identification and understanding of the underlying biological factors that contribute to sex differences will be critical to the development of translational targets to improve the treatment of women after stroke. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-4012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27870410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Animals ; BASIC (programming language) ; Brain Ischemia - complications ; Cell activation ; Cell death ; Effectiveness ; Encephalitis - etiology ; Encephalitis - prevention &amp; control ; epigenetics ; Females ; Fibrillation ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Geriatrics ; Health risk assessment ; hormones ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Immune response ; Incidence ; Inflammation ; Ischemia ; Males ; Mathematical models ; Men ; Metabolic syndrome ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Neuroprotection ; Neuroprotection - physiology ; Obesity ; Older people ; Populations ; Post-menopause ; Prevention ; Recovery ; Reviews ; Risk factors ; Sex ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex differences ; Signal transduction ; Stroke ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - etiology ; Translation ; X‐chromosome dosing</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroscience research, 2017-01, Vol.95 (1-2), p.462-471</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-9d9e9f2e83805a1d4fe185176124ed2b175fef3a1412e4d083d8bf16e4ad7a7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-9d9e9f2e83805a1d4fe185176124ed2b175fef3a1412e4d083d8bf16e4ad7a7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjnr.23962$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjnr.23962$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27870410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spychala, Monica S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honarpisheh, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Louise D.</creatorcontrib><title>Sex differences in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in ischemic stroke</title><title>Journal of neuroscience research</title><addtitle>J Neurosci Res</addtitle><description>Stroke is not only a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide it also disproportionally affects women. There are currently over 500,000 more women stroke survivors in the US than men, and elderly women bear the brunt of stroke‐related disability. Stroke has dropped to the fifth leading cause of death in men, but remains the third in women. This review discusses sex differences in common stroke risk factors, the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies, acute treatment responses, and post‐stroke recovery in clinical populations. Women have an increased lifetime risk of stroke compared to men, largely due to a steep increase in stroke incidence in older postmenopausal women, yet most basic science studies continue to only evaluate young male animals. Women also have an increased lifetime prevalence of many common stroke risk factors, including hypertension and atrial fibrillation, as well as abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. None of these age‐related risk factors have been well modeled in the laboratory. Evidence from the bench has implicated genetic and epigenetic factors, differential activation of cell‐death programs, cell‐cell signaling pathways, and systemic immune responses as contributors to sex differences in ischemic stroke. The most recent basic scientific findings have been summarized in this review, with an emphasis on factors that differ between males and females that are pertinent to stroke outcomes. Identification and understanding of the underlying biological factors that contribute to sex differences will be critical to the development of translational targets to improve the treatment of women after stroke. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BASIC (programming language)</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - complications</subject><subject>Cell activation</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Encephalitis - etiology</subject><subject>Encephalitis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>epigenetics</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fibrillation</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>hormones</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Metabolic syndrome</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neuroprotection</subject><subject>Neuroprotection - physiology</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Post-menopause</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Signal transduction</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - etiology</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>X‐chromosome dosing</subject><issn>0360-4012</issn><issn>1097-4547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0V1rFTEQBuAgij1WL_wDsuCNXmw7k49NcimlfhYFP65DzmaCe9zN1uQstv--sVu9KFi8GhgeXmZ4GXuKcIQA_HiX8hEXtuP32AbB6lYqqe-zDYgOWgnID9ijUnYAYK0SD9kB10aDRNiwD1_ooglDjJQp9VSaITWJljwPKY5-mvx-mFPjU1i353neU3-9q3Ao_Xeahr4p-zz_oMfsQfRjoSc385B9e3369eRte_bpzbuTV2dtL6XlrQ2WbORkhAHlMchIaBTqDrmkwLeoVaQoPErkJAMYEcw2YkfSB-11Lw7ZizW3XvNzobJ3U72ExtEnmpfi0MhOAqAS_0O5UqDAVvr8Ft3NS071EYcWNDfSWHmnMqJTIJQ1Vb1cVZ_nUjJFd56HyedLh-B-V-ZqZe66smqf3SQu24nCX_mnowqOV_BrGOny30nu_cfPa-QVkWyeZQ</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Spychala, Monica S.</creator><creator>Honarpisheh, Pedram</creator><creator>McCullough, Louise D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Sex differences in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in ischemic stroke</title><author>Spychala, Monica S. ; Honarpisheh, Pedram ; McCullough, Louise D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-9d9e9f2e83805a1d4fe185176124ed2b175fef3a1412e4d083d8bf16e4ad7a7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BASIC (programming language)</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - complications</topic><topic>Cell activation</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Encephalitis - etiology</topic><topic>Encephalitis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>epigenetics</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fibrillation</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>hormones</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Metabolic syndrome</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neuroprotection</topic><topic>Neuroprotection - physiology</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Post-menopause</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Signal transduction</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - etiology</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>X‐chromosome dosing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spychala, Monica S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honarpisheh, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Louise D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spychala, Monica S.</au><au>Honarpisheh, Pedram</au><au>McCullough, Louise D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex differences in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in ischemic stroke</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience research</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci Res</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>462</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>462-471</pages><issn>0360-4012</issn><eissn>1097-4547</eissn><abstract>Stroke is not only a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide it also disproportionally affects women. There are currently over 500,000 more women stroke survivors in the US than men, and elderly women bear the brunt of stroke‐related disability. Stroke has dropped to the fifth leading cause of death in men, but remains the third in women. This review discusses sex differences in common stroke risk factors, the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies, acute treatment responses, and post‐stroke recovery in clinical populations. Women have an increased lifetime risk of stroke compared to men, largely due to a steep increase in stroke incidence in older postmenopausal women, yet most basic science studies continue to only evaluate young male animals. Women also have an increased lifetime prevalence of many common stroke risk factors, including hypertension and atrial fibrillation, as well as abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. None of these age‐related risk factors have been well modeled in the laboratory. Evidence from the bench has implicated genetic and epigenetic factors, differential activation of cell‐death programs, cell‐cell signaling pathways, and systemic immune responses as contributors to sex differences in ischemic stroke. The most recent basic scientific findings have been summarized in this review, with an emphasis on factors that differ between males and females that are pertinent to stroke outcomes. Identification and understanding of the underlying biological factors that contribute to sex differences will be critical to the development of translational targets to improve the treatment of women after stroke. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27870410</pmid><doi>10.1002/jnr.23962</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-4012
ispartof Journal of neuroscience research, 2017-01, Vol.95 (1-2), p.462-471
issn 0360-4012
1097-4547
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846400153
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Age
Animals
BASIC (programming language)
Brain Ischemia - complications
Cell activation
Cell death
Effectiveness
Encephalitis - etiology
Encephalitis - prevention & control
epigenetics
Females
Fibrillation
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Geriatrics
Health risk assessment
hormones
Humans
Hypertension
Immune response
Incidence
Inflammation
Ischemia
Males
Mathematical models
Men
Metabolic syndrome
Morbidity
Mortality
Neuroprotection
Neuroprotection - physiology
Obesity
Older people
Populations
Post-menopause
Prevention
Recovery
Reviews
Risk factors
Sex
Sex Characteristics
Sex differences
Signal transduction
Stroke
Stroke - complications
Stroke - etiology
Translation
X‐chromosome dosing
title Sex differences in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in ischemic stroke
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20differences%20in%20neuroinflammation%20and%20neuroprotection%20in%20ischemic%20stroke&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroscience%20research&rft.au=Spychala,%20Monica%20S.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=462&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=462-471&rft.issn=0360-4012&rft.eissn=1097-4547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jnr.23962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1846400153%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1836503598&rft_id=info:pmid/27870410&rfr_iscdi=true